Mod Care J
Mod Care J

article information

Modern Care Journal: Vol.20, issue 3; e133701
published online: February 26, 2023
article type: Research Article
received: November 23, 2022
revised: January 17, 2023
accepted: January 22, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/modernc-133701
Crossmark

Depression, Anxiety, Stress, and Resilience in Faculty Members of Birjand University of Medical Sciences Following the COVID-19 Pandemic

authors:

avatar Mahya Mojahedi ORCID 1 , avatar Aliakbar  Esmaeili ORCID 2 , * , avatar Sara Sahranavard ORCID 1 , avatar Fatemeh Salmani ORCID 3

Social Determinants of Health Research Center, School of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
Clinical Research Development Unit of Imam Reza Hospital, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
Cardiovascular Diseases Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

how to cite: Mojahedi M, Esmaeili A, Sahranavard S, Salmani F. Depression, Anxiety, Stress, and Resilience in Faculty Members of Birjand University of Medical Sciences Following the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mod Care J. 2023;20(3):e133701. https://doi.org/10.5812/modernc-133701.

Abstract

Background:

Considering the COVID-19 pandemic, the mental state of the faculty members of medical universities responsible for educating students in various fields of medicine needs to gain attention.

Objectives:

This study aimed to analyze the psychological state of the Birjand University of Medical Sciences faculty members following the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods:

In this study, 122 faculty members of Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Iran, completed an online questionnaire containing demographic information along with two standard scales of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress-21 (DASS-21) and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-25 (CDRISC-25). The data were analyzed using an independent t-test and ANOVA.

Results:

The prevalence of moderate to very severe depression, anxiety, and stress in the target group was 32%, 50%, and 41.8%, respectively. The lecturer rank members showed significantly lower resilience (P = 0.03). However, individuals with administrative positions had substantially higher resilience and lower depression and stress levels (P < 0.001). The resilience level was significantly higher in the participants with 10 - 20 years of work (P = 0.02). Master graduate members showed more depression and anxiety (P < 0.001). There was a significant negative relationship between resilience and stress, depression, and anxiety (P < 0.001).

Conclusions:

The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress in the target group was considerable. Strengthening resilience according to its protective role could be an effective solution.

1. Background

The outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 rapidly turned into a critical global health issue. In March 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) proclaimed this situation a pandemic (1), indicating its importance. The COVID-19 outbreak has many side effects on routine human life, such as social withdrawal, financial imbalance, fear, and uncertainty. Besides, the anxiety of being affected by the virus and its related issues, such as stigma and death, has offered too many stressors and stress to the daily life of human beings (2).

Studies on COVID-19 have shown its adverse psychological effects on the general population (3-6). These adverse effects were investigated in many subgroups of society, such as university students (7) and medical health workers (8, 9). These effects varied based on stress, depression, sleep problems, fear, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, burnout, and frustration (10-12). These conditions could interfere with everyday personal and interpersonal relationships and a sense of well-being, leading to dysfunction in different areas of routine activities such as occupation and education (2).

Meanwhile, only a few studies have investigated the psychological status of faculty members of universities during the COVID-19 pandemic, reporting some psychological experiences of this group, such as exhaustion, frustration, depression, post-traumatic stress, anxiety (13, 14), and a decline in the mental health status (15). However, according to some limited studies, the psychological condition of faculty members has not been reported as favorable before the COVID-19 pandemic according to less job satisfaction due to heavy workload, the high number of students, extended working hours, and absence of work-life harmony (15).

On the other hand, resilience refers to the degree of flexibility and ability to adjust to undesirable changes, which can vary during the life course based on one’s psychological characteristics (16). The preventive role of resilience against the formation or aggravation of various psychopathologies was addressed in different scientific lectures (17, 18). Therefore, resilience might be crucial in protecting one’s mental and functional stability against a conflictual and complex situation, such as the COVID-19 outbreak (19).

2. Objectives

Although the psychological state of many subgroups of society has been analyzed in different studies after the COVID-19 outbreak, research on the psychological state of faculty members of medical universities, as part of society responsible for training students in various fields of medical sciences, following the coronavirus pandemic has been somehow neglected. The importance of this issue becomes apparent when we consider the indirect effects of this training on society’s health by educating and graduating medical students. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the psychological status of faculty members of Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Iran, regarding the COVID-19 outbreak, from May 2020 to December 2020.

3. Methods

With the method of convenience sampling, 122 faculty members of Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Iran, from May 2020 to December 2020, completed an online questionnaire containing demographic information along with two standard scales of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress-21 (DASS-21) and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-25 (CDRISC-25). The online questionnaire was made at Porsline, and its link was sent to the Birjand University of Medical Sciences faculty members. Demographic information can be seen in Table 1. The inclusion criteria were being a faculty member of Birjand University of Medical Sciences and being willing to complete the electronic questionnaires. Those electronic questionnaires, which were left uncompleted, were excluded.

Table 1.

Demographic Variables

Demographic VariablesFrequency (%)
Sex
Female81 (66.4)
Male41 (33.6)
Marital status
Single26 (21.3)
Married90 (73.8)
Divorced5 (4.1)
Widowed1 (0.8)
Having a child
Yes42 (34.4)
No80 (65.6)
Grade
MA34 (27.9)
Ph.D.35 (28.7)
Post-doctorate2 (1.6)
Specialty47 (38.5)
Subspecialty4 (3.3)
Academic rank
Lecturer39 (32.0)
Assistant professor61 (50.0)
Associate professor17 (13.9)
Professor5 (4.1)
Work experience (y)
< 552 (42.6)
5 - 1029 (23.8)
10 - 20(17.2)
> 2022 (16.4)
A family member who needs permanent care
Yes24 (19.7)
No98 (80.3)
Administrative position
Yes61 (50.0)
No61 (50.0)
Consumption of sedative drugs for more than three consecutive months
Yes11 (9.0)
No111 (91.0)

3.1. Tools

3.1.1. Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21

Lovibond and Lovibond developed this scale in 1995 to measure post-traumatic stress, anxiety, and depression, which involves 21 items with a Likert scale, from zero (did not apply to me at all.) to 3 (extremely applied to me). The range of scores is 0 - 63 (20). In one study, internal consistency for the total scale of DASS was reported as 0.89. Item-total correlations varied from 0.51 to 0.75. Split-half and test-retest reliability coefficients were reported as 0.96 and 0.99, respectively. The study revealed that DASS is a valid and reliable instrument (21). The translated Persian version of this questionnaire showed satisfactory reliability and validity in target groups (22, 23). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients of depression, anxiety, and stress in the present study were 0.87, 0.75, and 0.78, respectively.

3.1.2. Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-25

This scale was developed in 2003 and consisted of 25 items with a Likert scale, from 0 (completely incorrect) to 4 (always correct). The range of scores is 0 - 100. Cronbach’s alpha for the total scale was reported to be 0.89, and item-total correlations varied from 0.30 to 0.70. The test-retest reliability correlation coefficient was 0.87 (24). A higher mean score indicated a higher level of resilience. This questionnaire was translated into Persian, and its reliability coefficient using Cronbach’s alpha was reported to be 0.89 (25). The Cronbach’s alpha of this scale in the present study was 0.90.

3.2. Statistical Analysis

SPSS version 19 was used for statistical analysis. Qualitative variables were presented as percentages. Quantitative variables were presented as mean and standard deviation. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was applied to check normal distribution. Independent t-test (Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Kruskal-Wallis test for non-normally distributed data) were used to compare the variables between the groups. Pearson’s correlation coefficient measured the power of the relationship between variables. The P-value below 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

4. Results

This study enrolled 122 faculty members of Birjand University of Medical Sciences. Their mean age was 40.6 ± 8.35 years. Eighty-one (66.4%) participants were women. Ninety (73.8%) participants were married, and 80 (65.6%) participants had children. Regarding education, most participants had Ph.D. degrees (28.7%) or were specialists (38.5%). Ninety-eight (80.3%) participants did not deal with a family member who needed permanent care. Fifty-two (42.6%) participants had less than five years of work experience. Also, 111 (91%) participants had no history of taking sedative drugs (Table 1).

According to Figure 1, during the COVID-19 outbreak, the prevalence of moderate to very severe depression, anxiety, and stress in the target group was 32%, 50%, and 41.8%, respectively. As seen in Table 2, faculty members with administrative positions had significantly higher resilience levels than others (P < 0.001). There was a significant difference between the resilience scores of the participants based on academic rank (P = 0.03); according to Tukey’s Post Hoc test, the difference was between the lecturer and assistant professor ranks. Work experience also had a significant effect on resilience (P = 0.02). People with a history of 5 - 10 years had significantly lower resilience levels than people with a history of 10 - 20. Also, people who did not use sedative drugs revealed more resilience than those who used sedatives (P = 0.03).

The prevalence of different states of depression, anxiety, and stress in the target group
The prevalence of different states of depression, anxiety, and stress in the target group
Figure 1.

The prevalence of different states of depression, anxiety, and stress in the target group

Table 2.

Comparison of Resilience, Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Score Based on Demographic Characteristics

Demographic VariablesMean ± SDP-Value
Resilience
Administrative position< 0.001 a
Yes72.62 ± 10.41
No65.95 ± 11.18
Academic rank0.03 b
Lecturer65.41 ± 9.24
Assistant professor71.30 ± 11.85
Professor or associate professor70.59 ± 11.58
Work experience0.02 b
< 568.81 ± 11.10
5 - 1065.21 ± 12.32
10 - 2075.05 ± 10.18
> 2070.40 ± 8.98
Taking sedative drugs0.03 a
Yes62.27 ± 10.05
No69.98 ± 11.18
Depression
Marital status0.011 c
Single14.53 ± 9.74
Married9.70 ± 9.17
Administrative positions0.006 c
Yes8.33 ± 7.97
No13.14 ± 10.25
Education0.046 d
MA13.94 ± 10.03
Ph.D. or post-doctorate9.56 ± 8.22
Specialty or subspecialty9.45 ± 9.59
A family member who needs permanent care0.047 c
Yes15.75 ± 12.87
No9.51 ± 8.04
Taking sedatives0.001 a
Yes23.45 ± 13.02
No9.47 ± 8.08
Anxiety
Education0.009 d
MA12.70 ± 7.67
Ph.D. or post-doctorate8.21 ± 5.22
Specialty or subspecialty8.43 ± 6.96
Stress
Marital status0.036 c
Single20.61 ± 7.68
Married16.16 ± 9.04
Administrative Position0.002 c
Yes14.59 ± 8.24
No19.63 ± 8.93
A family member who needs permanent care0.013 c
Yes21.0 ± 9.95
No16.16 ± 8.44
Taking sedatives0.024 c
Yes23.45 ± 10.47
No16.48 ± 8.56

at-test.

b Analysis of variance (ANOVA).

c Mann-Whitney U test.

d Kruskal-Wallis.

The mean score of depression was significantly different between single and married individuals, so single participants had a higher score of depression (P = 0.011). Faculty members with administrative positions revealed lower depression scores than others (P = 0.006). Also, faculty members with master’s degrees showed more depression than specialists and subspecialists (P = 0.046). Also, individuals with a family member who needed permanent care (P = 0.047) and individuals who took sedative drugs (P = 0.001) had significantly higher scores of depression compared to related groups.

The anxiety scores of faculty members with master’s degrees were significantly higher than that of other groups of specialty and subspecialty, Ph.D., and post-doctorate holders (P = 0.009).

In our study, single participants experienced significantly higher stress than married ones (P = 0.036). Participants with administrative positions reported less stress than others (P = 0.002). Also, participants with a family member who needed permanent care (P = 0.013) and sedative drug consumption (P = 0.024) experienced significantly higher stress levels.

Figure 2 represents a relationship between resilience, anxiety, depression, and stress. Our results revealed a significant negative association of stress (r = -0.45, P < 0.001), depression (r = -0.57, P < 0.001), and anxiety (r = -0.46, P < 0.001) with resilience.

Relation between resilience, stress, anxiety, and depression in participants
Relation between resilience, stress, anxiety, and depression in participants
Figure 2.

Relation between resilience, stress, anxiety, and depression in participants

5. Discussion

In the present study, some psychological factors of faculty members of Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Iran, following the COVID-19 outbreak were assessed by an online self-reported questionnaire. Although there was a considerable number of studies about the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the mental health of the general population and many different subgroups with various types of psychopathologies such as depression, anxiety, and stress (26-32), the severe lack of studies focusing on faculty members’ mental health was observed. One study, compatible with our results, indicated that a substantial portion of university employees, more than 50%, experienced high levels of mood disturbances, anxiety, and stress in the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic (33). Another study described the experiences of Canadian faculty members during the COVID-19 pandemic as overwhelming and exhausting (14). The findings of another research about the different experiences of faculty members emphasized frustration, depression, post-traumatic stress, and anxiety in this influential health educational group during the COVID-19 outbreak (13).

On the other hand, parallel with our study, the protective role of resilience against the formation or aggravation of different psychopathologies (17, 18) and its positive impact on mental health (34, 35) were frequently reported in scientific literature. Regarding the academic degree and faculty members’ ranks, some studies reported that individuals with a higher academic degree experienced lower stress levels (36, 37). Also, several studies in line with our findings revealed that as the years of work experience increase, experiencing mental distress decreases, which could be described by resilience levels upraise and adaptation to the environment (38-41).

Although we could not find any paper about the administrative positions during the COVID-19 outbreak in target groups, we hypothesize that obtaining administrative experience by increasing the coping strategies and resilience level could decrease mental distress; inversely, possessing some acceptable characteristics in coping strategies, resilience, collaboration, teamwork, and the lower degree of mental distress lead to select one individual for an administrative position.

Compatible with our results, one study showed that being single could predict common mental disorders in faculty members (42). Furthermore, the necessity to take permanent care of a family member during the pandemic could be a significant stressor leading to some mental distress in the caregivers, as our study and several other studies revealed (43-45). Additionally, suffering from previous pathologies was reported as a risk for higher levels of mental distress such as depression, anxiety, and stress in some studies (32, 46-48), which could be considered somehow consistent with our results about previous usage of sedative drugs and its association with depression and stress.

5.1. Conclusions

Our results revealed that the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and stress in the target group was considerable, and strengthening resilience with its protective role could be considered an effective solution. We suggest further studies in enormous scope and different medical and non-medical universities to investigate the effectiveness of resilience-strengthening methods in promoting faculty members’ mental health.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Vizheh M, Qorbani M, Arzaghi SM, Muhidin S, Javanmard Z, Esmaeili M. The mental health of healthcare workers in the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2020;19(2):1967-78. [PubMed ID: 33134211]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7586202]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40200-020-00643-9.

  • 2.

    Markowitz JC. In the aftermath of the pandemic: interpersonal psychotherapy for anxiety, depression, and PTSD. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2021.

  • 3.

    Wang C, Pan R, Wan X, Tan Y, Xu L, Ho CS, et al. Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(5). [PubMed ID: 32155789]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7084952]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729.

  • 4.

    Qiu J, Shen B, Zhao M, Wang Z, Xie B, Xu Y. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: implications and policy recommendations. Gen Psychiatr. 2020;33(2). e100213. [PubMed ID: 32215365]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7061893]. https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213.

  • 5.

    Zandifar A, Badrfam R. Iranian mental health during the COVID-19 epidemic. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;51:101990. [PubMed ID: 32163908]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7128485]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.101990.

  • 6.

    Rajkumar RP. COVID-19 and mental health: A review of the existing literature. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;52:102066. [PubMed ID: 32302935]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7151415]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102066.

  • 7.

    Dhar BK, Ayittey FK, Sarkar SM. Impact of COVID-19 on Psychology among the University Students. Glob Chall. 2020;4(11):2000038. [PubMed ID: 33042575]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7537036]. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202000038.

  • 8.

    Zhang WR, Wang K, Yin L, Zhao WF, Xue Q, Peng M, et al. Mental Health and Psychosocial Problems of Medical Health Workers during the COVID-19 Epidemic in China. Psychother Psychosom. 2020;89(4):242-50. [PubMed ID: 32272480]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7206349]. https://doi.org/10.1159/000507639.

  • 9.

    Galbraith N, Boyda D, McFeeters D, Hassan T. The mental health of doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic. BJPsych Bull. 2021;45(2):93-7. [PubMed ID: 32340645]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7322151]. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2020.44.

  • 10.

    Pfefferbaum B, North CS. Mental Health and the Covid-19 Pandemic. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(6):510-2. [PubMed ID: 32283003]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2008017.

  • 11.

    Cullen W, Gulati G, Kelly BD. Mental health in the COVID-19 pandemic. QJM. 2020;113(5):311-2. [PubMed ID: 32227218]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7184387]. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcaa110.

  • 12.

    Talevi D, Socci V, Carai M, Carnaghi G, Faleri S, Trebbi E, et al. Mental health outcomes of the CoViD-19 pandemic. Riv Psichiatr. 2020;55(3):137-44.

  • 13.

    Anderson N, Fox KE. Faculty and Staff Experiences in Early Covid. Bridgewater Rev. 2022;40(1):12-5.

  • 14.

    VanLeeuwen CA, Veletsianos G, Johnson N, Belikov O. Never-ending repetitiveness, sadness, loss, and "juggling with a blindfold on:" Lived experiences of Canadian college and university faculty members during the COVID-19 pandemic. Br J Educ Technol. 2021;52(4). e13065. [PubMed ID: 34230673]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8250249]. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13065.

  • 15.

    Kita Y, Yasuda S, Gherghel C. Online education and the mental health of faculty during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):8990. [PubMed ID: 35637241]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9151810]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-12841-x.

  • 16.

    Chen LK. Older adults and COVID-19 pandemic: Resilience matters. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020;89:104124. [PubMed ID: 32474351]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7247489]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104124.

  • 17.

    PeConga EK, Gauthier GM, Holloway A, Walker RSW, Rosencrans PL, Zoellner LA, et al. Resilience is spreading: Mental health within the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol Trauma. 2020;12(S1):S47-8. [PubMed ID: 32496106]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7398149]. https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000874.

  • 18.

    Ouanes S, Kumar R, Doleh ESI, Smida M, Al-Kaabi A, Al-Shahrani AM, et al. Mental Health, resilience, and religiosity in the elderly under COVID-19 quarantine in Qatar. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021;96:104457. [PubMed ID: 34146999]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9754749]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2021.104457.

  • 19.

    Verdolini N, Amoretti S, Montejo L, Garcia-Rizo C, Hogg B, Mezquida G, et al. Resilience and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Affect Disord. 2021;283:156-64. [PubMed ID: 33556749]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7845537]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.055.

  • 20.

    Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995;33(3):335-43. [PubMed ID: 7726811]. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u.

  • 21.

    Akin A, Çetin B. The Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS): The study of validity and reliability. Kuram Uygul Egit Bil. 2007;7(1):260.

  • 22.

    Kakemam E, Navvabi E, Albelbeisi AH, Saeedikia F, Rouhi A, Majidi S. Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 Items (DASS-21) in a sample of health professionals: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):111. [PubMed ID: 35078477]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8789546]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07514-4.

  • 23.

    Asghari A, Saed F, Dibajnia P. Psychometric properties of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) in a non-clinical Iranian sample. Int J psychol. 2008;2(2):82-102.

  • 24.

    Connor KM, Davidson. Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(2):76-82. [PubMed ID: 12964174]. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113.

  • 25.

    Mohammadi M, Jazayeri A, Rafie A, Joukar B, ourshahbaz A. Resilience Factors in Individuals at Risk for Substance Abuse. J Psychol. 2006;1(2-3):224-3.

  • 26.

    Li J, Yang Z, Qiu H, Wang Y, Jian L, Ji J, et al. Anxiety and depression among general population in China at the peak of the COVID-19 epidemic. World Psychiatry. 2020;19(2):249-50. [PubMed ID: 32394560]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7214959]. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20758.

  • 27.

    Shevlin M, McBride O, Murphy J, Miller JG, Hartman TK, Levita L, et al. Anxiety, depression, traumatic stress and COVID-19-related anxiety in the UK general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. BJPsych Open. 2020;6(6). e125. [PubMed ID: 33070797]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7573460]. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.109.

  • 28.

    Lakhan R, Agrawal A, Sharma M. Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress during COVID-19 Pandemic. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2020;11(4):519-25. [PubMed ID: 33144785]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7595780]. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1716442.

  • 29.

    Mahmud S, Mohsin M, Dewan MN, Muyeed A. The global prevalence of depression, anxiety, stress, and insomnia among general population during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trends Psychol. 2022:28-1.

  • 30.

    Salari N, Khazaie H, Hosseinian-Far A, Khaledi-Paveh B, Kazeminia M, Mohammadi M, et al. The prevalence of stress, anxiety and depression within front-line healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-regression. Hum Resour Health. 2020;18(1):100. [PubMed ID: 33334335]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7745176]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-020-00544-1.

  • 31.

    Cam HH, Ustuner Top F, Kuzlu Ayyildiz T. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and health-related quality of life among university students in Turkey. Curr Psychol. 2022;41(2):1033-42. [PubMed ID: 33814870]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8011049]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01674-y.

  • 32.

    Xiong J, Lipsitz O, Nasri F, Lui LMW, Gill H, Phan L, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:55-64. [PubMed ID: 32799105]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7413844]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001.

  • 33.

    Peacock J. University employees’ perceptions of health during the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic. J Furth High Educ. 2021;46(1):107-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2021.1887464.

  • 34.

    Li F, Luo S, Mu W, Li Y, Ye L, Zheng X, et al. Effects of sources of social support and resilience on the mental health of different age groups during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Psychiatry. 2021;21(1):16. [PubMed ID: 33413238]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7789076]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-03012-1.

  • 35.

    Bahar A, Koçak HS, Samancıoğlu Bağlama S, Çuhadar D. Can Psychological Resilience Protect the Mental Health of Healthcare Professionals during the COVID-19 Pandemic Period? Dubai Med J. 2020;3(4):133-9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000510264.

  • 36.

    Khalaf OO, Khalil MA, Abdelmaksoud R. Coping with depression and anxiety in Egyptian physicians during COVID-19 pandemic. Middle East Curr Psychiatry. 2020;27(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-020-00070-9.

  • 37.

    Delgado-Gallegos JL, Padilla-Rivas GR, Zuñiga-Violante E, Avilez-Rodriguez G, Arrellanos Soto D, Franco-Villareal H, et al. Teaching anxiety, stress and resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: evaluating the vulnerability of academic professionals in Mexico through the adapted COVID-19 stress scales. Front Public Health. 2021;9:669057. [PubMed ID: 34041219]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8141807]. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202101.0406.v1.

  • 38.

    Chatzittofis A, Karanikola M, Michailidou K, Constantinidou A. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Mental Health of Healthcare Workers. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(4). [PubMed ID: 33546513]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7913751]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18041435.

  • 39.

    Hassamal S, Dong F, Hassamal S, Lee C, Ogunyemi D, Neeki MM. The Psychological Impact of COVID-19 on Hospital Staff. West J Emerg Med. 2021;22(2):346-52. [PubMed ID: 33856322]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7972387]. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2020.11.49015.

  • 40.

    Vitale E, Galatola V, Mea R. Observational study on the potential psychological factors that affected Italian nurses involved in the COVID-19 health emergency. Acta Biomed. 2021;92(Suppl 2). [PubMed ID: 33855977]. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v92iS2.11305.

  • 41.

    Murat M, Kose S, Savaser S. Determination of stress, depression and burnout levels of front-line nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021;30(2):533-43. [PubMed ID: 33222350]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7753629]. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12818.

  • 42.

    Donato GD, Pereira SLM, Pereira Junior ADC, Pillon SC, Vedana KGG, Miasso AI. Predictors of common mental disorders and psychiatric medication use among faculty members. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2022;58(4):1810-8. [PubMed ID: 34878669]. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12993.

  • 43.

    Farajzadeh A, Dehghanizadeh M, Maroufizadeh S, Amini M, Shamili A. Predictors of mental health among parents of children with cerebral palsy during the COVID-19 pandemic in Iran: A web-based cross-sectional study. Res Dev Disabil. 2021;112:103890. [PubMed ID: 33607484]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9758061]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.103890.

  • 44.

    Dhiman S, Sahu PK, Reed WR, Ganesh GS, Goyal RK, Jain S. Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on mental health and perceived strain among caregivers tending children with special needs. Res Dev Disabil. 2020;107:103790. [PubMed ID: 33091712]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7538124]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103790.

  • 45.

    Fong TK, Cheung T, Chan WC, Cheng CP. Depression, Anxiety and Stress on Caregivers of Persons with Dementia (CGPWD) in Hong Kong amid COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;19(1). [PubMed ID: 35010451]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8751129]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19010184.

  • 46.

    Santamaria MD, Mondragon NI, Santxo NB, Ozamiz-Etxebarria N. Teacher stress, anxiety and depression at the beginning of the academic year during the COVID-19 pandemic. Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2021;8. e14. [PubMed ID: 34192001]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8082122]. https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2021.14.

  • 47.

    Woon LS, Sidi H, Nik Jaafar NR, Leong Bin Abdullah MFI. Mental Health Status of University Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Post-Movement Lockdown Assessment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(24). [PubMed ID: 33302410]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7762588]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249155.

  • 48.

    Kaya H, Ayik B, Tasdelen R, Ercis M, Ertekin E. Social Support Promotes Mental Health During the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Cross-Sectional Study from Turkey. Psychiatr Danub. 2021;33(2):217-24. [PubMed ID: 34185753]. https://doi.org/10.24869/psyd.2021.217.