https://doi.org/10.5812/mcj-143404

Tendency to Consume Probiotics in the General Population: An Ecological Study

authors:

avatar Mohammadreza Rabiee ORCID 1 , avatar Masoumeh Sadat Mousavi ORCID 2 , *

Department of Sport Sciences, International Division, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
Modern Care Journal: Vol.21, issue 3; e143404
published online: March 4, 2024
article type: Research Article
received: November 26, 2023
revised: January 31, 2024
accepted: February 13, 2024

how to cite: Rabiee M, Mousavi M S. Tendency to Consume Probiotics in the General Population: An Ecological Study. Mod Care J. 2024;21(3):e143404. https://doi.org/10.5812/mcj-143404.

Abstract

Background:

Reports indicate that probiotics have beneficial effects on both the prevention and treatment of numerous diseases.

Objectives:

This study aims to explore the overall inclination toward probiotic consumption, its trends, and its association with common gastrointestinal diseases.

Methods:

We conducted an ecological study utilizing Google Trends (GTs) and Global Concern data. We analyzed search terms related to “probiotic," “Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)," “Peptic," “Constipation," “Diarrhea," and “Stomach Cancer (SC)" across all searches performed on GTs from January 2014 to July 2023.

Results:

Globally and in Iran, there has been an increasing interest in consuming probiotics over time. This increase is linked to a rise in cases of stomach cancer and irritable bowel syndrome, which, in turn, boosts the propensity to utilize probiotics. Globally, there is a direct correlation between probiotic consumption and IBS (R = +0.69, P = 0.0001), peptic disorders (R = +0.71, P = 0.001), Constipation (R = +0.93, P = 0.001), and diarrhea (R = +0.89, P = 0.001). In Iran, significant direct correlations were found between probiotic consumption and both constipation (R = +0.36, P = 0.001) and diarrhea (R = +0.40, P = 0.001). Among probiotic-containing products, yogurt was preferred over others worldwide and in Iran.

Conclusions:

The interest in probiotic use is high globally and in Iran. Consequently, there is a need for strategies to educate the public about the areas where the benefits of probiotics are well-supported by evidence and where information is either weak or lacking.

1. Background

Functional foods, such as probiotics, have beneficial effects on health (1). Probiotics are live microorganisms that help maintain or improve the intestinal microbial balance and can offer health benefits to their host (2). Probiotics, specifically known as Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, are used. Acid-producing bacteria, particularly lactobacilli and bifidobacteria, are naturally part of the digestive system's ecosystem and are considered probiotics (3).

Probiotics are non-pathogenic microorganisms; many of these are part of the human gut flora and exist in a symbiotic relationship with the digestive system's flora (4). They are utilized as a treatment method, targeting the prevention and treatment of a wide array of diseases, including digestive diseases, enhancing the immune system, and treating vaginal infections diabetes, and improving oral and dental health (5-7).

Probiotics serve as a treatment and prevention option for constipation (8), reducing the colon's pH and enhancing contractions, thereby increasing intestinal muscle movements. Certain probiotic species can boost mucus secretion and transform free bile salts, drawing significant water into the colon, softening stool, and aiding its elimination (8).

Helicobacter pylori is a significant factor in gastric ulcer disease, gastric adenocarcinoma, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma (9). Treatment regimens for eradicating this bacterium often rely on a combination of dual therapy and proton pump inhibitors. Despite therapeutic advancements, H. pylori eradication treatments in developed countries still face high infection rates (10). Resistance to antibiotics and side effects are among the common reasons for the failure of anti-H. pylori treatments. Some probiotic strains have shown inhibitory activity against H. pylori bacteria (11). Additionally, certain probiotic species can mitigate the side effects caused by antibiotic treatments, thus inhibiting the growth of H. pylori (12).

Diarrhea is a prevalent digestive disorder that leads to the loss of fluids and electrolytes and can be fatal, especially in children. Probiotics have been shown to reduce the incidence of diarrhea and promote regular bowel movements (13).

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a widely recognized gastrointestinal functional disorder. While not life-threatening, IBS significantly diminishes the quality of life for those affected (14). Probiotics can alleviate abdominal pain by influencing the expression of neurotransmitters and receptors involved in pain management, such as opioid receptors (15). Additionally, probiotics have been found to decrease intestinal cytokine secretion and enhance epithelial barrier function in mouse models of intestinal inflammation (14, 16).

Probiotics, including lactobacilli, inhibit the growth of various pathological cell types. These bacteria enhance the host's immune response and have preventive and inhibitory effects on cancer (17). Stomach cancer (SC) ranks as the fifth most common cancer globally, being the fourth most prevalent in men and the seventh in women, with over 1 million new cases in 2020 (18). Among these, Mongolia has the highest incidence rate of SC, followed by Japan in second place and Iran in ninth worldwide (19).

Doctors often prescribe probiotics for digestive issues such as chronic diarrhea and IBS (20). In the UK, 78% of general practitioners recommend probiotic-rich diets to their patients (21). The efficacy of probiotics varies; while some strains are effective, others are not, yet their consumption remains high among patients (8).

The internet and its data have become recognized as alternative tools for collecting information on disease patterns and population estimates in epidemiology (22, 23). Searches on Google and their trends can provide insights into public interest and opinions on specific issues, as well as the development and spread of diseases (24).

2. Objectives

Given the growing awareness and knowledge about healthy eating and its importance for health, this study aims to explore the general tendency towards probiotic consumption, its trends, and its association with common digestive diseases.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Design

This study is an ecological investigation utilizing Google Trends (GTs) and Global Concern data.

3.2. Data Collection

We initially searched for user-specified search terms related to “probiotic," “Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)," “Peptic," “Constipation," “Diarrhea," and “Stomach Cancer (SC)" across all searches conducted via GTs from January 2014 to July 2023. The volume range is from 1 to 100, where 100 signifies the peak popularity, and a score of 0 indicates that the search interest is below 1% of its peak (25). To gather the most recent data on the incidence and cases of SC globally and in various countries, we utilized statistics from the Global Cancer and the World Cancer Organization for the year 2020.

3.3. Data Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS16 and Microsoft Excel 2016, including the Spearman correlation coefficient with SPSS16. We analyzed interest over time and visualized the data using GTs.

3.4. Ethical Consideration

All ethical concerns, including plagiarism, data fabrication, and double publication, were strictly adhered to by the authors. The ethics committee of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences approved this study as a research project (ID: IR.SKUMS.REC.1401.054).

4. Results

4.1. Propensity to Consume Probiotic Foods in Countries with the Highest Incidence of Gastric Cancer

The inclination to consume probiotic foods in countries with the highest rates of gastric cancer shows that the interest in probiotics is on the rise globally, including in Iran. The peak interest was observed in Mongolia in 2017 and in Iran and Japan in 2021. A strong correlation exists between the consumption of probiotics and the incidence of gastric cancer across all regions examined (Figure 1).

The frequency of search terms related to “Probiotic" in the world, Iran, Mongolia, and Japan (from January 2014 to July 2023) is analyzed. *Countries with the highest incidence of stomach cancer in the world in 2020
The frequency of search terms related to “Probiotic
Figure 1.

The frequency of search terms related to “Probiotic" in the world, Iran, Mongolia, and Japan (from January 2014 to July 2023) is analyzed. *Countries with the highest incidence of stomach cancer in the world in 2020

Globally and in Iran, search trends for probiotics and IBS align with each other. In Iran, alongside an increase in cases of diarrhea and constipation, there has been a rise in interest in probiotics, with search trends for probiotics moving in tandem with searches for gastric ulcers (Figure 2).

The frequency of Google Search Trends for “probiotic" and “IBS" in the world and Iran from January 2014 to July 2023
The frequency of Google Search Trends for “probiotic
Figure 2.

The frequency of Google Search Trends for “probiotic" and “IBS" in the world and Iran from January 2014 to July 2023

4.2. Correlation Between SC, IBS, and Probiotics

Globally, a direct correlation has been identified between probiotics and IBS (R = +0.69, P = 0.0001), peptic disorders (R = +0.71, P = 0.001), constipation (R = +0.93, P = 0.001), and diarrhea (R = +0.89, P = 0.001). In Iran, a positive and significant correlation was observed between constipation (R = +0.36, P = 0.001) and diarrhea (R = +0.40, P = 0.001) and the interest in probiotics (Table 1).

Table 1.

The Correlation Coefficient Between the Number of People with Digestive Disorders Worldwide and in Countries with a High Incidence and Their Inclination Toward Using Probiotics

Stomach Cancer aIrritable Bowel SyndromePeptic DisordersConstipationDiarrhea
Worldwide
R20.800.690.710.930.89
P-value0.200.00010.0010.0010.001
Iran
R2-0.19-0.06 0.36 0.40
P-value-0.030.470.0010.001

a Based on 2020 data only

4.3. Comparison of the Willingness to Use Probiotics in the World and Iran Over 10 Years

According to Figures 3 and 4, among the substances containing probiotics, the desire to consume yogurt was the most (Figures 3 and 4).

The search frequency of different types of probiotics in the world during 10 years
The search frequency of different types of probiotics in the world during 10 years
Figure 3.

The search frequency of different types of probiotics in the world during 10 years

The search frequency of different types of probiotics in Iran during 10 years
The search frequency of different types of probiotics in Iran during 10 years
Figure 4.

The search frequency of different types of probiotics in Iran during 10 years

5. Discussion

This research examined the global and Iranian communities' inclination toward probiotic consumption and its association with digestive disorders. Overall, there is a high interest in consuming probiotics both globally and in Iran. This finding aligns with a 2021 study in Poland, which revealed that 65% of participants hold a positive attitude towards and a desire to consume probiotics (26). Furthermore, Mikolaj et al. have demonstrated that Google users' interest in probiotic information has been increasing annually, with peak interest during the colder months. The interest in probiotic information may be linked to antibiotic usage, healthcare expenses, and the developmental status of Google users' countries (27).

The study found a positive and significant link between constipation and probiotics both globally and in Iran. Various studies have reported differing effects of probiotics with different strains on constipation (28, 29). Despite the uncertainty, health professionals often hesitate to recommend probiotics, yet the consumption of probiotics among individuals with constipation remains high (30).

Additionally, a positive and significant correlation was observed between peptic disorders and probiotics. It is known that Helicobacter pylori is a causative agent of peptic disorders. Research indicates that incorporating probiotic supplements during H. pylori treatment can enhance outcomes and reduce complications (31). Despite the proven benefits of probiotics on the efficacy and side effects in individuals undergoing H. pylori treatment, the optimal dosage and treatment duration have yet to be established (12).

Based on the findings, it can be inferred that there is a high inclination among individuals with diarrhea to consume probiotics. The administration of probiotics during diarrhea, leading to a reduction in stool frequency, represents a promising approach for treating acute diarrhea (32).

Furthermore, a positive and significant correlation exists between IBS and probiotics. Numerous studies have validated the beneficial effects of probiotics on IBS, though the most effective strains and their combinations remain uncertain and warrant further research (14, 33, 34).

This research also identified a positive, albeit non-significant, relationship between SC cases and probiotic usage. Probiotics are widely used as dietary supplements in the general population, and their application to alleviate the adverse effects of treatment in cancer patients is progressively increasing (35). Surgical intervention remains the primary treatment for SC, with diarrhea being a prevalent complication among these patients. The use of probiotics has been shown to mitigate diarrhea (36, 37).

The production and consumption of probiotic-enriched foods are on the rise. Dairy products constitute the primary source of probiotics. According to this study, yogurt is the most favored probiotic food consumed both globally and in Iran (38).

5.1. Limitations

The quality of the data sources used in this study has not been adequately addressed. Data quality is a multifaceted concept, emphasizing the capacity of data to be efficiently and effectively utilized for informing and assessing decisions. Issues with data quality, such as significant measurement errors, can influence the estimation of model parameters and lead to inefficiencies.

It is crucial to acknowledge that GT alone does not sufficiently capture the nuances of screening behavior on a global scale. To achieve a more comprehensive understanding, it should be juxtaposed with additional sources of information, such as the volume of referrals for services, to yield more accurate results (39, 40).

5.2. Conclusions

The interest in consuming probiotics is notably high both globally and in Iran. There was a positive correlation between searches for keywords associated with digestive diseases and probiotics. However, it cannot be conclusively stated that probiotics have a beneficial impact on these conditions. Consequently, there is a pressing need for strategies that effectively communicate to the public where robust evidence supports the benefits of probiotics and where such evidence is lacking or absent.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    El-Sohaimy SA, Hussain MA. Functional Probiotic Foods Development: Trends, Concepts, and Products. Fermentation. 2023;9(3):249. https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation9030249.

  • 2.

    Reid G. Probiotics: definition, scope and mechanisms of action. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;30(1):17-25. [PubMed ID: 27048893]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2015.12.001.

  • 3.

    Hutkins RW, Krumbeck JA, Bindels LB, Cani PD, Fahey GJ, Goh YJ, et al. Prebiotics: why definitions matter. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;37:1-7. [PubMed ID: 26431716]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4744122]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2015.09.001.

  • 4.

    Lloyd-Price J, Abu-Ali G, Huttenhower C. The healthy human microbiome. Genome Med. 2016;8(1):51. [PubMed ID: 27122046]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4848870]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-016-0307-y.

  • 5.

    Wang Y, Li X, Ge T, Xiao Y, Liao Y, Cui Y, et al. Probiotics for prevention and treatment of respiratory tract infections in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(31). e4509. [PubMed ID: 27495104]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4979858]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004509.

  • 6.

    Liu Y, Tran DQ, Rhoads JM. Probiotics in Disease Prevention and Treatment. J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;58 Suppl 10(Suppl 10):S164-79. [PubMed ID: 30248200]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6656559]. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.1121.

  • 7.

    Gleeson M, Bishop NC, Oliveira M, Tauler P. Daily probiotic's (Lactobacillus casei Shirota) reduction of infection incidence in athletes. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2011;21(1):55-64. [PubMed ID: 21411836]. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsnem.21.1.55.

  • 8.

    Dimidi E, Mark Scott S, Whelan K. Probiotics and constipation: mechanisms of action, evidence for effectiveness and utilisation by patients and healthcare professionals. Proc Nutr Soc. 2020;79(1):147-57. [PubMed ID: 31262376]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665119000934.

  • 9.

    Zhang MM, Qian W, Qin YY, He J, Zhou YH. Probiotics in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(14):4345-57. [PubMed ID: 25892886]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4394097]. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i14.4345.

  • 10.

    Li S, Huang XL, Sui JZ, Chen SY, Xie YT, Deng Y, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the efficacy of probiotics in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy in children. Eur J Pediatr. 2014;173(2):153-61. [PubMed ID: 24323343]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-013-2220-3.

  • 11.

    Gong Y, Li Y, Sun Q. Probiotics improve efficacy and tolerability of triple therapy to eradicate Helicobacter pylori: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(4):6530-43. [PubMed ID: 26131283]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4483842].

  • 12.

    Zhu R, Chen K, Zheng YY, Zhang HW, Wang JS, Xia YJ, et al. Meta-analysis of the efficacy of probiotics in Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(47):18013-21. [PubMed ID: 25548501]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4273153]. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i47.18013.

  • 13.

    Applegate JA, Fischer Walker CL, Ambikapathi R, Black RE. Systematic review of probiotics for the treatment of community-acquired acute diarrhea in children. BMC Public Health. 2013;13 Suppl 3(Suppl 3). S16. [PubMed ID: 24564646]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3847198]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-S3-S16.

  • 14.

    Allen AP, Clarke G, Cryan JF, Quigley EMM, Dinan TG. Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 and other probiotics in the management of irritable bowel syndrome. Strain specificity, symptoms, and mechanisms. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017;33(7):1349-51. [PubMed ID: 28436237]. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2017.1322571.

  • 15.

    Rousseaux C, Thuru X, Gelot A, Barnich N, Neut C, Dubuquoy L, et al. Lactobacillus acidophilus modulates intestinal pain and induces opioid and cannabinoid receptors. Nat Med. 2007;13(1):35-7. [PubMed ID: 17159985]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1521.

  • 16.

    Dale HF, Rasmussen SH, Asiller OO, Lied GA. Probiotics in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: An Up-to-Date Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2019;11(9). [PubMed ID: 31480656]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6769995]. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11092048.

  • 17.

    Gorska A, Przystupski D, Niemczura MJ, Kulbacka J. Probiotic Bacteria: A Promising Tool in Cancer Prevention and Therapy. Curr Microbiol. 2019;76(8):939-49. [PubMed ID: 30949803]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6586914]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-019-01679-8.

  • 18.

    Matsuda T, Gatellier L. Projection of the number of new stomach cancer cases in the world. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2023;53(8):741-2. [PubMed ID: 37477363]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyad084.

  • 19.

    Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Pineros M, Znaor A, et al. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: An overview. Int J Cancer. 2021. [PubMed ID: 33818764]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.33588.

  • 20.

    Cordina C, Shaikh I, Shrestha S, Camilleri-Brennan J. Probiotics in the management of gastrointestinal disease: analysis of the attitudes and prescribing practices of gastroenterologists and surgeons. J Dig Dis. 2011;12(6):489-96. [PubMed ID: 22118700]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2980.2011.00534.x.

  • 21.

    Jordan D, Johnson N, Thomas L. Probiotics in primary care: A survey of health professionals. Pract Nurs. 2015;26(11):550-4. https://doi.org/10.12968/pnur.2015.26.11.550.

  • 22.

    Lippi G, Cervellin G. Is digital epidemiology reliable?-insight from updated cancer statistics. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7(1):15. [PubMed ID: 30788362]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6351361]. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.11.55.

  • 23.

    Cervellin G, Comelli I, Lippi G. Is Google Trends a reliable tool for digital epidemiology? Insights from different clinical settings. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2017;7(3):185-9. [PubMed ID: 28756828]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7320449]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2017.06.001.

  • 24.

    Nozari S, Dehghani L, Chabok R, Moloudpour B, Moradi Vastegani Z, Moalemi S, et al. Google Trend as an Early Warning System for Corona Outbreak Investigation in Iran. Health Manag Inf Sci. 2022;9(1):16-21.

  • 25.

    Flanagan R, Kuo B, Staller K. Utilizing Google Trends to Assess Worldwide Interest in Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Commonly Associated Treatments. Dig Dis Sci. 2021;66(3):814-22. [PubMed ID: 32361922]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-020-06290-7.

  • 26.

    Kozirok W. Consumer attitudes towards probiotic supplements. Sci J Gdynia Maritime Univ. 2021;(120):33-47. https://doi.org/10.26408/120.03.

  • 27.

    Mikolaj K, Igor L, Wojciech M. Global Internet Data on the Interest in Antibiotics and Probiotics Generated by Google Trends. Antibiotics (Basel). 2019;8(3). [PubMed ID: 31547273]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6784173]. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8030147.

  • 28.

    Miller LE, Zimmermann AK, Ouwehand AC. Contemporary meta-analysis of short-term probiotic consumption on gastrointestinal transit. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(21):5122-31. [PubMed ID: 27275105]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4886388]. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i21.5122.

  • 29.

    Ford AC, Quigley EM, Lacy BE, Lembo AJ, Saito YA, Schiller LR, et al. Efficacy of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics in irritable bowel syndrome and chronic idiopathic constipation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109(10):1547-61. quiz 1546, 1562. [PubMed ID: 25070051]. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2014.202.

  • 30.

    Dimidi E, Cox C, Scott SM, Whelan K. Probiotic use is common in constipation, but only a minority of general and specialist doctors recommend them and consider there to be an evidence base. Nutrition. 2019;61:157-63. [PubMed ID: 30716559]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2018.11.013.

  • 31.

    Lanas A, Chan FKL. Peptic ulcer disease. Lancet. 2017;390(10094):613-24. [PubMed ID: 28242110]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32404-7.

  • 32.

    Sharif MR, Kashani HH, Ardakani AT, Kheirkhah D, Tabatabaei F, Sharif A. The Effect of a Yeast Probiotic on Acute Diarrhea in Children. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins. 2016;8(4):211-4. [PubMed ID: 27530282]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-016-9221-2.

  • 33.

    Didari T, Mozaffari S, Nikfar S, Abdollahi M. Effectiveness of probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome: Updated systematic review with meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(10):3072-84. [PubMed ID: 25780308]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4356930]. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i10.3072.

  • 34.

    Barbara G, Cremon C, Azpiroz F. Probiotics in irritable bowel syndrome: Where are we? Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30(12). e13513. [PubMed ID: 30460770]. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.13513.

  • 35.

    Jampílek J, Kráľová K, Bella V. Probiotics and prebiotics in the prevention and management of human cancers (colon cancer, stomach cancer, breast cancer, and cervix cancer ). Probiotics in the Prevention and Management of Human Diseases: A Scientific Perspective. Academic Press; 2022. p. 187-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-823733-5.00009-x.

  • 36.

    Zhu L, Zhan Y, Zhang J, Chen L, Wu X. Effects of probiotics combined with enteral nutrition on gastrointestinal function of postoperative patients with esophageal cancer. Chin J Microecol. 2018;30(8):924-7.

  • 37.

    Zhao R, Wang Y, Huang Y, Cui Y, Xia L, Rao Z, et al. Effects of fiber and probiotics on diarrhea associated with enteral nutrition in gastric cancer patients: A prospective randomized and controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(43). e8418. [PubMed ID: 29069041]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5671874]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008418.

  • 38.

    Kumar S, Rattu G, Mitharwal S, Chandra A, Kumar S, Kaushik A, et al. Trends in non‐dairy‐based probiotic food products: Advances and challenges. J Food Proc Preserv. 2022;46(9). https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.16578.

  • 39.

    Patel MS, Halpern JA, Desai AS, Keeter MK, Bennett NE, Brannigan RE. Success of Prostate and Testicular Cancer Awareness Campaigns Compared to Breast Cancer Awareness Month According to Internet Search Volumes: A Google Trends Analysis. Urology. 2020;139:64-70. [PubMed ID: 32001306]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.11.062.

  • 40.

    Quintanilha LF, Souza LN, Sanches D, Demarco RS, Fukutani KF. The impact of cancer campaigns in Brazil: a Google Trends analysis. Ecancermedicalscience. 2019;13:963. [PubMed ID: 31645890]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6786828]. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2019.963.