Assessment of Health System Functions in Earthquake-stricken Regions in Kermanshah, Iran

authors:

avatar Sanaz Sohrabizadeh ORCID 1 , * , avatar Hamid Safarpour ORCID 2 , avatar Arezoo Dehghani 1 , avatar Amirhosein Bahramzadeh ORCID 1 , avatar Narges Rouhi 3

Department of Health in Disasters and Emergencies, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran
Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran

how to cite: Sohrabizadeh S , Safarpour H, Dehghani A, Bahramzadeh A, Rouhi N . Assessment of Health System Functions in Earthquake-stricken Regions in Kermanshah, Iran. Shiraz E-Med J. 2021;22(10):e112288. doi: 10.5812/semj.112288.

Abstract

Background:

The occurrence of an earthquake in Kermanshah province in 2017 leads to death and injury of its inhabitants. Assessment of the health system functions can lead to the provision of the necessary healthcare services for the affected population post-disasters. The present study is aimed to assess the health system functions after the Kermanshah earthquake.

Objectives:

Assessment of health system functions in the reproductive, pediatric, and environmental health dimensions in the affected regions of Kermanshah were the research objectives.

Methods:

This mixed methods study was conducted in the two phases of developing a tool and assessment of the main health system functions. Content validity and reliability were measured by CVR and CVI, and Cronbach's alpha, respectively. Assessment of health system functions was conducted by the participation of 100 affected households.

Results:

Firstly, the primary tool was designed using 31 primary items extracted from literature review and a qualitative study. CVR and CVI of the tool were 100%, and Cronbach's alpha was 0.97. The coverage of the reproductive, environmental, and children’s health services ranged from 90 to 100% since the first day to one year after the earthquake and between 30 and 60% from one year to two years post-earthquake.

Conclusions:

The assessment of health system performance can provide the necessary data for effective decision making and promoting health system functions. Further research is needed to assess the functions of the health system after other natural disasters rather than earthquakes.

1. Background

Although health is an essential human right and a fundamental factor for community development, well-being and health of disaster-affected people have been insufficiently considered, more specifically in low-income countries (1). On the other hand, disasters interrupt health system functions, and thus the vital health needs of affected people are addressed inadequately (2-4). Health system assessment can lead to effective interventions for meeting the health needs of the affected people, reducing duplicative services, and accelerating the recovery of disrupted health structures (5).

The literature reported the lack of monitoring and assessment of health system functions during and after disasters, more specifically reproductive, environmental, and children’s health (6, 7). For example, the study of men's and women's health in flood- and earthquake-stricken regions of Iran showed the inappropriate status of water, sanitation, and nutrition of people living in temporary settlements (8). Children’s malnutrition and mental disorder issues after floods and earthquakes were reported as well (9, 10). In addition, several studies highlighted the need for the assessment of pediatric, environmental, and reproductive healthcare services in disaster-affected regions in Iran (11-13).

A number of studies reported the health needs of children affected by disasters. For example, the Haiti earthquake (2010) affected about 1 million children and young people and exacerbated preconceived concerns about the health and protection needs of children (14). The long-term effects of disasters on children’s mental health were reported as one of the most important public health concerns (15, 16). Regarding the key role of parents in children’s mental health (17), a study of 489 children found that maternal PTSD increased children's depression and anxiety (18).

Although women have different public health needs and issues, they suffer from limited access to health facilities and resources after disasters (19-21). While reproductive health (RH) has been reported as one of the important needs of women post-disasters (22), evidence reports inadequate reproductive health services (23-25) due to degraded health facilities, insufficient human resources, exposure to sexual violence, and poverty (26). Neglecting post-disaster RH services can lead to maternal and neonatal death, stillbirth, unintended pregnancy, unsafe abortion, STDs, and menstrual problems (25, 27-31). For example, reproductive health indicators of women affected by the twin earthquakes of East Azerbaijan showed a decrease in live birth rate and coverage of contraceptive methods and an increased in stillbirth rate (32).

Evidence shows that environmental risk factors account for more than 25% of diseases post-disasters (33). For instance, the waste generated by the Indian Ocean tsunami (2004) was 5 to 15 times higher than conventional waste (34). Furthermore, the spread of infectious diseases at the time of disasters requires environmental health services to reduce mortality and morbidity (35). Basic environmental health activities such as water supply, wastewater and effluent management, and food safety are necessary to prevent outbreaks and facilitate the recovery process (36).

Assessment data can help public health systems with identifying their weaknesses and strengths at the times of disaster (37). Moreover, it can facilitate the provision of the most needed services based on limited resources after disasters (38). Primary data sources such as household surveys can provide details for health system assessment (39).

The health system is considered as one of the most important sections to provide various health needs of affected people, including reproductive, pediatric, and environmental health (40). A number of studies have emphasized that the assessment of health system functions is required after disasters (41). On the other hand, assessing all functions of health systems in one research project is not possible. Thus, the present study is aimed to assess the health system functions in the three aspects of reproductive, pediatric, and environmental health after the Kermanshah earthquake.

2. Objectives

Assessment of health system functions in the reproductive, pediatric, and environmental health dimensions in the affected regions of Kermanshah were the research objectives.

3. Methods

3.1. Settings

The occurrence of a 7.3-magnitude earthquake in Kermanshah province in 2017 caused the deaths and injuries of about 8000 inhabitants living in Kermanshah province (42).

3.2. Design

The present mixed methods study was conducted in the two phases of developing an assessment tool and assessing the health system functions.

3.3. Primary Phase: Design and Validation of the Assessment Tool

Both narrative review and qualitative study were conducted to design the assessment tool. Databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and WHO Library were searched for identifying the factors of health system functions. The inclusion criteria for the studies selections were articles, guidelines, and tools of post-earthquake health system functions assessment. Once the study selection process was completed, data analyses were performed to extract the main items of the primary tool. A qualitative study using deductive content analysis was conducted to minimize the missing items from the literature review. Participants were seven experts of health management and disaster medicine selected by the purposive sampling method. The number of participants was determined according to the saturation principle. Data were collected using unstructured, in-depth, interviews and transcribed verbatim in Farsi. A categorization matrix was developed, and interview data were coded according to the categories of reproductive, environmental, and pediatric health (43). Two indicators of content validity ratio (CVR) of Lawshe (44) and content validity index (CVI) of Basel and Waltz (45) were used to evaluate content validity. To determine the CVR, the tool was given to 10 experts in disaster health management. The experts evaluated each item based on a three-point Likert scale (i.e., necessary, useful but not necessary, and unnecessary). To evaluate CVI, experts were asked to evaluate the relevance, simplicity, and clarity of the tool separately based on a 4-point Likert scale. Cronbach's alpha was applied for the tool’s internal consistency with the participation of 15 earthquake-affected people who were randomly selected. Accordingly, an index above 0.7 indicates well internal consistency (45).

3.4. Second Phase: Assessment of the Health System Functions

The health system performance was assessed in the earthquake-stricken regions in Kermanshah Province using the designed tool. The size of household sample was calculated based on Cochran’s formula:

n=Nz2pqNd2+ z2pq

Accordingly, the total number of households damaged in the earthquake-stricken region of Kermanshah was estimated 300 ones (N) (46). Furthermore, the confidence level was 95%, which means z = 1.96 based on alpha level (5%). The estimated proportion of an attribute in the population (p) was 0.5. Considering (q), which is calculated as (1 - p), the estimated variance was (p) (q). Finally, the acceptable margin of error for proportion (d) was estimated as 8%. Accordingly, a sample of 100 household stricken by the earthquake were considered suitable for the survey. The randomized sampling method was used to select the households. A list of affected households was obtained from the health centers, and 100 households living in that area were selected by lottery.

4. Results

4.1. Phase 1: Assessment Tool Development

A number of five functions in each aspect of reproductive, pediatric, and environmental health was extracted from the literature review and qualitative study. The functions included public education and training, providing health services, availability of services, payment per services, and evaluation (Table 1). At this phase, the primary tool was designed using 31 primary items, including 11 items for reproductive health, 9 items for pediatric health, and 11 items for environmental health.

Table 1. Items of Assessing Health System Functions Extracted from Literature Review and a Qualitative Study
No.FunctionsSelected Sub-functions
1Public education and trainingWhat fields have been people educated or trained; When have education and training provided?
2Providing health serviceWhat services have been provided; When have services been provided?
3Availability of serviceHave services been available and accessible?
4Payment per serviceHave you paid for receiving required services?
5Monitoring and evaluationHas the health system monitored and evaluated its service delivery after disasters?

Based on the findings of content validity, CVR and CVI of the tool were 100%. That is, the validity of the tool was confirmed by the disaster health experts and scholars. Regarding reliability, Cronbach's alpha was 0.97, which revealed that there is an acceptable correlation between the items and the whole tool.

The final tool consisted of two sections of demographic information and the main body in the three categories of reproductive, pediatric, and environmental health. The questions are answered by “yes”, “no”, and “do not know” options, as well as a column for more descriptions.

The results showed that about 39% of the earthquake-affected households received training on reproductive health, 55% on pediatric health, and 63% on environmental health (Tables 2 and 3).

Table 2. Demographic Information of the Households
VariablesNo. (%)
Number of household members427 (100)
Deaths
Male21 (45.6)
Female25 (54.4)
Injured
Male62 (54.8)
Female51 (45.2)
Household residency
Urban67 (67)
Rural33 (33)
Damage to home92 (92)
Injury/ damage to work68 (68)
Table 3. Status of Health System Functions Since One Year After the Earthquake
FunctionFrequency (%)
Reproductive health training39
Reproductive health services41
Children health training55
Children health care and services45
Environmental health training63
Environmental health services60

The assessment of health system functions revealed that the coverage of almost all reproductive, environmental, and pediatric health services was between 90 and 100% one year after the earthquake. However, the level of providing health services was decreased to the range of 30 to 60% between one and two years after the earthquake.

5. Discussion

Functions of the health system were assessed in the aspects of reproductive, pediatric, and environmental health through a community-based survey in earthquake-affected regions of Kermanshah province. The assessment data showed that the frequency of providing health services decreased from a one-year to a two-year interval time after the earthquake. The assessment of reproductive, pediatric, and environmental health aspects of health system functions at the same time can make our research specific and comprehensive.

The assessment of health system functions was conducted in the earthquake-affected regions during intermediate and long-term recovery. The quality and continuity of health services provided for affected people need to be assessed during the long-term recovery process, and rapid assessment at the response phase may not be enough (47). The assessment of health system functions can provide the data for prioritizing actions and effective post-earthquake recovery planning and management (48).

An assessment tool was developed in the present research through which health system functions were assessed. Accordingly, the findings of a literature review showed that about 55% of disaster assessment studies were conducted using a structured questionnaire, and the remaining used registries. The health needs were assessed by questionnaires, while the health status of disaster-affected people was assessed by existing registries (49). On the other hand, the validity and reliability features of our tool can confirm its accuracy to assess health system functions during the post-earthquake stage. However, a number of disaster assessment studies have been conducted without a valid and reliable tool to shorten the assessment time and facilitate the process of data collection (50-52).

Similar to our findings, the study of reproductive health assessment of gulf-coast women after disasters suggested a closer understanding of reproductive health needs post-disasters through conducting a community-based assessment in Southeast Louisiana (23). Furthermore, the study of reproductive and sexual health needs after the Nepal earthquake (2015) suggested the establishment of a monitoring and assessment mechanism for reproductive health services provided for affected communities (53). The assessment study of Hurricane Mitch’s reported that women suffer from violence, especially sexual violence, and lack of access to family planning and adequate access to health and education about reproductive health issues is required based on assessment data (54).

The assessments of reproductive and pediatric health functions need to be considered due to the importance of providing health services for vulnerable groups such as pregnant and lactating women and children after disasters (55). Based on our findings, children’s health, as a specific vulnerable group, needs to be assessed in disaster-affected communities. However, the literature has highlighted the assessment of children’s mental health issues after disasters rather than their physical health (56-59) Children experiencing disasters are vulnerable to mental health trauma, particularly in developing countries (16). Thus, providing mental health services for children may be the most important step in the assessment of health system functions after disasters.

Our findings indicated that environmental health of disaster-affected regions such as water, waste, and food needs to be assessed for necessary interventions. Accordingly, a review of the public health needs assessment after major earthquakes reported that water health, food security, environmental health, and vaccinations were the items which were frequently evaluated after disasters (60). Furthermore, the prevalence of infectious diseases after disasters needs environmental health measures to decrease mortality and morbidity issues (35). The implementation of environmental health measures can facilitate the return of communities and health systems to normal life (36).

The limitation of the current study was difficulty in data collection and sampling in an community with poverty and poor health.

5.1. Conclusions

The assessment of health system functions at the long-term recovery phase can help with providing public health services for affected people. Our data revealed that such an assessment can lead to conducting necessary actions for preventing serious public health problems after earthquakes. On the other hand, the assessment data can improve post-disaster health management actions and decision making. Further research is needed to assess the other dimensions of health functions and other natural disasters.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    The Johns Hopkins and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. Public health guide in emergencies. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies; 2008.

  • 2.

    Carballo M, Daita S, Hernandez M. Impact of the Tsunami on healthcare systems. J R Soc Med. 2005;98(9):390-5. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.98.9.390. [PubMed: 16140848]. [PubMed Central: PMC1199632].

  • 3.

    Coupland R, Wille C, Taback N, Regard S. Health care in danger: A sixteen-country study. Geneva, Switzerland: International Committee of the Red Cross; 2011. 19 p.

  • 4.

    Pavignani E, Colombo S. Analysing disrupted health sectors: A modular manual. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009.

  • 5.

    Banatvala N, Zwi AB. Conflict and health. Public health and humanitarian interventions: Developing the evidence base. BMJ. 2000;321(7253):101-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7253.101. [PubMed: 10884265]. [PubMed Central: PMC1127723].

  • 6.

    Chu K, Stokes C, Trelles M, Ford N. Improving effective surgical delivery in humanitarian disasters: Lessons from Haiti. PLoS Med. 2011;8(4). e1001025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001025. [PubMed: 21541363]. [PubMed Central: PMC3082515].

  • 7.

    Sondorp E, Bornemisza O. Public health, emergencies and the humanitarian impulse. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83(3):163. [PubMed: 15798834]. [PubMed Central: PMC2624201].

  • 8.

    Sohrabizadeh S, Tourani Ph DS, Khankeh HR. Women and health consequences of natural disasters: Challenge or opportunity? Women Health. 2016;56(8):977-93. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2016.1176101. [PubMed: 27135961].

  • 9.

    Bernstein M, Pfefferbaum B. Posttraumatic growth as a response to natural disasters in children and adolescents. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018;20(5):37. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0900-4. [PubMed: 29766312].

  • 10.

    Bliss J, Golden K, Bourahla L, Stoltzfus R, Pelletier D. An emergency cash transfer program promotes weight gain and reduces acute malnutrition risk among children 6-24 months old during a food crisis in Niger. J Glob Health. 2018;8(1):10410. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.010410. [PubMed: 29497505]. [PubMed Central: PMC5825977].

  • 11.

    Hapsari ED, Nisman WA, Lusmilasari L, Siswishanto R, Matsuo H; Widyawati. Change in contraceptive methods following the Yogyakarta earthquake and its association with the prevalence of unplanned pregnancy. Contraception. 2009;79(4):316-22. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2008.10.015. [PubMed: 19272502].

  • 12.

    Kissinger P, Schmidt N, Sanders C, Liddon N. The effect of the hurricane Katrina disaster on sexual behavior and access to reproductive care for young women in New Orleans. Sex Transm Dis. 2007;34(11):883-6. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318074c5f8. [PubMed: 17579338].

  • 13.

    Peragallo Urrutia R, Merisier D, Small M, Urrutia E, Tinfo N, Walmer DK. Unmet health needs identified by Haitian women as priorities for attention: A qualitative study. Reprod Health Matters. 2012;20(39):93-103. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(12)39602-X. [PubMed: 22789086]. [PubMed Central: PMC3697112].

  • 14.

    Dube A, Moffatt M, Davison C, Bartels S. Health outcomes for children in Haiti since the 2010 earthquake: A systematic review. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(1):77-88. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17007105. [PubMed: 29248034].

  • 15.

    Chen XY, Chen J, Shi X, Jiang M, Li Y, Zhou Y, et al. Trajectories of maternal symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder predict long-term mental health of children following the Wenchuan earthquake in China: A 10-year follow-up study. J Affect Disord. 2020;266:201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.084. [PubMed: 32056877].

  • 16.

    Schwind JS, Formby CB, Santangelo SL, Norman SA, Brown R, Hoffman Frances R, et al. Earthquake exposures and mental health outcomes in children and adolescents from Phulpingdanda village, Nepal: A cross-sectional study. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2018;12:54. doi: 10.1186/s13034-018-0257-9. [PubMed: 30598695]. [PubMed Central: PMC6300918].

  • 17.

    Morris A, Gabert-Quillen C, Delahanty D. The association between parent PTSD/depression symptoms and child PTSD symptoms: A meta-analysis. J Pediatr Psychol. 2012;37(10):1076-88. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jss091. [PubMed: 23019132].

  • 18.

    Al-Turkait FA, Ohaeri JU. Psychopathological status, behavior problems, and family adjustment of Kuwaiti children whose fathers were involved in the first gulf war. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2008;2(1):12. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-2-12. [PubMed: 18510770]. [PubMed Central: PMC2423353].

  • 19.

    Liang Y, Cao R. Is the health status of female victims poorer than males in the post-disaster reconstruction in China: a comparative study of data on male victims in the first survey and double tracking survey data. BMC Womens Health. 2014;14:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-18. [PubMed: 24468297]. [PubMed Central: PMC3913328].

  • 20.

    Lowe SR, Rhodes JE, Scoglio AA. Changes in marital and partner relationships in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: An analysis with low-income women. Psychol Women Q. 2012;36(3):286-300. doi: 10.1177/0361684311434307. [PubMed: 23125478]. [PubMed Central: PMC3486647].

  • 21.

    Kohan S, Yarmohammadian MH, Bahmanjanbeh F, Haghshenas A. Consequences of earthquake (August 2012) on Iranian women's reproductive health: A qualitative study. Acta Med Mediterr. 2016;32:1503-11.

  • 22.

    Enarson E, Fordham M. From women's needs to women's rights in disasters. Environ Hazards. 2001;3(3):133-6. doi: 10.3763/ehaz.2001.0314.

  • 23.

    Arosemena FA, Fox L, Lichtveld MY. Reproductive health assessment after disasters: Embedding a toolkit within the disaster management workforce to address health inequalities among gulf-coast women. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2013;24(4 Suppl):17-28. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2014.0013. [PubMed: 24241257].

  • 24.

    Onyango MA, Hixson BL, McNally S. Minimum initial service package (MISP) for reproductive health during emergencies: time for a new paradigm? Glob Public Health. 2013;8(3):342-56. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2013.765024. [PubMed: 23394618].

  • 25.

    H. Parker A, A. Smith J, Verdemato T, Cooke J, Webster J, C. Carter R. Menstrual management: A neglected aspect of hygiene interventions. Disaster Prev Manag. 2014;23(4):437-54. doi: 10.1108/dpm-04-2013-0070.

  • 26.

    Warren E, Post N, Hossain M, Blanchet K, Roberts B. Systematic review of the evidence on the effectiveness of sexual and reproductive health interventions in humanitarian crises. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12). e008226. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008226. [PubMed: 26685020]. [PubMed Central: PMC4691726].

  • 27.

    Inter-agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises. Inter-agency field manual on reproductive health in humanitarian settings: 2010 revision for field review. Geneva, Switzerland: Inter-agency Working Group on Reproductive Health in Crises; 2010.

  • 28.

    Liu S, Han J, Xiao D, Ma C, Chen B. A report on the reproductive health of women after the massive 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010;108(2):161-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.08.030. [PubMed: 19892335].

  • 29.

    Lisam S. Minimum initial service package (MISP) for sexual and reproductive health in disasters. J Evid Based Med. 2014;7(4):245-8. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12130. [PubMed: 25586453].

  • 30.

    Zotti ME, Williams AM, Wako E. Post-disaster health indicators for pregnant and postpartum women and infants. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19(6):1179-88. doi: 10.1007/s10995-014-1643-4. [PubMed: 25476606].

  • 31.

    Ellington SR, Kourtis AP, Curtis KM, Tepper N, Gorman S, Jamieson DJ, et al. Contraceptive availability during an emergency response in the United States. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013;22(3):189-93. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2012.4178. [PubMed: 23421580]. [PubMed Central: PMC4388024].

  • 32.

    Bahmanjanbeh F, Kohan S, Yarmohammadian MH, Haghshenas A. Evaluation of reproductive health indicators in women affected by East Azarbaijan earthquake on August 2012. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2016;21(5):504-9. doi: 10.4103/1735-9066.193414. [PubMed: 27904635]. [PubMed Central: PMC5114796].

  • 33.

    Wisner B, Adams J. Environmental health in emergencies and disasters: A practical guide. Geneva, Switzeland: World Health Organization; 2002.

  • 34.

    Brown C, Milke M, Seville E. Disaster waste management: A review article. Waste Manag. 2011;31(6):1085-98. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.027. [PubMed: 21334871].

  • 35.

    Fatemi F, Mohammadi H, Ardalan A, Naddafi K. [Assessment of environmental health in the 2012 East Azerbaijan earthquake]. Iranian Journal of Health and Environment. 2013;6(2):177-86. Persian.

  • 36.

    Karami A, Dargahi A, Farrokhi M, Poursadeghian M, Ivanbagha R, Mostafaei P, et al. Studying the environmental health condition of the cities in the Kermanshah province affected by 2017 earthquake. Health in Emergencies & Disasters Quarterly. 2018;4(1):29-36. doi: 10.32598/hdq.4.1.29.

  • 37.

    Godsoe M, Ladd M, Cox R. Assessing Canada’s disaster baselines and projections under the sendai framework for disaster risk reduction: A modeling tool to track progress. Nat Hazards. 2019;98(1):293-317. doi: 10.1007/s11069-019-03599-z.

  • 38.

    Reynolds TA, Sawe H, Rubiano AM, Shin SD, Wallis L, Mock CN; rd. Strengthening health systems to provide emergency care. In: Jamison DT, Gelband H, Horton S, Jha P, Laxminarayan R, et al., editors. Disease control priorities: Improving health and reducing poverty. 3rd ed. Washington, USA: The World Bank Group; 2017.

  • 39.

    Deare F. A methodological approach to gender analysis in natural disaster assessment: A guide for the Caribbean. Chile, USA: United Nations Publications; 2004.

  • 40.

    Akbari ME, Asadi Lari M, Montazeri A, Aflatunian MR, Farshad AA. Evaluation of health system responsiveness to the 2003 Bam, Iran, Earthquake. Earthq Spectra. 2019;21(Suppl 1):469-74. doi: 10.1193/1.2091090.

  • 41.

    Bayntun C. A health system approach to all-hazards disaster management: A systematic review. PLoS Curr. 2012;4. e50081cad5861d. doi: 10.1371/50081cad5861d. [PubMed: 23066519]. [PubMed Central: PMC3461969].

  • 42.

    Forum IT. Towards zero ambitious road safety targets and the safe system approach: Ambitious road safety targets and the safe system approach. Paris, France: OECD Publishing; 2008.

  • 43.

    Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x. [PubMed: 18352969].

  • 44.

    Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x.

  • 45.

    Waltz CF, Bausell RB. Nursing research: Design, statistics, and computer analysis. Pennsylvania, USA: FA Davis Company; 1981.

  • 46.

    Authors' Group. [Health management in earthquakes: Experience from Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences Sarpol-e zahab Earthquake]. Kermanshah, Iran: Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences and Health Services; 2017. Persian.

  • 47.

    Babaie J, Moslehi S, Ardalan A. Rapid health needs assessment experience in 11 august 2012 East azerbaijan earthquakes: A qualitative study. PLoS Curr. 2014;6. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.308f6140d54f78fd1680e2b9e6460ae3. [PubMed: 25045586]. [PubMed Central: PMC4096797].

  • 48.

    World Health Organization. Hospital emergency response checklist: An all-hazards tool for hospital administrators and emergency managers. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011.

  • 49.

    Korteweg HA, van Bokhoven I, Yzermans CJ, Grievink L. Rapid health and needs assessments after disasters: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:295. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-295. [PubMed: 20515478]. [PubMed Central: PMC2889870].

  • 50.

    Edward A, Kumar B, Kakar F, Salehi AS, Burnham G, Peters DH. Configuring balanced scorecards for measuring health system performance: Evidence from 5 years' evaluation in Afghanistan. PLoS Med. 2011;8(7). e1001066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001066. [PubMed: 21814499]. [PubMed Central: PMC3144209].

  • 51.

    World Health Organization. Toolkit for assessing health-system capacity for crisis management. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012.

  • 52.

    Verlin A. A monitoring and evaluation framework for disaster recovery programs. Aust J Emerg Manag. 2018;33(1):8-10.

  • 53.

    Chaudhary P, Vallese G, Thapa M, Alvarez VB, Pradhan LM, Bajracharya K, et al. Humanitarian response to reproductive and sexual health needs in a disaster: The Nepal earthquake 2015 case study. Reprod Health Matters. 2017;25(51):25-39. doi: 10.1080/09688080.2017.1405664. [PubMed: 29254453].

  • 54.

    Westhoff WW, Lopez GE, Zapata LB, Corvin JAW, Allen P, McDermott RJ. Reproductive health education and services needs of internally displaced persons and refugees following disaster. Am J Health Educ. 2013;39(2):95-103. doi: 10.1080/19325037.2008.10599021.

  • 55.

    Sohrabizadeh S. [exploring gender analysis factors in risk management of natural disasters: The case of Iran [dissertation]]. Tehran, Iran: Iran University of Medical Sciences; 2015. Persian.

  • 56.

    Kar N. Psychological impact of disasters on children: Review of assessment and interventions. World J Pediatr. 2009;5(1):5-11. doi: 10.1007/s12519-009-0001-x. [PubMed: 19172325].

  • 57.

    Lee MS, Bhang SY. Assessment tools for the mental health of school-aged children and adolescents exposed to disaster: A systematic review (1988-2015). Soa Chongsonyon Chongsin Uihak. 2018;29(3):88-100. doi: 10.5765/jkacap.180002. [PubMed: 32595301]. [PubMed Central: PMC7289459].

  • 58.

    Pfefferbaum B, North CS. Assessing children's disaster reactions and mental health needs: Screening and clinical evaluation. Can J Psychiatry. 2013;58(3):135-42. doi: 10.1177/070674371305800303. [PubMed: 23461884].

  • 59.

    Pfefferbaum JDB, Jacobs AK, Houston JB. Children and disasters: A framework for mental health assessment. J Emerg Manag. 2012;10(5):349. doi: 10.5055/jem.2012.0112.

  • 60.

    World Health Organization. A systematic review of public health emergency operations centres (EOC). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2013.

Copyright © 2021, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.