Beyond the White Coat: Unveiling the Dynamic Role of Personality in Medical Education

authors:

avatar Nazanin Shamaeian Razavi ORCID 1 , avatar Haniye Mastour ORCID 2 , *

Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran
School of Medical Education and Learning Technologies, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

how to cite: Shamaeian Razavi N, Mastour H. Beyond the White Coat: Unveiling the Dynamic Role of Personality in Medical Education. Shiraz E-Med J. 2024;25(8):e146414. https://doi.org/10.5812/semj-146414.

Dear Editor,

Personality, a complex construct, significantly impacts medical education and patient care, extending beyond medical knowledge and technical skills to include enduring traits, behaviors, and characteristics such as communication style, emotional intelligence, and interpersonal skills. Understanding personality is essential for medical students' educational journeys (1-3).

The AMEE Guide No. 79 emphasizes the crucial role of personality in physician performance, encompassing diverse social, cultural, and personality factors. It advocates strongly for the evaluation of traits like conscientiousness and empathy to assess their impact on professional and academic success (1). Furthermore, these traits significantly shape leadership styles and effectiveness, influencing collaborative efforts and positive patient outcomes (4, 5). Effective leadership, regardless of formal titles, relies on qualities that enhance patient care and foster cohesive teamwork (6, 7).

Despite its importance, personality has been largely overlooked in medical education. While some evidence suggests that personality traits may influence medical specialty choice, academic performance, learning styles, and attitudes toward interprofessional education, there is no consensus on how personality should be measured, assessed, and integrated into the curriculum and practice of medical education (8-12). Integrating personality aspects into the medical curriculum involves developing modules focused on self-awareness, communication skills, and empathy, all essential for patient-centered care. Problem-based learning and reflective practices encourage students to understand the impact of their personality traits on patient interactions. Continuous assessment and feedback mechanisms help students recognize and cultivate the personal attributes necessary for effective medical practice. Additionally, personality assessments during the admission phase can assist in selecting candidates with traits predictive of success in medical training and practice (13-15).

The assessment of personality traits is beneficial and necessary in medical education. These traits can influence career success and satisfaction among physicians. Different medical specialties require distinct personality traits and skills, and emotional intelligence can significantly improve collaboration and patient-centered care (1, 3, 13, 15-21).

Traditionally, medical education focuses on knowledge acquisition and technical skill development, often sidelining aspects like personality assessment. Curriculum constraints and the need to cover extensive medical knowledge and clinical skills can lead to the neglect of non-academic aspects. Some educators and institutions may not be fully aware of the benefits and relevance of personality assessment in medical education. They may lack specific training on integrating personality assessment into the curriculum or may be unfamiliar with appropriate assessment tools (1, 8, 9, 21-24).

In conclusion, the role of personality in medical education is undeniable. Personality assessments can provide valuable insights into medical students' potential for success, well-being, and professionalism. By acknowledging the role of personality in medical education, institutions can develop comprehensive curricula and support structures that nurture both the intellectual and interpersonal growth of future healthcare professionals. This holistic approach recognizes the importance of personality in shaping the compassionate, patient-centered care that is the cornerstone of effective medical practice (23-25).

It is important to note that personality assessment should not be used in isolation or as the sole determinant of a student's capabilities or future success (2, 8, 9). It should be integrated into a comprehensive approach that includes other factors such as academic performance, clinical skills, and professional ethics. Moreover, personality assessment should be conducted ethically, focusing on personal growth and development rather than labeling or limiting individuals (1, 3, 10, 11).

References

  • 1.

    Hojat M, Erdmann JB, Gonnella JS. Personality assessments and outcomes in medical education and the practice of medicine: AMEE Guide No. 79. Med Teach. 2013;35(7):e1267-301. [PubMed ID: 23614402]. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.785654.

  • 2.

    Olsson C, Lachmann H, Kalen S, Ponzer S, Mellstrand Navarro C. Personality and learning styles in relation to attitudes towards interprofessional education: a cross-sectional study on undergraduate medical students during their clinical courses. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):398. [PubMed ID: 33129339]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7603747]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02327-7.

  • 3.

    Prins DJ, van Vendeloo SN, Brand PLP, Van der Velpen I, de Jong K, van den Heijkant F, et al. The relationship between burnout, personality traits, and medical specialty. A national study among Dutch residents. Med Teach. 2019;41(5):584-90. [PubMed ID: 30394166]. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1514459.

  • 4.

    Hogan R, Judge T. 37 Personality and Leadership. The Oxford Handbook of Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. 0 p. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398793.013.0003.

  • 5.

    Saxena A, Desanghere L, Stobart K, Walker K. Goleman's Leadership styles at different hierarchical levels in medical education. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17(1):169. [PubMed ID: 28927466]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5606110]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0995-z.

  • 6.

    Shamaeian Razavi N, Jalili M, Sandars J, Gandomkar R. Leadership Behaviors in Health Care Action Teams: A Systematized Review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2022;36:8. [PubMed ID: 35999940]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9386755]. https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.36.8.

  • 7.

    Razavi NS, Gandomkar R, Jafarian A, Jalili M. Team Leadership Behaviors from the Viewpoints of Healthcare Team Members: A Qualitative Study. Int J Organ Leadership. 2022;11(2).

  • 8.

    Hayat AA, Shateri K, Amini M, Shokrpour N. Relationships between academic self-efficacy, learning-related emotions, and metacognitive learning strategies with academic performance in medical students: a structural equation model. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):76. [PubMed ID: 32183804]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7079530]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-01995-9.

  • 9.

    Dash NR, Guraya SY, Al Bataineh MT, Abdalla ME, Yusoff MSB, Al-Qahtani MF, et al. Preferred teaching styles of medical faculty: an international multi-center study. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(1):480. [PubMed ID: 33256705]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7708200]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02358-0.

  • 10.

    Karimi L, Leggat SG, Bartram T, Afshari L, Sarkeshik S, Verulava T. Emotional intelligence: predictor of employees' wellbeing, quality of patient care, and psychological empowerment. BMC Psychol. 2021;9(1):93. [PubMed ID: 34088348]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8176682]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-021-00593-8.

  • 11.

    Kwame A, Petrucka PM. A literature-based study of patient-centered care and communication in nurse-patient interactions: barriers, facilitators, and the way forward. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):158. [PubMed ID: 34479560]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8414690]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00684-2.

  • 12.

    El Othman R, El Othman R, Hallit R, Obeid S, Hallit S. Personality traits, emotional intelligence and decision-making styles in Lebanese universities medical students. BMC Psychol. 2020;8(1):46. [PubMed ID: 32370782]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7201943]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00406-4.

  • 13.

    O'Tuathaigh CMP, Nadhirah Idris A, Duggan E, Costa P, Costa MJ. Medical students' empathy and attitudes towards professionalism: Relationship with personality, specialty preference and medical programme. PLoS One. 2019;14(5). e0215675. [PubMed ID: 31048851]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6497245]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215675.

  • 14.

    Purabdollah M, Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Valizadeh L, Mousavi S, Ghasempour M. Competency gap among graduating nursing students: what they have achieved and what is expected of them. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):546. [PubMed ID: 38755624]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11097550]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05532-w.

  • 15.

    Doherty EM, Nugent E. Personality factors and medical training: a review of the literature. Med Educ. 2011;45(2):132-40. [PubMed ID: 21208259]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03760.x.

  • 16.

    Assing Hvidt E, Ulso A, Thorngreen CV, Sondergaard J, Andersen CM. Empathy as a learning objective in medical education: using phenomenology of learning theory to explore medical students' learning processes. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):628. [PubMed ID: 35982451]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9389818]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03696-x.

  • 17.

    Louwen C, Reidlinger D, Milne N. Profiling health professionals' personality traits, behaviour styles and emotional intelligence: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):120. [PubMed ID: 36803372]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9938999]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04003-y.

  • 18.

    Gashi D, Gallopeni F, Imeri G, Shahini M, Bahtiri S. The relationship between big five personality traits, coping strategies, and emotional problems through the COVID-19 pandemic. Curr Psychol. 2022:1-10. [PubMed ID: 36406846]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9660183]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03944-9.

  • 19.

    Farcic N, Barac I, Pluzaric J, Ilakovac V, Pacaric S, Gvozdanovic Z, et al. Personality traits of core self-evaluation as predictors on clinical decision-making in nursing profession. PLoS One. 2020;15(5). e0233435. [PubMed ID: 32421752]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7233533]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233435.

  • 20.

    Lewis EG, Cardwell JM. The big five personality traits, perfectionism and their association with mental health among UK students on professional degree programmes. BMC Psychol. 2020;8(1):54. [PubMed ID: 32487181]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7265221]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-020-00423-3.

  • 21.

    Sultan S, Labban OM, Hamawi AM, Alnajrani AK, Tawfik AM, Felemban MH, et al. Relationship of big five personality traits and future specialty preference among undergraduate medical students: a cross-sectional study. Egypt J Neurol, Psychiatry Neurosurg. 2023;59(1):103.

  • 22.

    Burgess A, van Diggele C, Roberts C, Mellis C. Key tips for teaching in the clinical setting. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20(Suppl 2):463. [PubMed ID: 33272257]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7712575]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02283-2.

  • 23.

    Rammstedt B, John OP. Big Five Inventory. In: Zeigler-Hill V, Shackelford T, editors. Encyclopedia Pers Individ Diff. Cham: Springer; 2017.

  • 24.

    Davies DJ, McLean PF, Kemp PR, Liddle AD, Morrell MJ, Halse O, et al. Assessment of factual recall and higher-order cognitive domains in an open-book medical school examination. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022;27(1):147-65. [PubMed ID: 34687383]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8536902]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-021-10076-5.

  • 25.

    Khanna P, Roberts C, Lane AS. Designing health professional education curricula using systems thinking perspectives. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21(1):20. [PubMed ID: 33407403]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7789213]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02442-5.