https://doi.org/10.5812/jjnpp-152682

The Effect of Quercetin on the Expression of miR-21 and miR-34a-5p on HeLa and Ca Ski Cell Lines

authors:

avatar Seyyed Navid Mousavinejad ORCID 1 , avatar Mohammad Ali Takhshid ORCID 2 , avatar Siamak Salami ORCID 1 , avatar Marjan Khorsand ORCID 2 , avatar Fatemeh Asgari ORCID 3 , avatar Majid Sirati-Sabet ORCID 1 , *

Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Laboratory Sciences, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Student Research Committee, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Jundishapur Journal of Natural Pharmaceutical Products: Vol.19, issue 4; e152682
published online: October 21, 2024
article type: Research Article
received: August 6, 2024
revised: September 17, 2024
accepted: September 17, 2024

How To Cite Mousavinejad S N, Takhshid M A, Salami S, Khorsand M, Asgari F, et al. The Effect of Quercetin on the Expression of miR-21 and miR-34a-5p on HeLa and Ca Ski Cell Lines. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2024;19(4):e152682. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjnpp-152682.

Abstract

Background:

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women. In recent years, significant progress has been made in its treatment. Quercetin, a polyphenolic compound found in flavonoid-containing plants, is of interest due to its potential therapeutic effects. miR-21 plays a crucial role in cervical tumor metastasis by activating pathways related to invasion and migration, while miR-34a-5p is essential in regulating epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and preventing increased cell proliferation and migration. The findings of this study could provide insight into the role of quercetin in cancer cells.

Objectives:

This study aims to investigate the effect of quercetin on the expression levels of miR-21 and miR-34a-5p in HeLa and Ca Ski cervical cancer cell lines.

Methods:

In this study, HeLa and Ca Ski cells were treated with quercetin. Cell viability and apoptosis were evaluated using the MTT assay and flow cytometry over a 48-hour period. Additionally, the effects of quercetin on the expression levels of miR-21 and miR-34a-5p were analyzed using qRT-PCR.

Results:

The study demonstrated that quercetin inhibited the viability of HeLa and Ca Ski cells and induced apoptosis in these cells. Quercetin suppressed cell viability with an IC50 of 102.9 μM for HeLa and 304.1 μM for Ca Ski cells after 48 hours. Quercetin down-regulated miR-21 in HeLa and Ca Ski cell lines by 2.5 ± 0.1 (P = 0.045) and 2.0 ± 0.2 (P = 0.016) fold, respectively. Additionally, miR-34a-5p increased by 3.3 ± 0.7 (P = 0.010) and 2.4 ± 0.8 (P = 0.047) fold after exposure to quercetin in HeLa and Ca Ski cell lines, respectively.

Conclusions:

Our study showed that quercetin has an anti-cervical cancer effect and can be used alongside standard therapies as a promising agent with fewer side effects in cervical cancer treatment.

1. Background

Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer among women, with the most significant cause being infection with the HPV virus. Treatment options include surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, which are used alone or in combination (1).

Quercetin (3,5,7,3',4'-pentahydroxyflavone) is a polyphenolic compound derived from flavonoid-containing plants. Quercetin exhibits anti-inflammatory, antihypertensive, and especially anticancer properties. Some studies have highlighted the role of this compound in regulating proteins such as Akt, EGFR, IL-8, mTOR, NF-kB, PI3K, and TNF-α, as well as various microRNAs, including miR-21 and miR-34a-5p (2, 3).

MicroRNAs are essential for normal animal development and play a role in various biological processes. Abnormal expression of microRNAs is associated with many human diseases (4). miR-21 is one of the first identified microRNAs, with several target proteins, most of which are tumor suppressors such as PTEN. The expression of miR-21 is elevated in certain cancers. miR-21 plays a critical role in cervical tumor metastasis by activating pathways related to invasion and migration (5). Quercetin has been shown to reduce miR-21 expression in some cell types (6). On the other hand, the expression of miR-34a-5p is decreased in cervical tumors, and research has demonstrated that miR-34a-5p plays a significant role in inhibiting cell proliferation and migration (7).

The effect of quercetin on miR-21 and miR-34a-5p in cervical cancer cell lines such as HeLa and Ca Ski has not yet been explored. The results of this study may provide valuable insights into the role of quercetin in cancer cells.

2. Objectives

To investigate the effect of quercetin on the expression levels of miR-21 and miR-34a-5p in HeLa and Ca Ski cervical cancer cell lines.

3. Methods

3.1. Reagents and Cell Culture

Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), and penicillin-streptomycin were purchased from Gibco (USA). MTT and quercetin (CAS 117-39-5) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (USA), while dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was sourced from Merck (KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Cell-culture-grade chemicals and solutions were acquired from Biosera Europe (Neville, France) or other vendors and were used without further purification. Consumables were procured from SPL Life Sciences (Gyeonggi-do, Korea).

The human HeLa and Ca Ski cervical cancer cell lines were purchased from the National Center of Genetic and Biological Resources of Iran. The cell lines were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 1% penicillin-streptomycin at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere.

3.2. Bioinformatic Approaches

We identified the key microRNAs involved in cervical cancer using the HMDD v4.0 database (http://www.cuilab.cn/hmdd). This database classifies and displays the expression of the most relevant microRNAs related to specific cancers, based on laboratory-proven data and the number of published articles. Subsequently, we obtained the top twenty targets of miR-21 and miR-34a-5p, which are most significant in carcinogenesis, from the miRTarBase database. The findings were then visualized using the NetworkAnalyst website.

The PubChem database was used to identify all microRNAs targeted by quercetin that are involved in cancer, as well as all proven quercetin targets in the process of apoptosis. The data were finally illustrated using Cytoscape network drawing software (8).

3.3. Cytotoxicity Screening

The cytotoxicity of quercetin was evaluated using the MTT method as previously described (9). Cells were seeded at a density of 10,000 cells per well in a 96-well plate. A quercetin solution (100 mM) was prepared in DMSO, and different concentrations of the solution were diluted using the culture medium. Cells were treated with varying concentrations of quercetin (10 to 2000 μM) for 48 hours at 37°C. A stock solution of MTT (5 mg/mL) was added, and the plates were incubated for three hours in the dark at 37°C. The resulting formazan was solubilized using DMSO, and optical density was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (BioTek ELx800, USA) after two hours of incubation. IC25 and IC50 values were then calculated using GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 software.

3.4. Apoptosis Assay

The HeLa and Ca Ski cells were cultured in 12-well plates at a density of 2×10⁵ cells/well to investigate apoptosis using the Annexin V/PI technique. Cells were treated with 50 μM quercetin for HeLa cells and 200 μM quercetin for Ca Ski cells, with the negative control consisting of culture medium containing DMSO. After 48 hours, apoptosis was evaluated using the Annexin V-FITC/PI apoptosis kit from Abcam (USA). The Partec CyFlow Space flow cytometer (Germany) was used to assess the percentage of apoptosis, and FlowJo software was utilized to analyze the data (10).

3.5. RNA Extraction

Total RNA was extracted 48 hours post-quercetin treatment using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA). In brief, after removing the medium, TRIzol reagent was directly added to the cell culture flasks, and the lysate was homogenized by pipetting and swirling several times. The lysate was then transferred into an RNase-free tube and mixed with 0.2 mL chloroform. After a 3-minute incubation, the mixture was centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 minutes. The colorless upper aqueous phase, containing the RNA, was transferred to a new tube. RNA was precipitated using 0.5 mL isopropanol, followed by centrifugation at 12,000 g for 10 minutes at 4°C. The RNA pellet was washed with 75% ethanol, resuspended in 0.03 mL of RNase-free water, and either immediately processed for the next step or stored at -70°C. The quality of the RNA was assessed based on the 260/280 and 260/230 ratios using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific NanoDrop 2000, Finland).

3.6. cDNA Synthesis

Selected miRNA-specific cDNAs were generated using the Parsgenom RT reagent kit (Parsgenome, Iran), following the manufacturer's instructions. Poly A polymerization was performed to synthesize the cDNA. The reaction mixture included 5X reaction buffer, dNTP mix (10 mM), RT enzyme, cDNA synthesis primer (15 pM), and RNA with a Poly A tail (up to 2 μg), prepared according to the kit's instructions to generate specific cDNAs for each microRNA.

3.7. Real-Time qPCR Assay

The expression levels of miR-21 and miR-34a-5p were assessed through qRT-PCR using a StepOnePlus qPCR instrument (Applied Biosystems, Life Technologies Corporation, USA). Real-time PCR was conducted to analyze the cDNAs using the Parsgenom RT reagent kit (Parsgenome, Iran). The final PCR reaction volume (20 μL) consisted of 10 μL Sybr Green master mix, 1 μL primer mix (10 pM), 8 μL distilled water, and 1 μL cDNA. The qRT-PCR protocol included an initial denaturation at 95˚C for 15 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 95˚C for 30 seconds, 63˚C for 30 seconds, and 72˚C for 30 seconds. A melting curve analysis was performed to confirm the specificity of the products. The qRT-PCR amplification efficiency and cycle threshold (Ct) values were analyzed using the LinRegPCR program. Expression values were normalized using U6 rRNA as a reference gene and presented as relative expression using the 2–ΔΔCt method (11). Relative gene expression values lower than 1 were converted into fold change using the following formula:

Fold change=-1 Expression

3.8. Statistical Analyses

The data is presented as mean ± SD. GraphPad Prism version 8.0.2, was used for statistical analysis. Both methodological and biological replicates were included in the study. A statistically significant difference was defined as P < 0.05. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess the normal distribution of continuous numerical variables. ANOVA, followed by Bonferroni's test, was used to statistically evaluate flow cytometry analyses.

4. Results

4.1. Bioinformatic Studies

4.1.1. MicroRNAs Involved in Cervical Cancer

According to the bioinformatics findings, based on the number of articles registered until July 20, 2024, miR-21 (48 articles) and miR-34a-5p (28 articles) have the highest number of registered articles related to cervical cancer (Figure 1A).

Bioinformatic Studies. A, microRNAs involved in cervical cancer; B, prediction of miR-21; C, top twenty targets of miR-21 using the miRTarBase database based on the ranking of the number of articles registered until July 20, 2024; D, miR- 34a-5p targets; E, top twenty targets of miR-34a-5p using the miRTarBase database based on the ranking of the number of articles registered until July 20, 2024; F, some target microRNAs of quercetin involved in the cancer process; G, prediction the effect of quercetin on apoptosis
Bioinformatic Studies. A, microRNAs involved in cervical cancer; B, prediction of miR-21; C, top twenty targets of miR-21 using the miRTarBase database based on the ranking of the number of articles registered until July 20, 2024; D, miR- 34a-5p targets; E, top twenty targets of miR-34a-5p using the miRTarBase database based on the ranking of the number of articles registered until July 20, 2024; F, some target microRNAs of quercetin involved in the cancer process; G, prediction the effect of quercetin on apoptosis
Figure 1.

Bioinformatic Studies. A, microRNAs involved in cervical cancer; B, prediction of miR-21; C, top twenty targets of miR-21 using the miRTarBase database based on the ranking of the number of articles registered until July 20, 2024; D, miR- 34a-5p targets; E, top twenty targets of miR-34a-5p using the miRTarBase database based on the ranking of the number of articles registered until July 20, 2024; F, some target microRNAs of quercetin involved in the cancer process; G, prediction the effect of quercetin on apoptosis

4.1.2. Prediction of miR-21 and miR-34a-5p Targets by Bioinformatics

Targets of miR-21 (Figure 1B) and miR-34a-5p (Figure 1D) were mapped using bioinformatics, and the top twenty targets were selected based on the highest scores as of July 20, 2024. These targets were also identified as factors involved in carcinogenesis (Figure 1C and E).

4.1.3 Important Target microRNAs of Quercetin Involved in the Cancer Process

All target microRNAs of quercetin involved in the regulation of cancer-related genes were identified through analysis, revealing that miR-21 and miR-34a-5p are among the targets of quercetin (Figure 1F).

4.1.4 Prediction the Effect of Quercetin on Apoptosis

Some important targets of quercetin involved in the process of apoptosis were identified using the PubChem database. According to these findings, quercetin has been shown to increase the expression of apoptosis-activating proteins and decrease the expression of apoptosis-inhibiting proteins (Figure 1G).

4.2. Cytotoxicity Assay

Quercetin suppressed the viability of HeLa cells with IC25 and IC50 values of 54.6 μM and 102.9 μM, respectively, after 48 hours of treatment (Figure 2A and B). The IC25 and IC50 for Ca Ski cells after 48 hours of quercetin treatment were 172.2 μM and 304.1 μM, respectively (Figure 3A and B).

A, the curve of the dose-response of HeLa cells of cervical cancer with 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, 1000 and 2000 μM quercetin for 48 hours; B, treatment of HeLa cells of cervical cancer with 100 μM quercetin for 48 hours
A, the curve of the dose-response of HeLa cells of cervical cancer with 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, 1000 and 2000 μM quercetin for 48 hours; B, treatment of HeLa cells of cervical cancer with 100 μM quercetin for 48 hours
Figure 2.

A, the curve of the dose-response of HeLa cells of cervical cancer with 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, 1000 and 2000 μM quercetin for 48 hours; B, treatment of HeLa cells of cervical cancer with 100 μM quercetin for 48 hours

A, The curve of the dose-response of Ca Ski cells of cervical cancer with 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, 1000 and 2000 μM quercetin for 48 hours; B, treatment of Ca Ski cells of cervical cancer with 300 μM quercetin for 48 hours
A, The curve of the dose-response of Ca Ski cells of cervical cancer with 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, 1000 and 2000 μM quercetin for 48 hours; B, treatment of Ca Ski cells of cervical cancer with 300 μM quercetin for 48 hours
Figure 3.

A, The curve of the dose-response of Ca Ski cells of cervical cancer with 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 300, 500, 1000 and 2000 μM quercetin for 48 hours; B, treatment of Ca Ski cells of cervical cancer with 300 μM quercetin for 48 hours

4.3. Effect of Quercetin on Apoptosis

The effect of quercetin on apoptosis in HeLa (Figure 4A) and Ca Ski (Figure 4B) cervical cancer cell lines was investigated at the IC25 concentration of quercetin. Treatment with quercetin significantly induced both primary and secondary apoptosis in HeLa (Figure 4C) and Ca Ski (Figure 4D) cell lines at 50 μM and 200 μM of quercetin, respectively, compared to the control (P < 0.05).

Flow cytometry diagram of apoptosis induction in HeLa (A) and Ca Ski (B) cell lines by quercetin. Evaluation of primary and secondary apoptosis in HeLa (C) and Ca Ski (D) cell lines by quercetin. Any indicative value mean ± SD (n = 3). Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni test. * P < 0.05
Flow cytometry diagram of apoptosis induction in HeLa (A) and Ca Ski (B) cell lines by quercetin. Evaluation of primary and secondary apoptosis in HeLa (C) and Ca Ski (D) cell lines by quercetin. Any indicative value mean ± SD (n = 3). Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni test. * P < 0.05
Figure 4.

Flow cytometry diagram of apoptosis induction in HeLa (A) and Ca Ski (B) cell lines by quercetin. Evaluation of primary and secondary apoptosis in HeLa (C) and Ca Ski (D) cell lines by quercetin. Any indicative value mean ± SD (n = 3). Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni test. * P < 0.05

4.4. Expression of miR-21 and miR-34a-5p

The expression levels of miR-21 and miR-34a-5p in HeLa (Figure 5A) and Ca Ski (Figure 5B) cervical cancer cell lines were evaluated after treatment with 100 μM and 300 μM quercetin for 48 hours, respectively.

Expression of miR-21 and miR-34a-5p in HeLa (A) and Ca Ski (B) cell lines of cervical cancer in cells treated with 100 μM and 300 μM quercetin concentration for 48 hours compared to control, respectively. * P < 0.05.
Expression of miR-21 and miR-34a-5p in HeLa (A) and Ca Ski (B) cell lines of cervical cancer in cells treated with 100 μM and 300 μM quercetin concentration for 48 hours compared to control, respectively. * P < 0.05.
Figure 5.

Expression of miR-21 and miR-34a-5p in HeLa (A) and Ca Ski (B) cell lines of cervical cancer in cells treated with 100 μM and 300 μM quercetin concentration for 48 hours compared to control, respectively. * P < 0.05.

In HeLa cells treated with quercetin, the expression levels of miR-21 and miR-34a-5p compared to control cells showed a significant difference of 0.4 ± 0.1 (fold change = -2.5 ± 0.1, P = 0.045) and 3.3 ± 0.7 (fold change = 3.3 ± 0.7, P = 0.010), respectively (P < 0.05).

In Ca Ski cells treated with quercetin, the expression levels of miR-21 and miR-34a-5p compared to control cells showed a significant difference of 0.5 ± 0.2 (fold change = -2 ± 0.2, P = 0.016) and 2.4 ± 0.8 (fold change = 2.4 ± 0.8, P = 0.047), respectively (P < 0.05).

In both cell lines, quercetin decreased the expression of miR-21 and increased the expression of miR-34a-5p.

5. Discussion

In the present study, the role of quercetin in preventing the proliferation of cervical cancer cells was investigated. Additionally, the effect of quercetin on the expression of two important microRNAs involved in cervical cancer was evaluated.

Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy are commonly used in the treatment of cervical cancer. However, the side effects of certain drugs used in chemotherapy protocols have limited their use (12). Recently, the important role of natural plant extracts, including supportive supplements, in cancer treatment has gained attention (2).

Bioinformatics studies have highlighted the role of various microRNAs in cervical cancer. The results of this research showed that miR-21 (48 articles) and miR-34a-5p (28 articles) have the highest number of registered studies related to cervical cancer. It was also found that quercetin can affect the expression levels of these two microRNAs. However, based on a literature review, this study is the first to investigate the effect of quercetin on the expression of miR-21 (an oncogenic microRNA) and miR-34a-5p (a tumor suppressor microRNA) in HeLa and Ca Ski cervical cancer cell lines. The HeLa and Ca Ski cell lines are immortalized cells derived from cervical cancer tissue caused by HPV-18 and HPV-16, respectively.

Quercetin is a polyphenol compound with proven anti-cancer effects and minimal side effects (2). The results of this study demonstrated that quercetin could suppress the proliferation of HeLa and Ca Ski cancer cells. The effect of quercetin on the proliferation of cervical cancer cells in this study is consistent with its effects on breast and ovarian cancer cell lines (13). In a study reported by Xu et al., quercetin enhanced the inhibitory effect of cisplatin on the migration and invasion of cervical cancer cells. In that study, the combination of quercetin and cisplatin increased cisplatin's effect on the expression of ezrin protein in HeLa and SiHa cells, and a decrease in MMP2 expression was also observed. According to Xu's study and the present results, quercetin may have beneficial effects when used alongside standard treatments by promoting apoptosis and inhibiting the proliferation, migration, and invasion of cervical cancer cells (14).

The present study also showed an increase in apoptosis in cells treated with quercetin. Several studies have pointed to quercetin's role in suppressing anti-apoptotic proteins and increasing the expression of pro-apoptotic proteins in cervical cancer (15). In this study, factors involved in the process of apoptosis under the influence of quercetin were investigated using data from the PubChem database. Some of these targets include pro-apoptotic proteins such as BAX, BID, BAD, and BAK, and anti-apoptotic proteins like Bcl-2 and Bcl2A1, according to bioinformatic analyses. Additionally, quercetin was found to increase the expression of caspase family proteins, which promote apoptosis through both the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways.

MicroRNAs are considered important regulators of gene expression and signaling pathways. Studies have shown that changes in the expression of these molecules can disrupt cellular systems, such as the cell proliferation cycle and migration, potentially leading to serious consequences, including cancer (16). In the present study, the effect of quercetin on the expression of miR-21 in HeLa and Ca Ski cervical cancer cell lines was investigated, and it was found that quercetin reduces the expression of miR-21. Several studies have identified miR-21 as an onco-miR, with increased expression being linked to many cancers, including cervical cancer (17). A study conducted on three cervical cancer cell lines SiHa, HeLa, and C33a demonstrated that elevated miR-21 expression is associated with increased metastasis and tumor growth in cervical cancer (18). In 2021, Alshammari et al. explored the relationship between quercetin-induced reduction of miR-21 expression and the improvement of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in a mouse model (6). Thus, the results of the present study highlight the positive effect of quercetin, a plant extract with minimal side effects, in aiding the treatment of cervical cancer by suppressing miR-21 expression.

Another microRNA examined in this research was miR-34a-5p, which has reduced expression levels in many cancers, including cervical cancer (19). miR-34a-5p, as a tumor suppressor, negatively affects processes related to cancer progression, such as epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasion, and metastasis (20). Quercetin was found to increase the expression of miR-34a-5p in cancer cells. A study showed that quercetin-induced miR-34a-5p activates p53, which in turn promotes apoptosis and cell death in the HepG2 cell line, associated with liver carcinoma (21). Additionally, in a 2020 study, Chai et al. investigated the relationship between miR-34a-5p and quercetin in a non-small cell lung carcinoma cell line and its effect on apoptosis. The results demonstrated that quercetin plays a significant role in increasing the expression of miR-34a-5p, and this increase was associated with enhanced apoptosis (22). In the present study, the effect of quercetin on miR-34a-5p expression in Ca Ski and HeLa cervical cancer cell lines was investigated, and the results showed an increase in miR-34a-5p expression when these cells were treated with quercetin.

miR-21 is considered an onco-miR, while miR-34a-5p acts as a tumor suppressor. Therefore, reducing miR-21 and increasing miR-34a-5p levels is desirable in cancer treatment. In the present study, quercetin was observed to decrease miR-21 and increase miR-34a-5p levels in HeLa and Ca Ski cervical cancer cell lines.

According to previous studies, several mechanisms have been proposed regarding quercetin's effect on the expression of miR-21 and miR-34a-5p. p53, STAT3, NF-κB, and IL-6 are associated with quercetin's effect on miR-21, while p53, HIF-1α, and ZEB1 are related to its effect on miR-34a-5p. Quercetin increases p53 levels in cervical cancer cells. It has been suggested that quercetin interacts with the HPV E6 protein in HeLa and SiHa cell lines, potentially preventing p53 degradation by disrupting the formation of the E6AP/E6/p53 complex (23). Some studies highlight p53's role in reducing miR-21 expression (24) and increasing miR-34a-5p expression (25) in various cancers. Therefore, quercetin may decrease miR-21 and increase miR-34a-5p expression through the p53 pathway.

Furthermore, research points to quercetin's role in reducing STAT3 (26) and IL-6 (27) expression, as well as inhibiting NF-κB (28). Several studies indicate that miR-21 is upregulated by STAT3, IL-6 (29), and NF-κB (30). As a result, quercetin may reduce miR-21 levels by influencing these factors.

Recent studies have confirmed that quercetin suppresses the expression of HIF-1α (31) and ZEB1 (32). Additionally, researchers have reported that HIF-1α (33) and ZEB1 (34) play a role in suppressing miR-34a-5p. Based on this, quercetin may induce the expression of miR-34a-5p by inhibiting HIF-1α and ZEB1.

Quercetin shows promise as a natural compound with low side effects that could complement standard approaches in the treatment of cervical cancer. However, animal studies have shown that quercetin can exacerbate adverse effects in already pre-damaged kidneys. Therefore, quercetin may pose a risk for cervical cancer patients with impaired renal function (35). While the occurrence of harmful effects from quercetin in humans remains low, its consumption cannot be considered entirely without adverse effects. Future studies are suggested to further explore the mechanisms through which quercetin affects miR-21 and miR-34a-5p expression in cervical cancer.

5.1. Conclusions

Quercetin has the ability to inhibit the growth of HeLa and Ca Ski cervical cancer cell lines and induce apoptosis. Additionally, quercetin reduces the expression of miR-21 and increases the expression of miR-34a-5p in these cells. Given its anti-cancer properties, quercetin shows promise as a potential therapeutic agent with fewer side effects, making it a valuable complement to standard treatments for cervical cancer.

References

  • 1.

    Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, Denny L. Cervical cancer. Lancet. 2019;393(10167):169-82. [PubMed ID: 30638582]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32470-X.

  • 2.

    Salehi B, Machin L, Monzote L, Sharifi-Rad J, Ezzat SM, Salem MA, et al. Therapeutic Potential of Quercetin: New Insights and Perspectives for Human Health. ACS Omega. 2020;5(20):11849-72. [PubMed ID: 32478277]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7254783]. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c01818.

  • 3.

    Sethi G, Rath P, Chauhan A, Ranjan A, Choudhary R, Ramniwas S, et al. Apoptotic Mechanisms of Quercetin in Liver Cancer: Recent Trends and Advancements. Pharmaceut. 2023;15(2). [PubMed ID: 36840034]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9960374]. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics15020712.

  • 4.

    Paul P, Chakraborty A, Sarkar D, Langthasa M, Rahman M, Bari M, et al. Interplay between miRNAs and human diseases. J Cell Physiol. 2018;233(3):2007-18. [PubMed ID: 28181241]. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.25854.

  • 5.

    Hashemi M, Mirdamadi MSA, Talebi Y, Khaniabad N, Banaei G, Daneii P, et al. Pre-clinical and clinical importance of miR-21 in human cancers: Tumorigenesis, therapy response, delivery approaches and targeting agents. Pharmacol Res. 2023;187:106568. [PubMed ID: 36423787]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106568.

  • 6.

    Alshammari GM, Al-Qahtani WH, AlFaris NA, Alzahrani NS, Alkhateeb MA, Yahya MA. Quercetin prevents cadmium chloride-induced hepatic steatosis and fibrosis by downregulating the transcription of miR-21. Biofactors. 2021;47(3):489-505. [PubMed ID: 33733575]. https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.1724.

  • 7.

    Fu J, Imani S, Wu MY, Wu RC. MicroRNA-34 Family in Cancers: Role, Mechanism, and Therapeutic Potential. Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(19). [PubMed ID: 37835417]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10571940]. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15194723.

  • 8.

    Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga NS, Wang JT, Ramage D, et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003;13(11):2498-504. [PubMed ID: 14597658]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC403769]. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.1239303.

  • 9.

    Kumar P, Nagarajan A, Uchil PD. Analysis of Cell Viability by the MTT Assay. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2018;2018(6). [PubMed ID: 29858338]. https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot095505.

  • 10.

    Crowley LC, Marfell BJ, Scott AP, Waterhouse NJ. Quantitation of Apoptosis and Necrosis by Annexin V Binding, Propidium Iodide Uptake, and Flow Cytometry. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2016;2016(11). https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.prot087288.

  • 11.

    Ruijter JM, Ramakers C, Hoogaars WM, Karlen Y, Bakker O, van den Hoff MJ, et al. Amplification efficiency: linking baseline and bias in the analysis of quantitative PCR data. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(6). e45. [PubMed ID: 19237396]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2665230]. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp045.

  • 12.

    Palagudi M, Para S, Golla N, Meduri KC, Duvvuri SP, Vityala Y, et al. Adverse Effects of Cancer Treatment in Patients With Cervical Cancer. Cureus. 2024;16(2). e54106. [PubMed ID: 38487144]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10938271]. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.54106.

  • 13.

    Xintaropoulou C, Ward C, Wise A, Marston H, Turnbull A, Langdon SP. A comparative analysis of inhibitors of the glycolysis pathway in breast and ovarian cancer cell line models. Oncotarget. 2015;6(28):25677-95. [PubMed ID: 26259240]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4694858]. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.4499.

  • 14.

    Xu W, Xie S, Chen X, Pan S, Qian H, Zhu X. Effects of Quercetin on the Efficacy of Various Chemotherapeutic Drugs in Cervical Cancer Cells. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021;15:577-88. [PubMed ID: 33623367]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7894806]. https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S291865.

  • 15.

    He C, Lu X, Li J, Shen K, Bai Y, Li Y, et al. The effect of quercetin on cervical cancer cells as determined by inducing tumor endoplasmic reticulum stress and apoptosis and its mechanism of action. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(5):5240-7. [PubMed ID: 34150114]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8205781].

  • 16.

    Medina PP, Slack FJ. MicroRNAs and cancer: An overview. Cell Cycle. 2014;7(16):2485-92. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.7.16.6453.

  • 17.

    Singh A, Singh AK, Giri R, Kumar D, Sharma R, Valis M, et al. The role of microRNA-21 in the onset and progression of cancer. Future Med Chem. 2021;13(21):1885-906. [PubMed ID: 34590501]. https://doi.org/10.4155/fmc-2021-0096.

  • 18.

    Han Y, Li Q, Ling C, Jin M, Li D, Zhong J, et al. HPV-Induced MiR-21 Promotes Epithelial Mesenchymal Transformation and Tumor Progression in Cervical Cancer Cells through the TGFbeta R2/hTERC Pathway. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022;2022:6297694. [PubMed ID: 36105448]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9458404]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6297694.

  • 19.

    Aida R, Hagiwara K, Okano K, Nakata K, Obata Y, Yamashita T, et al. miR-34a-5p might have an important role for inducing apoptosis by down-regulation of SNAI1 in apigenin-treated lung cancer cells. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48(3):2291-7. [PubMed ID: 33675467]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8060201]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06255-7.

  • 20.

    Nie D, Fu J, Chen H, Cheng J, Fu J. Roles of MicroRNA-34a in Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition, Competing Endogenous RNA Sponging and Its Therapeutic Potential. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(4). [PubMed ID: 30781524]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6413055]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20040861.

  • 21.

    Lou G, Liu Y, Wu S, Xue J, Yang F, Fu H, et al. The p53/miR-34a/SIRT1 Positive Feedback Loop in Quercetin-Induced Apoptosis. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;35(6):2192-202. [PubMed ID: 25896587]. https://doi.org/10.1159/000374024.

  • 22.

    Chai R, Xu C, Lu L, Liu X, Ma Z. Quercetin inhibits proliferation of and induces apoptosis in non-small-cell lung carcinoma via the lncRNA SNHG7/miR-34a-5p pathway. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2021;43(6):693-703. [PubMed ID: 34448661]. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923973.2021.1966032.

  • 23.

    Clemente-Soto AF, Salas-Vidal E, Milan-Pacheco C, Sanchez-Carranza JN, Peralta-Zaragoza O, Gonzalez-Maya L. Quercetin induces G2 phase arrest and apoptosis with the activation of p53 in an E6 expression‑independent manner in HPV‑positive human cervical cancer‑derived cells. Mol Med Rep. 2019;19(3):2097-106. [PubMed ID: 30664221]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6390007]. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2019.9850.

  • 24.

    Ma X, Choudhury SN, Hua X, Dai Z, Li Y. Interaction of the oncogenic miR-21 microRNA and the p53 tumor suppressor pathway. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34(6):1216-23. [PubMed ID: 23385064]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3670255]. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgt044.

  • 25.

    Navarro F, Lieberman J. miR-34 and p53: New Insights into a Complex Functional Relationship. PLoS One. 2015;10(7). e0132767. [PubMed ID: 26177460]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4503669]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132767.

  • 26.

    Yu D, Ye T, Xiang Y, Shi Z, Zhang J, Lou B, et al. Quercetin inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition, decreases invasiveness and metastasis, and reverses IL-6 induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition, expression of MMP by inhibiting STAT3 signaling in pancreatic cancer cells. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:4719-29. [PubMed ID: 29026320]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5626388]. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S136840.

  • 27.

    Lee HN, Shin SA, Choo GS, Kim HJ, Park YS, Kim BS, et al. Anti‑inflammatory effect of quercetin and galangin in LPS‑stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages and DNCB‑induced atopic dermatitis animal models. Int J Mol Med. 2018;41(2):888-98. [PubMed ID: 29207037]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5752163]. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2017.3296.

  • 28.

    Chekalina N, Burmak Y, Petrov Y, Borisova Z, Manusha Y, Kazakov Y, et al. Quercetin reduces the transcriptional activity of NF-kB in stable coronary artery disease. Indian Heart J. 2018;70(5):593-7. [PubMed ID: 30392493]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6204471]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2018.04.006.

  • 29.

    Zhu C, Zhang M, Hu J, Li H, Liu S, Li T, et al. Prognostic effect of IL-6/JAK2/STAT3 signal-induced microRNA-21-5p expression on short term recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11(8):4169-78. [PubMed ID: 31949811]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6962805].

  • 30.

    Wu J, Ding J, Yang J, Guo X, Zheng Y. MicroRNA Roles in the Nuclear Factor Kappa B Signaling Pathway in Cancer. Front Immunol. 2018;9:546. [PubMed ID: 29616037]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5868594]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00546.

  • 31.

    Lee DH, Lee YJ. Quercetin suppresses hypoxia-induced accumulation of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha) through inhibiting protein synthesis. J Cell Biochem. 2008;105(2):546-53. [PubMed ID: 18655183]. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.21851.

  • 32.

    Chen B, Li X, Wu L, Zhou D, Song Y, Zhang L, et al. Quercetin Suppresses Human Glioblastoma Migration and Invasion via GSK3beta/beta-catenin/ZEB1 Signaling Pathway. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:963614. [PubMed ID: 36386155]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9663482]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2022.963614.

  • 33.

    Li XJ, Ren ZJ, Tang JH. MicroRNA-34a: a potential therapeutic target in human cancer. Cell Death & Disease. 2014;5(7):e1327. https://doi.org/10.1038/cddis.2014.270.

  • 34.

    Ahn YH, Gibbons DL, Chakravarti D, Creighton CJ, Rizvi ZH, Adams HP, et al. ZEB1 drives prometastatic actin cytoskeletal remodeling by downregulating miR-34a expression. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(9):3170-83. [PubMed ID: 22850877]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3428095]. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI63608.

  • 35.

    Andres S, Pevny S, Ziegenhagen R, Bakhiya N, Schafer B, Hirsch-Ernst KI, et al. Safety Aspects of the Use of Quercetin as a Dietary Supplement. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2018;62(1). [PubMed ID: 29127724]. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201700447.