The diagnosis of PCD has always been one of the challenging issues in pediatric sciences. Although TEM, high speed video microscopy, and genetic studies are more accurate for diagnosis of PCD, there had been several problems such as lack of equipment, lack of experienced personnel, high cost for importing equipment, and high cost and unavailability of genetic studies. On the other hand, it is worth considering that although bronchiectasis in children is not rare, there is not any available screening or more accurate diagnostic tests for these patients in Iran. Therefore, we decided to investigate PCD in children with bronchiectasis by performing two screening tests, NO and saccharin.
In the current study, 31 patients with the diagnosis of bronchiectasis were assessed regarding the presence of PCD. Therefore, two tests of FeNO measurement and saccharin test were performed. The findings of this study represented that the FeNO measurements in favor of PCD were found in 92.3% of the patients, while only 54.8% of saccharin tests revealed results consistent with the diagnosis of PCD. In other words, the sensitivity of FeNO measurement was remarkably higher in diagnosing PCD as compared to the other routine test, the saccharin test. Among the assessed factors in this study, gender and presence of dextrocardia (the probable diagnosis of Kartagener’s syndrome) were neither associated with the FeNO measurement outcomes nor saccharin test, while those who had a saccharin test in favor of PCD were remarkably older.
In the current study, we considered the cut-off point of 60 minutes for the saccharin test in order to make the diagnosis of PCD, while Adde et al. (cited in Vergani) presented that the cut-off point of 30 minutes has the sensitivity of 95%, and this rate decreases to 75% by the consideration of 60 minutes as the cut-off time for positive saccharin test outcomes (
14). The notable low sensitivity of this test in the current study may be attributed to the used cut-off value. Furthermore, despite previous studies, recent guidelines such as the European Respiratory Society Guidelines do not support the diagnostic value of the saccharin test now, and they prefer the selection of novel techniques (
15).
Therefore, exhaled NO level was considered for further assessments in the diagnosis of PCD. Previous studies have shown that exhaled NO level is lower among patients with PCD and cystic fibrosis than the general population (
16). Also, the Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guidelines presented the cut-off point of 25 ppb and 20 ppb as the normal range of exhaled NO for adults and children, respectively (
10).
You et al. (
17), in a study regarding the amount of exhaled NO in the general population of China, presented that FeNO is affected by gender (male to female, 2: 1) but not age, height, and weight. These findings are different from the current presentation (
17) as we found no association between FeNO findings with gender, age, and cardioposition. These differences may be attributed to the racial differences between the Iranian and Chinese.
Boon et al. (
16) conducted their study using this technique for the diagnosis of PCD and presented the sensitivity of 89.5% and specificity of 58.3% at the cut-off point of 10 ppb for the FeNO test in the diagnosis of PCD. Although outcomes of this study are in favor of FeNO administration for the diagnosis of PCD, other studies have presented the more excellent values of nasal FeNO measurements for the more accurate diagnosis of PCD. It is a limitation in our study that we performed our study using oral FeNO measurements.
The other study carried out by Corbelli et al. (
18) presented the cut-off point of 105 ppb for the diagnosis of PCD. They declared that FeNO levels lower than 105 ppb had a specificity of 88% for the detection of PCD among the patients who had been confirmed with the diagnosis of PCD through the histological study. They also reported that FeNO levels upper than 105 ppb could exclude the diagnosis of PCD with 100% confidence (
18).
Other studies have presented different cut-offs for the nasal FeNO among the patients with PCD. For instance, Mateos-Corral et al. (
19) presented the cut-off of 60.8 ppb with specificity and sensitivity of 100%; Marthin and Nielsen (
20) mentioned the oral cut-off of 72.6 ppb with a sensitivity of 94.3% and specificity of 100%. Harris et al. (
21) declared the nasal exhaled NO of 38 ppb with the sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 95%, respectively, and Narang et al. (
22) in a similar amount to this study, presented the cut-off of 25 ppb with the specificity of 96% and sensitivity of 75%. This considerable diversity in the cut-off presentations may be attributed to the racial, physical, and genetic differences of the communities. As this study is the first one in the population of Iran, further studies are strongly recommended.
5.1. Conclusions
Based on the current study, the FeNO test had the remarkable sensitivity of 90.3% for the diagnosis of PCD, and its outcomes were not affected by age, gender, and cardioposition. This is while the saccharin test had a sensitivity of 54.8% and was affected by age but not by gender or cardioposition. Although there are more accurate tests for the diagnosis of PCD, such as TEM and genetic studies, we decided to investigate PCD in children with bronchiectasis by performing two screening tests, NO and saccharin, because there had been several problems in the availability and performance of more accurate tests.