1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Animals
3.2. Experimental Approach and Grouping
3.3. Cerebral Ischemia
3.4. Neurological Examination
3.5. Radial Arm Water Maze Test
3.6. Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining
3.7. Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability
3.8. Immunohistochemistry
3.9. Data Analyses
4. Results
4.1. The Combination of Chrysin with Gallic Acid Protects Hippocampal Neurons Against Cerebral Ischemia
A, representative images of tissue sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) in the hippocampal CA1, CA3, and D.G regions (400x magnification). The percentages of living cells in the hippocampal regions; B, CA1, C, CA3; and D, D.G are presented for the sham-operated group, the control group [bilateral common carotid artery occlusion (BCCAO) + DMSO], and groups treated with chrysin (BCCAO + chrysin), gallic acid (GA) (BCCAO + GA), and their combination (BCCAO + chrysin + GA). The results are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 5, each). ### P < 0.001 vs. sham group, *** P < 0.001, vs. BCCAO + DMSO as control group. ^^^ P < 0.001 vs. chrysin and G.A groups, + P < 0.05 vs. chrysin group.
4.2. The Combination of Chrysin with Gallic Acid Reduced Spatial Memory Impairment and Neurological Deficit Score Following Cerebral Ischemia
A, escape latency time (in seconds) during the four days of training using the RAWM; B, escape latency time in the probe trial; C, time spent in the target zone; and D, neurological deficit scores are shown in the sham-operated group, control group [bilateral common carotid artery occlusion (BCCAO) + DMSO], and groups treated with chrysin (BCCAO + chrysin), gallic acid (GA) (BCCAO + GA), and their combination (BCCAO + chrysin + GA). Parametric results are presented as mean ± SEM, while non-parametric data (escape latency time and neurological deficit scores) are displayed as the median and interquartile range (IQR) (n = 6, each). Statistical significance is indicated as ### P < 0.001, ## P < 0.01, and # P < 0.05 compared to the sham group, and ** P < 0.01 and * P < 0.05 compared to the BCCAO + DMSO group.
4.3. The Combination of Chrysin with Gallic Acid Enhanced the Expression of Claudin-5 and Reduced Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Following Cerebral Ischemia
A, immunofluorescence images show claudin-5 expression in the endothelial cells of brain blood vessels (400x magnification). Green indicates claudin-5, while blue represents DAPI (nuclear stain); B, quantitative analysis of claudin-5 expression (n = 4, each); and C, EB leakage (µg/g/tissue, n = 7, each) into brain tissue are presented for the sham-operated group, the control group [bilateral common carotid artery occlusion (BCCAO) + DMSO], and the groups treated with chrysin (BCCAO + chrysin), gallic acid (GA) (BCCAO + GA), and their combination (BCCAO + chrysin + GA). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM, with statistical significance indicated as ### P < 0.001 compared to the sham group, *** P < 0.001 compared to the BCCAO + DMSO group, and ^ P < 0.05 compared to the BCCAO + GA group. Scale bar = 100 μm.
![A, representative images of tissue sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) in the hippocampal CA1, CA3, and D.G regions (400x magnification). The percentages of living cells in the hippocampal regions; B, CA1, C, CA3; and D, D.G are presented for the sham-operated group, the control group [bilateral common carotid artery occlusion (BCCAO) + DMSO], and groups treated with chrysin (BCCAO + chrysin), gallic acid (GA) (BCCAO + GA), and their combination (BCCAO + chrysin + GA). The results are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 5, each). ### P < 0.001 vs. sham group, *** P < 0.001, vs. BCCAO + DMSO as control group. ^^^ P < 0.001 vs. chrysin and G.A groups, + P < 0.05 vs. chrysin group. A, representative images of tissue sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) in the hippocampal CA1, CA3, and D.G regions (400x magnification). The percentages of living cells in the hippocampal regions; B, CA1, C, CA3; and D, D.G are presented for the sham-operated group, the control group [bilateral common carotid artery occlusion (BCCAO) + DMSO], and groups treated with chrysin (BCCAO + chrysin), gallic acid (GA) (BCCAO + GA), and their combination (BCCAO + chrysin + GA). The results are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 5, each). ### P < 0.001 vs. sham group, *** P < 0.001, vs. BCCAO + DMSO as control group. ^^^ P < 0.001 vs. chrysin and G.A groups, + P < 0.05 vs. chrysin group.](https://brieflands.com/journals/jjnpp/articles/159908/figures/jjnpp-159908-i001-F1-preview.webp)
![A, escape latency time (in seconds) during the four days of training using the RAWM; B, escape latency time in the probe trial; C, time spent in the target zone; and D, neurological deficit scores are shown in the sham-operated group, control group [bilateral common carotid artery occlusion (BCCAO) + DMSO], and groups treated with chrysin (BCCAO + chrysin), gallic acid (GA) (BCCAO + GA), and their combination (BCCAO + chrysin + GA). Parametric results are presented as mean ± SEM, while non-parametric data (escape latency time and neurological deficit scores) are displayed as the median and interquartile range (IQR) (n = 6, each). Statistical significance is indicated as ### P < 0.001, ## P < 0.01, and # P < 0.05 compared to the sham group, and ** P < 0.01 and * P < 0.05 compared to the BCCAO + DMSO group. A, escape latency time (in seconds) during the four days of training using the RAWM; B, escape latency time in the probe trial; C, time spent in the target zone; and D, neurological deficit scores are shown in the sham-operated group, control group [bilateral common carotid artery occlusion (BCCAO) + DMSO], and groups treated with chrysin (BCCAO + chrysin), gallic acid (GA) (BCCAO + GA), and their combination (BCCAO + chrysin + GA). Parametric results are presented as mean ± SEM, while non-parametric data (escape latency time and neurological deficit scores) are displayed as the median and interquartile range (IQR) (n = 6, each). Statistical significance is indicated as ### P < 0.001, ## P < 0.01, and # P < 0.05 compared to the sham group, and ** P < 0.01 and * P < 0.05 compared to the BCCAO + DMSO group.](https://brieflands.com/journals/jjnpp/articles/159908/figures/jjnpp-159908-i002-F2-preview.webp)
![A, immunofluorescence images show claudin-5 expression in the endothelial cells of brain blood vessels (400x magnification). Green indicates claudin-5, while blue represents DAPI (nuclear stain); B, quantitative analysis of claudin-5 expression (n = 4, each); and C, EB leakage (µg/g/tissue, n = 7, each) into brain tissue are presented for the sham-operated group, the control group [bilateral common carotid artery occlusion (BCCAO) + DMSO], and the groups treated with chrysin (BCCAO + chrysin), gallic acid (GA) (BCCAO + GA), and their combination (BCCAO + chrysin + GA). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM, with statistical significance indicated as ### P < 0.001 compared to the sham group, *** P < 0.001 compared to the BCCAO + DMSO group, and ^ P < 0.05 compared to the BCCAO + GA group. Scale bar = 100 μm. A, immunofluorescence images show claudin-5 expression in the endothelial cells of brain blood vessels (400x magnification). Green indicates claudin-5, while blue represents DAPI (nuclear stain); B, quantitative analysis of claudin-5 expression (n = 4, each); and C, EB leakage (µg/g/tissue, n = 7, each) into brain tissue are presented for the sham-operated group, the control group [bilateral common carotid artery occlusion (BCCAO) + DMSO], and the groups treated with chrysin (BCCAO + chrysin), gallic acid (GA) (BCCAO + GA), and their combination (BCCAO + chrysin + GA). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM, with statistical significance indicated as ### P < 0.001 compared to the sham group, *** P < 0.001 compared to the BCCAO + DMSO group, and ^ P < 0.05 compared to the BCCAO + GA group. Scale bar = 100 μm.](https://brieflands.com/journals/jjnpp/articles/159908/figures/jjnpp-159908-i003-F3-preview.webp)