Logo
J Health Rep Technol

Image Credit:J Health Rep Technol

Pregnant Women’s Health Practices and Self-reported Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in a Tertiary Hospital in Northern Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author(s):
Yahaya JafaruYahaya JafaruYahaya Jafaru ORCID1,*, Aisha Abdullahi MagajiAisha Abdullahi Magaji2
1Department of Nursing Science, College of Health Sciences, Federal University Birnin Kebbi, Kebbi State, Nigeria
2College of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences Birnin Kebbi, Kebbi State, Nigeria


Journal of Health Reports and Technology:Vol. 11, issue 2; e147859
Published online:Apr 06, 2025
Article type:Research Article
Received:Apr 13, 2024
Accepted:Mar 20, 2025
How to Cite:Yahaya JafaruAisha Abdullahi MagajiPregnant Women’s Health Practices and Self-reported Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in a Tertiary Hospital in Northern Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study.J Health Rep Technol.11(2):e147859.https://doi.org/10.5812/jhrt-147859.

Abstract

Background:

Health practices during pregnancy refer to those activities and habits of pregnant women which impact their health. These practices can affect maternal and foetal health, and influence pregnancy outcomes.

Objectives:

The study was aimed at investigating pregnant women’s health practices and self-reported adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs).

Methods:

The research was a retrospective cross-sectional analytic study. The population of the study was pregnant women attending Ante-Natal Clinic in Ahmad Sani Yariman Bakura Specialist Hospital. The instrument for data collection was a questionnaire. Frequencies and percentages, Spearman rank order correlation, and chi-square were used in data analysis.

Results:

The majority (62.3%) of the respondents were having a moderate level of health practices, and there was no respondent with a high level of health practices. There were significant weak negative correlations between the health practices and all the APOs (P < 0.01) except in neonatal death (P > 0.05).

Conclusions:

The health practices of the pregnant women were mostly moderate. There were weak negative significant correlations between pregnant women's health practices and APOs.

1. Background

Women's health practices during pregnancy refer to those activities and habits of pregnant women which impact their health (1). These practices include having a healthy diet, controlling maternal weight gain, adequate rest and sleep, regular exercise, regular prenatal care, oral hygiene and avoiding alcohol, tobacco and other illicit substances (2). The malaria and HIV prevention, foetal measurements including the use of ultrasound, nutritive and balanced diet, recreation, physical exercise, rest and sleep, dress and dwellings and body cleanliness, precautionary measures and home sanitation are other positive health practices in pregnancy (3). These practices are aimed at maintaining maternal and foetal health.

In a Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018 only 58% of the pregnant women slept under an insecticide-treated net (ITN) the night before the survey. Also, 31% of women with a child born in the last 5 years did not take any iron tablets during their most recent pregnancy; the same percent took iron tablets for 90 days or more during their most recent pregnancy; and only 17% of women took deworming medication (4). There are reports in northern Nigeria of pregnant women patronising over the counter drugs for treating minor discomforts of pregnancy (5). In a study conducted in Katsina, Yobe and Zamfara States, only 27% of women with a live birth in the previous five years had attended at least one antenatal consultation. Thirty percent sought advice from friends, family or traditional birth attendants, and the rest did not seek or receive any pregnancy-related advice (4).

Patel et al. (6) asserted that adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) are said to occur when any of the following events exist: Losing a baby during early pregnancy (miscarriage or spontaneous abortion), losing a baby in late pregnancy (stillbirths), and delivery of a baby earlier than normal time (preterm birth) or having a baby with low birth weight. However, Yeshialem et al. (7) point out that APOs vary from pregnancy to pregnancy and it includes intrauterine foetal death, early neonatal death and late neonatal death. Several risk factors for APOs have been identified including maternal tobacco consumption (8), and exposure to unsafe water, poor sanitation, and poor waste management (9).

Globally about 3 million third trimester stillbirths are occurring annually with the same number of occurrences of infant death within 28 days of life (10). Around 14% of all births in sub-Saharan Africa result in stillbirths (11) and more than 60% of global preterm births occur in Asia and sub-Saharan Africa (12). In Nigeria, of the children with known birth weights, 7% weighed less than 2.5 kg at birth. But according to mothers’ reports, 3% of births were very small, 11% were smaller than average, and 85% were average or larger. Also, the country’s infant mortality rate was 67 deaths per 1,000 live births and the neonatal mortality rate was 39 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2018 (13).

In the recent years, association between the maternal life style and pregnancy outcomes has been given attention. But related studies are limited in sub-Saharan Africa (14). Most of the studies did not give emphasis on maternal characteristics that could affect the health practices in pregnancy. This could be useful in identifying the risk factors of APOs especially in countries like Nigeria where the APOs are not uncommon. The low health practices among pregnant women and the common occurrence of APOs in developing countries like Nigeria as well as inadequacy of studies that completely addressed the issue make the investigation of pregnant women’s health practices and self-reported APOs pertinent.

2. Objectives

The study was aimed at investigating pregnant women’s health practices and self-reported APOs.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Design and Population

The study was a retrospective cross-sectional analytic study that investigated pregnant women’s health practices and self-reported APOs in Ante-Natal Clinic (ANC) unit of Ahmad Sani Yariman Bakura Specialist Hospital, Gusau, Zamfara State, Nigeria. Only multigravida and grand-multigravida women were included. Pregnant women with a known chronic disease or condition predisposing woman to APOs were excluded from the study. The calculated sample size was 190 and systematic sampling was used in selecting the study sample. However, 175 questionnaires were retrieved.

3.2. Instrument for Data Collection

The “Health Practices Questionnaire-II” (HPQ-II) adapted from Lindgren (15) was used in data collection. It was a Likert scale measured as 1 = Never, 2 = Almost never, 3 = Sometimes, 4 = Almost always, and 5 = Always. The measuring scaled used was a mean score of ≤ 3.00 is low health practices; a mean score of 3.01 - 4.00 is moderate health practice; and a mean score of 4.01 - 5.00 is high health practices. Adverse pregnancy outcomes was assessed using a researcher constructed questionnaire. It was measured as ≤ 10 very low, 11 - 20 low, 21 - 30 moderate, 30 - 40 high, and 41 - 50 very high. The reliability of the adapted HPQ-II was 0.782 using Cronbach’s alpha.

3.3. Data Analysis

Data were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 26. Frequencies and percentages were used to present the respondents’ socio-demographic variables and health practices. Spearman rank order correlation was used to examine the correlation between respondents' health practices and their self-reported APOs. Chi-square was used to assess the association between respondents’ demographic variables and pregnant women's health practices and APOs respectively at 0.05 level of significance.

4. Results

Table 1 indicates that the respondents within the age bracket 15 - 24 years were having the highest percentage (41.1%). The majority (57.7%) of the respondents had 1 - 3 deliveries. Also, the majority (62.3%) of the respondents were having 2 - 4 pregnancies. The respondents with tertiary education had the highest percentage (37.1%).

Table 1.The Socio-demographic Variables of the Respondents (N = 175)
VariablesNo. (%)
Age bracket
15 - 2472 (41.1)
25 - 3448 (27.4)
35 - 4431 (17.7)
≥ 4524 (13.7)
Number of deliveries
1 - 3101 (57.7)
4 - 637 (21.1)
7 - 921 (12.0)
≥ 1016 (9.1)
Number of pregnancies
2 - 4109 (62.3)
5 - 726 (14.9)
8 - 1026 (14.9)
≥ 1114 (8.0)
Level of education
Primary19 (10.9)
Secondary61 (34.9)
Tertiary65 (37.1)
Non-formal30 (17.1)
Socio-economic status
Upper - upper27 (15.4)
Upper21 (12.0)
Middle99 (56.6)
Lower11 (6.3)
Lower - lower17 ( 9.7)

The Socio-demographic Variables of the Respondents (N = 175)

Table 2 revealed that there were significant weak negative correlations between the health practices and all the APOs (P < 0.01) except in neonatal death.

Table 2.The Spearman Correlation Between the Pregnant Women Health Practices and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes
APOsCorrelationP-Value
Hypertension in pregnancy-0.387< 0.001
Prenatal bleeding-0.340< 0.001
Intrauterine death-0.2360.002
Still birth-0.295< 0.001
Preterm baby-0.291< 0.001
Caesarean section-0.302< 0.001
Low birth weight baby-0.316< 0.001
Malformed baby-0.337< 0.001
Neonatal death-0.1430.058
Postpartum hemorrhage-0.261< 0.001

The Spearman Correlation Between the Pregnant Women Health Practices and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes

In Table 3 it is shown that there was a significant relationship between all the socio-demographic variables and respondents' health practices, P < 0.01 except for the number of deliveries, P < 0.05.

Table 3.The Relationship Between Socio-demographic Variables and Respondent’s Health Practices a
Variables Low Health PracticesModerate Health PracticesTotalχ2P-ValueCramer’s V
Age bracket32.2170.000.43
15 - 2417 (23.6)55 (76.4)72 (41.1)
25 - 3413 (27.1)35 (72.9)48 (27.4)
35 - 4416 (51.6)15 (48.4)31 (17.7)
≥ 4520 (83.3)4 (16.7)24 (13.7)
Number of deliveries9.7960.020.24
1 - 331 (30.7)70 (69.3)101 (57.7)
4 - 613 (35.1)24 (64.9)37 (21.1)
7 - 913 (61.9)8 (38.1)21 (12.0)
≥ 109 (56.3)7 (43.8)16 (9.1)
Number of pregnancies12.1620.000.26
1 - 334 (31.2)75 (68.8)109 (62.3)
4 - 68 (30.8)18 (69.2)26 (14.9)
7 - 914 (53.8)12 (46.2)26 (14.9)
≥ 1010 (71.4)4 (28.6)14 (8.0)
Level of education16.1810.000.30
Primary10 (52.6)9 (47.4)19 (10.9)
Secondary22 (36.1)39 (63.9)61 (34.9)
Tertiary15 (23.1)50 (76.9)65 (37.1)
Non-formal19 (63.3)11 (36.7)30 (17.1)
Socio-economic status38.2660.000.47
Upper-upper9 (33.3)18 (66.7)27 (15.4)
Upper5 (23.8)16 (76.2)21 (12.0)
Middle27 (27.3)72 (72.7)99 (56.6)
Lower10 (90.9)1 (9.1)11 (6.3)
Lower-lower15 (88.2)2 (11.8)17 (9.7)

The Relationship Between Socio-demographic Variables and Respondent’s Health Practices a

The multiple bar charts depicts the relationship between demographic variable and levels of health practices of the respondents (Figure 1).

Relationship between socio-demographic variables and respondents health practices
Figure 1.

Relationship between socio-demographic variables and respondents health practices

Table 4 revealed that there was no respondent with a very high APOs. There were strong significant relationships between socio-demographic variables and APOs, P < 0.01 across all the variables except in age variable in which P < 0.05.

Table 4.The Relationship Between Socio-demographic Variables and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes a,b
Variables1234Totalχ2P-ValueCramer’s V
Age range19.80.010.19
15 - 2430 (41.7)33 (45.8)5 (6.9)4 (5.6)72 (41.1)
25 - 3420 (41.7)21 (43.8)4 (8.3)3 (6.3)48 (27.4)
35 - 449 (29.0)15 (48.4)7 (22.6)0 (0.0)31 (17.7)
≥ 452 (8.3)13 (54.2)5 (20.8)4 (16.7)24 (13.7)
Number of deliveries30.9< 0.0010.24
1 - 349 (48.5)41 (40.6)8 (7.9)3 (3.0)101 (57.7)
4 - 66 (16.2)24 (64.9)3 (8.1)4 (10.8)37 (21.1)
7 - 95 (23.8)9 (42.9)5 (23.8)2 (9.5)21 (12.0)
≥ 101 (6.3)8 (50)5 (31.3)2 (12.5)16 (9.1)
Number of pregnancies21.8< 0.0010.20
1 - 346 (42.2)52 ( (47.7)9 (8.3)2 (1.8)109 (62.3)
4 - 68 (30.8)12 (46.2)3 (11.5)3 (11.5)26 (14.9)
7 - 95 (19.2)11 (42.3)5 (19.2)5 (19.2)26 (14.9)
≥ 102 (14.3)7 (50)4 (28.6)1 (7.1)14 (8)
Level of education23.2< 0.0010.22
Primary8 (42.1)10 (52.6)0 (0.0)1 (5.3)19 (10.9)
Secondary22 (36.1)29 (47.5)7 (11.5)3 (4.9)61 (34.9)
Tertiary27 (41.5)31 (47.7)3 (4.6)4 (6.2)65 (37.1)
Non-formal4 (13.3)12 (40)11 (36.7)3 (10)30 (17.1)
Socio-economic status25.4< 0.0010.24
Upper-upper12 (44.4)14 (51.9)1 (3.7)0 (0.0)27 (15.4)
Upper8 (38.1)10 (47.6)3 (14.3)0 (0.0)21 (12)
Middle38 (38.4)47 (47.5)9 (9.1)5 (5.1)99 (56.7)
Lower1 (9.1)4 (36.4)4 (36.4)2 (18.2)11 (6.3)
Lower-lower2 (11.8)7 (41.2)4 (23.5)4 (23.5)17 (9.1)

The Relationship Between Socio-demographic Variables and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes a,b

The multiple bar charts depicts the relationship between demographic variable and levels of APOs of the respondents (Figure 2).

Relationship between socio-demographic variables and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs)
Figure 2.

Relationship between socio-demographic variables and adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs)

5. Discussion

Usually pregnancy inspires women to develop a healthier practices even before becoming pregnant. This makes practicing healthy behaviour more successful during pregnancy, and positively influences the infant’s life (16). Despite this and the importance of healthy practices in the health of an individual, and most importantly in the health of pregnant women, developing foetus and infant; it was found that no respondents had a high level of health practices. This situation is capable of causing negative pregnancy outcomes, since one of the major attribute of a successful pregnancy is healthy prenatal behaviors (17).

However, about two-thirds of the respondents were having moderate health practices. Contrary to this study, a cross-sectional study on predictors of health practices among a group of Iranian adolescent pregnant women found that the mean score of health practice was very good (18). Their study was only on adolescent pregnant women. This, and differences in the study areas might be the reasons for the differences. Another found that pregnant women had high levels of healthy behaviours including healthy practices (19). The authors used different instruments with this study and there are differences in culture and traditions between the two areas of the studies.

By implication, the women’s insight should be developed toward understanding that the pre-pregnancy negative behaviour can have devastating effect on both the mother, foetus and infant. Many maternal risk factors develop either prior to pregnancy or between pregnancies (20). Addressing these risk factors serves as a pathway for ensuring safer motherhood (21). This study’s results revealed the higher the APOs the lower the health practices. This finding is in consonance with the assertion that health practices of women during pregnancy can affect maternal and foetal health, and influence pregnancy outcomes (2). A chance of having healthy children improves with healthy behaviours (22). Lower health practices among pregnant women are therefore risk factors that can be manipulated through appropriate intervention (23).

The percentage of low health practices increased with an increase in age. The percentage of moderate health practices decreased with an increase in age. The younger women had more healthy practices than the older women with a significant association. In disagreement with this study, Boguszewski et al. (19) found no correlation between age and levels of healthy behaviour amongst pregnant women. However, in consonance to this study, the authors found that women under 30 years old manifested substantially higher levels of healthy behaviour. The two studies have differences in the respondent’s’ age grouping.

The percentage of low health practices roughly increased with an increase in number of deliveries. Also, the percentage of moderate health practices roughly decreased with an increase in number of deliveries. This finding tally with the finding of a study at Abou-Tig district Assiut in where it was found that there is a significant relationship between the number of births and Health-promoting lifestyle behaviours (P < 0.05) (24). The percentage of low health practices roughly increased with an increase in number of pregnancies. Likewise, the percentage of moderate health practices roughly decreased with an increase in number of pregnancies. This is in accordance with the association between the number of deliveries and health practices.

The results of this study indicate that the higher the level of education the higher the health practices. This finding is in agreement with the findings of a study conducted in the Netherlands, where it was found that lower educated women were more likely to have low health control beliefs (25). In line with these findings, educated women are more likely to understand the public health message (26). It was also found in this study that the higher the socio-economic status the higher the health practices. In agreement with this finding other studies have also shown a relationship between socio-economic status and rates of smoking, alcohol use, and dietary behavior (27). However, the strength of the relationship in this study was moderate.

In this study, the higher the age brackets, the higher the APOs. This is in accordance with the findings of this study in which the lower age brackets had higher health practices. Also, finding of a study by Boguszewski et al. (19) revealed that women under 30 years old manifested substantially higher levels of healthy behaviour. In accordance with a study in Kenya (28), respondents at the upper extreme parity were having the highest percent in high APOs. The authors found that parity is associated with APOs. High parity is associated with adverse outcomes. In another dimension, the lower the number of pregnancies the lower the APOs.

In this study APOs were found to be higher among those with non-formal education. The educated women are more likely to understand health messages (26); and therefore more likely to adhere to the messages, and in turn impact their health positively. It is shown that the higher the socio-economic status, the lower the APOs. Also, the lower the socio-economic status, the higher the APOs. This finding corresponds with the finding of this study that respondents with lower socioeconomic status had a higher percent of low health practices, and the respondents with upper socio-economic status had a higher percent of moderate health practices.

5.1. Limitations

The limitations of this study include the use of retrospective information from the respondents, which could be associated with recall bias. The use of one center for the study is associated with limited sample size. Moreover, other factors such as maternal stress, emotional support, cultural beliefs, and social support were not considered in this study.

5.2. Conclusions

The health practices of the pregnant women were mostly moderate. There were weak negative significant correlations between pregnant women's health practices and APOs. Also, very few respondents had a high-level APOs. Further studies can focus on the mediators of maternal health practices and APOs. The maternal stress, emotional support, cultural beliefs, and social support can be considered as possible mediators. Based on the findings of the study, the following recommendations are made: (1) Healthcare professionals should give high emphasis on older women and grand multiparous when educating mothers about health practices for healthy pregnancy and birth. (2) Healthcare professionals should provide an economical strategy for ensuring health practices to mothers from a low socio-economic background.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Morris JL, Short S, Robson L, Andriatsihosena MS. Maternal health practices, beliefs and traditions in southeast Madagascar. Afr J Reprod Health. 2014;18(3):101-17. [PubMed ID: 25438515].
  • 2.
    Hadian T, Mousavi S, Meedya S, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Mohammadi E, Mirghafourvand M. Adolescent pregnant women's health practices and their impact on maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes: a mixed method study protocol. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):45. [PubMed ID: 31023375]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6485063]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0719-4.
  • 3.
    N S, Padmakala S. Health Practices of High School Student in Kanyakumari District. Int J Res. 2017;5(3(SE)):33-9. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v5.i3(SE).2017.1933.
  • 4.
    Doctor HV, Findley SE, Ager A, Cometto G, Afenyadu GY, Adamu F, et al. Using community-based research to shape the design and delivery of maternal health services in Northern Nigeria. Reprod Health Matters. 2012;20(39):104-12. [PubMed ID: 22789087]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(12)39615-8.
  • 5.
    Jafaru Y, Yalwa T, Muhammad S, Musa I. Assessment of Drugs Use Among Pregnant Women Attending ANC in Sir Yahaya Memorial Hospital Birnin-Kebbi Kebbi State Nigeria Source: Journal of Health, Medicine and Nursing Published: 2016. J Health, Med Nurs. 2016;26:169-82.
  • 6.
    Patel R, Gupta A, Chauhan S, Bansod DW. Effects of sanitation practices on adverse pregnancy outcomes in India: a conducive finding from recent Indian demographic health survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):378. [PubMed ID: 31651276]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6813085]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2528-8.
  • 7.
    Yeshialem E, Alemnew N, Abera M, Tesfay A. Determinants of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes among mothers who gave birth from Jan 1-Dec 31/2015 in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Case control study, 2016. Med Clin Rev. 2017;3(4). https://doi.org/10.21767/2471-299x.1000063.
  • 8.
    Rozi S, Butt ZA, Zahid N, Wasim S, Shafique K. Association of tobacco use and other determinants with pregnancy outcomes: a multicentre hospital-based case-control study in Karachi, Pakistan. BMJ Open. 2016;6(9). e012045. [PubMed ID: 27650766]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5051420]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012045.
  • 9.
    Elliott P, Briggs D, Morris S, de Hoogh C, Hurt C, Jensen TK, et al. Risk of adverse birth outcomes in populations living near landfill sites. BMJ. 2001;323(7309):363-8. [PubMed ID: 11509424]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC37394]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7309.363.
  • 10.
    Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(2):e98-e108. [PubMed ID: 26795602]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2.
  • 11.
    Dassah ET, Odoi AT, Opoku BK. Stillbirths and very low Apgar scores among vaginal births in a tertiary hospital in Ghana: a retrospective cross-sectional analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:289. [PubMed ID: 25163488]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4162948]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-289.
  • 12.
    Padhi BK, Baker KK, Dutta A, Cumming O, Freeman MC, Satpathy R, et al. Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes among Women Practicing Poor Sanitation in Rural India: A Population-Based Prospective Cohort Study. PLoS Med. 2015;12(7). e1001851. [PubMed ID: 26151447]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4511257]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001851.
  • 13.
    Demographic N. National Population Commission (NPC)[Nigeria] and ICF International. Nigeria: Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: NPC and ICF International; 2019.
  • 14.
    Muglia LJ, Benhalima K, Tong S, Ozanne S. Maternal factors during pregnancy influencing maternal, fetal, and childhood outcomes. BMC Med. 2022;20(1):418. [PubMed ID: 36320027]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9623926]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02632-6.
  • 15.
    Lindgren K. A comparison of pregnancy health practices of women in inner-city and small urban communities. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2003;32(3):313-21. [PubMed ID: 12774873]. https://doi.org/10.1177/0884217503253442.
  • 16.
    Norwegian Directorate of Health. A healthy lifestyle before and during pregnancy. Oslo, Norway: Helsedirektoratet; 2018. Available from: https://www.helsedirektoratet.no/brosjyrer/gode-levevaner-for-og-i-svangerskapet/Gode%20levevaner%20f%C3%B8r%20og%20i%20svangerskapet%20-%20engelsk.pdf.
  • 17.
    Nguyen LD, Nguyen LH, Ninh LT, Nguyen HTT, Nguyen AD, Vu LG, et al. Women's holistic self-care behaviors during pregnancy and associations with psychological well-being: implications for maternal care facilities. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):631. [PubMed ID: 35945522]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9364562]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04961-z.
  • 18.
    Hadian T, Sanaz M, Shahla M, Sakineh MA, Eesa M, Mojgan M. Predictors of health practices among a group of Iranian adolescent pregnant women: a cross-sectional study. Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2020;34(4):155-61. [PubMed ID: 32549175]. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2020-0006.
  • 19.
    Boguszewski D, Adamczyk JG, Tomaszewski W, Salata D, Skowera E, Patalon M, et al. Evaluation of the Health-related Behaviour of Pregnant Women from Warsaw, Poland. Iran J Public Health. 2018;47(1):57-63. [PubMed ID: 29318118]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5756601].
  • 20.
    Jacob CM, Baird J, Barker M, Cooper C, Hanson M. The importance of a life-course approach to health: Chronic disease risk from preconception through adolescence and adulthood: White paper. Uni Southampton. 2017.
  • 21.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy Women, Healthy Pregnancies, Healthy Futures. Action plan to improve maternal health in America. USA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2025. Available from: https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/private/aspe-files/264076/healthy-women-healthy-pregnancies-healthy-future-action-plan_0.pdf.
  • 22.
    Procter SB, Campbell CG. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: nutrition and lifestyle for a healthy pregnancy outcome. J Academy Nutr Diet. 2014;114(7):1099-103.
  • 23.
    Parada C. Women's health during pregnancy, childbirth and puerperium: 25 years of recommendations from international organizations. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019;72(suppl 3):1-2. [PubMed ID: 31851227]. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2019-72suppl301.
  • 24.
    Ibrahim SA, Hassanen RH, Hassan AK. The Effect of Parity on Health- Promoting Lifestyle Behaviors among Women in Reproductive Age at Abou-Tig district Assiut. Assiut Sci Nurs J. 2020;8(20):21-32. https://doi.org/10.21608/asnj.2020.88467.
  • 25.
    Baron R, Mannien J, te Velde SJ, Klomp T, Hutton EK, Brug J. Socio-demographic inequalities across a range of health status indicators and health behaviours among pregnant women in prenatal primary care: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:261. [PubMed ID: 26463046]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4604767]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0676-z.
  • 26.
    Naik J, Kumar R, Mathurkar M, Jain S, Jailkhani S, Thakur M. Sociodemographic determinants of pregnancy outcome: a hospital based study. Int J Med Sci Pub Health. 2016;5(9). https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmsph.2016.01012016384.
  • 27.
    de Wolff MG, Backhausen MG, Iversen ML, Bendix JM, Rom AL, Hegaard HK. Prevalence and predictors of maternal smoking prior to and during pregnancy in a regional Danish population: a cross-sectional study. Reprod Health. 2019;16(1):82. [PubMed ID: 31200725]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6567454]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-019-0740-7.
  • 28.
    Maawiya HA, Ogutu O, Osoti A, Ayieko P, Kireki O, Koigi PK, et al. Factors Associated with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes among Home and Health Facility Deliveries in Lamu County, Kenya: A Comparative Cross Sectional Study. J Obstetrics Gynaecol Eastern Central Africa. 2018;30(2):11-20. https://doi.org/10.59692/jogeca.v30i2.272.
comments

Leave a comment here


Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles