The results of our investigation reveal that paraxanthine exhibits a proconvulsant effect in an i.v. PTZ test. Pretreatment with L-NAME, a NOS inhibitor, abolished the proconvulsant effect of paraxanthine. In contrast, pretreatment with L-arginine, a substrate for NOS, did not modify this effect.
Most of the caffeine ingested by humans (approximately 80%) is metabolized into paraxanthine (
10). Like caffeine, paraxanthine inhibits ARs with similar potency (
12). There are four AR subtypes in the brain: A1, A2A, A2B, and A3 ARs. Adenosine exerts its neuromodulatory effects primarily through the activation of A
1ARs and A
2AARs (
25). Postsynaptic activation of A
1ARs by adenosine decreases neuronal excitability, whereas postsynaptic activation of A
2AARs increases neuronal excitability (
26). Knockout receptor studies indicate that A
1ARs play a critical role in the anticonvulsant effect of adenosine (
27,
28).
Paraxanthine at a dose of 100 mg/kg significantly lowered the threshold for the onset of MCT, GNC, and FLT (
Figure 2). To our knowledge, only one study has examined the effects of paraxanthine on seizures. Forelimb tonus significantly decreased when paraxanthine was administered in drinking water (0.5 g/L) for 14 days, but the clonic seizure threshold was marginally non-significant (
20). Numerous studies have reported neuroprotective, psychostimulant, and locomotor-activating effects of paraxanthine (
22,
29,
30). However, paraxanthine appears protective at much lower doses than its proconvulsant effect.
Only paraxanthine at a dose of 100 mg/kg significantly reduced the thresholds for the first MCT and GNC. In contrast, paraxanthine at doses of 10, 50, and 100 mg/kg significantly lowered the threshold for the onset of FLT (
Figure 2). While MCT and GNC arise from the cerebellum, FLT originates from the hindbrain (
31). A
1ARs are widely distributed in both the forebrain and hindbrain, while A
2AARs are exclusively distributed in the forebrain structures (
32). Adenosine at low doses activates A
1ARs, resulting in a reduced release of dopamine and glutamate. In contrast, high doses of adenosine increase glutamate release by activating A
2AARs (
33).
As a result, discrepancies in the effects of paraxanthine on the first MCT, GNC, and FLT may be partly explained by differences in the distribution of the A1ARs and A2AARs in the central nervous system (CNS). The exclusive distribution of A1ARs in the hindbrain likely accounts for paraxanthine's proconvulsant effects and the reduced threshold for FLT at doses of 10, 50, and 100 mg/kg. When paraxanthine is administered at low doses (10 and 50 mg/kg), its proconvulsant effect on A1ARs may be obscured by its antagonistic effect on A2AARs in the forebrain.
Caffeine and paraxanthine are non-competitive AR antagonists (
9,
12). However, comparing the findings of the present study with our previous work reveals both similarities and differences in the effects of paraxanthine and caffeine on PTZ-induced seizures. At doses of 5 and 50 mg/kg, caffeine exhibited a proconvulsant effect, whereas at a dose of 100 mg/kg, it did not influence PTZ-induced clonic seizures (
18). Our recent study demonstrated that the threshold dose for the onset of all seizure endpoints was significantly lowered by caffeine at doses of 5 and 50 mg/kg. Conversely, caffeine at a dose of 100 mg/kg reduced only the threshold for FLT seizures (
19).
Although some reports suggest that caffeine is a less potent A
1AR and A
2AAR antagonist than paraxanthine (
9,
12), other studies indicate that caffeine and paraxanthine have similar affinities for A
1AR and A
2AAR (
22,
34). Adenosine receptors are not essential for the high-dose effects of caffeine (
35). Thus, caffeine and paraxanthine may have similar effects, partly due to their similar affinities to ARs. Caffeine and paraxanthine impact seizures differently, likely due to mechanisms other than AR blockade. Some reports suggest that the NO-cGMP pathway is more significant for the central effects of paraxanthine compared to caffeine (
22,
29).
Our results show that pretreatment with L-arginine before an ineffective dose of paraxanthine (5 mg/kg) did not affect the seizure threshold (
Figure 3), while pretreatment with L-NAME eliminated the proconvulsant effect of paraxanthine at a dose of 100 mg/kg (
Figure 4).
As a neurotransmitter and neuromodulator, NO participates in many physiological and pathological functions. Its role involves stimulating the formation of cGMP through the activation of soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC). By activating different isoforms of protein kinase G (PKG), cGMP regulates neurotransmitter release, synaptic transmission, neuronal differentiation, and gene expression. Nitric oxide plays a significant role in seizure susceptibility, but there are discrepancies in the results of various studies. Depending on the seizure type, NO source, and other neurotransmitter systems involved, NO can exert either proconvulsant or anticonvulsant effects. There is a complex interaction between adenosine and NO. Adenosine has an anticonvulsant effect in which NO is implicated. Meanwhile, the antidepressant action of adenosine also involves NO. We have recently demonstrated that the NO-cGMP pathway participates in caffeine's effect on the PTZ-induced seizure threshold.
A high dose of paraxanthine (100 mg/kg) elevated the NOx levels in brain tissues (
Figure 5). Reductions in MCT and GNC thresholds were observed only with this dose of paraxanthine. L-NAME attenuated the proconvulsant effect of paraxanthine (
Figure 3), whereas L-arginine had no effect (
Figure 3). Nitric oxide metabolites levels increased after L-arginine pretreatment before an otherwise ineffective dose of paraxanthine (
Figure 6). In contrast, L-NAME pretreatment before a proconvulsant dose of paraxanthine reduced NOx levels in the brain (
Figure 6). These results suggest that the proconvulsant effect of paraxanthine is mediated by the NO-cGMP pathway.
No research has been conducted to determine if paraxanthine influences seizures via the NO-cGMP pathway. Several studies have examined the relationship between paraxanthine and locomotion (
22,
29). Adenosine receptor blockade increases locomotor activity, and activation of the NO-cGMP pathway can enhance it. Paraxanthine can effectively inhibit PDE9, as mentioned previously (
29). Consequently, paraxanthine may exert some of its effects through PDE9 inhibition and an increase in cGMP levels. Pretreatment with L-NAME reduces the locomotor-activating effect of paraxanthine but does not affect caffeine's locomotor activity. In ex vivo experiments, paraxanthine increases striatal cGMP levels, whereas caffeine does not (
22). It is reasonable to assume that part of the proconvulsant effect of paraxanthine may be mediated by the activation of the NO-cGMP signaling pathway.
5.1. Conclusions
We concluded that the acute administration of paraxanthine has a proconvulsant effect. A dose-dependent effect of paraxanthine was observed at various stages of PTZ-induced seizures. Finally, the levels of brain NOx in animals administered L-arginine or L-NAME before paraxanthine administration suggest an interaction of the NO-cGMP pathway in the proconvulsant effect of paraxanthine.