Jundishapur J Microbiol
Jundishapur J Microbiol

article information

Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology: Vol.15, issue 3; e118946
published online: May 17, 2022
article type: Research Article
received: August 26, 2021
revised: February 1, 2022
accepted: February 2, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm-118946
Crossmark

Intestinal Carriage of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase and Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Hemodialysis Patients

authors:

avatar Nahid Hosseinzadeh-sohi 1 , avatar Shahin Najar-Peerayeh 1 , avatar Bita Bakhshi 1 , *

Department of Bacteriology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran

how to cite: Hosseinzadeh-sohi N, Najar-Peerayeh S, Bakhshi B. Intestinal Carriage of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase and Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Hemodialysis Patients. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2022;15(3):e118946. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm-118946.

Abstract

Background:

Gastrointestinal colonization with resistant pathogens is significant because they could be easily transmitted to other hosts or spread to different microbiota through mobile genetic elements.

Objectives:

This study assessed the prevalence of fecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E and CPE, respectively) among hemodialysis patients and the factors affecting their emergence in a hospital in Tehran.

Methods:

From January 2018 to May 2019, 150 hemodialysis patients referred to a hospital in Tehran were sampled in this study. Stool samples of the patients were diluted in saline and cultured on MacConkey agar plates containing cefotaxime, ceftazidime, imipenem, and meropenem discs. The clinical data were analyzed to identify the risk factors using a logistic regression model.

Results:

The colonization rate of ESBL-E was 48.6%, while only 2% of patients were identified as the carriers of CPE (3 of 150). A higher prevalence rate was obtained for intestinal carriage of ESBL-E among hemodialysis patients aged 18 to 42 years using multivariate analysis. The prevalence rate of multidrug-resistant isolates was 73.8%. The blaCTX-M1 gene was identified as the most prevalent ESBL gene. Among carbapenemase-encoding genes, blaKPC and blaoxa-48 were found in 12 and two isolates, respectively.

Conclusions:

These results demonstrated a high prevalence rate of ESBLs among hemodialysis patients, although this rate was low for carbapenemases. Therefore, more control measures should be taken in hospitals to prevent the spread of antibiotic resistance genes in healthcare settings.

1. Background

In recent years, antibiotic resistance has been the subject of much research worldwide because it has become a serious threat to the health of patients with chronic diseases, such as hemodialysis patients. Carbapenemase-producing and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE and ESBL-E, respectively) are the leading causes of infections such as urinary tract infection and sepsis, playing a role in many therapeutic problems (1, 2). The gut is an important place for accumulating these pathogenic bacteria (3, 4). The association between bacterial colonization of the intestine by resistant bacteria and bacterial infections has been well documented in hemodialysis patients (5-7). Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase enzymes were first identified in Germany and have spread rapidly among bacteria with considerable variability. These enzymes are produced by a specific group of bacteria and can hydrolyze cephalosporins of a wide range of antibiotics such as ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, and cefotaxime. In addition, they are inhibited by clavulanic acid and tazobactam.

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections are often associated with high mortality. One of the most important reasons is the limited treatment options. The producers of Metallo beta-lactamase and OXA-48 are usually resistant to carbapenems and other beta-lactams, except for aztreonam. These resistances have caused a great deal of concern in therapeutic settings, and fecal carriers of these strains can be a serious alarm to increase the rate of urinary tract infections. The rate of bacterial colonization of the intestine is high in hemodialysis patients, predominantly Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (8-10). These asymptomatic carriers could spread ESBL and carbapenemase resistance genes in the community (11). These genes are often found on mobile genetic elements alongside other resistance genes and could be easily transferred to different strains (12). In the last decade, carbapenemase- and ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae were endemic in the Middle East (13-15). Diabetes mellitus, antibiotic consumption, and gender have been identified as the risk factors of rectal colonization with ESBL-producing bacteria (7).

2. Objectives

Hemodialysis patients who visit hospitals every day are in constant contact with fistulas, catheters, other colonized patients, and infected staff hands. They are at high risk of infection and can easily transmit resistant isolates to the community. However, such an issue has not yet been studied in Iran. Therefore, this study assessed the prevalence of fecal carriage among hemodialysis patients and the factors affecting its occurrence in a hospital in Tehran.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Population

This study was performed on 150 hemodialysis patients (98 males and 52 females) referred to a hospital in Tehran from February 2018 to April 2020. Due to kidney problems, such patients are referred to the hospital for dialysis every day. The required information was collected through a questionnaire completed by the patients to assess the risk factors of intestinal colonization, including age, sex, occupation, education, diabetes history, gastrointestinal status, antibiotic consumption, and the number of dialysis sessions.

3.2. Sample Collection and Screening

Stool samples were collected from 150 hemodialysis patients from February 2018 to April 2019 in a hospital in Tehran. Fecal specimens underwent the necessary tests within four hours of sampling. For screening, 0.5 g of each fecal sample was dissolved in 1 mL of 0.9% saline and then vortexed. This suspension was cultured on MacConkey agar. Then, four antibiotic discs containing cefotaxime (CTX, 30 µg), ceftazidime (CAZ, 30 µg), imipenem (IMI, 10 µg), and meropenem (MEM, 10 µg) were placed on the plate. Colonies were examined after 24 hours of incubation at 37°C. The colonies within the growth inhibition zone around each antibiotic disc were isolated as the strains suspected resistant to cephalosporins and carbapenems and maintained for further investigation. Furthermore, conventional biochemical tests were carried out to identify possible strains of Enterobacteriaceae.

3.3. Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing and Phenotypic Detection of ESBL

Antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed by the disc diffusion method according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines (16). The following antimicrobial agents were examined: amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (20/10 µg), cefotaxime (30 µg), ceftazidime (30 µg), ciprofloxacin (5 µg), fosfomycin (200 µg), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (1.25/23.75 µg), gentamicin (10 µg), tetracycline (30 µg), aztreonam (30 µg), meropenem (10 µg), and imipenem (10 µg). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was selected as the quality control strain in this test. The results were interpreted according to the CLSI guidelines. Double-disc Synergy Test (DDST) was performed to confirm ESBL production phenotypically. In this experiment, the ceftazidime and cefotaxime discs were placed at a distance of 15 mm from the amoxicillin/clavulanic acid disc.

3.4. Evaluation of ESBL and Carbapenemase-Encoding Genes

The studied beta-lactamase genes were identified by the PCR method. The presence of ESBL-encoding (blaCTX-M1, blaSHV, and blaTEM) and carbapenemase-encoding (blaKPC, blaOXA-48, blaNDM, blaVIM, and blaIMP) genes was investigated. These genes were detected by specific primers (17-24). DNA extraction was performed by the boiling method.

3.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 23 software. The chi-square test assessed the relationship between ESBL carriage (dependent variable) and risk factors, including sex, age, occupation, education, diabetes history, gastrointestinal status, antibiotic consumption, and the number of dialysis sessions (independent variables). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression. In multivariate analysis, ESBL carriage was the dependent variable, and related factors were the independent variables. In this analysis, factors with a P-value of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

4. Results

4.1. Study Population

This study was performed on 150 hemodialysis patients, including 52 women and 98 men. The distribution of patients based on the number of dialysis years was as follows: 0 - 2 years, 2 - 4 years, 4 - 7 years, and more than seven years. Also, they were divided into four age groups: 18 - 42, 43 - 54, 55 - 67, and over 67 years. Furthermore, 53 out of 150 patients had diabetes, while 25 were carriers of ESBL-producing bacteria.

4.2. Identification of Isolates and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

In this study, 106 bacterial isolates were collected from 73 out of 150 patients studied. The biochemical tests identified the bacteria as follows: E. coli (90.6%, n = 97), K. pneumoniae (3.73%, n = 4), Enterobacter cloacae (0.93%, n = 1), K. oxytoca (0.93%, n = 1), and Morganella morganii (2.83%, n = 3). Infection to more than one type of bacteria was found in five out of 150 patients (Table 1). The rates of resistance to cefotaxime (CTX 30 µg), ceftazidime (CAZ 30 µg), aztreonam (ATM 30 µg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT 1.25 - 23.75 µg), and tetracycline (TE 30 µg) were more than 70%. Also, the highest susceptibility to gentamicin, imipenem, fosfomycin, and meropenem was observed in 100, 101, 101, and 106 isolates, respectively (Figure 1, Table 2). In this study, multidrug-resistant (MDR) was the antimicrobial resistance of a microorganism to at least one antimicrobial drug in three or more antimicrobial categories, except for aztreonam. The prevalence of MDR isolates was 73.8%.

Table 1.

Double Infection in Patients

Type of BacteriaNumber of Patients
Escherichia coli + Klebsiella pneumoniae2
E. coli + K. oxytoca1
E. coli + Enterobacter cloacae1
E. coli + Morganella morganii1
Antibiotic resistance of ESBL-producing bacteria. Cefotaxime (CTX), aztreonam (ATM), ceftazidime (CAZ), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), tetracycline (TE), ciprofloxacin (CIP), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC), gentamicin (GN), fosfomycin (FOS), imipenem (IMI), meropenem (MEM).
Antibiotic resistance of ESBL-producing bacteria. Cefotaxime (CTX), aztreonam (ATM), ceftazidime (CAZ), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), tetracycline (TE), ciprofloxacin (CIP), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC), gentamicin (GN), fosfomycin (FOS), imipenem (IMI), meropenem (MEM).
Figure 1.

Antibiotic resistance of ESBL-producing bacteria. Cefotaxime (CTX), aztreonam (ATM), ceftazidime (CAZ), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), tetracycline (TE), ciprofloxacin (CIP), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (AMC), gentamicin (GN), fosfomycin (FOS), imipenem (IMI), meropenem (MEM).

Table 2.

Antibiotic Resistance of ESBL-Producing Strains

Antimicrobial AgentEscherichia coli (N = 97)Klebsiella pneumoniae (N = 4)K. oxytoca (N = 1)Enterobacter cloacae (N = 1)Morganella morganii (N = 3)
Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid46.45002525
Tetracycline67250075
Gentamicin5.2250025
Aztreonam81.450000
Cefotaxime95.97502575
Ceftazidime79.45002575
Ciprofloxacin58.8250050
Fosfomycin3.0925000
Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole69.102500
Imipenem3.102500
Meropenem1.00000

4.3. Phenotypic and Genotypic Detection of ESBLs

The DDST was performed on 106 resistant isolates to phenotypically confirm the production of ESBL, which resulted in the identification of 70 (67.3%) out of 106 isolates as phenotypically approved ESBL producers. In two DDST-positive isolates, no ESBL genes were detected by the PCR method, while 28 out of 36 unapproved isolates in the DDST method carried the ESBL genes studied. Also, only three isolates showing resistance to carbapenems in the DDST were confirmed directly by the PCR method.

4.4. Genotypic Characteristics of ESBL and Carbapenemase

The CTX gene was detected in 82 isolates as the dominant ESBL gene. The TEM and SHV genes were detected in 26.4% and 24.5% of the isolates, respectively. Also, 17 E. coli isolates carried a combination of the CTX and SHV genes. In addition, 17 E. coli and one K. pneumoniae isolates carried a combination of the CTX and TEM genes. Co-harboring of SHV and TEM genes was found in one E. coli isolate (Table 3). The OXA-48 gene was found in 4.6% of the isolates, including two E. coli and two M. morganii isolates. Unexpectedly, the KPC gene was only detected in 12 E. coli isolates (Table 4). None of the VIM, IMP, and NDM genes were detected in CPE isolates. Furthermore, the co-harboring of carbapenemase genes was not found in any of the isolates. Instead, 14.06% (n = 15) of the isolates carried a combination of both ESBL and carbapenemase genes.

Table 3.

Prevalence of Beta-lactamase Genes Among Bacterial Isolates

SpeciesNo. of Isolates (%)SHVTEMCTXCTX -SHVCTX- TEMSHV-TEM
Escherichia coli97 (91.5)24267917171
Klebsiella pneumoniae4 (3.7)211-1-
K. oxytoka1 (0.9)------
Enterobacter cloacae1 (0.9)------
Morganella morganii3 (2.8)----1-
Table 4.

Prevalence of Carbapenemase Genes Among Bacterial Isolates

SpeciesNo. of Isolates (%)OXA-48KPCVIMIMPNDM
Escherichia coli97 (91.5)212---
Klebsiella pneumoniae4 (3.7)-----
K. oxytoka1 (0.9)-----
Enterobacter cloacae1 (0.9)-----
Morganella morganii3 (2.8)2----

4.5. Risk Factors and Prevalence of Rectal Carriage of ESBL in Enterobacteriaceae

The effect of risk factors on the intestinal carriage of ESBL was investigated by univariate and multivariate statistical analyses (Table 5). The patients were divided into four age groups to evaluate the effect of age on the fecal carriage of ESBL. According to multivariate analysis, there was a significant association between the age group of 18 - 42 years and ESBL carriage (P = 0.04; OR = 0.32; 95%CI: 0.10 - 0.99). Moreover, patients were divided into four groups to investigate the effect of dialysis sessions. There was no significant relationship between the number of dialysis sessions and ESBL carriage in either analysis. Diabetes was surveyed as an important possible risk factor in carriers. This factor had no significant relationship with ESBL carriage (univariate: P = 0.71, OR = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.45 - 1.72) (multivariate: P = 0.66, OR = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.39 - 1.80). Occupation and education were the other risk factors examined in this survey. Neither of these risk factors was significantly associated with ESBL carriage. The status of the gastrointestinal tract, which is affected by diet, was examined as another possible risk factor in these patients. Accordingly, patients were divided into three groups: Constipation, normal, and diarrhea. There was no significant relationship between any of the groups and ESBL carriage. The use of antibiotics was examined as an important risk factor considered in various studies worldwide. No link was found between this factor and ESBL carriage.

Table 5.

Characteristics of Hemodialysis Patients Carrying ESBL-Producing Bacteria

VariablesTotal No.No. (%)UnivariateMultivariate
P-ValueORP-ValueOR
Sex
Male9853 (54.1)0.071.88 (0.94 - 3.74)0.231.63 (0.73 - 3.62)
Female5220 (38.5)11
Age
18 - 423716 (43.2)0.0640.41 (0.16 - 1.05)0.030.28 (0.09 - 0.88)
43 - 543917 (43.6)0.0650.41 (0.16 - 1.05)0.080.40 (0.14 - 1.11)
55 - 673716 (43.2)0.0640.41 (0.16 - 1.05)0.050.37 (0.13 - 1.03)
> 673724 (64.9)11
Number of dialysis years
0 - 23613 (36.1)0.200.53 (0.19 - 1.41)0.730.82 (0.27 - 2.52)
2 - 43718 (48.6)0.800.88 (0.34 - 2.30)0.711.22 (0.41 - 3.57)
4 - 74626 (56.5)0.671.21 (0.48 - 3.04)0.271.79 (0.63 - 5.09)
> 73116 (51.6)11
Occupation
Self-employed1611 (68.8)0.092.55 (0.84 - 7.75)0.112.79 (0.76 - 10.13)
Salaried- - - -
Unemployed13462 (46.3)11
Education
High school8841 (46.6)0.790.87 (0.31 - 2.04)0.410.62 (0.19 - 1.94)
Diploma4423 (52.3)0.871.09 (0.36 - 3.28)0.831.13 (0.32 - 3.97)
Above diploma189 (50.0)11
Antibiotic consumption
No consumption13869 (50)0.123.50 (0.70 - 17.4)0.124.03 (0.68 - 23.7)
Previous consumption32 (66.7)0.187.00 (0.39 - 123.3)0.178.24 (0.38 - 178.6)
Consumption at the time of sampling92 (22.2)11
Digestive status
Constipation3518 (51.4)0.801.09 (0.51 - 2.35)0.791.14 (0.45 - 2.87)
Diarrhea72 (28.6)0.300.41 (0.07 - 2.23)0.430.50 (0.87 - 2.86)
Normal10853 (49.1)11
Diabetes mellitus
Diabetic5325 (47.2)0.780.91 (0.46 - 1.78)0.740.88 (0.41 - 1.87)
Non-diabetic9748 (49.5)11

5. Discussion

Evaluation of intestinal colonization with ESBL-E and CPE is of great importance because of the increased risk of bacterial infections. In Iran, a few studies have been performed on the fecal carriage of CPE and ESBL-PE. In a study conducted by Aghamohammad et al. in Iran, the prevalence rate of fecal carriage of ESBL-PE was 18.3% among intensive care unit patients and outpatients (25). In another study by Bazargani and Hashemzade in Iran, the prevalence rate of ESBL carriage among hospitalized patients with diarrhea was 25.9% (26). Fecal carriage of ESBL among patients with urinary tract infection was reported to be 35% in another study from Kerman (27). In this study, for the first time, the prevalence of intestinal carriage of ESBL-PE and CPE and its related risk factors were investigated among hemodialysis patients. The incidence of the fecal carriage was estimated to be high among these patients due to frequent hospital visits, frequent contact with staff and medical devices, hospital food intake, and the use of antibiotics. Recent studies have reported different prevalence rates for ESBL carriage, including 1.9%, 30%, and 52.1% (28-30).

As expected, in the present study, a high prevalence rate was obtained for ESBL carriage among hemodialysis patients (75 of 150 patients). However, only 2% of the study population were identified as CPE carriers. More than 50% of ESBL-producing isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, ceftazidime, aztreonam, and cefotaxime. Simultaneous harboring of genes encoding resistance to different antibiotics on the same mobile genetic element is one of the main reasons for the emergence of MDR isolates. Although these genes were not the main subject of the study, the PCR method showed that blaCTX-M and blakpc genes were the predominant genes encoding ESBL and carbapenemase, respectively. Moreover, five participants carried two different bacterial isolates. These findings are probably due to the inter-species transfer of varying resistance genes by mobile genetic elements between different bacterial strains, which could also spread across the intestinal ecosystem (31-33).

Various studies have been conducted worldwide to examine the prevalence of ESBL-E and CPE and their related risk factors (34, 35). Identifying the risk factors associated with intestinal colonization is a way to control and prevent the spread of antibiotic resistance. In some studies, intestinal flora has been introduced as a risk factor for resistance (28, 36, 37). The prevalence of fecal carriage of ESBL has been reported to vary across different age groups (38-41). However, the impact of age on fecal carriage varies with the age range of the study populations. Tellevik et al. reported age less than 12 months as a risk factor for ESBL carriage (42). In another study, Cakir Erdogan et al. demonstrated age greater than 65 years as a related factor for intestinal carriage of ESBL (28). However, in this study, patients aged 18 - 42 years were more likely to be colonized by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae than those in the other age groups. There were different results about the association between sex and ESBL carriage. A study by Pitout et al. showed that the rate of rectal carriage of ESBL bacteria was higher among females (37). In contrast, Ben-Ami proved that males were more prone to be an ESBL-producing bacteria carrier (36). However, sex was not recognized as a risk factor in the present study.

The role of diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for fecal carriage of ESBL has been proven in many studies (28, 30, 43). Diabetic people are more prone to bacterial infections due to their weakened immune systems. Schoevaerdts et al. showed that the bacteria isolated from the urethra of diabetic patients with urinary tract infections were the same as the bacteria colonizing the intestines of these patients (44). This finding is inconsistent with the present study, in which no significant association was found between diabetes and fecal carriage. Unemployment can also be associated with an increased carriage rate. Poor hygiene and non-compliance with hygienic principles due to poor economic conditions can increase ESBL colonization (45). However, occupation was not recognized as a risk factor affecting ESBL carriage in this study. In a study from India, highly educated people were more prone to intestinal colonization with resistant bacteria. It was hypothesized that this group might also be socio-economically better off, resulting in more likely seeking health care and higher exposure to antibiotics (46). While the carriage rate was lower among educated individuals in Turkey (28), no association was found between education level and resistant intestinal flora in the present study.

Furthermore, it was hypothesized that patients with a longer history of dialysis were more likely to develop resistant gut flora due to more hospital visits. Although the number of carriers with a history of four to seven years of dialysis was higher than the number of carriers in other groups, no significant relationship was found between the number of dialysis sessions and fecal colonization. The commensal flora of patients in the hospital is replaced by pathogenic bacteria under selective pressure due to factors such as the overuse of antibiotics. Antibiotic use in intensive care unit patients was a risk factor in the studies by Solgi et al. in Iran and Day et al. in India (32, 47). The rate of colonization was also high among antibiotic users admitted to a hospital in Pakistan (47). In the present study, although antibiotic users were carriers, statistical analysis showed no significant relationship between antibiotic use and resistant bacteria carriage.

5.1. Conclusions

This study highlights the high fecal carriage of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae among hemodialysis patients. This indicates that these are expanding in our hospital setting. The high rate of resistance to many classes of antibiotics has caused concern due to therapeutic problems and the risk of transmitting resistance genes to other patients. Understanding the factors associated with intestinal colonization will help prevent infection. Carriage is a circulating pool of resistance genes leading to disease. Therefore, the link between carriage and infection needs further elucidation.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Djuikoue IC, Woerther PL, Toukam M, Burdet C, Ruppe E, Gonsu KH, et al. Intestinal carriage of Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase producing E. coli in women with urinary tract infections, Cameroon. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2016;10(10):1135-9. [PubMed ID: 27801378]. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.7616.

  • 2.

    Linares L, Cervera C, Cofan F, Lizaso D, Marco F, Ricart MJ, et al. Risk factors for infection with extended-spectrum and AmpC beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative rods in renal transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(5):1000-5. [PubMed ID: 18727176]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02197.x.

  • 3.

    Carlet J. The gut is the epicentre of antibiotic resistance. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2012;1(1):1-7. [PubMed ID: 23181506]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3554492]. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-2994-1-39.

  • 4.

    Woerther PL, Burdet C, Chachaty E, Andremont A. Trends in human fecal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in the community: toward the globalization of CTX-M. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26(4):744-58. [PubMed ID: 24092853]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3811232]. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00023-13.

  • 5.

    D'Agata EMC. Addressing the problem of multidrug-resistant organisms in dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;13(4):666-8. [PubMed ID: 29567862]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5968912]. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.13781217.

  • 6.

    Onal EM, Afsar B, Covic A, Vaziri ND, Kanbay M. Gut microbiota and inflammation in chronic kidney disease and their roles in the development of cardiovascular disease. Hypertens Res. 2019;42(2):123-40. [PubMed ID: 30504819]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-018-0144-z.

  • 7.

    Salazar-Ospina L, Vanegas JM, Jimenez JN. High intermittent colonization by diverse clones of beta-lactam-resistant Gram-negative bacilli suggests an excessive antibiotic use and different sources of transmission in haemodialysis patients. J Hosp Infect. 2021;107:76-86. [PubMed ID: 33171186]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.10.026.

  • 8.

    Castillo-Rodriguez E, Fernandez-Prado R, Esteras R, Perez-Gomez MV, Gracia-Iguacel C, Fernandez-Fernandez B, et al. Impact of altered intestinal microbiota on chronic kidney disease progression. Toxins (Basel). 2018;10(7). [PubMed ID: 30029499]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6070989]. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10070300.

  • 9.

    Mafra D, Borges N, Alvarenga L, Esgalhado M, Cardozo L, Lindholm B, et al. Dietary components that may influence the disturbed gut microbiota in chronic kidney disease. Nutrients. 2019;11(3). [PubMed ID: 30818761]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6471287]. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11030496.

  • 10.

    Rukavina Mikusic NL, Kouyoumdzian NM, Choi MR. Gut microbiota and chronic kidney disease: evidences and mechanisms that mediate a new communication in the gastrointestinal-renal axis. Pflugers Arch. 2020;472(3):303-20. [PubMed ID: 32064574]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-020-02352-x.

  • 11.

    Mittal G, Gaind R, Kumar D, Kaushik G, Gupta KB, Verma PK, et al. Risk factors for fecal carriage of carbapenemase producing Enterobacteriaceae among intensive care unit patients from a tertiary care center in India. BMC Microbiol. 2016;16(1):138. [PubMed ID: 27392139]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4938945]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-016-0763-y.

  • 12.

    Arhoune B, Oumokhtar B, Hmami F, Barguigua A, Timinouni M, El Fakir S, et al. Rectal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae among hospitalised neonates in a neonatal intensive care unit in Fez, Morocco. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2017;8:90-6. [PubMed ID: 28039104]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2016.11.004.

  • 13.

    Ake J, Scott P, Wortmann G, Huang XZ, Barber M, Wang Z, et al. Gram-negative multidrug-resistant organism colonization in a US military healthcare facility in Iraq. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011;32(6):545-52. [PubMed ID: 21558766]. https://doi.org/10.1086/660015.

  • 14.

    Davtyan H, Grigoryan R, Niazyan L, Davidyants M, Ghalechyan T, Davtyan K. Antimicrobial resistance in a tertiary care hospital in Armenia: 2016-2019. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2021;6(1). [PubMed ID: 33800026]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8005984]. https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed6010031.

  • 15.

    Perry JD, Naqvi SH, Mirza IA, Alizai SA, Hussain A, Ghirardi S, et al. Prevalence of faecal carriage of Enterobacteriaceae with NDM-1 carbapenemase at military hospitals in Pakistan, and evaluation of two chromogenic media. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(10):2288-94. [PubMed ID: 21788293]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr299.

  • 16.

    Clinical; Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 30th ed. Wayne, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017.

  • 17.

    Bedenic B, Vranes J, Hofmann-Thiel S, Tonkic M, Novak A, Bucevic-Popovic V, et al. Characterization of the extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and determination of the virulence factors of uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains isolated from children. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2012;124(15-16):504-15. [PubMed ID: 22895677]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-012-0210-5.

  • 18.

    Begum N, Shamsuzzaman SM. Emergence of carbapenemase-producing urinary isolates at a tertiary care hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Ci Ji Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016;28(3):94-8. [PubMed ID: 28757733]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5442910]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcmj.2016.04.005.

  • 19.

    Eckert C, Gautier V, Saladin-Allard M, Hidri N, Verdet C, Ould-Hocine Z, et al. Dissemination of CTX-M-type beta-lactamases among clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae in Paris, France. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(4):1249-55. [PubMed ID: 15047527]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC375249]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.48.4.1249-1255.2004.

  • 20.

    Essa EA, Afifi IK. Multiplex PCR study of nosocomial Pseudomonas aeruginosa for genes of Metallo Beta–Lactamases: could such enzymes bring us to end of antibiotics? Egypt J Med Microbiol. 2007;16(1):189-200.

  • 21.

    Kalantar D, Mansouri S. Emergence of multiple β-lactamases produced by Escherichia coli clinical isolates from hospitalized patient in Kerman, Iran. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2010;3(4):137-45.

  • 22.

    Kwong JC, Lane CR, Romanes F, Goncalves da Silva A, Easton M, Cronin K, et al. Translating genomics into practice for real-time surveillance and response to carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: evidence from a complex multi-institutional KPC outbreak. PeerJ. 2018;6. e4210. [PubMed ID: 29312831]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5756455]. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4210.

  • 23.

    Mlynarcik P, Roderova M, Kolar M. Primer evaluation for PCR and its application for detection of carbapenemases in Enterobacteriaceae. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2016;9(1). e29314. [PubMed ID: 27099689]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4834133]. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjm.29314.

  • 24.

    Voets GM, Fluit AC, Scharringa J, Cohen Stuart J, Leverstein-van Hall MA. A set of multiplex PCRs for genotypic detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, carbapenemases, plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamases and OXA beta-lactamases. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;37(4):356-9. [PubMed ID: 21353487]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.01.005.

  • 25.

    Aghamohammad S, Badmasti F, Shirazi AS, Dabiri H, Solgi H, Sabeti S, et al. Considerable rate of putative virulent phylo-groups in fecal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli. Infect Genet Evol. 2019;73:184-9. [PubMed ID: 31054921]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2019.04.035.

  • 26.

    Bazargani A, Hashemizadeh Z. Bacteremia due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Acinetobacter baumannii. Afr J Microbiol Res. 2011;5(21). https://doi.org/10.5897/ajmr11.654.

  • 27.

    Bazargani A, Hashemizadeh Z, Mohebi S, Kalantar-Neyestanaki D, Mansouri S, Hosseini-Nave H. Prevalence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance and ESBLs genes in Escherichia coli isolated from urinary tract infections and fecal samples in Southeast Iran. Gene Rep. 2019;17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2019.100487.

  • 28.

    Cakir Erdogan D, Comert F, Aktas E, Kokturk F, Kulah C. Fecal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. in a Turkish community. Turk J Med Sci. 2017;47(1):172-9. [PubMed ID: 28263486]. https://doi.org/10.3906/sag-1512-9.

  • 29.

    Niumsup PR, Tansawai U, Na-Udom A, Jantapalaboon D, Assawatheptawee K, Kiddee A, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for intestinal carriage of CTX-M-type ESBLs in Enterobacteriaceae from a Thai community. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;37(1):69-75. [PubMed ID: 28918585]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-017-3102-9.

  • 30.

    Wu PC, Wang JL, Hsueh PR, Lin PH, Cheng MF, Huang IF, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for colonization by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing or ST 131 Escherichia coli among asymptomatic adults in community settings in Southern Taiwan. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:1063-71. [PubMed ID: 31118712]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6506006]. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S201086.

  • 31.

    Girlich D, Nordmann P, Lecuyer H, Berche P, Marmorat-Khuong A, Gros I, et al. Multiple colonization with highly resistant bacteria: carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa, carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii, and glycopeptide-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;81(3):217-8. [PubMed ID: 25547540]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.12.002.

  • 32.

    Solgi H, Badmasti F, Aminzadeh Z, Giske CG, Pourahmad M, Vaziri F, et al. Molecular characterization of intestinal carriage of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae among inpatients at two Iranian university hospitals: first report of co-production of bla NDM-7 and bla OXA-48. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;36(11):2127-35. [PubMed ID: 28639165]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-017-3035-3.

  • 33.

    Tijet N, Richardson D, MacMullin G, Patel SN, Melano RG. Characterization of multiple NDM-1-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates from the same patient. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(6):3648-51. [PubMed ID: 25845877]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4432124]. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.04862-14.

  • 34.

    Ravikant M, Felix JW. Prevalence and risk factor analysis of faecal carriage of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae in a tertiary care hospital. Int J Clin Diagn Res. 2019;13(7):1-6. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2019/40614.12969.

  • 35.

    Royden A, Ormandy E, Pinchbeck G, Pascoe B, Hitchings MD, Sheppard SK, et al. Prevalence of faecal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli in veterinary hospital staff and students. Vet Rec Open. 2019;6(1). [PubMed Central ID: PMC6327872]. https://doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2018-000307.

  • 36.

    Ben-Ami R, Rodriguez-Bano J, Arslan H, Pitout JD, Quentin C, Calbo ES, et al. A multinational survey of risk factors for infection with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae in nonhospitalized patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49(5):682-90. [PubMed ID: 19622043]. https://doi.org/10.1086/604713.

  • 37.

    Pitout JD, Hanson ND, Church DL, Laupland KB. Population-based laboratory surveillance for Escherichia coli-producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: importance of community isolates with blaCTX-M genes. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38(12):1736-41. [PubMed ID: 15227620]. https://doi.org/10.1086/421094.

  • 38.

    Boutet-Dubois A, Pantel A, Prere MF, Bellon O, Brieu-Roche N, Lecaillon E, et al. Faecal carriage of oxyiminocephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae among paediatric units in different hospitals in the south of France. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32(8):1063-8. [PubMed ID: 23494770]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-013-1851-7.

  • 39.

    Karanika S, Karantanos T, Arvanitis M, Grigoras C, Mylonakis E. Fecal colonization with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and risk factors among healthy individuals: A systematic review and meta analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(3):310-8. [PubMed ID: 27143671]. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw283.

  • 40.

    Mshana SE, Falgenhauer L, Mirambo MM, Mushi MF, Moremi N, Julius R, et al. Predictors of blaCTX-M-15 in varieties of Escherichia coli genotypes from humans in community settings in Mwanza, Tanzania. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:1-9. [PubMed ID: 27129719]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4850702]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1527-x.

  • 41.

    Schaumburg F, Alabi A, Kokou C, Grobusch MP, Kock R, Kaba H, et al. High burden of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Gabon. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68(9):2140-3. [PubMed ID: 23645586]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt164.

  • 42.

    Tellevik MG, Blomberg B, Kommedal O, Maselle SY, Langeland N, Moyo SJ. High prevalence of faecal carriage of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae among children in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. PLoS One. 2016;11(12). e0168024. [PubMed ID: 27936054]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5148075]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168024.

  • 43.

    Johnson JR, Thuras P, Johnston BD, Weissman SJ, Limaye AP, Riddell K, et al. The pandemic H30 subclone of Escherichia coli sequence type 131 is associated with persistent infections and adverse outcomes independent from its multidrug resistance and associations with compromised hosts. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(12):1529-36. [PubMed ID: 27025834]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4885656]. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciw193.

  • 44.

    Schoevaerdts D, Bogaerts P, Grimmelprez A, de Saint-Hubert M, Delaere B, Jamart J, et al. Clinical profiles of patients colonized or infected with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates: a 20 month retrospective study at a Belgian University Hospital. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:1-10. [PubMed ID: 21226923]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3023698]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-12.

  • 45.

    Herindrainy P, Randrianirina F, Ratovoson R, Ratsima Hariniana E, Buisson Y, Genel N, et al. Rectal carriage of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacilli in community settings in Madagascar. PLoS One. 2011;6(7). e22738. [PubMed ID: 21829498]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3146483]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022738.

  • 46.

    Pathak A, Chandran SP, Mahadik K, Macaden R, Lundborg CS. Frequency and factors associated with carriage of multi-drug resistant commensal Escherichia coli among women attending antenatal clinics in central India. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:1-9. [PubMed ID: 23638834]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3655905]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-199.

  • 47.

    Day KM, Ali S, Mirza IA, Sidjabat HE, Silvey A, Lanyon CV, et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of Enterobacteriaceae producing NDM-1 carbapenemase at a military hospital in Pakistan and evaluation of two chromogenic media. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;75(2):187-91. [PubMed ID: 23246367]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.11.006.