1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Plant Collection and Preparation of Hydroalcoholic Extract
3.2. Animals and Induction of Diabetes
3.3. Analysis of Serum Biochemical Parameters and Histological Examination
3.4. Islets Isolation and Incubation with Hydro-Alcoholic Extract
3.5. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Effects of the Extract on the Body Weight and Blood Glucose Levels
| Groups (N = 9) | Body Weight, g | Fasting Blood Glucose, mg/dL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | After Intervention | Initial | After Intervention | |
| HC | 266.78 ± 10.89 | 253.33 ± 18.43 | 93.11 ± 12.23 | 93.22 ± 11.51 |
| DC | 240.00 ± 20.31 | 209.78 ± 50.97c | 331.42 ± 77.75c | 389.00 ± 132.93c |
| DT250 | 267.22 ± 30.32 | 235.00 ± 26.92d | 462.67 ± 90.17 | 158.00 ± 106.54d |
| DT500 | 255.44 ± 26.71 | 244.44 ± 44.47d | 364.89 ± 129.52 | 93.78 ± 12.56d |
Abbreviations: DC, diabetic control; HC, healthy control.
aValues are expressed as mean ± SD.
bComparisons were made using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test.
cSignificant difference with HC (P < 0.05).
dSignificant difference with DC (P < 0.001).
4.2. Effects of the Extract on the Parameters Related to Insulin
Abbreviations: DC, diabetic control; HC, healthy control; HOMA-β, the homeostasis model assessment of β cell function; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase.
aValues are expressed as mean ± SD.
bSignificant difference with DC (P < 0.001).
cSignificant difference with DC (P < 0.05).
4.3. Effects of the Extract on the Biochemical Parameters
| Groups (N = 9) | AST, U/L | ALT, U/L | Total Protein, g/dL | Albumin, g/dL | Total Bilirubin, mg/dL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC | 143 ± 32.44 | 64 ± 13.56 | 8.04 ± 0.68 | 3.76 ± 0.24 | 0.23 ± 0.52 |
| DC | 162 ± 39.30 | 115 ± 37.08 | 7.36 ± 0.65 | 3.20 ± 0.54 | 0.44 ± 0.18 |
| DT250 | 152 ± 46.78 | 99 ± 41.97 | 7.87 ± 0.36 | 3.55 ± 0.25b | 0.41 ± 0.16 |
| DT500 | 146 ± 26.86 | 70 ± 19.41b | 7.81 ± 0.52 | 3.80 ± 0.18b | 0.31 ± 0.12b |
Abbreviations: AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; DC, diabetic control; HC, healthy control.
aValues are expressed as mean ± SD.
bSignificant difference with DC (P < 0.05).
Abbreviation: HC, healthy control.
aValues are expressed as mean ± SD.
bInsulin level (µIU/islets/24 h).
cT0.01, the islets treated with 0.01 mg/mL of the extract.
dSignificant difference compared to basal glucose (P < 0.05).
eT0.1, the islets treated with 0.1 mg/mL of the extract.
fT1.0, the islets treated with 1.0 mg/mL of the extract.
4.4. Effects of the Extract on the Pancreas, Liver, and Kidney Histopathology
Histopathological evaluation of liver. Healthy control (A); diabetic control (B); diabetic rats treated with 250 mg/kg of the extract (C); diabetic rats treated with 500 mg/kg of the extract (D); (H&E X300); notice to the condensed nuclei (arrows) and cytoplasm surrounding of nucleus in the diabetic control in (B).
Histopathological evaluation of kidney. Healthy control (A); diabetic control (B); diabetic treated with 250 mg/kg of the extract (C); diabetic treated with 500 mg/kg of the extract (D); (H&E X300); notice to the destruction of some renal tubules (rectangle) and glomeruli (black arrows) also, increase in urinary space (white arrows) in (B), and cellular infiltration into interstitial tissue (black arrows in (C)).


