Efficiency of electrocoagulation process coupled with UV/H2O2 to remove the orange reactive dye 122 from wastewater of textile industries

authors:

avatar Tayebeh nadri , avatar Mohammad Hassn Ehrampoush , avatar Mohammad Malakootian ORCID , *

Koomesh: Vol.18, issue 3; 408-415
published online: December 28, 2016
article type: issue_documents_importer
received: October 06, 2016
accepted: November 02, 2016

how to cite: nadri T, Ehrampoush M H, Malakootian M. Efficiency of electrocoagulation process coupled with UV/H2O2 to remove the orange reactive dye 122 from wastewater of textile industries. koomesh. 2016;18(3):e151131. 

Abstract

Introduction: Besides aesthetic aspects, the discharge of textile wastewater into the environment create serious environmental problems as well. The objective of this research was to investigate the factors affecting the efficiency of the electrocoagulation process coupled with UV/H2O2 and determine the optimum conditions for dyes and COD removal from textile wastewater containing the orange reactive dye 122. Materials and Methods: This experimental research was done at Environmental Health Engineering Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences in 2014. In this research, the efficiency of Color removal and COD from synthetic solution under various conditions such as different pH (3, 6, 9), time (40, 30, 20, 10 minutes), flow (80, 20.60 amps per square meter) and initial concentration of H2O2 (80, 40, 20, 10 Mm/L) were measured. In addition, optimization experiments in real sewage have also been investigated. Results: the obtained results showed that the maximum efficiency of dyes and COD removal from synthetic solution in optimal condition of pH=6, flow rate=60 A/m2, initial concentration of H2O2 20 Mm/L, and 20 minutes’ reaction time was obtained 98% and 85.5% respectively. While, the maximum efficiency of dyes and COD removal from real wastewater samples was found 92% and 65.5% respectively. Conclusion: Due to the use of fewer chemicals, non-residual products, low sludge production, and High efficiency of removal can be concluded that electrocoagulation process coupled with UV/ H2O2 is an effective method to remove the orange reactive dye 122 from wastewater of textile industries.

References

  • 1.

    Balla W, Essadki A, Gourich B, Dassaa A, Chenik H, Azzi M. Electrocoagulation/electroflotation of reactive, disperse and mixture dyes in an external-loop airlift reactor. J Hazard Mater 2010; 184: 710-716.

  • 2.

    Elemen S, Akcakoca-Kumbasar EP, Yapar S. Modeling the adsorption of textile dye on organoclay using an artificial neural network. Dyes and Pigments 2012; 95: 102-111.

  • 3.

    Ghaly A, Ananthashankar R, Alhattab M, Ramakrishnan V. Production, characterization and treatment of textile effluents: a critical review. J Chem Eng Proc Technol 2014; 5: 182.

  • 4.

    Waring DR, Hallas G. The chemistry and application of dyes: Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.

  • 5.

    Ma L, Zhuo R, Liu H, Yu D, Jiang M, Zhang X, et al. Efficient decolorization and detoxification of the sulfonated azo dye reactive orange 16 and simulated textile wastewater containing reactive orange 16 by the white-rot fungus Ganoderma sp. En3 isolated from the forest of Tzu-chin mountain in China. Biochem Eng J 2014; 82: 1-9.

  • 6.

    Ferraz E, Umbuzeiro G, deAlmeida G, Caloto Oliveira A, Chequer F, Zanoni MV, et al. Differential toxicity of disperse red 1 and disperse red 13 in the ames test, HepG2 cytotoxicity assay, and Daphnia acute toxicity test. Environ Toxicol 2011; 26: 489-497.

  • 7.

    Saravanan M, Sambhamurthy NP, Sivarajan M. Treatment of acid blue 113 dye solution using iron electrocoagulation. CLEANSoil, Air, Water 2010; 38: 565-571.

  • 8.

    Yazdanbakhsh AR, Kermani M, Komasi S, Aghayani E, Sheikhmohammadi A. Humic acid removal from aqueous solutions by peroxi-electrocoagulation process. Ehem J 2015; 2: 53-58.

  • 9.

    Phalakornkule C, Polgumhang S, Tongdaung W, Karakat B, Nuyut T. Electrocoagulation of blue reactive, red disperse and mixed dyes, and application in treating textile effluent. J Environ Manag 2010; 91: 918-926.

  • 10.

    Mahvi AH, Malakootian M, Heidari MR. Comparison of polyaluminum silicate chloride and electrocoagulation process, in natural organic matter removal from surface water in Ghochan. Iran J Water Chem Technol 2011; 33: 377. (Persian).

  • 11.

    Malakootian M, Yousefi N, Fatehizadeh A. Survey efficiency of electrocoagulation on nitrate removal from aqueous solution. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2011; 8: 107. (Persian).

  • 12.

    Momenzadeh R, Malakootian M, Yaghmaeian K. Efficiency of titanium dioxide photocatalytic activity in removing anionic surfactant of sodium dodecyl sulfate from waste water. Koomesh 2015; 16: 648-654. (Persian).

  • 13.

    Akbal F, Camc S. Copper, chromium and nickel removal from metalplating wastewater by electrocoagulation. Desalination 2011; 269: 214-222.

  • 14.

    Roa-Morales G, Campos-Medina E, Aguilera-Cotero J, Bilyeu B, Barrera-Daz C. Aluminum electrocoagulation with peroxide applied to wastewater from pasta and cookie processing. Separa Purific Technol 2007; 54: 124-129.

  • 15.

    Khandegar V, Saroha AK. Electrochemical treatment of textile effluent containing Acid Red 131 dye. J Hazard Toxic Radio Waste 2013; 18: 38-44.

  • 16.

    Mollah MYA, Gomes JA, Das KK, Cocke DL. Electrochemical treatment of Orange II dye solution use of aluminum sacrificial electrodes and floc characterization. J Hazard Mater 2010; 174: 851-858.

  • 17.

    Aoudj S, Khelifa A, Drouiche N, Hecini M, Hamitouche H. Electrocoagulation process applied to wastewater containing dyes from textile industry. Chem Eng Proc 2010; 49: 1176-1182.

  • 18.

    Attour A, Touati M, Tlili M, Amor MB, Lapicque F, Leclerc JP. Influence of operatingparameters on phosphate removal from water by electrocoagulation using aluminum electrodes. Sep Purif Technol 2014; 123: 124-129.

  • 19.

    El-Ashtoukhy EZ, Amin N. Removal of acid green dye 50 from wastewater by anodic oxidation and electrocoagulationA comparative study. J Hazard Mater 2010; 179: 113-119.

  • 20.

    Kabdal I, Vardar B, Arslan-Alaton I, Tnay O. Effect of dye auxiliaries on color and COD removal from simulated reactive dyebath effluent by electrocoagulation. Chem Eng J 2009; 148: 89-96.

  • 21.

    Malakootian M, Mansoorian H, Moosazadeh M. Performance evaluation of electrocoagulation process using iron-rod electrodes for removing hardness from drinking water. Desalination 2010; 255: 67-71.

  • 22.

    Malakootian M, Yousefi N. The efficiency of electrocoagulation process using aluminum electrodes in removal of hardness from water. Chem Eng J 2009; 148: 89-96.

  • 23.

    Sridhar R, Sivakumar V, Immanuel VP, Maran JP. Treatment of pulp and paper industry bleaching effluent by electrocoagulant process. J Hazard Mater 2011; 186: 1495-1502.

  • 24.

    Hanafi F, Assobhei O, Mountadar M. Detoxification and discoloration of Moroccan olive mill wastewater by electrocoagulation. J Hazard Mater 2010; 174: 807-812.

  • 25.

    Kobya M, Delipinar S. Treatment of the baker's yeast wastewater by electrocoagulation. J Hazard Mater 2008; 154: 1133-1140.

  • 26.

    Rahmanian N, Jafari SM, Galanakis CM. Recovery and removal of phenolic compounds from olive mill wastewater. J Amer Oil Chem Soc 2014; 91: 1-18.

  • 27.

    Bazrafshan E, Mahvi AH. Textile wastewater treatment by electrocoagulation process using aluminum electrodes. Iran J Health Sci 2014; 2: 16-29.

  • 28.

    Rahmani AR, Samarghandi MR. Electrocoagulation treatment of color solution containing colored index eriochrome black T. J Water Wastewater 2009; 69: 52-58.

  • 29.

    Sirs I, Brillas E, Oturan MA, Rodrigo MA, Panizza M. Electrochemical advanced oxidation processes: today and tomorrow. A review. Environ Sci Pollu Res 2014; 21: 8336-8367.

  • 30.

    Keen OS, Baik S, Linden KG, Aga DS, Love NG. Enhanced biodegradation of carbamazepine after UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation. Environ Sci Technol 2012; 46: 6222-6227.

  • 31.

    Kasiri M, Khataee A. Removal of organic dyes by UV/H2O2 process: modelling and optimization. Environ Technol 2012; 33: 1417-1425.

  • 32.

    Mitrovi J, Radovi M, Boji D, Anelkovi T, Purenovi M, Boji A. Decolorization of textile azo dye reactive orange 16 with UV/H2O2 process. J Serb Chem Soc 2012; 77: 465-481.

  • 33.

    Spellman FR. Handbook of water and wastewater treatment plant operations: CRC Press; 2013.

  • 34.

    Pajootan E, Arami M, Mahmoodi NM. Binary system dye removal by electrocoagulation from synthetic and real colored wastewaters. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 2012; 43: 282-290.

  • 35.

    engil A, zacarM. The decolorization of CI Reactive Black 5 in aqueous solution by electrocoagulation using sacrificial iron electrodes. J Hazard Mater 2009; 161: 1369-1376.

  • 36.

    Zuorro A, Fidaleo M, Lavecchia R. Response surface methodology (RSM) analysis of photodegradation of sulfonateddiazo dye Reactive Green 19by UV/H2O2 process. J Environ Manag 2013; 127: 28-35.

  • 37.

    Racyte J, Rimeika M, Bruning H. pH effect on decolorization of raw textile wastewater polluted with reactive dyes by advanced oxidation with UV/H2O2. Environ Prot Eng 2009; 35: 167-178.

  • 38.

    Elmorsi TM, Riyad YM, Mohamed ZH, El Bary HMA. Decolorization of mordant red 73 azo dye in water using H2O2/UV and photo- Fenton treatment. J Hazard Mater 2010; 174: 352-358.

  • 39.

    Amin H, Amer A, Fecky A, Ibrahim I. Treatment of textile wastewater using H2O2/UV system. Physicochemical. Problems of Mineral Processing 2008; 42: 17-28.

  • 40.

    Singh A, Srivastava A, Tripathi A, Dutt NN. Optimization of brilliant green dye removal efficiency by electrocoagulation using response surface methodology. World J Environ Eng 2016; 4: 23-29.

  • 41.

    Basturk E, Karatas M. Decolorization of antraquinone dye reactive blue 181 solution by UV/H2O2 process. J photo Chem Photobio A Chem 2015; 299: 67-72.

  • 42.

    ChiuC, Moss CF. The role of the external ear in vertical sound localization in the free flying bat, Eptesicusfuscus. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 121: 2227-2235.

  • 43.

    Kalra SS, Mohan S, Sinha A, Singh G, Advanced oxidation processes for treatment of textile and dye wastewater: a review. 2nd International Conference on Environmental Science and Development, IACSIT Press, Singapore, 2011; 4: 271-275.

  • 44.

    Guimaraes JR, Maniero MG, de Araujo RN. A comparative study on the degradation of RB-19 dye in an aqueous medium by advanced oxidation processes. J Environ Manag 2012; 110: 33-39.##.