Comparison of Gastric-ulcerogenecity Effect of Methanolic Extract of Capparis spinosa and Indomethacin in Rat

authors:

avatar Mitra Abbasifard ORCID 1 , 2 , avatar Mahmoud Reza Heidari ORCID 3 , avatar Zahra Kamiab ORCID 4 , 5 , avatar Ayat Kaeidi ORCID 6 , 7 , avatar Mahmood Kahnooji ORCID 2 , avatar Gholamhossein Taghipur Khajehsharifi 8 , avatar Morteza Amirteimoury 9 , avatar Gholamreza Bazmandegan ORCID 4 , 5 , *

Non Communicable Diseases Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
Department of Internal Medicine, Ali-Ibn Abi-Talib Hospital, School of Medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
Pharmaceutics Research Center, School of Pharmacy, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
Clinical Research Development Unit, Ali-Ibn Abi-Talib Hospital, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
Department of Family Medicine, Ali-Ibn Abi-Talib Hospital, School of Medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
Physiology-Pharmacology Research Center, Research Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
Department of Surgery, Ali-Ibn Abi-Talib Hospital, School of Medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
Student Research Committee, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran

how to cite: Abbasifard M, Heidari M R, Kamiab Z, Kaeidi A, Kahnooji M, et al. Comparison of Gastric-ulcerogenecity Effect of Methanolic Extract of Capparis spinosa and Indomethacin in Rat. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2021;16(1):e93823. https://doi.org/10.5812/jjnpp.93823.

Abstract

Background:

Several plants are used as analgesic in traditional medicine. Capparis spinosa (C. spinosa) is widely used for the treatment of gout and rheumatic arthritis. The previous studies have reported the antinociceptive effects of this plant.

Objectives:

The study was aimed at examining the C. spinosa’s gastric-ulcerogenecity effect in comparison to indomethacin.

Methods:

The percolated extract of C. spinosa and Indomethacin were orally administered to the rats at 50,100, 200, and 400 mg/kg doses, which were slaughtered after 4 hours. The stomach was detached, and 10 mL of 2% formalin was injected into it to fix the gastric wall internal layer. The stomach was then split by cutting along the greater curvature, and the lacerations in the glandular section examined. J-score was used to determine ulcer index.

Results:

The results indicated that percolated extract of C. spinosa administered orally in antinociceptive dosage and even 2,4 and 8 folds did not cause a gastric ulcer (J-score = 0) compared to indomethacin (J-score = 46 to 253) (P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

Concerning the favorable analgesic effect of C. spinosa and lack of gastric ulcerogenecity effects, it seems to be a suitable choice for more pharmacological and toxicology examinations to use as analgesic.

1. Background

As a defensive mechanism, pain happens in humans and animals when the tissue is damaged, whose lack of control ends in bad consequences for the physiologic and psychological states of the patient (1). Analgesics fall into opioids and non-opiates (2). Opioids have a role in relieving acute and chronic pains through the central nervous system. Morphine and codeine are considered as two important medicines in this group. It is indicated that chronic use of opioids results in the emergence of analgesic tolerance, physical dependence, and an increase in the sensitivity to pain, and finally, dependence in humans and animals (3). Non-opioids analgesics entail non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), selective COX-2 inhibitors, and acetaminophen. NSAIDs, including indomethacin, aspirin, and ibuprofen exert their analgesic functions by inhibiting cyclooxygenase enzyme. The prevalence of adverse effects varies among NSAIDs (4). The commonest complication of NSAIDs is gastrointestinal side effects because excessive use of these drugs may be related to gastrointestinal bleeding, and chronic consumption may end in degeneration of the gastric mucosa (5, 6).

Owing to the numerous side effects of these medicines in pain relief, finding a new choice with fewer side effects seems critical. The common medicinal plants have been examined by many researchers, given their availability and less complication (7). Capparis spinosa (C. spinosa) is a plant growing in hot and dry climates, such as various parts of Iran, especially in the Alborz, Northeastern Baluchistan, and Shiraz (7, 8). Given the valuable compounds like flavonoids, saponins, and pectin in different sections of this plant, analgesic (1, 9), anti-inflammatory (10), lipid profile modulation (11), antioxidant (12), and anti-allergic (13) impacts have been shown. In several studies, the antinociceptive effects of C. spinosa have been reported mainly because of the stachydrine content (14, 15). Considering the above mentioned and, most importantly, the significant antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory properties of this plant, it seems to work like NSAIDs and may have the effect of ulcerogenecity on the stomach.

2. Objectives

Therefore, it is necessary to control gastrointestinal complications. This study was designed to investigate the effect of gastric-ulcerogenecity of C. spinosa percolated extract on stomach rat and compared to indomethacin.

3. Methods

3.1. Animals

In this study, 40 male Wistar rats weighing 200 to 250 grams were obtained from the physiology-pharmacology Research Center of Kerman University of medical sciences, Iran. Animals were housed in polycarbonate cages under 24 ± 2°C room temperature with a 12-hour light/dark cycle and adlibitum access to food (Plate prepared by Pars Industrial Company of Iran) and water (Urban Purified water). All experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines set by the ethical committee of Kerman University of medical sciences (code: IR.KM.REC.1389.84) and the European community’s council directive 24 November 1986 (86/609/EEC).

3.2. Extraction Method

C. spinosa was obtained from around Fasa (Fars Province). After being identified by the botanist from the Kerman Faculty of Agricultural, its fruits were dried in the shade. Later on, the fruits were ground with the powder used for extraction using the percolation method. Firstly, the powdered fruits were macerated in a solvent (80% methanol) to get the complete extract through the percolation method. Later on, it was poured into a container, percolator, and extraction was done at environment temperature (20°C to 15°C) using the flowing fluid. For preparing oral solution and administration.

3.3. The Procedure for Preparing Oral Solution and Administration

The complete fruit extract was condensed using a distillation tool under a vacuum. Following evaporation of the solvent, a fully dry powder was obtained. Later on, the mass of extract, the total crude dried extract weight was measured using an electronic scale, and the concentration of the solutions was prepared using normal saline solvent. Based on the previous studies, the doses in this study were 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg, respectively (16, 17).

3.4. Study Groups

In the study, the animals were divided into eight groups randomly using five animals in every group as follows: The groups from 1 to 4 were used as experimental group, got C. spinosa extract at doses 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg orally. Groups 5 to 8 were used as positive control and received daily indomethacin at doses 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg orally. Twenty-four hours prior to the test, all of the animals were taken to the lab and kept in special cages (with netting) for passing the animal stool. At this time, the animals just had access to water. Then 24 hours later, the animals in each group got 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg of extract or indomethacin. Four hours following the administration of the extract or indomethacin, the animals were slaughtered using ether, their stomach removed immediately, and 10 mL of 2% formalin injected into the stomach for fixation of the internal layers of the gastric wall. Twenty minutes later, the stomach was cut from its larger curvature, and the number of ulcers was counted. The length of each wound was measured and recorded as well. J-score (Ulcer index, UI) was used to get the ulcer severity (18, 19). J-score was calculated with the help of the following formula:

J-score (UI) = a + 2b + 3c

a = ulcers smaller than 1 mm; b = ulcers between 1 and 2 mm; c = ulcers larger than 2 mm.

3.5. Statistical Analysis

For determining the significant differences between experimental groups, student t-test, ANOVA and Newman-Keuls were used. A P-value < 0.01 was considered the significant level.

4. Results

The effect of gastric-ulcerogenecity of C. spinosa percolated fruit at the dose of 50, 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg was compared with indomethacin at similar doses. The effect of gastric-ulcerogenecity following indomethacin injection is shown in Figure 1. Comparison of UI (J-score) showed that the index was significantly lower in all the groups receiving C. spinosa than the recipient of the indomethacin (P < 0.001) (Table 1). Reviewing each of the doses studied in different groups, Figure 2, also confirms this issue. As shown in this figure, treatment with the several doses of the C. spinosa percolated extract (50, 100, 200, and 400 mg/kg) did not cause any injury in the stomach of rats (UI = 0), while the administration of indomethacin suspension, at the same doses, caused a number of ulcers at the same doses (UI = 46 to 253), which was statistically significant (P < 0.001).

Table 1.

Comparison of UI at Several Doses in Different Groupsa, b

Group, mg/kgUIP-Value
C. spinosa (50)0< 0.001
Indomethacin (50)46 ± 2
C. spinosa (100)0< 0.001
Indomethacin (100)81 ± 3
C. spinosa (200)0< 0.001
Indomethacin (200)136/8 ± 5
C. spinosa (400)0< 0.001
Indomethacin (400)253/8 ± 7
It shows A, Gastric ulcer following indomethacin injection Vs. B, Gastric normal following indomethacin injection.
It shows A, Gastric ulcer following indomethacin injection Vs. B, Gastric normal following indomethacin injection.
Effects of gastric-ulcerogenecity of C. spinosa compared with indomethacin at the different doses. Comparison of UI showed that treatment with the several doses of the C. spinosa percolated extract did damage the stomach of rats (UI = 0), which was lower statistically than that of the indomethacin groups. C. spinosa, Capparis spinosa; UI, Ulcer index. Data are represented mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.001 versus C. spinosa group.
Effects of gastric-ulcerogenecity of C. spinosa compared with indomethacin at the different doses. Comparison of UI showed that treatment with the several doses of the C. spinosa percolated extract did damage the stomach of rats (UI = 0), which was lower statistically than that of the indomethacin groups. C. spinosa, Capparis spinosa; UI, Ulcer index. Data are represented mean ± SEM. *, P < 0.001 versus C. spinosa group.

5. Discussion

C. spinosa is one of the plants in Iranian traditional medicine used for reducing pain whose analgesic effects have been reported in several studies. It was initially seen that 50 mg/kg of the fruit extract of this plant entails a good analgesic effect (20, 21). The study investigated the gastric ulcerogenecity effect of C. spinosa extract on rats compared to indomethacin, so the impact of wounding some doses with the same doses of indomethacin was examined. Based on the findings, the ulcer made by the administration of the extract was not observed in any of the doses examined.

The progress in pharmacy technology and the synthesis of chemical medicines and its wide application to diminish pain were related to bad complications. Nonetheless, herbal remedies can act as a proper replacement to synthetic chemical medicines given their fewer consequences and costs (22). In a study entitled “analgesic and wound healing effect of methanol extract of chamomile flowers”, Heidari et al. (23) showed that this extract has no gastrointestinal impact, and its analgesic impact is not affected through the opioids system probably because of anti-inflammatory activity. In another study on antinociceptive effect of methanol extract of C. ovate in mice, Arslan and Bektas (17) indicated that 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg doses of extract showed significant antinociceptive effect compared to the control group. Sini et al. (24) showed protective effects of C. zeylanica extract on gastric lesions in experimental animals using aspirin and indomethacin. Also, in a similar study, the extracts of the Artemisia dracunculus extract from the percolated method at 800 mg/kg dose had the most analgesic effects compared to the control group. Also, it has been shown that the extract has a more analgesic effect than aspirin. Ulcerogenecity studies of Artemisia dracunculus extract in the gastric mouse, it was determined that the single dose of this extract does not have ulcerogenecity effects (25). The results of these studies are consistent with the results of our study. In a similar study conducted by Heidari et al. (26). On The analgesic effect of tribulusterrestris extract at 400, 200, and 100 mg/kg doses, it was found that all three doses had ulcerogenecity effect in the gastric mouse, while the results of our study showed that the fruit extract of the plant does not cause any ulcer in the gastric rats at different doses. Behravan et al. (27) showed that gastric ulcerogenecity of percolated extract of Anacardium occidentale at the doses of 300, 400, and 800 mg/kg was less than the similar doses of indomethacin. The results of this study showed that administration of different doses of fruit extract of C. spinosa in male rats compared to indomethacin had no ulcerogenecity effect. For a more accurate examination of the effects of this extract, studies on cellular, molecular and histopathological effects with specific staining are suggested.

5.1. Conclusions

Considering the potential antinociceptive effects reported for C. spinosa extract and due to the lack of observation of the ulcerogenecity effect of this plant, it seems that by further research and identifying the effective substances of this plant, an appropriate analgesic can be provided with minimal gastrointestinal complications.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Hardt J, Jacobsen C, Goldberg J, Nickel R, Buchwald D. Prevalence of chronic pain in a representative sample in the United States. Pain Med. 2008;9(7):803-12. [PubMed ID: 18346058]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00425.x.

  • 2.

    Daubresse M, Chang HY, Yu Y, Viswanathan S, Shah ND, Stafford RS, et al. Ambulatory diagnosis and treatment of nonmalignant pain in the United States, 2000-2010. Med Care. 2013;51(10):870-8. [PubMed ID: 24025657]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3845222]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182a95d86.

  • 3.

    Fatemi I, Amirteimoury M, Shamsizadeh A, Kaeidi A. The effect of metformin on morphine analgesic tolerance and dependence in rats. Res Pharm Sci. 2018;13(4):316-23. [PubMed ID: 30065764]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6040165]. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-5362.235158.

  • 4.

    Dwivedi AK, Gurjar V, Kumar S, Singh N. Molecular basis for nonspecificity of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Drug Discov Today. 2015;20(7):863-73. [PubMed ID: 25794602]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2015.03.004.

  • 5.

    Gnjidic D, Blyth FM, Le Couteur DG, Cumming RG, McLachlan AJ, Handelsman DJ, et al. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in older people: prescribing patterns according to pain prevalence and adherence to clinical guidelines. Pain. 2014;155(9):1814-20. [PubMed ID: 24954164]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.06.009.

  • 6.

    Arzi A, Sistani Karampour N, Rezaei A, Gholamhoseyni A. Histopathological Study of Hydroalcoholic Extract of Terminalia catappa Leaves in Treatment of Indomethacin-Induced Gastric Ulcer in Rats. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2017;12(3 (Supp)).

  • 7.

    Singh E, Sharma S, Dwivedi J, Sharma S. Diversified potentials of Ocimum sanctum Linn (tulsi): an exhaustive survey. J Nat Prod Plant Resour. 2012;2(1):39-48.

  • 8.

    Kheirollah A, Aberumand M, Ramezani Z, Amraee F. Inhibition of Aldose Reductase and Red Blood Cell Sorbitol Accumulation by Extract of Capparis spinosa. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2015;10(4). https://doi.org/10.17795/jjnpp-24331.

  • 9.

    Kalantar M, Goudarzi M, Khodayar MJ, Babaei J, Foruozandeh H, Bakhtiari N, et al. Protective Effects of the Hydroalcoholic Extract of Capparis spinosa L. Against Cyclophosphamide-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Mice. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2016;11(4). https://doi.org/10.17795/jjnpp-37240.

  • 10.

    al-Said MS, Abdelsattar EA, Khalifa SI, el-Feraly FS. Isolation and identification of an anti-inflammatory principle from Capparis spinosa. Pharmazie. 1988;43(9):640-1. [PubMed ID: 3244735].

  • 11.

    Eddouks M, Lemhadri A, Michel JB. Hypolipidemic activity of aqueous extract of Capparis spinosa L. in normal and diabetic rats. J Ethnopharmacol. 2005;98(3):345-50. [PubMed ID: 15814271]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2005.01.053.

  • 12.

    Germano MP, De Pasquale R, D'Angelo V, Catania S, Silvari V, Costa C. Evaluation of extracts and isolated fraction from Capparis spinosa L. buds as an antioxidant source. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50(5):1168-71. [PubMed ID: 11853498]. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf010678d.

  • 13.

    Trombetta D, Occhiuto F, Perri D, Puglia C, Santagati NA, De Pasquale A, et al. Antiallergic and antihistaminic effect of two extracts of Capparis spinosa L. flowering buds. Phytother Res. 2005;19(1):29-33. [PubMed ID: 15799005]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.1591.

  • 14.

    Khatib M, Pieraccini G, Innocenti M, Melani F, Mulinacci N. An insight on the alkaloid content of Capparis spinosa L. root by HPLC-DAD-MS, MS/MS and (1)H qNMR. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2016;123:53-62. [PubMed ID: 26874255]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2016.01.063.

  • 15.

    Feng X, Lu J, Xin H, Zhang L, Wang Y, Tang K. Anti-arthritic active fraction of Capparis spinosa L. fruits and its chemical constituents. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2011;131(3):423-9. [PubMed ID: 21372539]. https://doi.org/10.1248/yakushi.131.423.

  • 16.

    Aghel N, Rashidi I, Mombeini A. Hepatoprotective activity of Capparis spinosa root bark against CCl4 induced hepatic damage in mice. Iran J Pharm Res. 2007:285-90.

  • 17.

    Arslan R, Bektas N. Antinociceptive effect of methanol extract of Capparis ovata in mice. Pharm Biol. 2010;48(10):1185-90. [PubMed ID: 20819022]. https://doi.org/10.3109/13880201003629323.

  • 18.

    Dehpour AR, Mani AR, Alikhani Z, Zeinoddini M, Toor Savadkoohi S, Ghaffari K, et al. Enhancement of aspirin-induced gastric damage by cholestasis in rats. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 1998;12(4):442-5. [PubMed ID: 9711467]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-8206.1998.tb00969.x.

  • 19.

    Dehpour AR, Mani AR, Amanlou M, Nahavandi A, Amanpour S, Bahadori M. Naloxone is protective against indomethacin-induced gastric damage in cholestatic rats. J Gastroenterol. 1999;34(2):178-81. [PubMed ID: 10213115]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005350050240.

  • 20.

    Jiang HE, Li X, Ferguson DK, Wang YF, Liu CJ, Li CS. The discovery of Capparis spinosa L. (Capparidaceae) in the Yanghai Tombs (2800 years b.p.), NW China, and its medicinal implications. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007;113(3):409-20. [PubMed ID: 17693045]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2007.06.020.

  • 21.

    Maresca M, Micheli L, Di Cesare Mannelli L, Tenci B, Innocenti M, Khatib M, et al. Acute effect of Capparis spinosa root extracts on rat articular pain. J Ethnopharmacol. 2016;193:456-65. [PubMed ID: 27647009]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2016.09.032.

  • 22.

    Houghton PJ. The role of plants in traditional medicine and current therapy. J Altern Complement Med. 1995;1(2):131-43. [PubMed ID: 9395610]. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.1995.1.131.

  • 23.

    Heidari MR, Asadipour A, Ghayoor M. Evaluation of analgesic and ulcerogenic effect of methanolic extract of matricaria chamomilla L. J Inflammatory Dis. 2002;5(4):15-23.

  • 24.

    Sini KR, Sinha BN, Rajasekaran A. Antidiarrheal activity of Capparis zeylanica leaf extracts. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2011;2(1):39-42. [PubMed ID: 22171290]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3217678]. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-4040.79803.

  • 25.

    Heidari MR, Asadipour A, Hami M. Analgesic and ulcerogenic effect of methanolic extract of Artemisia dracunculus and histopathological evaluation. Physiol Pharmacol. 2002;6(1):107-18.

  • 26.

    Heidari MR, Mehrabani M, Pardakhty A, Khazaeli P, Zahedi MJ, Yakhchali M, et al. The analgesic effect of Tribulus terrestris extract and comparison of gastric ulcerogenicity of the extract with indomethacine in animal experiments. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1095:418-27. [PubMed ID: 17404054]. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1397.045.

  • 27.

    Behravan E, Heidari MR, Heidari M, Fatemi G, Etemad L, Taghipour G, et al. Comparison of gastric ulcerogenicity of percolated extract of Anacardium occidentale (cashew nut) with indomethacin in rats. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2012;25(1):111-5. [PubMed ID: 22186317].