Logo

Comparing the Effects of Chest Trauma Management Training Webinars on Clinical Decision-Making Skills of Emergency Medical Technicians Through Lectures and Scenario-Based Methods

Author(s):
Abdullah Rahmani TabasAbdullah Rahmani TabasAbdullah Rahmani Tabas ORCID1, Gholam Reza SharifzadehGholam Reza SharifzadehGholam Reza Sharifzadeh ORCID2, Seyyed Mohammad Reza HosseiniSeyyed Mohammad Reza HosseiniSeyyed Mohammad Reza Hosseini ORCID3,*
1Department of Emergency Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
2Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Social Determinants of Health Research Center, School of Health, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
3School of Nursing and Midwifery, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran


Modern Care Journal:Vol. 22, issue 3; e154569
Published online:Mar 25, 2025
Article type:Research Article
Received:Sep 12, 2024
Accepted:Jan 21, 2025
How to Cite:Abdullah Rahmani TabasGholam Reza SharifzadehSeyyed Mohammad Reza HosseiniComparing the Effects of Chest Trauma Management Training Webinars on Clinical Decision-Making Skills of Emergency Medical Technicians Through Lectures and Scenario-Based Methods.Mod Care J.2025;22(3):e154569.https://doi.org/10.5812/mcj-154569.

Abstract

Background:

Trauma is a significant issue in public health and emergency care, with decision-making being a critical component of the care system.

Objectives:

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of webinar training on chest trauma management using two methods — lecture-based and scenario-based — on the clinical decision-making skills of emergency medical technicians (EMTs).

Methods:

In this interventional study, 50 EMTs were randomly assigned to two groups: A lecture-based webinar group and a scenario-based webinar group. A researcher-developed pre-test questionnaire was distributed via WhatsApp. Subsequently, a 4-hour webinar training session was conducted using the Adobe Connect platform. Immediately following the training, the questionnaire was redistributed to both groups via WhatsApp. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 22, employing Fisher's exact test, independent samples t-test, and paired t-test, with a significance level set at 0.05.

Results:

The mean score of decision-making skills prior to the intervention did not differ significantly between the lecture and scenario groups (P = 0.76). However, post-intervention, the increase in the mean score of decision-making skills was greater in the scenario-based group (7.44 ± 5.8 points) compared to the lecture group (3.44 ± 3.9 points), with this difference being statistically significant (P = 0.007).

Conclusions:

The findings suggest that scenario-based training, even in a virtual format, is a more effective method than traditional training approaches. Nonetheless, further studies are recommended to validate these results.

1. Background

Trauma significantly impacts societal health, imposing substantial economic and social costs and leading to long-term impairments in young, productive individuals (1). It accounts for 10% of all deaths worldwide (2). The increase in motor vehicle usage has resulted in a rise in traumatic accidents (3), with 25% of these injuries affecting the chest (4). Emergency medical technicians (EMTs) are typically the first responders to trauma cases, and their skills are crucial for patient survival (5). Effective decision-making during emergencies is vital for patient care (6). A better understanding of clinical decision-making can enhance clinical and organizational interventions, thereby improving treatment outcomes (7). The EMTs must rapidly assess situations, diagnose issues, manage crises, and refer patients for appropriate treatment (8). Their awareness can be life-saving during the critical early "golden hour" (9).

Continuous training using the latest methods is essential to maintain EMTs' knowledge and skills (10). Unfortunately, the issue of clinical decision-making in training emergency technicians for pre-hospital settings has not received adequate attention (11), and current teaching methods are not as effective as they should be in developing this vital skill (12). Most workshops are conducted in face-to-face environments (13), which present challenges such as high costs, logistical difficulties, participant absence due to work or distance, low engagement, and limited capacity for larger groups (14). However, advancements in communication technologies now enable effective teaching and learning without the need for face-to-face interactions (13).

Electronic learning is a modern educational approach that utilizes communication and information technology, allowing for flexible content distribution and learning without a specific location or time (15). A key aspect of this method is the use of active teaching techniques, such as scenario-based education, which promotes student engagement through discussion, creativity, and problem-solving (16). Due to the limitations of in-person workshops for pre-hospital emergency personnel during crises like COVID-19, virtual workshops have gained importance. It is essential to enhance their quality by integrating active learning methods (17). Most virtual education still relies on lectures, and there is limited research on the effectiveness of active learning techniques, such as scenario-based webinars, for improving decision-making skills. Further research is needed to better understand and improve virtual education approaches.

2. Objectives

Given the limitations of previous studies in this area, this study was designed and conducted to examine the effect of webinar training on chest trauma management using two methods — lecture-based and scenario-based — on the clinical decision-making skills of EMTs.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Design

This interventional study involved EMTs employed at pre-hospital emergency centers in South Khorasan, 2022.

3.2. Participants

Emergency medical technicians with post-graduate degrees or bachelor's degrees and at least one year of work experience, who had access to the internet via a smartphone, laptop, or computer, were included in the study. Technicians who did not attend at least two-thirds of the training sessions or had incomplete questionnaires were excluded from the study. According to the results of Sadeghnezhad et al.'s study (18), and based on the formula for comparing two means with a mean difference of 6.59, s1 = 3.68, s2 = 2.98, α = 0.05, and β = 0.90, the minimum sample size was estimated to be 6 EMTs for each group. This study used a final sample size of 25 participants per group, considering that educational interventions require a minimum sample size of 25 participants for each intervention group (19).

Sampling was conducted using the available sampling method, where a sample is drawn from conveniently available subjects (20). To ensure equal distribution of samples, eligible participants were divided using randomized block sampling. Thirteen blocks of four letters each were created with random combinations of A (lecture-based) and B (scenario-based). At each stage, a block was randomly selected using a random number table, and participants were assigned to one of the two study groups until the desired sample size was reached.

3.3. Scales

Based on six chest trauma scenarios — compression pneumothorax, hemothorax, floating chest, cardiac tamponade, aortic dissection, and rib fracture — 15 questions were designed for both groups, with 5 options (decision cards) developed for each question. These questions were crafted using two books: Pre-hospital Emergency Medicine (21) and Trauma Case Studies for the Paramedic (22). To confirm the content validity of the questionnaire, consultations were held with 5 academic staff members, 5 emergency medicine specialists, and 5 trauma specialists, and the questionnaire was subsequently modified based on their feedback. To assess reliability, the questionnaire was completed by 10 pre-hospital emergency technicians who did not participate in the main study, resulting in a Cronbach's alpha of 0.86.

The Q-Sort method was employed to measure the quality of clinical decisions, consisting of four steps. The first step involves collecting relevant ideas, beliefs, and opinions concerning the research object, which can be based on various sources such as interviews, content analysis, or previous research. The second step involves selecting and formulating a set of meaningful statements, resulting in the Q-sample. These statements are randomly numbered and printed on separate cards. In the third step, respondents express their views on the research topic by placing all cards in the pre-structured Q-sort distribution. The fourth step is data analysis, where a correlation matrix is created from all Q-sorts, indicating the degree of correspondence between respondents. This matrix is submitted to a by-person factor analysis to explore attitudinal groupings. Factor scores are computed for each item in the resulting clusters of respondents, leading to one representative Q-sort per group. Additionally, confounding respondents (loading significantly on more than one factor) and non-significant respondents (not loading on any factors) are identified. The final task is to interpret and explain similarities and differences among the factors (18, 23).

The Williamson system was used to score the cards. If the option chosen by the technician met all the standard items, a score of 4 was given; if some items were not met, a lower score was assigned. Thus, a useful card received 4 points, a facilitator card but not the main card received 3 points, a card neither promoting nor hindering care received 2 points, an unnecessary or discomfort-causing card received 1 point, and an inappropriate card received 0 points. The score range was 0 - 60, with a higher score indicating greater clinical decision-making power (18).

3.4. Data Collection

Participants in both groups were informed and provided with a pre-test questionnaire via WhatsApp. A 4-hour webinar training course, consisting of two 2-hour sessions, was conducted on the Adobe Connect platform by an assistant professor specializing in Health in Disasters and Emergencies, along with a master's degree student in nursing. The training, focusing on either webinar-based or scenario-based methods, included interactive scenarios and videos, followed by a test after each scenario. Upon completion of the course, the questionnaire was redistributed to both groups via WhatsApp (Table 1).

Table 1.Summarize of Study Implementation Educational Contents Based on Study Groups
Lecture-Based WebinarScenario-Based Webinar
StepsTime (min)StepsTime (min)
Completing the questionnaire before the webinar30Completing the questionnaire before the webinar30
Welcome and introduction to the course10Welcome and introduction to the course10
General trauma assessment40General evaluation of trauma along with scenario planning and questions and answers40
Tension pneumothorax40Pressure pneumothorax with scenario plan and questions and answers40
Hemothorax30Hemothorax with a scenario plan and questions and answers30
Rest15Rest15
Flail chest30Flail chest with scenario plan and questions and answers30
Pericardial tamponade30Pericardial tamponade with a scenario plan and questions and answers30
Rib fracture30A rib fracture with scenario plan and questions and answers30
Aortic dissection30Aortic dissection with a scenario plan and questions and answers30
Complete the questionnaire immediately after the webinar30Complete the questionnaire immediately after the webinar30

Summarize of Study Implementation Educational Contents Based on Study Groups

3.5. Data Analysis

Data were analyzed using SPSS 22. Data normality was checked by the Kolmogorov-Smironov test. Fisher's exact test, independent samples t-test and paired t-test were used for analytical analysis at a significance level of 0.05.

3.6. Ethical Consideration

The Birjand University of Medical Sciences ethical committee approved this study (IR.BUMS.REC.1400.373). All participants filled out the informed consent form and were assured that their information would not be published individually.

4. Results

The mean age of participants in the lecture-based and scenario-based groups was 27.7 ± 3.8 and 27.2 ± 4.0, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.67). Additionally, there were no significant differences in education level, employment type, or marital status between the two groups (P > 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2.Comparison of Frequency Distribution of Basic Features in Two Studied Groups a
VariablesLecture-BasedScenario-BasedP-Value
Age27.7 ± 3.827.2 ± 4.00.67 b
Education0.51 c
Postgraduate20 (80)18 (72)
Bachelor's degree5 (20)7 (28)
Type of employment0.054 d
Designated recruitment3 (12)7 (28)
Contract employment18 (72)18 (72)
Official employment4 (16)0 (0)
Marriage status1 c
Single11 (44)11 (44)
Married14 (56)14 (56)

Comparison of Frequency Distribution of Basic Features in Two Studied Groups a

The results of the independent samples t-test indicated that the mean score of decision-making skills before the intervention was not significantly different between the lecture and scenario groups (P = 0.76). However, after the intervention, the mean score of decision-making skills in both groups increased significantly (P = 0.017). The mean score increase in the scenario-based group (7.44 ± 5.8 points) was significantly higher than the increase in the lecture group (3.44 ± 3.9 points). This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.007) (Table 3).

Table 3.Comparison of the Mean Score of Clinical Decision-Making Skills Before and After the Intervention in the Two Study Groups a
GroupsBefore InterventionAfter InterventionP-Value bAverage Changes
Lecture-based41.0 ± 6.744.4 ± 5.60.0013.44 ± 3.9
Scenario-based41.5 ± 5.148.9 ± 7.2< 0.0017.44 ± 5.8
P-value b0.760.017-0.007

Comparison of the Mean Score of Clinical Decision-Making Skills Before and After the Intervention in the Two Study Groups a

5. Discussion

This study compared the effects of lecture-based and scenario-based webinar training on EMTs' decision-making skills in managing chest trauma. Both methods significantly improved scores, but the scenario-based group showed greater increases than the lecture-based group. This study is the first to compare two training methods for improving a clinical skill in a virtual environment. Prior research has mainly focused on comparing in-person training methods or contrasting them with virtual training. Hashemiparast et al. found that electronic education and lectures equally enhance the awareness of administrative staff in clinical departments about hospital infection control (24). Hosseinzadeh et al. found that a 4-week scenario-based training significantly improved students' critical thinking skills (25). A systematic review and meta-analysis also indicated that such simulation courses enhance nursing students' knowledge, clinical skills, and self-confidence (26). The current study found that the scenario-based learning group significantly outperformed the lecture-based group in improving clinical decision-making skills. Parvaresh et al. also demonstrated that both scenario and lecture methods positively affected awareness of chest trauma management, with the scenario group showing notably higher levels (16). Additionally, scenario-based training improved EMTs' clinical decision-making, satisfaction, and reduced stress (11, 27). Researchers regard scenario-based learning as an effective, dynamic approach that enhances analytical thinking, problem-solving, communication, and teamwork while boosting self-confidence, minimizing common errors in practical assessments, and facilitating knowledge retrieval (28-30).

In general, virtual education addresses the limitations of traditional learning and offers numerous opportunities for employees and students in low- and middle-income countries (31). It is accessible to anyone with a computer, tablet, or smartphone, regardless of time and location (32). Many qualified individuals cannot attend in-person workshops due to work schedules or distance (33), making virtual education an effective alternative that increases learner participation (34). Previous studies indicate that virtual education can be as effective as traditional education in theoretical learning (35, 36). However, some research suggests that face-to-face education is more effective for developing practical skills (33). In face-to-face workshops, direct interaction with instructors in a safe environment enhances skill acquisition (33). More research is needed to compare virtual education methods and improve quality in clinical skills training.

Furthermore, this study focused on individuals with degrees in emergency medicine. However, due to a manpower shortage in Iran, graduates from fields like nursing and anesthesia are also working in pre-hospital emergency services. Therefore, integrated training is essential to accommodate the diverse backgrounds of these professionals.

5.1. Conclusions

Considering that the clinical decision-making skills of emergency technicians improved more after the intervention using the scenario method compared to the lecture method, it can be concluded that scenario-based training, even in a virtual setting, is a more effective approach than traditional training methods. This teaching method allows learners to experience situations closer to reality, thereby reducing the gap between theoretical education and practical application by engaging them with real scenarios they may encounter. Therefore, educational planners should consider using this method to achieve better outcomes.

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Jones AR, Miller J, Brown M. Epidemiology of Trauma-Related Hemorrhage and Time to Definitive Care Across North America: Making the Case for Bleeding Control Education. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2023;38(6):780-3. [PubMed ID: 37781932]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10694464]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X23006428.
  • 2.
    Rossiter ND. "Trauma-the forgotten pandemic?". Int Orthop. 2022;46(1):3-11. [PubMed ID: 34519840]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8438546]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05213-z.
  • 3.
    Ishii W, Hitosugi M, Baba M, Kandori K, Arai Y. Factors Affecting Death and Severe Injury in Child Motor Vehicle Passengers. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9(11). [PubMed ID: 34828478]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8624717]. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111431.
  • 4.
    Dogrul BN, Kiliccalan I, Asci ES, Peker SC. Blunt trauma related chest wall and pulmonary injuries: An overview. Chin J Traumatol. 2020;23(3):125-38. [PubMed ID: 32417043]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7296362]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjtee.2020.04.003.
  • 5.
    Damanabad Z, Dehghannezhad J, Rahmani F, Ghafouri R, Hassankhani H, Dadashzadeh A. Promotion of knowledge, skill, and performance of emergency medical technicians in prehospital care of traumatic patients: An action-research study. Arch Trauma Res. 2020;9(2). https://doi.org/10.4103/atr.atr_112_19.
  • 6.
    Heidari M, Shahbazi S. Effect of training problem-solving skill on decision-making and critical thinking of personnel at medical emergencies. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2016;6(4):182-7. [PubMed ID: 28149823]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5225761]. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-5151.195445.
  • 7.
    Javadi N, Paryad E, Fadakar K, Atarkar Ruoshan Z, Asiri S. [Clinical decision making: its relation with critical thinking]. J Holistic Nurs Midwifery. 2008;18(2):9-16. FA.
  • 8.
    Lewis-Schroeder NF, Kieran K, Murphy BL, Wolff JD, Robinson MA, Kaufman ML. Conceptualization, Assessment, and Treatment of Traumatic Stress in First Responders: A Review of Critical Issues. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2018;26(4):216-27. [PubMed ID: 29975339]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6624844]. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000176.
  • 9.
    Yeguiayan JM, Garrigue D, Binquet C, Jacquot C, Duranteau J, Martin C, et al. Medical pre-hospital management reduces mortality in severe blunt trauma: a prospective epidemiological study. Crit Care. 2011;15(1):R34. [PubMed ID: 21251331]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3222071]. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc9982.
  • 10.
    Shirzad F, Shariat SV, Masjedi N, Ghadirivasfi M, Ghalichi L, Fakhrian A, et al. Workshop-based training of pre-hospital emergency technicians for acute psychiatric patients: benefits and drawbacks. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):996. [PubMed ID: 39267028]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11396583]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05856-7.
  • 11.
    Esmaeilzadeh MH, Mogharab M, Hosseini SMR, Bazeli J, Zamani A. [Effect of pre-hospital trauma management training program on the capability of clinical decision-making in emergency medical technicians]. J Hayat. 2019;25(2):168-78. FA.
  • 12.
    Beighi R, Abedini S. [The effect of decision making skill training on perception of clinical decision making of nursing student]. Dev Strategies Med Educ. 2015;2(1):4-10. FA.
  • 13.
    Mehrdad N, Hooshmand Bahabadi A, Yaghoobi N, Aalaa M, Sanjari M, Zolfaghari M. [Evaluation of perceived satisfaction, usefulness and efficiency of virtual workshops from the perspective of faculty members and postgraduate students of Tehran University of Medical Sciences]. J Med Educ Dev. 2015;8(18):125-36. FA.
  • 14.
    Taveira-Gomes T, Ferreira P, Taveira-Gomes I, Severo M, Ferreira MA. What Are We Looking for in Computer-Based Learning Interventions in Medical Education? A Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(8). e204. [PubMed ID: 27480053]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4985611]. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5461.
  • 15.
    Muirhead RJ. E-learning: is this teaching at students or teaching with students? Nurs Forum. 2007;42(4):178-84. [PubMed ID: 17944698]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.2007.00085.x.
  • 16.
    Parvaresh Masoud M, Farhadloo R, Vahedian M, Kashaninejad M, Hasanpoor L, Mohebi S. [A Comparison between the Effects of Scenario and Lecture-based Education Methods on Knowledge and Attitude of Emergency Medical Technicians towards Patients with Chest Trauma]. Qom Univ Med Sci J. 2016;10(5):47-54. FA.
  • 17.
    Amin N, Leila K, Farnaz A, Mehrdad A, Amin R, Kaveh E. A Review on Different Virtual Learning Methods in Pharmacy Education. J Pharm Care. 2015;2(2).
  • 18.
    Sadeghnezhad H, Khazaei T, Nasiri A. [Comparing the Effect of Concept Mapping to Clinical Simulation on Emergency Medical Students' Clinical Decision Making]. Iran J Med Educ. 2014;14(3):241-51. FA.
  • 19.
    McConnell MM, Monteiro S, Bryson GL. Sample size calculations for educational interventions: principles and methods. Can J Anaesth. 2019;66(8):864-73. [PubMed ID: 31119552]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-019-01405-9.
  • 20.
    Panacek EA, Thompson CB. Sampling methods: selecting your subjects. Air Med J. 2007;26(2):75-8. [PubMed ID: 17346642]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amj.2007.01.001.
  • 21.
    Wilson MH, Habig K, Wright C, Hughes A, Davies G, Imray CH. Pre-hospital emergency medicine. Lancet. 2015;386(10012):2526-34. [PubMed ID: 26738719]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00985-X.
  • 22.
    Rahm SJ, Pollak AN. Trauma Case Studies for the Paramedic. Burlington, Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2005.
  • 23.
    ten Klooster PM, Visser M, de Jong MD. Comparing two image research instruments: The Q-sort method versus the Likert attitude questionnaire. Food Quality Preference. 2008;19(5):511-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.02.007.
  • 24.
    Hashemiparast MS, Sadeghi R, Ghaneapur M, Azam K, Tol A. [Comparing E-learning and Lecture-Based Education in Control of Nosocomial Infections]. Payavard Salamat. 2016;10(3):230-8. FA.
  • 25.
    Hosseinzadeh H, Ratan ZA, Shnaigat M, Edwards J, Verma I, Niknami M, et al. Effectiveness of case scenario-based teaching to transition international Master of Public Health students specialising in health promotion from memorization to critical thinking. Health Promot J Austr. 2022;33 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):39-49. [PubMed ID: 35714044]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9796551]. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.631.
  • 26.
    Saragih ID, Tarihoran D, Lin WT, Lee BO. Outcomes of scenario-based simulation courses in nursing education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Educ Today. 2024;136:106145. [PubMed ID: 38422795]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106145.
  • 27.
    Senturk Erenel A, Yaman Sozbir S, Uzun Aksoy M, Arslan Gurcuoglu E, Pelit Aksu S, Unal Toprak F, et al. Effect of Scenario-Based Simulation Training on the Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing Clinical Practicum. J Nurs Res. 2021;29(2). e142. [PubMed ID: 33395173]. https://doi.org/10.1097/jnr.0000000000000417.
  • 28.
    Amorim PG, Morcillo AM, Fraga AM, Brandão MB, Belluomini F, Baracat EC. Realistic simulation in pediatric emergency: evaluation of strategy as a teaching tool for medical students. Arch Emerg Med Crit Care. 2018;3(1):1036.
  • 29.
    Battista A. An activity theory perspective of how scenario-based simulations support learning: a descriptive analysis. Adv Simul (Lond). 2017;2:23. [PubMed ID: 29450024]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5806455]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-017-0055-0.
  • 30.
    Jung D, Lee SH, Kang SJ, Kim JH. Development and evaluation of a clinical simulation for new graduate nurses: A multi-site pilot study. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;49:84-9. [PubMed ID: 27889583]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.010.
  • 31.
    Cheng C, Papadakos J, Umakanthan B, Fazelzad R, Martimianakis MAT, Ugas M, et al. On the advantages and disadvantages of virtual continuing medical education: a scoping review. Can Med Educ J. 2023;14(3):41-74. [PubMed ID: 37465741]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10351643]. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.75681.
  • 32.
    Botelho FHF. Accessibility to digital technology: Virtual barriers, real opportunities. Assist Technol. 2021;33(sup1):27-34. [PubMed ID: 34951832]. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2021.1945705.
  • 33.
    Rad RF, Sadrabad AZ, Nouraei R, Khatony A, Bashiri H, Bozorgomid A, et al. Comparative study of virtual and face-to-face training methods on the quality of healthcare services provided by Kermanshah pre-hospital emergency staff (EMS): randomized educational Intervention trial. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):203. [PubMed ID: 35337312]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8957122]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03277-y.
  • 34.
    Frehywot S, Vovides Y, Talib Z, Mikhail N, Ross H, Wohltjen H, et al. E-learning in medical education in resource constrained low- and middle-income countries. Hum Resour Health. 2013;11:4. [PubMed ID: 23379467]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3584907]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-11-4.
  • 35.
    Wolf AB. The Impact of Web-Based Video Lectures on Learning in Nursing Education: An Integrative Review. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2018;39(6):E16-20. [PubMed ID: 30335709]. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000389.
  • 36.
    Ghiyasvandian S, Khazaei A, Zakerimoghadam M, Salimi R, Afshari A, Mogimbeigi A. Evaluation of Airway Management Proficiency in Pre-Hospital Emergency Setting; a Simulation Study. Emerg (Tehran). 2018;6(1). e58. [PubMed ID: 30584574]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6289146].
comments

Leave a comment here


Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles