Abstract
Background:
Since the early diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) is crucial, understanding its epidemiological characteristics can facilitate timely diagnosis and treatment. This study investigated CD's epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory characteristics in South Khorasan Province, Iran.Objectives:
This study aimed to clarify the epidemiological characteristics, clinical manifestations, and laboratory findings of patients with CD in South Khorasan Province.Methods:
This descriptive epidemiological research was conducted on 110 individuals with CD referred to the Gastroenterology Clinic from March to August 2019. The data were acquired via a comprehensive questionnaire, encompassing the participants' demographic specifications, medical records, the symptoms of the disease, laboratory diagnostic evaluations, and biopsy results. The data were employed for epidemiological inquiry, and the corresponding analyses were performed in SPSS v. 22.Results:
The participants' mean age was 28.38 ± 15.25 years,78 (70.9%) were men, and 32 (29.1%) were women. The most common clinical gastrointestinal symptoms included abdominal pain in 70 (63.6%), diarrhea in 44 (40%), constipation in 43 (39.1%), and nausea in 35 (31.8%). Of the 83 biopsy cases, 3 (3.6%), 4 (4.8%), 9 (10.8%), 21 (25.3%), and 43 (55.4%) belonged to Marsh-I, Marsh-II, Marsh-IIIa, Marsh-IIIb, Marsh-IIIc categories, respectively.Conclusions:
Most participants were male and aged 10 to 20 years. Abdominal pain was the most common clinical symptom. All the pathologically examined patients showed evidence of CD, while approximately two-thirds were serologically positive.Keywords
Celiac Disease Clinical Characteristics Epidemiology South Khorasan
1. Background
Celiac disease (CD), also known as celiac sprue and gluten-sensitive enteropathy, is a common autoimmune disease in genetically predisposed individuals through the gluten protein in rye and wheat. Although this disease had been known as a pure gastrointestinal disease, it is now considered an inflammatory disease of the gastrointestinal tract that affects the small intestine, especially its initial parts (1). A systematic review of the global prevalence of CD demonstrated a seroprevalence rate of 1.4%, with the prevalence varying by continent, ranging from 1.3 (South America) to 1.8% (Europe and Asia) (2). Furthermore, based on the literature, its prevalence is about 1% in the general population of Iran (3-5). This disease is more common in childhood and adolescence but also occurs in adulthood. Approximately 20% of patients diagnosed with this disease are over 60 years old (6). Asymptomatic CD can progress to classic or typical intestinal symptoms such as diarrhea, weight loss, and abdominal pain, as well as atypical or nonclassical symptoms such as iron deficiency, bloating, constipation, chronic fatigue, headache, osteoporosis, neurologic disorders (e.g., depression and gluten ataxia), reproductive disorders (e.g., menarche and menopausal disorders), and oral/cutaneous disorders (e.g., dermatitis) (7-10).
Numerous studies in Iran have examined the symptoms of CD and related diseases. For example, Ganji et al. reported that the classic type of CD was the most common in northeast Iran. Moreover, female CD patients are more likely to have concomitant disorders such as nervous problems, bone diseases, and anemia (11). Dehbozorgi et al. reported that the patients' most common gastrointestinal symptoms were abdominal pain, flatulence, and constipation. Furthermore, the most common extraintestinal manifestations included bone pain, long-term fatigue, and anemia. The most frequent comorbidities associated with CD in children were type 1 diabetes mellitus and hypothyroidism (12).
2. Objectives
Because CD is relatively standard and associated with other diseases, collecting data on its prevalence and associated factors can assist authorities in planning early diagnostic and therapeutic measures. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the epidemiological characteristics, clinical symptoms, and laboratory findings of people with CD in South Khorasan Province, Iran.
3. Methods
3.1. Study Design
This descriptive study was conducted on all patients with new cases of CD who were referred to the Gastrointestinal Clinic in South Khorasan from March to August 2019.
3.2. Participants
In total, 110 individuals with CD participated in this study. After obtaining written informed consent from all participants, their medical history and medication adherence information were collected using a questionnaire. A checklist was also administered to collect demographic information, medical records, family history of the disease, symptoms, laboratory diagnostic tests (evaluation of anti-tissue transglutaminase immunoglobulin A (anti-TTG-IgA levels)), and biopsy results using the Marsh classification.
3.3. Scales
Histological examinations were performed for a definitive diagnosis of CD based on the Marsh classification. In Marsh I, the natural appearance of the mucosa was accompanied by an increase in lymphocytes inside the epithelium. In Marsh II, the height of the intestinal villi was shortened, which was attributed to hyperplastic crypts. Marsh III is associated with hyperplastic crypts and a moderate-to-severe reduction of villi. Most patients with celiac disease are classified as Marsh III at diagnosis (13, 14).
3.4. Data Collection
Histological examinations were performed for a definitive diagnosis of CD based on the Marsh classification. In Marsh I, the natural appearance of the mucous is accompanied by an increase in lymphocytes inside the epithelium. In Marsh II, the height of the intestinal villi is shortened, which is attributed to hyperplastic crypts. Marsh III is associated with hyperplastic crypts and a moderate-to-severe reduction of villi. Most celiac patients were classified as Marsh III at diagnosis (13, 14).
3.5. Data Analysis
The data were used for epidemiological inquiry, and the corresponding analyses were performed using SPSS v.22.
3.6. Ethical Consideration
This study was approved by the Research Council and Ethics Committee of Birjand University of Medical Science (ethics code: IR. BUMS. REC.1398.285). Informed written consent was obtained from all patients. No cost was imposed on the patients. The final report and analysis were performed without the names of the study participants.
4. Results
4.1. Demographic Information
We aimed to determine the frequency distribution of clinical and demographic characteristics of 110 individuals with CD in South Khorasan from March to August 2019. The population consisted of 78 (70.9%) men and 32 (29.1%) women, with a mean age of 15.25 ± 28.38 years (median = 27.5 and IQR = 24), ranging from 4 to 71 years.
The findings regarding gastrointestinal symptoms showed that abdominal pain in 70 (63.6%) and diarrhea in 44 (40%) were the most common symptoms among the patients (Table 1). Regarding nongastrointestinal symptoms, 22 (20%) individuals reported skin problems (dermatitis herpetiformis), 15 (13.6%) had oral problems (mouth ulcers), and 10 (9.1%) noted bone problems (osteoporosis and osteopenia).
The Frequency Distribution of Clinical Gastrointestinal and Nongastrointestinal Symptoms in the Participants
| Clinical Symptoms | No. (%) |
|---|---|
| Abdominal pain | 70 (63.6) |
| Constipation | 43 (39.1) |
| Diarrhea | 44 (40) |
| Nausea | 35 (31.8) |
| Skin disorders (dermatitis herpetiformis) | 22 (20) |
| Oral disorders (mouth ulcers) | 15 (13.6) |
| Bone disorders (osteoporosis and osteopenia) | 10 (9.1) |
4.2. Laboratory Findings
The frequency distribution of serum anti-tissue transglutaminase IgA (anti-TTG-IgA) levels revealed that immunoglobulin levels were less than 12 U/mL (negative) in 28 (25.5%), between 12 and 18 U/mL (borderline) in 7 (6.4%), and greater than 19 (positive) in 75 (68.2%) patients (Figure 1).
The frequency distribution of serum anti-tTg-IgA levels in the studied population
4.3. Diagnostic and Interventional Results
The diagnostic and interventional findings showed that all the participants underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, but only two had colonoscopies. The results of gastrointestinal biopsy pathology among those who underwent endoscopy revealed that most participants were in the Marsh 3c (n = 54, 49.1%) and Marsh 3b (n = 26, 23.6%) categories (Figure 2).
Frequency distribution of pathology findings in the endoscopic specimens of the upper gastrointestinal tract
4.4. Frequency of Comorbidities in Patients with Celiac Disease
Of 110 participants, 17 (15.5%) had musculoskeletal disorders, 17 (15.5%) had psychiatric problems, 11 (10%) had iron deficiency anemia, 10 (9.1%) had Sjogren's syndrome, and 8 (7.3%) had diabetes (Appendix 1 in the Supplementary File).
5. Discussion
Celiac disease was initially proposed to affect white Europeans exclusively. However, recent epidemiological studies have reported its occurrence in almost every part of the world, including Africa, the Middle East, Asia, and South America (13). The global prevalence of CD is approximately 0.5-1%, except for those who consume very little or no gluten (14). Celiac disease is a relatively common cause of chronic diarrhea in Iran, Iraq, and Kuwait and is diagnosed in 2-8% of patients with type 1 diabetes in Iran, Israel, and Saudi Arabia. These numbers are obtained while the per capita consumption of wheat in many of these countries is among the highest in the world (> 150 kg per person per year) (15). Due to the limited availability of epidemiological studies on the prevalence of CD and its symptoms in Iran, particularly in the country's southeast, this study looked into the frequency distribution of clinical and demographic characteristics of 110 CD patients in South Khorasan from March to August 2019. According to the findings, the most common symptoms in both sexes were abdominal pain and diarrhea. Previous research shows these symptoms affect 85 – 54% of the population (16). In a study by Rostami Nejad et al., the prevalence of diarrhea in CD patients ranged from 6.5 to 20% (17). Previous studies have also reported constipation as another common disease symptom, and women are more likely to suffer from it. The frequency of constipation in women may be affected by physiological differences in the anatomy of the pelvis, as well as other factors such as hormones, including estrogen and progesterone. One study found constipation in 52% of people, which was higher than ours (18). In an Italian study, constipation was found in 13% of the CD patients, which was lower than ours (19).
Celiac disease manifests as osteopenia, osteoporosis, arthritis, and inflammation (20). Our findings appear consistent with previous studies despite differences in populations and study areas. Regarding comorbidities, musculoskeletal problems, including osteoporosis (15.5%), psychological disorders such as depression (15.5%), and peripheral neuropathy (12.7%, were the most common diseases associated with CD. Most previous studies have found that CD increases the risk of depression and osteoporosis. A clinical visit should include a mood assessment. Besides, depression is prevalent in CD in varying degrees, ranging from 6 to 57%. This rate went from 6.5% (21) to 14% (22), 17% (23), and 19 - 24% (24).
A study by the US National Institutes of Health, which looked at the 12-month prevalence of major depressive episodes in American adults with CD, found that 6.7% of these patients showed some depression (25). Preventing osteoporosis in younger CD patients and aggressively treating this disease in older patients should also be prioritized. In women with CD, the risk of osteoporosis is more than twice that in men; this risk is also nearly 4 times higher in CD patients than in healthy people (26).
The first step in CD screening and diagnosis is evaluating serological markers and tTG-IgA antibodies. The second step is the detection of anti-endomysial antibodies (EMA). The sensitivity and specificity of both methods are high. Studies on diagnostic laboratory markers in patients indicated that anti-tTG-IgA had a sensitivity of 96.8%, a specificity of 91%, and a positive predictive value of 91.2%. In comparison, its negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were 96.8% and 97.7%, respectively (27). According to another study, the sensitivity of tTG-IgA and EMA tests was 92% for the diagnosis of CD, but the specificity of TTG and EMA tests was 98.5% and 100%, respectively (13).
A weak association was observed between lower tTG-IgA levels and intestinal enteropathy among symptomatic patients with CD (14). In contrast, tTG-IgA levels (> 100 U/mL) were found to be highly specific for Marsh III lesions (28). Our findings about the serum levels of anti-tTG-IgA in 110 participants showed that 28 (25.5%) had immunoglobulin levels of less than 12 U/mL (negative), 7 (6.4%) had immunoglobulin levels of around 12 - 18 U/mL (borderline), and 75 (68.2%) had immunoglobulin levels greater than or equal to 19 U/mL (positive). Their mean serum levels of anti-tTG-IgA were 16.352 ± 91.642 U/mL. Moreover, 9 (8.2%), 9 (8.2%), 12 (10.9%), 26 (23.6%), and 54 cases (49.1%) belonged to Marsh I, Marsh II, Marsh IIIa, Marsh IIIb, and Marsh IIIc classes, respectively. In a study of 49 participants, 3, 4, and 5 patients were categorized as having Marsh I, Marsh II, and Marsh IIIa, respectively (3, 28). Another study among 1440 people showed that 7 individuals had positive serological evidence for anti-tTG-IgA, 5 of whom were satisfied to undergo endoscopy, and all of them showed a Marsh IIIc classification of CD in their gastrointestinal biopsy (29). Singh et al. also reported Marsh 0 (n = 1), Marsh III (n = 8), Marsh II (n = 1), and Marsh IIIa (n = 1) classifications of CD among their participants (30). Tursi et al. studied 119 patients with CD and observed Marsh I lesions in 13 patients (10.92%), Marsh II in 24 anti-tTG (20.16%), Marsh IIIa in 27 anti-tTG (22.68%), Marsh IIIb in 31 anti-tTG (26.05%), and Marsh IIIc in 24 anti-tTG (20.16%) participants. This study revealed that the prevalence of anti-tTG and its mean serum values were higher in CD patients with severe enteropathy (Marsh IIIb-c lesions) than in those with mild enteropathy (Marsh I-3a) (31). Webb et al. noted that among 230 individuals with CD, 67 had low tTG-IgA levels (less than 5 U/mL), of whom 55% had Marsh III lesions (27). In a study by Karami, serological results revealed that 47% of the participants had tTG antibodies. Based on the disease severity classification, the highest frequency (57%) was linked to Marsh III. Furthermore, 10% of the CD patients were simultaneously diagnosed with diabetes (32).
Gastrointestinal pathology tests in the current study revealed that Marsh IIIc categorization is more common in CD patients, consistent with the findings of earlier studies (33). Tissue changes were also observed in people with CD, although 25.5% of the participants had harmful antibody levels. Factors such as different measurement methods and technical errors in the measurement process of this type of antibody can justify this finding. In this regard, false negatives caused by abnormal serum IgA levels, elimination of gluten from the diet, and even the intake of immunosuppressive drugs and corticosteroids should be considered (34).
5.1. Conclusions
Most of the patients in this study were male and within the age range of 10-20 years. Abdominal pain was considered the most common clinical symptom by the participants. All the pathologically examined patients showed evidence of CD, while approximately two-thirds were serologically positive.
References
-
1.
Tye-Din JA, Galipeau HJ, Agardh D. Celiac Disease: A Review of Current Concepts in Pathogenesis, Prevention, and Novel Therapies. Front Pediatr. 2018;6:350. [PubMed ID: 30519552]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6258800]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00350.
-
2.
Singh P, Arora A, Strand TA, Leffler DA, Catassi C, Green PH, et al. Global Prevalence of Celiac Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16(6):823-836 e2. [PubMed ID: 29551598]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.037.
-
3.
Shahbazkhani B, Malekzadeh R, Sotoudeh M, Moghadam KF, Farhadi M, Ansari R, et al. High prevalence of coeliac disease in apparently healthy Iranian blood donors. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15(5):475-8. [PubMed ID: 12702902]. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.meg.0000059118.41030.96.
-
4.
Akbari MR, Mohammadkhani A, Fakheri H, Javad Zahedi M, Shahbazkhani B, Nouraie M, et al. Screening of the adult population in Iran for coeliac disease: comparison of the tissue-transglutaminase antibody and anti-endomysial antibody tests. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;18(11):1181-6. [PubMed ID: 17033439]. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.meg.0000224477.51428.32.
-
5.
Khoshnia M, Pourshams A, Mohammadkhani A, Tavangar S, Shahbazkhani B, Malekzadeh R. [Celiac disease in gonbad-kavoos]. Govaresh. 2012;10(3):131-3. Persian.
-
6.
Green PH. The many faces of celiac disease: clinical presentation of celiac disease in the adult population. Gastroenterology. 2005;128(4 Suppl 1):S74-8. [PubMed ID: 15825130]. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.016.
-
7.
Spijkerman M, Tan IL, Kolkman JJ, Withoff S, Wijmenga C, Visschedijk MC, et al. A large variety of clinical features and concomitant disorders in celiac disease - A cohort study in the Netherlands. Dig Liver Dis. 2016;48(5):499-505. [PubMed ID: 26854256]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2016.01.006.
-
8.
Lebwohl B, Sanders DS, Green PHR. Coeliac disease. Lancet. 2018;391(10115):70-81. [PubMed ID: 28760445]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31796-8.
-
9.
Dominguez Castro P, Harkin G, Hussey M, Christopher B, Kiat C, Liong Chin J, et al. Changes in Presentation of Celiac Disease in Ireland From the 1960s to 2015. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(6):864-871 e3. [PubMed ID: 28043932]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2016.11.018.
-
10.
Reilly NR, Fasano A, Green PH. Presentation of celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2012;22(4):613-21. [PubMed ID: 23083982]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2012.07.008.
-
11.
Ganji A, Roustai Geraylow K, Shahbazkhani B, Attarian F. Common clinical symptoms and concomitant disease in celiac patients – A large cohort study in the North-East of Iran. J Contemp Med Sci. 2021;7(6). https://doi.org/10.22317/jcms.v7i6.1074.
-
12.
Dehbozorgi M, Honar N, Ekramzadeh M, Saki F. Clinical manifestations and associated disorders in children with celiac disease in southern Iran. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20(1):256. [PubMed ID: 32460713]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7251905]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02162-1.
-
13.
Shahramian I, Mohammadi MH, Kalvandi G, Sargazi AR, Sotodeh A. [Prevalence of Celiac in Children and Adolescents with SeizureReferring to Amir Hospital in Zabol during 2016]. J Ilam Univ Med Sci. 2019;26(6):176-82. Persian. https://doi.org/10.29252/sjimu.26.6.176.
-
14.
Gujral N, Freeman HJ, Thomson AB. Celiac disease: prevalence, diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(42):6036-59. [PubMed ID: 23155333]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3496881]. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i42.6036.
-
15.
Rostami K, Kerckhaert J, Tiemessen R, von Blomberg BM, Meijer JW, Mulder CJ. Sensitivity of antiendomysium and antigliadin antibodies in untreated celiac disease: disappointing in clinical practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94(4):888-94. [PubMed ID: 10201452]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.983_f.x.
-
16.
Jansson-Knodell CL, King KS, Larson JJ, Van Dyke CT, Murray JA, Rubio-Tapia A. Gender-Based Differences in a Population-Based Cohort with Celiac Disease: More Alike than Unalike. Dig Dis Sci. 2018;63(1):184-92. [PubMed ID: 29127609]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5961510]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-017-4835-0.
-
17.
Rostami Nejad M, Rostami K, Emami M, Zali M, Malekzadeh R. Epidemiology of celiac disease in iran: a review. Middle East J Dig Dis. 2011;3(1):5-12. [PubMed ID: 25197526]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4154929].
-
18.
Caio G, Volta U, Sapone A, Leffler DA, De Giorgio R, Catassi C, et al. Celiac disease: a comprehensive current review. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):142. [PubMed ID: 31331324]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6647104]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1380-z.
-
19.
Volta U, Caio G, Stanghellini V, De Giorgio R. The changing clinical profile of celiac disease: a 15-year experience (1998-2012) in an Italian referral center. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014;14:194. [PubMed ID: 25404189]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4236812]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-014-0194-x.
-
20.
Harper JW, Holleran SF, Ramakrishnan R, Bhagat G, Green PH. Anemia in celiac disease is multifactorial in etiology. Am J Hematol. 2007;82(11):996-1000. [PubMed ID: 17636474]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.20996.
-
21.
Ciacci C, Iavarone A, Mazzacca G, De Rosa A. Depressive symptoms in adult coeliac disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998;33(3):247-50. [PubMed ID: 9548616]. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365529850170801.
-
22.
Cicarelli G, Della Rocca G, Amboni M, Ciacci C, Mazzacca G, Filla A, et al. Clinical and neurological abnormalities in adult celiac disease. Neurol Sci. 2003;24(5):311-7. [PubMed ID: 14716525]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-003-0181-4.
-
23.
Siniscalchi M, Iovino P, Tortora R, Forestiero S, Somma A, Capuano L, et al. Fatigue in adult coeliac disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22(5):489-94. [PubMed ID: 16128688]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02619.x.
-
24.
Fera T, Cascio B, Angelini G, Martini S, Guidetti CS. Affective disorders and quality of life in adult coeliac disease patients on a gluten-free diet. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15(12):1287-92. [PubMed ID: 14624151]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042737-200312000-00006.
-
25.
Mental Health Services Administration. National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Summary of National Findings, 1971–2014. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2014.
-
26.
Looker AC, Borrud LG, Dawson-Hughes B, Shepherd JA, Wright NC. Osteoporosis or low bone mass at the femur neck or lumbar spine in older adults, United States, 2005-2008. Cent Dis Cont Prevent. 2012;3.
-
27.
Webb C, Norstrom F, Myleus A, Ivarsson A, Halvarsson B, Hogberg L, et al. Celiac disease can be predicted by high levels of anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies in population-based screening. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60(6):787-91. [PubMed ID: 25564816]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000688.
-
28.
Saberi-Firouzi M, Omrani GR, Nejabat M, Mehrabani D, Khademolhosseini F. Prevalence of celiac disease in Shiraz, southern Iran. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(3):135-8. [PubMed ID: 19568522]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2702920]. https://doi.org/10.4103/1319-3767.41732.
-
29.
Rodrigo L. Celiac disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(41):6585-93. [PubMed ID: 17075969]. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v12.i41.6585.
-
30.
Singh P, Arora S, Lal S, Strand TA, Makharia GK. Celiac Disease in Women With Infertility: A Meta-Analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;50(1):33-9. [PubMed ID: 25564410]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000000285.
-
31.
Tursi A, Brandimarte G, Giorgetti GM. Prevalence of antitissue transglutaminase antibodies in different degrees of intestinal damage in celiac disease. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;36(3):219-21. [PubMed ID: 12590232]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004836-200303000-00007.
-
32.
Karami M, Afshar B, Monsef Esfahani A, Bashirian S, Halimi L. Clinical and laboratory surveys of the Iranian celiac patients. Nutr Food Sci Res. 2021;8(1):29-34.
-
33.
Cataldo F, Pitarresi N, Accomando S, Greco L, Glnbi Working Group on Coeliac Disease; Sigenp. Epidemiological and clinical features in immigrant children with coeliac disease: an Italian multicentre study. Dig Liver Dis. 2004;36(11):722-9. [PubMed ID: 15571002]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2004.03.021.
-
34.
Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, Calderwood AH, Murray JA, American College of G. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(5):656-76. quiz 677. [PubMed ID: 23609613]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3706994]. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2013.79.