New formulas for fetal weight prediction by sonography: A comparison of their effectivenss with Hadlock and Shepard method

Authors

A Hekmatnia, F Afshinnia,*, M Eslamian
*Corresponding Author: Email: [email protected]

Journal of Inflammatory Diseases:Vol. 4, issue 1; 8-14
Published online:Jun 30, 2000
Article type:Research Article
How to Cite:Hekmatnia A, Afshinnia F, Eslamian M. New formulas for fetal weight prediction by sonography: A comparison of their effectivenss with Hadlock and Shepard method. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;4(1):e154691. doi:

Abstract

Abstract Background: Prediction of fetal weight by anthropometric measurements through sonography has been considered by many researchers. Objective: To compare the predicted weights by Hadlock and shepard formulas to observed weights and recommend new formulas. Methods: 99 pregnant women underwent sonography at the last week of their pregnancy to measure biparietal diameter, femoral length and abdominal circum ference .Their fetal weights were measured immediately after delivery .The predicted weights were calculated by Hadlock , Shepard and first and second Afshinnia- Hekmatnia formulas based on the three variables .The estimated weights were compard to the observed ones.The formulas were determined by multiple regression line analysis. Findings: In women with normal amniotic volume or polyhydroamnious, Hadlock and Shepard formulas showed Significant to observed weights and lacked appropriate predictive power .Only E2 in oligohydroamnious worked effectively. The first Afshinnia _ Hekmatnia formula predicted weights in normal and oligohydroamnious mothers with the error of 0.3_%and 3.6% respectively. Similarly, the second Afshinnia- Hekmatnia formula predicted weights in polyhydroamnious mothers with no error. Conclusion: None of Hadlock and shepard formulas except E2 in oligohydoamniotic mothers can predict fetal weights effectively due to Iranian anthropometric features.

Copyright

© 2024, Journal of Inflammatory Diseases. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows for the copying and redistribution of the material only for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

19
Sep
2015

The relationship between the maternal body mass index and clinical fetal weight estimation in term pregnancy

Maryam Zangeneh,
Firoozeh Veisi,
Behzad Ebrahimi,
Shahla Safari

Zangeneh M, Veisi F, Ebrahimi B, Safari S. The relationship between the maternal body mass index and clinical fetal weight estimation in term pregnancy. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2015;19(4):e69867. doi: https://doi.org/10.22110/jkums.v19i4.2035

31
Mar
2012

Comparative Assessment of Fetal Malnutrition by Anthropometry and CAN Score

BSV Shivanagaraja,
Kamila Raghuveera,
Achappa Basavaprabhu,
Mahalingam Soundarya

Shivanagaraja B, Raghuveera K, Basavaprabhu A, Soundarya M. Comparative Assessment of Fetal Malnutrition by Anthropometry and CAN Score. Inn J Pediatr. 2016;22(1):. doi:

20
Jun
2007

Estimation of Gestational Age Using Ultrasound Scan

Nazanin Farshchian,
Sh Iranfar,
M Rezaei

Farshchian N, Iranfar S, Rezaei M. Estimation of Gestational Age Using Ultrasound Scan. J Kermanshah Univ Med Sci. 2007;11(1):e80906. doi:

12
Apr
2017

Comparison of Gestational Age Based on BPD and FL in Standard of of HADLOCK and OSAKA with Real Gestational Age Based on LMP in Teaching Hospitals in Zahedan

Aiob Beiknejad

Beiknejad A. Comparison of Gestational Age Based on BPD and FL in Standard of of HADLOCK and OSAKA with Real Gestational Age Based on LMP in Teaching Hospitals in Zahedan. I J Radiol. 2017;14(Special Issue):e48042. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.48042

5
Mar
2016

Evaluating the Prevalence of Small for Gestational Age and Its Associated Risk Factors

Mojgan Barati,
Farideh Moramezi,
Hoda Moramezi,
Nava Shirzadi,
Parsia Shirzadi

Barati M, Moramezi F, Moramezi H, Shirzadi N, Shirzadi P. Evaluating the Prevalence of Small for Gestational Age and Its Associated Risk Factors. Jentashapir J Cell Mol Biol. 2016;7(3):e36171. doi: https://doi.org/10.17795/jjhr.36171

More by these authors

A HekmatniaPubMedScholar
F AfshinniaPubMedScholar
M EslamianPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics