The present study addressed the impact of HSRP implementation on some rare birth complications. The study results showed that after the implementation of HSRP, the rate of natural births in the state hospitals significantly increased. Previous studies in this area also show increased natural birth rates in state hospitals after the HSRP implementation (
10). However, some studies show that in private hospitals, the prevalence of cesarean delivery increased after launching the HSRP (
10).
The present study showed that some of the studied complications- i.e., ischemic-hypoxic encephalopathy, low Apgar score, cephalic hematoma, and clavicle fracture, increased significantly after the HSRP implementation. However, the overall incidence of ischemic-hypoxic encephalopathy in the studied hospital (1.8 per 1,000 births) was similar to those reported in other studies from developed countries (1.3 - 1.7 per 1,000 births) (
11). In African countries, the incidence of ischemic-hypoxic encephalopathy is estimated at 4.8% - 6.8% (
12).
The authors’ previous study in Qom showed that the decreased rate of cesarean section was mostly attributed to emergency cesarean delivery (
13). Another study in Shush City, Iran, showed a significant decrease in the causes of cesarean section- i.e., maternal pelvis-fetal head mismatch, meconium excretion, etc., after the HSRP implementation (
2). It means that the gynecologists, after the implementation of HSRP, gave a greater chance of natural birth, and their decision on cesarean section was made with more delay. It could be one of the causes of an increase in some complications, such as the Erb palsy, ischemic-hypoxic encephalopathy, birth with a low Apgar score, and clavicle fracture.
In Norway, the results of a large clinical trial (2000) showed that the tendency of physicians toward cesarean delivery was greater in breech cases. Subsequently, in a study comparing birth complications between two periods, the results showed that during periods in which physicians had a greater tendency toward vaginal delivery in breach cases, the incidence of the low Apgar score and neonatal death was also higher (
14).
Results of a study conducted in a hospital in Tehran, Iran, showed that the rate of birth injury in vaginal delivery was higher than that of emergency cesarean section (4.16% vs. 2.71%) (
3).
The results of the study by Liu et al. (
15), showed that the incidence of neonatal sepsis and umbilical cord blood acidosis was higher in twins born by vaginal delivery compared with their counterparts born by cesarean section.
A study conducted in Kurdistan Province, Iran, evaluated the viewpoint of healthcare service providers on the Vaginal Delivery Promotion Package in HSRP and the results showed that the main disadvantage the healthcare service providers- i.e., specialists and midwives, worried about was the increased maternal complications due to excessive emphasis on vaginal delivery (
16).
Another change occurred after the implementation of HSRP was an increase in the number of vaginal delivery due to its free franchise, which consequently increased the workload of hospital personnel and may also affect the incidence of the studied complications.
In the present study, the number of complications per 10,000 births was studied in six-month intervals. The result showed that after the implementation of HSRP, the number of complications increased, and the trend continued until 2016; but afterward, the number of complications followed a declining trend. Two reasons can justify this behavior; first, the project implementation problems were gradually identified and resolved, and the rate of complications decreased afterward; second, increased experiences of specialists and midwives in the implementation of protocols and management of patients who mostly underwent cesarean section prior to HSRP, while vaginal delivery was advised to them after HSRP.
5.1. Limitation
According to the type of study, it was not possible to evaluate all variables affecting the desired outcomes in the present study. The study was conducted in a single-center, and the manner of implementing the protocols in the center can affect the studied complications. Evaluation of the overall effect of HSRP requires a comprehensive review of the plan, such as examining its cost-effectiveness and comparing other aspects of the plan, such as the impact on maternal complications, long-term infantile complications, etc.
5.2. Conclusions
The HSRP seems to be approached its goals in the promotion of vaginal delivery, but the results of the present study showed that the implementation of HSRP was accompanied by an increase in the number of some rare birth complications. It seems that in order to promote vaginal delivery, alongside the goals of HSRP, more attention should be paid to women’s knowledge of assisted vaginal delivery- e g, vacuum extraction.