Logo
J Motor Control Learn

Image Credit:J Motor Control Learn

A Comparison of Time Perspective Dimensions Between Elite and Non-elite Taekwondo Athletes

Author(s):
Shahram NazarpouriShahram NazarpouriShahram Nazarpouri ORCID1,*, Mohammad Taghi AghdasiMohammad Taghi AghdasiMohammad Taghi Aghdasi ORCID2, Saleh RafieeSaleh RafieeSaleh Rafiee ORCID3
1Assistant Professor of Motor Behavior, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
2Full Professor of Motor Behavior, Faculty of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
3Associate Professor of Motor Behavior, Physical Education and Sports Sciences Research Institute, Tehran, Iran

Journal of Motor Control and Learning:Vol. 7, issue 2; e162357
Published online:May 30, 2025
Article type:Research Article
Received:Feb 01, 2025
Accepted:May 26, 2025
How to Cite:Nazarpouri S, Aghdasi M T, Rafiee S. A Comparison of Time Perspective Dimensions Between Elite and Non-elite Taekwondo Athletes.J Motor Control Learn.2025;7(2):e162357.https://doi.org/10.5812/jmcl-162357.

Abstract

Background:

The theory of Zimbardo’s time perspectives (TP) has attracted considerable attention in fields such as education and health; however, its role in athletic performance remains underexplored.

Objectives:

This study aimed to compare TP dimensions between elite and non-elite Taekwondo athletes.

Methods:

This comparative cross-sectional study purposively sampled 300 male Taekwondo athletes in Tehran, including 105 elite (with national team experience) and 195 non-elite athletes. The TP were assessed using Zimbardo’s Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI). Data were analyzed via multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) using SPSS 26 (α = 0.05).

Results:

Significant differences emerged between elite and non-elite athletes across several TP dimensions. Elite athletes scored significantly higher in past-positive (PP), present-hedonistic (PH), and future (F) dimensions, while non-elite athletes scored higher in present-fatalistic (PF) and past-negative (PN) dimensions.

Conclusions:

These findings underscore the practical relevance of TP theory in sports. Psychological interventions promoting a balanced TP may enhance athletes’ focus, motivation, and mental resilience. Coaches and sport psychologists can leverage these insights to support performance and long-term development, especially in competitive disciplines like Taekwondo.

1. Background

The concept of time perspectives (TP) has garnered considerable attention in fields such as education and health, yet it remains underexplored within the domain of sport psychology (1). A fundamental research problem in this area is the variability in athletes’ temporal focus: Some attend primarily to the present moment, while others direct their mental attention toward the past or future (F) through memories, anticipations, or dreams. This leads to two key research questions that have not been sufficiently addressed: How do different temporal orientations affect athletic performance? Can these orientations explain psychological differences between elite and non-elite athletes?

Despite the intuitive relevance of these questions, empirical research has yet to clarify whether, and how, various TP dimensions contribute to athletic success across competitive levels. Addressing this gap is critical because athletes’ temporal orientations can profoundly influence their pre-competition mindset, motivation, and focus. In other words, an athlete’s dominant temporal perspective may shape not only training and competition behaviors but also the trajectory of their long-term athletic development (2).

According to Zimbardo and Boyd’s theory (3), a balanced time perspective (BTP) supports athletes' development and success while promoting harmony in their sporting lives. This profile includes high levels of F orientation for planning and goal setting, present-hedonistic (PH) orientation for enjoyment and positive experiences, and past-positive (PP) orientation reflecting favorable past views. It also involves low levels of past-negative (PN) and present-fatalistic (PF) orientations, which relate to negative past memories and a sense of helplessness about the F (3). In this regard, Stolarski et al. (1), proposed a psychological model elucidating the role of BTP in athletic performance. Their model suggests that TP influences performance through three key pathways: Enhancing motivation, regulating emotions, and evaluating outcomes. Positive temporal orientations such as PP and F bolster self-efficacy, confidence, and long-term goal setting, thereby increasing motivation and persistence in training and competition. Effective emotion regulation is facilitated by an appropriate present orientation and the avoidance of PN and PF perspectives, helping athletes manage anxiety and maintain focus under pressure. The third pathway, performance evaluation, concerns how athletes interpret successes and failures; F-oriented athletes tend to view failures as learning opportunities, whereas a PN orientation may lead to pessimistic interpretations and reduced confidence (1).

Given the emphasis of Zimbardo’s TP Theory (3) and Stolarski’s model (1), exploring the relationship between temporal perspectives and motivational theories can enhance our understanding of the psychological processes affecting performance. In this context, Ryan and Deci’s self-determination theory (4), which focuses on three basic psychological needs autonomy, competence, and relatedness provides a framework for explaining intrinsic motivation and goal-directed behavior. Accordingly, time perspective may serve as a mediator between temporal orientations and motivational needs (1). Furthermore, Levin (5), defines TP as how individuals perceive past and F in the present, with related cognitive and emotional activities influencing current behavior and shaping F actions. Thus, athletes’ present mental states affect their F goals and achievements. Understanding athletes’ TP profiles helps identify a BTP to improve performance (5).

The BTP positively influences a range of outcomes, including well-being and education (6-11), but research on its dimensions in athletic performance is limited. Studies show mixed results: Notarnicola et al. (12) found spatiotemporal differences between volleyball players and non-athletes; Nazarpouri and Aghdasi (13) reported higher PP and F in elite wrestlers; Zentsova and Leonov (14) observed stronger PP in elite athletes; Popovych et al. (2) highlighted the role of F in sports like tennis, wrestling, shooting, rowing, track and field, handball, and gymnastics. In contrast, Mitic et al. (15) found lower F scores in elite athletes from basketball, football, volleyball, handball, and water polo. These inconsistencies suggest TP’s effects may depend on sport type, level, and individual traits, calling for broader, cross-sport research. Differences in sport types individual, team, and combat likely shape athletes’ TP differently. For example, team athletes may focus more on present social experiences, while individual and combat athletes emphasize F goals. This underscores the need for more cross-sport research on TP’s role in performance (2, 13, 15).

Athletic performance is not limited to physical readiness and technical skills; psychological skills play a fundamental role in optimizing performance (16, 17). Research has shown that psychological preparedness such as goal-setting, anxiety coping, and concentration significantly impacts athletic success (17, 18). Hence, psychological skills that help manage negative factors like anxiety are critical for achieving sustainable performance (2). In the sport of taekwondo, which demands rapid decision-making and sustained focus due to its technical, speed, and tactical characteristics, psychological factors gain even greater importance. Skills such as goal-setting, anxiety control, concentration, and emotion regulation are key determinants of success among Taekwondo athletes (17, 19). Therefore, investigating TP in this sport closely linked with motivation, emotional regulation, concentration, and goal-setting can provide valuable insights.

2. Objectives

Overall, given the importance of TP in athletic performance (1, 3, 5), the contradictory findings of previous research, and the lack of focused studies in taekwondo, the present study aims to compare different dimensions of TP in elite and non-elite Taekwondo athletes. This research represents the first investigation of various TP dimensions among Iranian taekwondo practitioners and seeks to identify an BTP profile in this cultural context.

3. Methods

3.1. Subjects

This study was a comparative cross-sectional design. The statistical population included all elite and non-elite Taekwondo athletes in Tehran. Accordingly, 300 male athletes were selected through purposive sampling, consisting of 105 elite athletes with at least one previous appearance on the national team (mean age = 27.45 years) and 195 non-elite athletes (mean age = 28.50 years) who had at least five years of training experience but no history of national team membership. The sample size was determined to be appropriate using G*Power software with a significance level (α) of 0.05 and a statistical power (1 - β) of 0.95.

3.2. Apparatus and Task

3.2.1. Demographic Questionnaire

This questionnaire gathered information on personal details, education level, economic status, sports experience, history of national team membership, and any history of disorders or illnesses. At the end of the questionnaire, a consent form was provided for participants to give their approval to take part in the study.

3.2.2. Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory

The Zimbardo’s Time Perspective Inventory (ZTPI) has 36 questions divided into five subscales (3). The Persian version of the inventory was previously validated in Iranian samples (20). In the current study, the Persian version was reviewed and slightly modified by three sport psychology experts and two taekwondo coaches to better suit the target population (Taekwondo athletes). These modifications involved simplifying culturally ambiguous terms and replacing some expressions with sport-specific language to improve clarity and relevance. Care was taken to preserve the original construct meanings of each subscale. A pilot study involving 35 athletes was conducted to assess reliability and confirm construct validity. The instrument demonstrated good internal consistency, with Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranging from 0.74 to 0.89.

3.3. Procedure

After obtaining consent from the Taekwondo federations and receiving an official letter of introduction, the researcher began data collection. In this study, elite Taekwondo athletes were defined as those who had at least once participated in a national team training camp in their sport. Non-elite athletes were defined as individuals who, in an organized manner, trained in Taekwondo for at least two to three sessions per week for five years, but had no experience of participating in a national team training camp (15). The execution of the study was coordinated with the provincial federation, taking into account the limitations related to the athletes' performance levels. Therefore, due to the national team training camps being held in Tehran, elite athletes were selected from this city. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Lorestan University of Medical Sciences with the code IR.LUMS.REC.1403.898.

3.4. Data Analysis

To examine differences between elite and non-elite Taekwondo athletes in various dimensions TP, a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was conducted. The independent variable was athletic skill level (elite vs. non-elite), and the dependent variables included the five subscales of the ZTPI. Prior to the main analysis, MANOVA assumptions were assessed. Normality of data distribution was examined using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The homogeneity of covariance matrices was tested using Box’s M test, and Levene’s test was used to assess the homogeneity of variances across subscales. No covariates were included in the model. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 26 (α = 0.05).

4. Results

The results of the normality test using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test showed that the data followed a normal distribution. Additionally, the results of the homogeneity of variances test using Levene's test indicated that the assumption of homogeneity of variances was met (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the results showed no significant differences between elite and non-elite athletes in demographic characteristics and confounding variables, including Body Mass Index [BMI; I (298) = -0.769, P = 0.433], economic status [chi-square (2) = 0.409, P = 0.825], and education level [chi-square (2) = 0.133, P = 0.922] (Table 1).

Table 1.Frequency Distribution of Demographic Characteristics of the Participants a
Demographic CharacteristicsAthletes
EliteNon-elite
Frequncy (n) 105195
Age (y)27.45 ± 3.2028.50 ± 4.01
BMI24.93 ± 0.8525.04 ± 0.97
Education level
Elementary60 (20)35 (18)
Diploma105 (35)66 (34)
Academic135 (45)94 (48)
Economic status
Inappropriate22 (21)37 (19)
Relatively appropriate52 (50)92 (47)
Appropriate31 (29)66 (34)

Frequency Distribution of Demographic Characteristics of the Participants a

As shown in Table 2, descriptive statistics for the dimensions of TP were presented for the study participants. A MANOVA was conducted to compare TP dimensions between elite and non-elite athletes. The results of Wilks’ Λ test indicated a significant difference between the two groups of Taekwondo athletes [Λ = 0.863, F(5, 29) = 80.46, P < 0.001], suggesting that at least one TP dimension differed significantly between them.

Table 2.Comparing Scores of Different Time Perspective in Research Participants a
VariablesAthletes
EliteNon-elite
PN orientation19.08 ± 4.8127.01± 3.84 b
PP orientation38.21 ± 5.14 b26.48 ± 5.12
PF orientation23.23 ± 5.0131.66 ± 8.26 b
PH orientation55.01 ± 5.02 b51.79 ± 5.10
F orientation53.64 ± 8.63 b27.14 ± 4.87

Comparing Scores of Different Time Perspective in Research Participants a

Elite Taekwondo athletes had higher scores compared to non-elite Taekwondo athletes in the dimensions of PP (F = 77.07, P < 0.001, η2 = 0.531), PH (F = 14.09, P < 0.001, η2 = 0.172), and F (F = 313.96, P < 0.001, η2 = 0.822). However, the dimensions of PF (F = 16.08, P = 0.003, η2 = 0.191) and PN (F = 63.90, P < 0.001, η2 = 0.484) were more pronounced in non-elite Taekwondo athletes compared to elite Taekwondo athletes (Table 2, Figure 1).

Comparison of time perspectives (TP): Past-negative (PN), past-positive (PP), present-fatalistic (PF), present-hedonistic (PH), and future (F), in elite and non-elite Taekwondo athletes.
Figure 1.

Comparison of time perspectives (TP): Past-negative (PN), past-positive (PP), present-fatalistic (PF), present-hedonistic (PH), and future (F), in elite and non-elite Taekwondo athletes.

5. Discussion

The study revealed that elite male Taekwondo athletes demonstrated a BTP, characterized by higher scores on positive dimensions PP, PH, and F and lower scores on negative dimensions PN and PF compared to their non-elite counterparts. These findings support the notion found in the literature that possessing a BTP is associated with better motivation, emotion regulation, and goal setting, whereas negative TP (such as PN and PF) can impair athletic performance (1, 3). Our results are also consistent with previous studies by Zentsova and Leonov (14) and Popovich et al. (2). Given the limited number of studies in this area and the lack of research specifically on Taekwondo athletes, the present findings can serve as a foundation for further investigations and the development of psychological interventions tailored to athletes' TP in Taekwondo.

According to Zimbardo and Boyd's (3), TP theory, athletes with a BTP tend to be associated with higher levels of psychological readiness and athletic performance. In the current study, the higher scores among elite Taekwondo athletes on PP, PH, and F dimensions may reflect a tendency to focus more on positive past experiences, goal setting, planning, and self-regulation factors identified in Ryan and Deci’s (4), self-determination theory as key elements of intrinsic motivation and sustained performance. Stolarski et al.'s (1), model further shows that a BTP influences athletic performance by enhancing motivation, improving emotion regulation, and fostering constructive interpretation of experiences. Accordingly, elite Taekwondo athletes leverage positive past experiences and a clear F outlook to maintain a constructive attitude towards successes and failures, whereas non-elite athletes may show less psychological cohesion when facing challenges, which could be linked to a stronger focus on negative TP (such as PN or PF) (1).

Moreover, based on Lewin’s (5), field theory, it can be argued that a BTP may be associated with a more stable and positive psychological field for elite Taekwondo athletes. This psychological field facilitates behaviors such as commitment, motivation, focus, and optimal athletic performance. Positive past memories, including victories and coach support, are likely linked to higher motivation, confidence, self-efficacy, and psychological stability in competitive situations. The PH orientation appears to be related to increased mindfulness and focus in the moment, which may improve the quality of practice and competition. The F orientation, as a component of the athlete’s psychological field, may support overcoming challenges, maintaining systematic planning, and sustaining steady athletic progress. Therefore, a BTP, especially across these three dimensions, may be associated with a more coherent, dynamic, and purposeful psychological field in elite Taekwondo athletes, promoting enhanced performance, increased intrinsic motivation, and reduced psychological stress under competitive pressure (5).

The findings of this study have important practical implications for improving the performance of Taekwondo athletes. Coaches, by understanding BTP, can design targeted training and psychological programs that encourage athletes toward an F-oriented and balanced temporal focus. For instance, long-term goal-setting training can boost motivation, self-efficacy, and commitment among athletes (3). Sports psychologists can also employ cognitive-behavioral techniques and mindfulness exercises to help athletes manage negative TP such as PN and PF; such interventions reduce anxiety, improve focus under pressure, and enhance performance (1). Additionally, consistent with Ryan and Deci’s (4), self-determination theory, creating a supportive environment that fosters athletes' sense of autonomy, competence, and social relatedness facilitates the development of positive and stable TP, thereby enhancing intrinsic motivation. Ultimately, structured psychological interventions such as goal-setting, mindfulness training, and cognitive restructuring may positively influence BTP, which could potentially contribute to improvements in focus, motivation, and athletic performance. Coaches and sports psychologists can implement short-term group workshops or individual sessions aimed at strengthening positive TP and managing negative ones. These interventions have the potential to enhance both athletic success and mental well-being among Taekwondo athletes. These interventions can be delivered through weekly group workshops or individual sessions lasting 45 - 60 minutes over multiple weeks, incorporating psychoeducation, practical exercises, and feedback (21).

Despite the significance of this study, several limitations should be noted. First, the cross sectional design precludes causal inferences, and the sample limited to male Taekwondo athletes from Tehran restricts the generalizability of the findings to other genders, regions, and sports. Second, reliance on self reported measures may have introduced social desirability bias or recall inaccuracies, leading athletes to portray their motivation and time perspective more favorably than they truly are. Finally, unmeasured variations in coaching style and athlete coach dynamics could have shaped athletes’ psychological states and responses, further biasing the results. The F longitudinal studies with more diverse samples and multi informant data (e.g., coach ratings or objective performance metrics) are recommended to address these issues. Furthermore, cultural context plays a significant role in shaping athletes’ time perspective. In Iranian culture, which is deeply rooted in traditional values, respect for elders, and strong familial bonds, individuals may be more inclined to score higher on the PP dimension. Recollections of family traditions, national pride, and religious observances may serve as emotional anchors, boosting self-confidence and a sense of identity in athletes. On the other hand, prevalent cultural beliefs in fate and divine will, which are more common in collectivist and religious societies, may enhance PF dimension, potentially reducing athletes’ perceived control over F outcomes and diminishing motivation (3, 22). However, the strong social support structures in Iranian culture especially from family, coaches, and peers can foster F orientation by providing external motivation and reinforcing long-term commitment to sport. In contrast, athletes from more individualistic cultures might rely more on internalized goal-setting and autonomy, aligning with different TP profiles. These cultural nuances highlight the importance of tailoring psychological interventions to the sociocultural background of athletes, ensuring more effective and relevant outcomes.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Stolarski M, Walerianczyk W, Pruszczak D. Introducing Temporal Theory to the Field of Sport Psychology: Toward a Conceptual Model of Time Perspectives in Athletes' Functioning. Front Psychol. 2018;9:2772. [PubMed ID: 30687202]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6336711]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02772.
  • 2.
    Popovych I, Chervinska I, Kazibekova V, Vasylyk M, Verbeschuk S, Gniezdilova V. Young athletes' time perspective as a factor in the development of sports motivation. Journal of Physical Education and Sport. 2022;22(10):2427-35.
  • 3.
    Zimbardo PG, Boyd JN. Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999;77(6):1271-88. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1271.
  • 4.
    Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Springer. 2024:6229-35. [PubMed ID: 35002182]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2630.
  • 5.
    Burnes B, Cooke B. Kurt Lewin's Field Theory: A Review and Re‐evaluation. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2012;15(4):408-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00348.x.
  • 6.
    Shores K, Scott D. The Relationship of Individual Time Perspective and Recreation Experience Preferences. Journal of Leisure Research. 2017;39(1):28-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2007.11950097.
  • 7.
    García JA, Ruiz B. Exploring the Role of Time Perspective in Leisure Choices. Journal of Leisure Research. 2017;47(5):515-37. https://doi.org/10.18666/jlr-2015-v47-i5-5876.
  • 8.
    Zarbo C, Stolarski M, Zamparini M, Damiani S, Casiraghi L, Rocchetti M, et al. Time perspective affects daily time use and daily functioning in individuals with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: Results from the multicentric DiAPAson study. J Psychiatr Res. 2023;160:93-100. [PubMed ID: 36796292]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.02.012.
  • 9.
    Davis PA, Trotter M, Astrom E, Ronnlund M. Balancing Time for Health Behaviors: Associations of Time Perspective With Physical Activity and Weight Management in Older Adults. Am J Health Promot. 2024;38(7):960-9. [PubMed ID: 38566500]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11348636]. https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171241242546.
  • 10.
    McKay MT, Cole JC. The relationship between balanced and negative time perspectives, and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Psychiatry Res. 2020;293:113383. [PubMed ID: 32866793]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113383.
  • 11.
    Li Y. Balanced time perspective, time management disposition, and resilience: a moderated mediation model of academic performance. Front Psychol. 2025;16:1484152. [PubMed ID: 40134729]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11933095]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1484152.
  • 12.
    Notarnicola A, Maccagnano G, Pesce V, Tafuri S, Novielli G, Moretti B. Visual- spatial capacity: gender and sport differences in young volleyball and tennis athletes and non-athletes. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:57. [PubMed ID: 24447526]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3925789]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-57.
  • 13.
    Nazarpouri S, Aghdasi M. A Comparison of Emotional Intelligence, Self-Efficacy, and Time Perspective Dimensions Between Elite and Non-Elite Wrestlers. Sport Psychology Studies. 2024;13(48):55-74. https://doi.org/10.22089/spsyj.2024.14287.2375.
  • 14.
    Zentsova NI, Leonov SV. Comparative Characteristics of Time Perspective of Professional Athletes and Drug Addicted People. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;78:340-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.307.
  • 15.
    Mitic P, Nedeljkovic J, Bojanic Z, Francesko M, Milovanovic I, Bianco A, et al. Differences in the Psychological Profiles of Elite and Non-elite Athletes. Front Psychol. 2021;12:635651. [PubMed ID: 33815222]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8012685]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.635651.
  • 16.
    Williams JM, Andersen MB. Psychosocial antecedents of sport injury: Review and critique of the stress and injury model'. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 1998;10(1):5-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209808406375.
  • 17.
    Nabilpour M, Samanipour MH, Bragazzi NL, Haddad M, Herrera-Valenzuela T, Tao D, et al. An investigation into the associations between psychological skills, anaerobic fitness, and aerobic fitness in elite Iranian taekwondo athletes. PLoS One. 2023;18(7). e0288227. [PubMed ID: 37418479]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10328248]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288227.
  • 18.
    Li B, Ding C, Fan F, Shi H, Guo L, Yang F. Associations Between Psychological Profiles and Performance Success Among Professional Taekwondo Athletes in China: A Multidimensional Scaling Profile Analysis. Front Psychol. 2020;11:822. [PubMed ID: 32499737]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7242764]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00822.
  • 19.
    Nam JH, Kim EJ, Cho EH. Sport Psychological Skill Factors and Scale Development for Taekwondo Athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(6). [PubMed ID: 35329120]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8955023]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19063433.
  • 20.
    Mohammadi Mazraei E, Gashouli M, Mohammadpanah Ardakan A. Determine the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Temporal focusing scale. Assessment and research in counseling and psychology. 2021;3(4):30-40. https://doi.org/10.52547/jarcp.3.4.30.
  • 21.
    Rothlin P, Birrer D, Horvath S, Grosse Holtforth M. Psychological skills training and a mindfulness-based intervention to enhance functional athletic performance: design of a randomized controlled trial using ambulatory assessment. BMC Psychol. 2016;4(1):39. [PubMed ID: 27457721]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4960835]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-016-0147-y.
  • 22.
    Ma B. Psychometri properties of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire in a sample of Iranian population. Advances Nurs Midwifery. 2014;24(84):61-70.

Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles