In the current study most of the isolates (74.2%) were obtained from patients in ICUs and in accordance to other researches worldwide, the rate of infection caused by
A. baumannii is high in ICUs (
25,
26). Previously, it was reported that
A. baumannii is more prevalent among endotracheal aspirate samples. Moreover, ventilator associated pneumonia is one of the frequent nosocomial infections caused by this organism (
27-
31). In accordance to the mentioned studies, most of the current study samples (57.3%) were isolated from tracheal aspirates. In the present study, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern showed that colistin and polymyxin-B are the most effective agents against
A. baumannii isolates, in vitro. Colistin is the last line antimicrobial agent to treat multidrug resistant
A. baumannii (
26,
32). Although, colistin resistant isolates are reported globally (
32), in the current study only 0.8% of isolates were colistin resistant.
This result indicates that colistin can be used to treat
A. baumannii infections in the studied hospitals. Afterwards, among the tested antimicrobial agents, the highest rate of resistance was observed against rifampin; 96.8% and 3.2% of the isolates were resistant and intermediate to this antibiotic, respectively. No isolate was sensitive to rifampin; hence, it is suggested t that rifampin might be ineffective to treat
A. baumannii infections in the studied hospitals. Carbapenems are successfully used to treat multidrug resistant
A. baumannii infections; however, in recent years increase of carbapenem resistant
A. baumannii isolates compromised their use (
4,
26,
33). The emergence of carbapenem resistant
A. baumannii is a global concern (
4). In the current study the rates of resistance to imipenem by E-test and disk diffusion method were 78.2% and 74.2%, respectively. In addition, 79.8% and 73.4% of the isolates were resistant to meropenem by disk diffusion and E-test, respectively.
There is a discrepancy between carbapenems E-test and disk diffusion method. Based on E-test, 78.2% of the isolates were resistant to imipenem; while disk diffusion method showed that 74.2% of the isolates were resistance to imipenem. In contrast, meropenem E-test detected 73.4% of isolates as resistant; whilst, according to disk diffusion more isolates (79.8%) were recorded as meropenem resistant. However, authors could not elucidate this difference. In
A. baumannii, the most common carbapenemase genes involved in carbapenem resistance are,
blaOXA-23-like,
blaOXA-24-like,
blaOXA-58-like and
blaOXA-143-like (
26,
34). In the current study, multiplex PCR detected 85.6% of carbapenem resistant isolates carrying
blaOXA-23-like. The spread of OXA genes varies in different parts of the world and
blaOXA-23-like is reported from 31% to 94% (
7,
12,
35-
39). The current study found that 6.2% of carbapenem resistant isolates harbor
blaOXA-24-like. Some authors worldwide, reported the rate of
blaOXA-24-like from 0 to 85.43% (
7,
33,
36,
38-
40).
The results of the current study were consistent with those of other studies and the findings for
blaOXA-23-like and
blaOXA-24-like were in the reported ranges. In contrast to other studies that reported the range of
blaOXA-58-like from 2% to 84.92% (
12,
35-
38,
40), the current study could not find any isolates positive for
blaOXA-58-like. Albeit the reported co-existence of OXAs genes (
29,
41,
42), coexistence between these genes was not observed in the current study and all
A. baumannii isolates only had one of the
blaOXA-23-like or
blaOXA-24-like genes. In the current study, 42.3% and 79.4% of the isolates were MBL positive by DDs test and MBL E-test, respectively. Despite phenotypic tests, no
blaIMP,
blaVIM and
blaSPM genes were detected by PCR and the isolates were negative for these genes. There are some possibilities about this phenomenon: 1) the MBL production may be false positive and due to bactericidal activity of EDTA, which may result in increased inhibitory zone and not associated with true MBL production (
43); 2) MBL production my be true positive due to other MBL genes such as
blaNDM that were not investigated in the current study (
44). Similar results are reported that
A. baumannii isolates were MBL producer by phenotypic tests but no MBL encoding genes were detected (
45,
46).
It is reported that MBL E-test has good sensitivity for MBL detection and could detected MBL both chromosomally and plasmid mediated in aerobic and anaerobic bacteria (
47). According to the E-test results, it is possible that the current study isolates were true MBL producers. Interestingly the study found eight carbapenem resistant isolates that were negative for
blaOXA-23-like,
blaOXA-24-like,
blaOXA-58-like and MBL genes and only harbored
blaOXA-51-like. Similarly, Nowak et al. reported that seven isolates of carbapenem resistant
A. baumannii only had
blaOXA-51-like (
29). Carbapenem resistance in these isolates may be associated with other mechanisms such as: modification of penicillin binding proteins, loss of porins and decreased permeability, AmpC stable derepression or over expression of efflux pump (
4,
8,
9). It is noteworthy that, insertion of ISAba1 in upstream of
blaOXA-51-like can lead to caebapenem resistance in
A. baumannii (
48).
The relationship between harboring bla
OXA-51-like and resistance to carbapenem in the eight isolates still need to be investigated. The current study also aimed to investigate the clonality of
A. baumannii isolates by rep-PCR. Genotypic comparison by rep-PCR revealed that carbapenem resistant isolates belonged to six clones. All clones were spread in the ICUs. Clone A was dominant (30.9%) and clone F had the lowest prevalence (1%). Clonal dissemination of carbapenem resistant
A. baumannii was previously reported in different studies. It has been establish that multidrug resistant of
A. baumannii isolates with similar genotype can disseminate among various wards, different hospitals and even among cities (
4,
10,
12,
49-
51). In the current study, the vast majority of carbapenem resistant isolates (94/97, 96.9%) belonged to one of the four dominant genotypes indicating clonal dissemination of resistant isolates in the studied hospitals.
In conclusion, overall, the rate of carbapenem resistant isolates were high in the studied hospitals. Colistin and polymyxin-B were the effective antimicrobial agents, in vitro. Since in the current study blaOXA-58-like or MBL genes were not detected, it seems that carbapenem resistance is mostly related to blaOXA-23-like and blaOXA-24-like, and these genes may play an important role in carbapenem resistance in the isolates. In addition, four clones of carbapenem resistant of A. baumannii isolates are disseminated in the two studied hospitals and clone A was dominant. In accordance to other studies, in the current investigation most of the resistant isolates belonged to four clones indicating clonal dissemination of A. baumannii in the studied hospitals and that effective infection control strategies are necessary to control the spread of these resistant isolates.