There is no consensus on the therapeutic approach for first-degree AVB caused by immune-mediated factors (
3-
5). The main purpose of this study is to facilitate early diagnosis and treatment of suspected CAVB. We utilized the aforementioned major risk factors as either a basis for early echocardiographic evaluation or as a therapeutic guideline in cases of immune-mediated first-degree AVB. Our major risk factors included a history of CCHB, a history of fetal death, higher titers of SSB/A antibodies (> 50 - 100 U/mL), bradycardia (HR < 110 bpm), a high PR interval (> 165 ms) or progressive increase in PR interval, and early evidence of myocarditis (
3,
9,
11). In our case series, only one pregnant mother had a previous history of CCHB. However, previous fetal death was a common occurrence, with a prevalence of 47%. This is the foreseeable consequence of the threatening nature of CCHB (
20). Additionally, a previous history of fetal death is a risk factor for pregnant mothers who test positive for antibodies (
20). Moderate and high antibody titers were present in 80% of our cases. However, high values (> 100 U/mL) were consistently observed in CCHB. This may indicate that higher titers are an important risk factor. A higher titer of SSB/SSA antibodies is typically associated with an increased risk of developing CCHB (
3,
9). However, our results contradict this finding.
Various degrees of bradycardia, particularly those below 110 bpm, may be considered a potential predictor of CAVB (
21). Constant bradycardia ranging from 90 to 110 bpm may be caused by inflammatory dysfunction of the sinus node (
1,
2). However, more severe bradycardia, with a heart rate of less than 90 bpm, may be caused by second or third-degree AVB (
22). Bradycardia was a common finding (86%) among our cases, including those with CCHB, second-degree AVB, and even first-degree AVB. Mild bradycardia (90 - 110 bpm) was detected in five cases (33%) of our study, both in first and second-degree AVB. Because bradycardia is not typically a direct result of first-degree AVB, it may be linked to other mechanisms, such as sinus node dysfunction (
1,
12). Irregular fetal heart rate detected by sonography or ultrasonography could be the primary indicator of CAVB. This can be caused by second-degree AVB or atrial flutter (
2,
22). Fetal cardiomegaly detected by ultrasonography may be due to myocarditis or CHB with extreme bradycardia (
11,
23). In our case series, a fetus with second-degree AVB and mild cardiomegaly showed signs of possible early myocarditis. Endocardial fibroelastosis (EFE) is a concerning indication of CCHB, which is identified by sonographic echo density in various areas of the endocardium (
11). Hydrops fetalis may result from heart failure during CCHB and has a poor prognosis (
6,
7). Rapid diagnosis and management of CAVB depend on a regular protocol for early referral of pregnant mothers at around 16 weeks of gestation.
Likewise, inflammation of other parts of the conduction system can lead to various types of arrhythmia, such as atrial flutter or atrial bigemini/trigemini (
1,
11). The severity of inflammation may also be linked to the specific type of arrhythmia observed (
3,
5). In our experience, regularly measuring PR intervals in all fetuses can predict the early stages of CAVB. Unfortunately, our survey revealed that the referral times for cases of CCHB were between 21 and 22 weeks of gestational age. This confirms the characteristic rapid development of CCHB and the necessity for emergent screening of high-risk pregnancies (
4).
Despite the low frequency of CCHB in pregnant mothers, certain risk factors can increase the likelihood of its development (
24,
25). Type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypothyroidism may increase the risk of developing CAVB in cases of immune-mediated AVB (
5). Additionally, administering medications such as antiepileptic drugs to pregnant women who have tested positive for autoantibodies may elevate the risk (
26,
27). In our case series, we found that minor risk factors such as diabetes mellitus and hypothyroidism were relatively common. These factors served as a guideline for closely monitoring the cases with immune-mediated first-degree AVB through echocardiographic follow-up.
Most of our cases had positive autoantibody titers; however, only one had overt maternal lupus erythematosus. This may be related to early management of known cases of lupus erythematosus, mostly prior to pregnancy. Some studies have reported similar results (
3,
11).
Starting medication for cases with first-degree AVB is controversial due to the debate surrounding their necessity versus their potential side effects (
3,
14). Our therapeutic strategy for immune-mediated first-degree AVB depends on the major risk factors.
Currently, there is no established therapeutic protocol to prevent CCHB. However, corticosteroids have been considered the primary treatment option, although their effectiveness is not definitive. Typically, they are prescribed for a period of 2 to 4 weeks in cases of immune-mediated second-degree AVB. Additionally, some centers recommend early initiation after the onset of immune-mediated CCHB (
3,
15). Dexamethasone is our primary medication for all cases of high-risk immune-mediated first-degree AVB and immune-mediated second-degree AVB. It is typically used in combination with HCQ. Unfortunately, we did not administer CCHB at the early stages of emergent treatment with this medication.
Moreover, IVIG, plasmapheresis, and HCQ have been used by many centers with relatively satisfactory outcomes (
5,
15). Most references recommend administering these medications for second-degree AVB, especially in pregnancies with a positive autoantibody titer (
3,
5). Some reports recommend administering IVIG during the early stages (12 - 24 hours after onset) of immune-mediated CCHB (
3,
16,
19). Some reports recommend early prophylactic medication with IVIG and/or plasmapheresis for pregnancies with a previous history of CCHB and moderate or high positive autoantibody titers (
10), which has shown satisfactory results. In our survey, IVIG was only used in high-risk cases of immune-mediated second-degree AVB, yielding satisfactory results. There is controversy surrounding the therapeutic or preventive role of HCQ. Some reports recommend using HCQ for pregnant mothers with a previous history of immune-mediated AVB, starting from early gestational ages (around 10 weeks) until its termination. However, some other centers use it to treat newly recognized cases of immune-mediated AVB, typically for shorter periods of around two months (
3,
19). We administered long-term HCQ medication to treat immune-mediated first-degree AVB in patients with a history of CCHB or fetal death (
Figure 1).
The main strategy for CCHB was the treatment of heart failure. In fetuses under 28 weeks of gestational age with CCHB (without congenital heart disease and hydrops fetalis), we attempted a short-term (2 to 4 weeks) administration of dexamethasone, but it did not produce the desired effects. Additionally, we started administering salbutamol (2.5 mg / 8 h) to patients with heart rates below 60 bpm, hoping to increase their heart rate. Saxena et al. recommended using beta-2 agonists such as terbutaline, salbutamol, or ritodrine to prevent further ventricular rate reduction, especially in cases where the rate is less than 60 bpm (
19). Additionally, we have initiated digoxin treatment in CCHB cases complicated by heart failure. Some reports recommend using digoxin in cases of CCHB and heart failure. Some reports recommend the prompt administration of corticosteroids and/or IVIG for the recent onset of CCHB within 12 - 24 hours of its onset (
4,
14). IVIG was not indicated in any of our cases of CCHB. None of the fetuses in our study required emergent pacemaker implantation at birth. However, medication for heart failure was used during the years following birth. Recently, we referred a 6-year-old with CCHB for PPM (permanent pacemaker implantation).
The main limitation of the study is the small sample size, which is attributed to the study being conducted in a single setting. The lack of randomization in using the protocol is another limitation. However, due to the small number of fetuses with CHB, these limitations will be evident in each single-center study.
5.1. Conclusions
Utilizing "Major and Minor Risk Factors" can aid in achieving our preventive objectives for immune-mediated congenital AVB. However, this protocol is a rudimentary guideline. For greater certainty, a larger population should be studied in the future.