Are There Any Differences Between the Effect of Resistance and Aerobic Training on Spatial Learning and Memory in the Rat Model of AD?

authors:

avatar Khadijeh Ebrahimi ORCID 1 , * , avatar Behrouz Baghaiee ORCID 2

Department of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Marand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Marand, Iran
Department of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, Jolfa Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jolfa, Iran

how to cite: Ebrahimi K, Baghaiee B. Are There Any Differences Between the Effect of Resistance and Aerobic Training on Spatial Learning and Memory in the Rat Model of AD?. J Clin Res Paramed Sci. 2022;11(1):e123329. doi: 10.5812/jcrps-123329.

Abstract

Background:

Physical training, especially endurance training as a non-pharmacological prevention strategy can attenuate the consequences of memory loss in Alzheimer's disease (AD) without side effects. However, the role of resistance training and the difference between these two types of training has not been well established in this field.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to determine and compare the effect of both training on spatial learning and memory in the amyloid-beta(Aβ)-induced rat model of AD using the Morris Water Maze test (MWM).

Methods:

Rats were randomly divided into six groups: Control; treadmill; resistance; Aβ + normal saline; Aβ + treadmill and; Aβ + Resistance (n = 6 group). Alzheimer's disease rats were induced by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) infusion of Aβ25-35 peptides. After performing aerobic (by treadmill) and resistance training (by vertical ladder with weights attached to the animals' tails) for eight weeks, the rats underwent the MWM.

Results:

The results showed that the mean escape latency significantly increased and the time in the target quadrant significantly decreased in the AD rats compared to the Control group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the mean escape latency and time in the target quadrant between the Control, Treadmill, and Resistance groups (P < 0.05). Also, both AD-training groups had significantly less escape latency and more time in the target quadrant compared to the AD group (P < 0.005) without any significant differences between them (P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

Finally, we conclude that both of trainings could improve spatial memory and learning without any superiority over each other in the AD animals and may subsequently prevent the progression of AD.

1. Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, which is the most widespread cause of dementia and its incidence will continue to increase rapidly as the population ages (1). It is characterized clinically by the deposition of beta-amyloid (Aβ) plaques and tau proteins in the brain that leads to progressive cognitive function loss in AD (2). In addition to the risk factors for AD mentioned above, there are others like obesity (3), cardiovascular disease, high cholesterol, blood pressure, and sedentary (4). Of those, inactivity is one of the most important risk factors for AD (4).

Memory which allows animals to encode, retain and retrieve information declines in the early stages of AD and often precedes the biological hallmarks (5). The brain’s hippocampus is a key player in these processes (6). It is shown that the hippocampus-dependent learning and memory, a component of cognitive function, declines in the AD model of animals (7).

No effective treatment has yet been successfully found to treat all pathological aspects of AD (8). Therefore, special attention has been applied to the non-pharmacological prevention strategy with minimal cost and adverse effects (9, 10), and especially physical aerobic training (11, 12). Recent studies suggested that resistance training could improve several aspects of cognition (13, 14) and prevent the age-related cognitive decline of memory among elderly people (15). For example, studies indicated that weeks of progressive resistance training improves the hippocampus-dependent memory in the rats (16) and aged people (17). Even a single bout of resistance training could improve contextual memory in the Wistar rats (18). In patients with AD, Garuffi et al. revealed that resistance training improves the performance of activities of daily living like agility, flexibility, strength, and balance (19). Also, in a diabetic rat model, resistance training ameliorated cognitive deficits (20). Recently, Pena et al. demonstrated that resistance training in the AD mice model could affect hippocampal factors and attenuates memory deficits (14). So, to our knowledge, little is known about the effects of resistance training as a non-pharmacological preventing or ameliorating the memory loss on AD samples, and also it is yet unclear which type of training is preferable in this field.

2. Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of resistance training in comparison with aerobic training on spatial learning and memory in a rat model of AD using MWM.

3. Methods

3.1. Animals

Male Wistar rats (4 months and 250 ± 10 g) were obtained from the Animal House of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. They were housed six per standard polycarbonate cage with standard sawdust as bedding (temperature 21 ± 2°C, 12/12 light-dark cycle). Rats were fed a standard pellet diet which had ad libitum access to food and water. Animals were divided into six groups (n = 6): Control; aerobic training (treadmill); resistance training (resistance); AD rats without training (Aβ + normal saline); AD rats with aerobic training (Aβ + treadmill); and AD rats with resistance training (Aβ + resistance). This research project has been reviewed by the Research Ethics Committee of Sport Sciences Research Institute and was approved according to compliance with Ethical Standards in Research of the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, with the code IR.SSRI.REC.1399.822.

3.2. Induction of Alzheimer's Rat Model

Amyloid-β25-35 (Sigma-Aldrich, Beijing, China) was suspended at a concentration of 1 μg/μL. To obtain the aggregated form of Aβ25-35, the peptide solution was placed in an incubator at 37°C for 72 h. Aβ25-35 (10 nmol/10 μL) by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection was used in the brain ventricles rats with the coordinates AP = -1.2 mm, ML = ± 2 mm, DV = -4 mm. Alzheimer’s disease rats started training after one week of Aβ25-35 injection.

3.3. Aerobic Training Protocol

To familiarize the rats with the training, rats ran on the treadmill (10 m/min, 10 minutes, 3 days/weeks). According to a recent study (13, 21), the training protocol included three steps as presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Aerobic Training Protocol on Rodent Treadmill
Steps
1- Warm-up10 minutes warm up at a speed of 10 m/min
2- Main bodyFirst weekSecond weekThird weekforth weekFifth weekSixth weekSeventh weekEighth week
Speed (m/min)1215172020202020
Time (min)1010152025303540
3- Cool-down10 minutes cool down at a speed of 10 m/min

3.4. Resistance Training Protocol

Before any resistance training, animals were submitted to three familiarization sessions (three trials per day) on an 80° inclined vertical ladder apparatus (110 × 18 cm) with 2-cm grid steps, as well as, with a housing chamber at the top of the ladder (16). In the first, second, and third familiarization trials, rats were placed on the top, middle, and bottom of the ladder, respectively. The resistance training protocol (10 repetitive dynamic movements to reach the chamber with the 30 s to 60 s rest) was modified from previous studies (3, 22) (Table 2). At the beginning of the training, 30% of the body weight was attached to the rats' tails, which gradually increased by 10% per week.

Table 2. Resistance Training Protocol
WeeksFirst WeekSecond WeekThird WeekForth WeekFifth WeekSixth WeekSeventh WeekEighth Week
Load a30405060708090100

3.5. Morris Water Maze Test (MWM)

Rats performed Morris water maze test (MWM) 24 hours after training protocols. The maze contained a black circular pool (diameter: 210 cm) filled with water (temperature: ~ 23°C, depth: 40 cm) located in a room with visual cues on the walls. A black platform (10 cm in diameter) was underwater 2 cm from the surface. The pool was abstractly separated into four quadrants with four starting points (N, S, W, or E) (23, 24).

3.6. Spatial Learning

In this task, rats received 4 trials/day over five days. A trial began when the rat was randomly placed in the water at one of the four starting points, with its head facing the wall. The rat had the 60 s to discover the platform; if an animal did not succeed to find the platform within the allocated time, it was guided to the platform and left on it for 30 s. The order of starting points in every trial was different. After each trial, animals were dried and returned to their cages for the 30 s. The time to find the platform in each trial (escape latencies) and the mean latency for every training day were measured (23, 24). To record the escape latency, a video camera was installed above the pool and connected to a computer.

3.7. Spatial Memory

To access spatial memory, a single probe trial was conducted 24 h after the last acquisition day, with the platform removed. During this test, animals were placed in the opposite position of the platform quadrant in the pool. Here, the time spent in the platform quadrant (time in the target quadrant) was measured (23, 24).

3.8. Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM and analyzed using SPSS software (version 22). Behavioral performance was analyzed using a two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc tests for multiple comparisons.

4. Results

4.1. Spatial Learning Tasks

The results showed that the mean escape latency was significantly different between the Control and Aβ + normal saline groups (P < 0.05; Figure 1B). This test showed that on the second, third, and fifth days, the AD rats performed worse in finding the hidden platform compared to the control group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the mean escape latency between the control, treadmill, and resistance groups (P < 0.05; Figure 1A). In addition, the mean escape latency was significantly better on the second, third, fourth, and fifth days in the Aβ + Resistance group and on the third, fourth, and fifth days in the Aβ + treadmill group compared to the Aβ + normal saline group (P < 0.05; Figure 1C). Notably, the post hoc analysis had not indicated any significant differences in escape latency values between the two kinds of training (P < 0.05). In other words, both treadmill and resistance training improved spatial learning performance in the rat model of AD.

Mean escape latency of rats in five days at different groups in the MWM spatial learning task. A, mean escape latency in control, treadmill and resistance groups; B, mean escape latency in Aβ + normal saline and the control groups. Aster (*) indicates significant differences between the Aβ + normal saline and the control groups (P).

4.2. Spatial Memory Task

The results indicated that in the probe test, the time in the target quadrant significantly decreased in the AD rats compared to the control group (P < 0.05; Figure 2B). However, there was no significant difference in the time in the target quadrant between the control, treadmill, and resistance groups (P < 0.05; Figure 2A). Also, Aβ + resistance and Aβ + treadmill group significantly spent more time in the target quadrant compared to the Aβ + normal saline group (P < 0.05; Figure 2C). On the other hand, the post hoc analysis did not show a significant preference in the time target quadrant for the resistance training compared to the treadmill group in improving the spatial memory of AD rats. In other words, both treadmill and resistance training improved spatial memory in the AD rat model without any superiority over each other.

Time in target quadrant at different groups in the MWM spatial memory task. A, time in target quadrant in control, treadmill and resistance group; B, time in target quadrant in Aβ + normal saline group compared with the control; C, time in target quadrant in Aβ + treadmill and Aβ + resistance group compared with the Aβ + normal saline group in the MWM reference memory task. Aster (*) indicate significant differences between the two groups (* P &lt; 0.05).

5. Discussion

According to studies, the factors that protect the heart, will protect the brain and reduce dementia-related diseases, and it seems that physical activity is one of those (4, 25). It is also stated physical inactivity are primary risk factors for dementia and AD (4). In recent decades, many studies as our study have well established that aerobic training has a positive effect on cognitive function and inhibits the process of memory loss in AD (26, 27). But about the effect of resistance training on cognitive function especially in AD cases there are fewer studies. In this study, we evaluated the effects of aerobic and resistance training on spatial learning and memory in the rat model of AD by using the MWM. Our results showed that both types of training could improve spatial learning and memory and inhibit memory loss in AD rats without any significant differences between them.

Our results were in agreement with the previous study that demonstrated 5-month voluntary running in the wheel-running results in a decrease in extracellular Aβ plaques in the frontal cortex and enhances the rate of learning and memory of TgCRND8 animals in the MWM, with significant reductions in escape latencies over the first 3 (of 6) trial days (28). Similar to previous research it has been shown that voluntary wheel running for 10 weeks also reduced all the neuropathological hallmarks of AD (neuronal loss, phosphorylated tau protein, Aβ burden, Thioflavin-S-positive plaques, astrogliosis, and Aβ oligomers) and improved spatial memory performance and hippocampus volume in the transgenic mouse model of AD (26). Consistently, other research showed that voluntary wheel running could improve learning and memory and increase neurogenesis in aged mice (29). Also revealed that treadmill training improves short-term and spatial memories by enhancing neurogenesis and suppressing apoptosis in the hippocampal dentate gyrus of old-aged rats (30). Recently reported that endurance treadmill training prevents and reverses compromised spatial learning and long-term memory and upregulates mitochondrial oxygen consumption in AD Wistar rats (27). Similar to our finding, another study showed that 12 weeks of treadmill running could protect and reverse the cognitive deficit progression based on MWM via decreasing the levels of Aβ plaque and hyper-phosphorylated tau protein and upregulating mitochondrial function and hippocampal neurogenesis markers in triple transgenic (3xTgAD) AD mice (12). On the other hand, it is established that hippocampal glycogen and its metabolite lactate are crucial for hippocampus-dependent memory function (31). Aerobic exercise plays an important role in regulating glucose metabolism in the hippocampus (32). So, aerobic training is a very useful strategy for reducing the risk or delaying the onset of memory and learning loss in AD and elderly people.

Many researchers have shown that resistance training could enhance functional abilities and decrease the risk of falls and functional limitations in the elderly (33). Although studied far less than aerobic training, resistance training has been shown to affect cognitive performance in the aging samples (34). Similar to previous, Cassilhas et al. showed a significant effect of resistance training on cognitive and physical functions of the elderly (35). Recently shown that even a simple resistance training session, using only body mass for resistance, may be an effective method for preventing the age-related cognitive decline of inhibitory control and working memory among elderly people (52 - 81 years) (15). Most recently in 2022, Serra et al. also revealed that 12-week resistance training improves the learning and spatial memory, as well as, neurotransmission-related and hippocampal metabolomic profiles in aged Wistar rats (17). Although the cognitive-related benefits of resistance training are well-known in the elderly population, very little is identified in the AD group. In agreement with our study, 9-week weighted ladder climbing as a resistance training reduced the Aβ burden in the hippocampus concurrent with increased concentrations of IGF-1 in 3xTgAD Mice (14). Similarly, Ashofteh et al. in 2022 found that resistance training could up-regulate the neurotrophins profile in the hippocampus of AD rats (36). These results were in agreement with our findings that showed resistance training could improve learning and spatial memory in the AD rat model.

In consistence with our results, only one study revealed positive effect of both training on cognitive function with no significantly differences between them (37), which showed that either training are beneficial in cognitive performance. Findings suggest that Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)/Tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB) and β-Calcium/Calmodulin-dependent kinase type II (CaMKII) mediates the effects of aerobic training on cognitive function (13), in a process in which energy metabolism (AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)) probably play an important role (38). But, resistance training via increasing the level of synaptic proteins, (synapsin I, synaptophysin), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1)/IGF-1R, and protein kinase B (Akt) pathway improves the spatial learning and memory (13). Therefore, the molecular pathway of their positive effect on cognition performance is different and requires further studies.

5.1. Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that spatial memory and learning deficit in AD rat model was reversed by both 8 weeks aerobic and resistance trainings, without any significant superiority over each other. Therefore, both trainings seem to be a helpful non-pharmacological approach to delay memory loss in AD.

References

  • 1.

    Jiang J, Gao K, Zhou Y, Xu A, Shi S, Liu G, et al. Electroacupuncture Treatment Improves Learning-Memory Ability and Brain Glucose Metabolism in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease: Using Morris Water Maze and Micro-PET. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:142129. doi: 10.1155/2015/142129. [PubMed: 25821477]. [PubMed Central: PMC4363614].

  • 2.

    DeTure MA, Dickson DW. The neuropathological diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2019;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13024-019-0333-5. [PubMed: 31375134]. [PubMed Central: PMC6679484].

  • 3.

    Luo L, Lu AM, Wang Y, Hong A, Chen Y, Hu J, et al. Chronic resistance training activates autophagy and reduces apoptosis of muscle cells by modulating IGF-1 and its receptors, Akt/mTOR and Akt/FOXO3a signaling in aged rats. Exp Gerontol. 2013;48(4):427-36. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2013.02.009. [PubMed: 23419688].

  • 4.

    Kivimaki M, Singh-Manoux A, Pentti J, Sabia S, Nyberg ST, Alfredsson L, et al. Physical inactivity, cardiometabolic disease, and risk of dementia: an individual-participant meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019;365:l1495. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l1495. [PubMed: 30995986]. [PubMed Central: PMC6468884].

  • 5.

    Shrestha P, Klann E. Alzheimer's disease: Lost memories found. Nature. 2016;531(7595):450-1. doi: 10.1038/nature17312. [PubMed: 26982731].

  • 6.

    Lott IT, Head E. Alzheimer disease and Down syndrome: factors in pathogenesis. Neurobiol Aging. 2005;26(3):383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.08.005. [PubMed: 15639317].

  • 7.

    Janus C, Flores AY, Xu G, Borchelt DR. Behavioral abnormalities in APPSwe/PS1dE9 mouse model of AD-like pathology: comparative analysis across multiple behavioral domains. Neurobiol Aging. 2015;36(9):2519-32. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.05.010. [PubMed: 26089165].

  • 8.

    Ahlskog JE, Geda YE, Graff-Radford NR, Petersen RC. Physical exercise as a preventive or disease-modifying treatment of dementia and brain aging. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(9):876-84. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2011.0252. [PubMed: 21878600]. [PubMed Central: PMC3258000].

  • 9.

    Plascencia-Villa G, Perry G. Preventive and Therapeutic Strategies in Alzheimer's Disease: Focus on Oxidative Stress, Redox Metals, and Ferroptosis. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2021;34(8):591-610. doi: 10.1089/ars.2020.8134. [PubMed: 32486897]. [PubMed Central: PMC8098758].

  • 10.

    Squitti R, Siotto M, Polimanti R. Low-copper diet as a preventive strategy for Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35 Suppl 2:S40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.02.031. [PubMed: 24913894].

  • 11.

    Zhang X, He Q, Huang T, Zhao N, Liang F, Xu B, et al. Treadmill Exercise Decreases Abeta Deposition and Counteracts Cognitive Decline in APP/PS1 Mice, Possibly via Hippocampal Microglia Modifications. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:78. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00078. [PubMed: 31024293]. [PubMed Central: PMC6461026].

  • 12.

    Kim D, Cho J, Kang H. Protective effect of exercise training against the progression of Alzheimer's disease in 3xTg-AD mice. Behav Brain Res. 2019;374:112105. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112105. [PubMed: 31325514].

  • 13.

    Cassilhas RC, Lee KS, Fernandes J, Oliveira MG, Tufik S, Meeusen R, et al. Spatial memory is improved by aerobic and resistance exercise through divergent molecular mechanisms. Neuroscience. 2012;202:309-17. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.11.029. [PubMed: 22155655].

  • 14.

    Pena GS, Paez HG, Johnson TK, Halle JL, Carzoli JP, Visavadiya NP, et al. Hippocampal Growth Factor and Myokine Cathepsin B Expression following Aerobic and Resistance Training in 3xTg-AD Mice. Int J Chronic Dis. 2020;2020:5919501. doi: 10.1155/2020/5919501. [PubMed: 32090058]. [PubMed Central: PMC7011393].

  • 15.

    Ikudome S, Mori S, Unenaka S, Kawanishi M, Kitamura T, Nakamoto H. Effect of Long-Term Body-Mass-Based Resistance Exercise on Cognitive Function in Elderly People. J Appl Gerontol. 2017;36(12):1519-33. doi: 10.1177/0733464815625834. [PubMed: 26912733].

  • 16.

    Cassilhas RC, Lee KS, Venancio DP, Oliveira MG, Tufik S, de Mello MT. Resistance exercise improves hippocampus-dependent memory. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2012;45(12):1215-20. doi: 10.1590/s0100-879x2012007500138. [PubMed: 22930413]. [PubMed Central: PMC3854211].

  • 17.

    Serra FT, Cardoso FDS, Petraconi N, Dos Santos JCC, Araujo BHS, Arida RM, et al. Resistance exercise improves learning and memory and modulates hippocampal metabolomic profile in aged rats. Neurosci Lett. 2022;766:136322. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136322. [PubMed: 34737021].

  • 18.

    Fernandes J, Soares JC, do Amaral Baliego LG, Arida RM. A single bout of resistance exercise improves memory consolidation and increases the expression of synaptic proteins in the hippocampus. Hippocampus. 2016;26(8):1096-103. doi: 10.1002/hipo.22590. [PubMed: 27008926].

  • 19.

    Garuffi M, Costa JL, Hernandez SS, Vital TM, Stein AM, dos Santos JG, et al. Effects of resistance training on the performance of activities of daily living in patients with Alzheimer's disease. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2013;13(2):322-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2012.00899.x. [PubMed: 22726761].

  • 20.

    Zarrinkalam E, Ranjbar K, Salehi I, Kheiripour N, Komaki A. Resistance training and hawthorn extract ameliorate cognitive deficits in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;97:503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.138. [PubMed: 29091901].

  • 21.

    Parnpiansil P, Jutapakdeegul N, Chentanez T, Kotchabhakdi N. Exercise during pregnancy increases hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA expression and spatial learning in neonatal rat pup. Neurosci Lett. 2003;352(1):45-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2003.08.023. [PubMed: 14615046].

  • 22.

    Yang JY, Nam JH, Park H, Cha YS. Effects of resistance exercise and growth hormone administration at low doses on lipid metabolism in middle-aged female rats. Eur J Pharmacol. 2006;539(1-2):99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.03.079. [PubMed: 16687135].

  • 23.

    Cechetti F, Worm PV, Elsner VR, Bertoldi K, Sanches E, Ben J, et al. Forced treadmill exercise prevents oxidative stress and memory deficits following chronic cerebral hypoperfusion in the rat. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2012;97(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2011.09.008. [PubMed: 22001013].

  • 24.

    Vorhees CV, Williams MT. Morris water maze: procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(2):848-58. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.116. [PubMed: 17406317]. [PubMed Central: PMC2895266].

  • 25.

    Alzheimer's A. 2013 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(2):208-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2013.02.003. [PubMed: 23507120].

  • 26.

    Tapia-Rojas C, Aranguiz F, Varela-Nallar L, Inestrosa NC. Voluntary Running Attenuates Memory Loss, Decreases Neuropathological Changes and Induces Neurogenesis in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease. Brain Pathol. 2016;26(1):62-74. doi: 10.1111/bpa.12255. [PubMed: 25763997]. [PubMed Central: PMC8029165].

  • 27.

    Bernardo TC, Beleza J, Rizo-Roca D, Santos-Alves E, Leal C, Martins MJ, et al. Physical exercise mitigates behavioral impairments in a rat model of sporadic Alzheimer's disease. Behav Brain Res. 2020;379:112358. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112358. [PubMed: 31733314].

  • 28.

    Adlard PA, Perreau VM, Pop V, Cotman CW. Voluntary exercise decreases amyloid load in a transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci. 2005;25(17):4217-21. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0496-05.2005. [PubMed: 15858047]. [PubMed Central: PMC6725122].

  • 29.

    Gibbons TE, Pence BD, Petr G, Ossyra JM, Mach HC, Bhattacharya TK, et al. Voluntary wheel running, but not a diet containing (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate and beta-alanine, improves learning, memory and hippocampal neurogenesis in aged mice. Behav Brain Res. 2014;272:131-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2014.05.049. [PubMed: 25004447]. [PubMed Central: PMC4428596].

  • 30.

    Kim SE, Ko IG, Kim BK, Shin MS, Cho S, Kim CJ, et al. Treadmill exercise prevents aging-induced failure of memory through an increase in neurogenesis and suppression of apoptosis in rat hippocampus. Exp Gerontol. 2010;45(5):357-65. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2010.02.005. [PubMed: 20156544].

  • 31.

    Soya M, Jesmin S, Shima T, Matsui T, Soya H. Dysregulation of Glycogen Metabolism with Concomitant Spatial Memory Dysfunction in Type 2 Diabetes: Potential Beneficial Effects of Chronic Exercise. Adv Neurobiol. 2019;23:363-83. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-27480-1_13. [PubMed: 31667816].

  • 32.

    Li J, Liu B, Cai M, Lin X, Lou S. Glucose metabolic alterations in hippocampus of diabetes mellitus rats and the regulation of aerobic exercise. Behav Brain Res. 2019;364:447-56. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.11.001. [PubMed: 29113873].

  • 33.

    Hong AR, Kim SW. Effects of Resistance Exercise on Bone Health. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2018;33(4):435-44. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2018.33.4.435. [PubMed: 30513557]. [PubMed Central: PMC6279907].

  • 34.

    Liu-Ambrose T, Nagamatsu LS, Voss MW, Khan KM, Handy TC. Resistance training and functional plasticity of the aging brain: a 12-month randomized controlled trial. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(8):1690-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.05.010. [PubMed: 21741129].

  • 35.

    Cassilhas RC, Viana VA, Grassmann V, Santos RT, Santos RF, Tufik S, et al. The impact of resistance exercise on the cognitive function of the elderly. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(8):1401-7. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e318060111f. [PubMed: 17762374].

  • 36.

    Ashofteh A, Cheragh-Birjandi S, TaheriChadorneshin H. [The effect of resistance trainings along with Royal jelly supplementation on gene expression of nerve growth factor and tyrosine kinase A receptor in the hippocampal tissue of Alzheimer’s male rats]. Journal of Practical Studies of Biosciences in Sport. 2022;10(21):78-89. Persian. doi: 10.22077/jpsbs.2021.3849.1600.

  • 37.

    Ozkaya GY, Aydin H, Toraman FN, Kizilay F, Ozdemir O, Cetinkaya V. Effect of strength and endurance training on cognition in older people. J Sports Sci Med. 2005;4(3):300-13. [PubMed: 24453535]. [PubMed Central: PMC3887334].

  • 38.

    Gomez-Pinilla F, Vaynman S, Ying Z. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor functions as a metabotrophin to mediate the effects of exercise on cognition. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;28(11):2278-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06524.x. [PubMed: 19046371]. [PubMed Central: PMC2805663].

Copyright © 2022, Journal of Clinical Research in Paramedical Sciences. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.