Comparison of Standard and Impedance Methods for the Detection of Enterococci Contamination in Medicinal Herbs in Iran

authors:

avatar Maryam Ekhtelat ORCID 1 , * , avatar Maryam Maghamesi Mahmoodi 1 , avatar Ali Fazlara 2 , avatar Forough Namjoyan 1

Medicinal Plant Research Center, School of Pharmacy, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
Department of Food Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran

How To Cite Ekhtelat M, Maghamesi Mahmoodi M, Fazlara A, Namjoyan F. Comparison of Standard and Impedance Methods for the Detection of Enterococci Contamination in Medicinal Herbs in Iran. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2019;14(2):e64341. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjnpp.64341.

Abstract

Background:

Medicinal herbs have a long record of application in therapy throughout the world. Today, knowledge and public acceptability of the usage of herbal drugs is on a growing trend. However, medicinal plants may be contaminated with a variety of microorganisms. Enterococci are among nosocomial pathogens that are commonly found in large numbers in foods, plant materials, and vegetables.

Objectives:

We aimed to detect enterococci contamination in industrial and traditional medicinal herbs by using standard and impedance methods.

Methods:

Eighty samples of industrial and traditional medicinal herb samples (40 per group) were analyzed for the detection of enterococci by using standard and impedimetric techniques.

Results:

In general, Enterococcus contamination rate in herb samples was found to be 33.7% and 25% by using standard and impedimetric methods, respectively. McNemar’s test did not reflect any significant difference between the two methods in identifying Enterococcus contamination. Comparing the results of enterococci contamination obtained from the two methods, no significant differences were found between the industrial and traditional samples, although contamination was greater in traditional herb samples.

Conclusions:

The current standard methods for detecting enterococci are labor-intensive and time-consuming compared to advanced methods such as impedance. However, based on our results, sensitivity and specificity of impedance method could vary based on the type of samples being evaluated. However, it is recommended to perform further diagnostic tests for confirming our results.

1. Background

Herbal products are commonly categorized as food, dietary supplements, herbal medicinal products, and cosmetic materials (1). There is growing knowledge and public acceptability regarding the usage of herbal drugs in today’s medicine in both developing and developed countries. In addition to drugstores, medicinal plants and herbal products are widely available via other retail outlets, for example markets, stores, and mail order (2).

Lack of regulation, loose distribution channels, poor cultivation conditions, and a myriad of environmental factors during the post-harvest and manufacturing stages can result in poor quality of herbal products. Accordingly, the safety of herbal products and their contamination with harmful pathogens have become a major public health concern (3).

Medicinal herbs can be contaminated with a variety of bacteria and their spores, fungi, viruses, protozoa, and other organisms (2). Gastrointestinal tract of humans and animals is the dominant habitat of enterococci. Because of their high heat tolerance and survival under harmful environmental conditions, these pathogens are considered as the indicators of the hygienic quality of food. These bacteria are abundantly present in foods, vegetables, and plant materials (4), and the resulting infections are usually hard to treat due to the increased antibiotic resistance (5).

Enterococci can cause food poisoning through the production of biogenic amines and can cause opportunistic infections (4). Pathogenic microorganisms, including Enterobacter, Enterococcus, Clostridium, Pseudomonas, Shigella, and Streptococcus, have been shown to contaminate herbal products.

It goes without saying that it is necessary to curtail the risk of microbial contaminations (6), and there are quality standards that could be considered as guidelines. According to Iran Standard National Organization, the standard limit for enterococci is zero per gram (0/gr) of dehydrated herbs (7). Conventional microbiological methods have been used as standard for the detection of pathogens, but traditional microbiological methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive and are therefore, not suitable for a timely response to possible risks. As a result, many rapid methods have been developed to reduce experimentation time (8). The impedance method has been applied in the field of microbiology for the detection and quantification of bacteria. Impedance measurement is based on the evaluation of changes in electrical impedance of a culture medium during bacterial growth and metabolic processes that generate electrically measurable changes in the medium (8-10).

2. Objectives

In this study, we sought to detect enterococci contamination in industrial and traditional medicinal herbs by standard and impedance methods.

3. Methods

3.1. Media, Supplements, and Medicinal Herbs

KF Streptococcus agar (Merck, Germany), Bromocresol Purple Azide broth (Quelab, Canada), Bile Esculin Azide agar (Merck, Germany) BiMedia 330A (Kanamycin Esculine), and Azide broth (BiMedia Sy-Lab, Austria) were prepared according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) was purchased from Merck Millipore. In this study, 80 samples of industrial and traditional medicinal herbs including valerian (Nardostachys jatamansi), licorice (Glycyrrhiza glabra), fennel (Foeniculum vulgare), and avishan shirazi (Zataria multiflora) were collected randomly from grocery shops, drugstores, retailers, and manufacturers of herbal medicinal products.

3.2. Standard Method

For enterococci detection, 1 g of the sample was inoculated in 10 mL of glucose broth medium (Bromocresol Purple Azide broth) for enrichment. Then, the medium was incubated at 37°C for 48 h. In case the color of the glucose culture medium changed to yellow, it was cultivated on KF Streptococcus agar containing 1% TTC. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Suspected colonies of Enterococcus were detected as a result of TTC reduction and conversion to formazan with red, purple, pink, and chestnut colors. Then, the esculin hydrolysis test was performed on suspected colonies as a confirmatory test. For this purpose, the selected colonies were transferred to Bile Esculin Azide agar medium and incubated at 37°C for 48 h. Intestinal enterococci hydrolyze esculin and produce dark brown to black colonies (11).

3.3. Impedance Method

All the samples were also analyzed using the impedimetric monitoring technique (Bactrac 4300 microbial analyzer, Sy-Lab Company). For this purpose, 0.1 mL of Bromocresol Purple Azide broth was inoculated into impedance glass tubes (cells) containing 9.9 mL of BiMedia 330A (Kanamycin Esculin Azide broth). Simultaneous specifications of the tube samples were added via System software. The evaluation protocol was set at 37°C and 10-minute intervals for measuring impedance for 24 h. In our study, electrical resistance changes were measured every 10 minutes in BiMedia 330 A for 24 h.

As microorganisms grow and metabolize nutrients, large molecules change to smaller ones in liquid phase and cause a change in electrical conductivity and resistance in the liquid and at the interphase of electrodes. The bacterial level associated with this change in conductance is called the bacterial threshold level. This time is called “impedance detection time” (IDT) that is usually inversely proportional to the log number of bacteria in the sample. Usually, IDT is not visible until the number of bacteria approaches 106 - 107 CFU/mL. Many studies indicate that detection time is related to the initial population. Thus, when a sample has a large initial population, the IDT will be shorter than that of a sample with a smaller initial population (12, 13).

3.4. Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using nonparametric McNemar’s test and Chi-square test in SPSS version 16. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

4. Results

The results of the enterococci detection by using the two methods in the 40 traditional and 40 industrial samples are shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. Considering herb type, contamination rate was higher in fennel and valerian. The maximum and minimum detection times in the impedance method for the total samples were 0.66 and 21.11 hours, respectively, which is a considerable speed compared to the minimum time necessary for enterococci detection in the standard method (5 to 6 days). Considering the industrial and traditional herbs, the maximum and minimum times for detection in the impedance method were 6.71 and 21.11 hours in industrial and 0.66 and 14.46 hours in traditional samples, respectively. These results showed higher contamination in traditional medicinal herbs. However, Chi-square test did not show any significant differences between industrial and traditional samples using the two methods (P > 0.05).

Table 1.

The Contaminated Samples with the Standard and Impedance Methods

MethodTraditional Samples, N = 40Industrial Samples, N = 40Total Samples, N = 80
Impedance
Negative303060
Positive101020
Standard
Negative223153
Positive18927
Enterococcal contamination (%) by the two methods in all the studied herbs (1), traditional herbs (2) and industrial herbs (3)
Enterococcal contamination (%) by the two methods in all the studied herbs (1), traditional herbs (2) and industrial herbs (3)

Comparing the obtained results of standard and impedance methods in detecting enterococci by the non-parametric McNemar’s test, we found no significant difference between the two methods (P > 0.05). Also, sensitivity and specificity of the impedance method in detecting enterococci were 51.9% and 88.7%, respectively, and the kappa value between the two methods was equal to 0.43 (P < 0.001; Table 2). Accordingly, the agreement between the two methods for all the samples was 76.2%. These results were also observed in industrial samples with the sensitivity and specificity of 55.6% and 83.9%, respectively, and in traditional samples with the sensitivity and specificity of 50% and 95.5%, respectively. Also, the agreement rates between the two methods for industrial and traditional samples were 77.5% and 75%, respectively. The results of traditional samples indicated significant differences between the two methods using McNemar’s test (P < 0.05).

5. Discussion

Herbal medicines, as the first choice in self-treatment, are popular in the general population worldwide, and a large number of modern drugs are derived from them. Although it is commonly believed that most herbal products are safe, some herbs could be toxic and harmful with undesirable side effects. Thus, the safety of herbal products is an important public health concern. Medicinal plants and herbal products normally carry a number of soil organisms. Additional microbial contaminations may result from poor methods of harvesting, cleaning, drying, handling, transportation, processing, and storage (14).

Fecal streptococci, including enterococci, have been considered an alternative potential indicator of fecal pollution of foods because they are more resistant than coliforms (primary fecal indicator) to most environmental insults (4).

Contamination of medicinal herbs with antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains is hazardous. In a study performed at Czech Republic, 250 enterococcal isolates from different types of foods were analyzed based on virulence and antibiotic resistance. It was found that 88.4% of isolates had at least one gene encoding a virulence factor. Antibiotic resistance analysis suggested that all the isolates had cross-resistance against different antibiotics (15). Separation of enterococci from plants in different regions has been reported previously (16-18). One of the barrier to acceptance of medicinal plants is the absence of a standard quality control index (14). Therefore, similar concepts of quality control and quality guarantee existing in food regulations should be applied to herbal products as well, because they have the same risk of contamination.

Since traditional microbiological methods are time-consuming and labor-intensive, rapid and automatic methods are valuable in applied microbiology (12, 19). Impedance measurement as a faster technique can replace the conventional plating methods for quality control (8). Many efforts have been made to apply the impedance method for the detection of different bacteria in different samples. In a study, psychrophilic and mesophilic bacterial loads of ice stored fresh silver pomfret were evaluated by two conventional and impedimetric methods. The impedance detection times were highly correlated with psychrophilic (r = -0.9614) and mesophilic (r = -0.9547) bacterial loads (13).

Grossi et al. evaluated total microbial density in all types of ice creams sold in Bellona through standard and impedance methods. They stated that impedance method could be used as a reliable, applicable, and easy method for evaluating the quality of ice creams (20). In this study, based on the minimum time spent for obtaining results in impedance method, more contamination was found in traditional medicinal plants, although no significant differences were observed between industrial and traditional samples (P > 0.05). Also, based on Table 1, positive results in traditional samples using the standard method were more than the impedance method. It seems that in traditional samples, because of the high possibility of cross-microbial contamination, there is a probability of obtaining false positive results. Chemical tests are used as reference methods, such as resistance to bile hydrolysis of esculin, TTC reduction, and formazan production in the identification of Enterococci and Streptococci of group D. However, Gram-positive bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes may cause false-positive results in these tests; therefore, it seems that more diagnostic and molecular tests are required to confirm contamination to enterococci.

Table 2.

Comparison of Standard and Impedance Methods

MethodStandardTotal Samples
PositiveNegative
Impedance
Positive14620
Negative134760
Total samples275380

Despite previous studies on enterococcal contamination in different types of feed, there is a lack of data on contamination of medicinal plants by enterococci. Analyzing microbial quality of plants, especially medicinal plants, based on nutritional habits and increasing attention to continuous analysis of contaminants’ levels in foods, water, and plants are required for sanitary control and management. In most countries, herbal products are sent into the market without suitable scientific evaluations and without any safety and toxicology studies (14). It is needed to ensure that the distributed herbal medicines are in accordance with microbiological standards, and attaining this goal is possible by using rapid microbial tests in order to monitor the microbial quality of herbal medicines.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    World Health Organization. National policy on traditional medicine and regulation of herbal medicines: Report of a WHO global survey. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/43229/1/9241593237.pdf.

  • 2.

    Kosalec I, Cvek J, Tomic S. Contaminants of medicinal herbs and herbal products. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2009;60(4):485-501. [PubMed ID: 20061249]. https://doi.org/10.2478/10004-1254-60-2009-2005.

  • 3.

    World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on safety monitoring of herbal medicines in pharmacovigilance systems. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2004. Available from: http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s7148e/s7148e.pdf.

  • 4.

    Giraffa G. Enterococci from foods. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2002;26(2):163-71. [PubMed ID: 12069881]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2002.tb00608.x.

  • 5.

    Kirschner C, Maquelin K, Pina P, Ngo Thi NA, Choo-Smith LP, Sockalingum GD, et al. Classification and identification of enterococci: A comparative phenotypic, genotypic, and vibrational spectroscopic study. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(5):1763-70. [PubMed ID: 11325987]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC88022]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.5.1763-1770.2001.

  • 6.

    Barnes J, Anderson LA, Phillipson JD. Herbal medicine. 3rd ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2007. p. 1-23.

  • 7.

    Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran. Microbiology of dehydrated vegetables-specifications. 2008. Available from: http://www.isiri.gov.ir/portal/files/std/5939.pdf.

  • 8.

    Yang L, Bashir R. Electrical/electrochemical impedance for rapid detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria. Biotechnol Adv. 2008;26(2):135-50. [PubMed ID: 18155870]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.10.003.

  • 9.

    Dupont J, Dumont F, Menanteau C, Pommepuy M. Calibration of the impedance method for rapid quantitative estimation of Escherichia coli in live marine bivalve molluscs. J Appl Microbiol. 2004;96(4):894-902. [PubMed ID: 15012830].

  • 10.

    Flint SH, Brooks JD. Rapid detection of Bacillus stearothermophilus using impedance-splitting. J Microbiol Methods. 2001;44(3):205-8. [PubMed ID: 11240042].

  • 11.

    Institute of Standards and Industrial Research of Iran. Microbiology of foods and food stuffs -detection and enumeration of enterococcus in food. 2009. Available from: http://www.isiri.gov.ir/portal/files/std/2198.pdf.

  • 12.

    Fung DYC. Rapid methods and automation in microbiology. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2002;1(1):3-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2002.tb00003.x.

  • 13.

    Fazlara A, Yavari V, Abhari Segonbad H, Rajabzadeh Ghatromi E. Predictive models for evaluation of mesophilic and psychrophilic bacterial loads in muscles of fresh ice-stored silver pomfret by impediometric technique. Iran J Fish Sci. 2014;13(2):303-18.

  • 14.

    Folashade O, Omoregie H, Ochogu P. Standardization of herbal medicines: A review. Int J Biodivers Conserv. 2012;4(3):101-12. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJBC11.163.

  • 15.

    Trivedi K, Cupakova S, Karpiskova R. Virulence factors and antibiotic resistance in enterococci isolated from food-stuffs. Vet Med. 2011;56(7):352-7. https://doi.org/10.17221/1584-VETMED.

  • 16.

    Muller T, Ulrich A, Ott EM, Muller M. Identification of plant-associated enterococci. J Appl Microbiol. 2001;91(2):268-78. [PubMed ID: 11473591].

  • 17.

    Kineman B, Nahikian-Nelms ML, Frazier C, Somarajan N, Galati V. A pilot investigation of the microbial contamination of herbal supplements: A potential risk for immunocompromised populations. J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101(9):A-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(01)80191-7.

  • 18.

    Wilson C, Dettenkofer M, Jonas D, Daschner FD. Pathogen growth in herbal teas used in clinical settings: A possible source of nosocomial infection? Am J Infect Control. 2004;32(2):117-9. [PubMed ID: 15057205]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2003.09.004.

  • 19.

    Ekhtelat M. Impediometric technique as a rapid estimation to detect pathogenic bacteria in quality control. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Product. 2016;11(2). https://doi.org/10.17795/jjnpp-36811.

  • 20.

    Grossi M, Pompei A, Lanzoni M, Lazzarini R, Matteuzzi D, Riccò B. Total bacterial count in soft-frozen dairy products by impedance biosensor system. IEEE Sensor J. 2009;9(10):1270-6. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2009.2029816.