In this study, we evaluated LFTs before and after cholecystectomy in children. The mean age of the children was 7.2 ± 2.65 years. The sample comprised 48.48% boys and 51.52% girls. Abdominal pain was the most common clinical symptom, reported in 72.7% of cases. There were no significant differences in the levels of AST and ALT before and after surgery. However, a significant difference was observed in the levels of ALP before and after cholecystectomy. No pathological evidence was found in the specimens, and there were no post-surgery complications.
Contrary to our findings, Kim et al. reported a significant increase in the levels of AST, ALT, ALP, and bilirubin after cholecystectomy in children (
5). In our study, we observed an increase in the levels of ALT and AST after cholecystectomy, although this increase was not statistically significant. We also observed a significant decrease in ALP levels after cholecystectomy. The discrepancies between the two studies could be attributed to differences in sample sizes and the populations in the study. The discrepancies between the two studies could be attributed to differences in sample sizes and populations; our study was conducted on 66 Iranian children, while the study by Kim et al. was conducted on 24 Korean children (
5).
In a recent study by Choudhury and Dutta, significant increases in AST and ALT within the first 24 to 48 hours post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy were reported, attributed to CO
2 pneumoperitoneum. These enzyme levels typically returned to baseline within a week, consistent with our results of transient changes. While the reduction in ALP levels remained stable, the transient nature of AST and ALT elevations suggests that although they may raise initial concerns, they usually resolve without long-term implications for patients with normal preoperative liver function (
14).
In a study conducted by Maleknia and Ebrahimi, liver enzymes increased significantly after cholecystectomy, but ALP did not change significantly. This increase occurred immediately after surgery and returned to previous levels in serial tests (
15). Similarly, a study by Bellad and Sahu reported a significant increase in the levels of ALT, AST, ALP, and bilirubin 24 hours after cholecystectomy, with all these tests showing a downward trend in subsequent evaluations (
16). The results of our study showed not only no significant increase in liver enzymes after surgery but also a significant decrease in ALP levels after the intervention. This difference could be due to the fact that liver enzyme levels in our study were not measured immediately after surgery; rather, the tests were conducted one week post-surgery. From this perspective, our results are consistent with previous studies and confirm that liver enzyme levels returned to normal following the intervention.
Singal et al. concluded that in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, serum bilirubin, AST, and ALT levels increased 24 hours post-surgery compared to preoperative levels and subsequently decreased 72 hours after surgery. In other words, an increase in liver enzyme levels was not observed three days post-surgery, except for ALP. Alkaline phosphatase levels exhibited a slight decrease 24 hours post-surgery and a slight increase 72 hours post-surgery (
17).
These results illustrate the impact of CO
2 gas used during laparoscopy on hepatocellular damage. Therefore, it is recommended to conduct baseline liver tests prior to laparoscopy in patients with suspected liver failure or underlying liver disease. However, this recommendation is less critical for open cholecystectomy in patients with suspected liver issues (
18,
19).
Cholecystectomy in cases of hepatocyte damage is often accompanied by an increase in liver enzymes. In laparoscopic cholecystectomy, compared to open cholecystectomy, a significant increase in liver enzymes can be observed, likely due to increased pneumoperitoneal pressure from the use of carbon dioxide gas during laparoscopy. However, a study by Singh et al., comparing changes in liver enzymes after open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy, showed similar increases in liver enzyme levels in patients undergoing open surgery and those undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (
20). This finding suggests that differences in surgical skills and techniques in both methods may account for discrepancies in liver enzyme levels after the interventions.
According to a study by Ashraf Butt et al., ALT levels and leukocyte counts increased significantly after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (
21). An increase in leukocyte count is expected after invasive interventions. However, the results of our study showed that this increase was not significant, likely because blood tests were performed one week after the operation. At this point, the effect of neutrophil diapedesis on peripheral blood flow would no longer be evident. Since our patients did not experience serious complications such as sepsis or infection, significant leukocytosis was not observed.
A recent study presents findings that conflict with our results. This research reported significant increases in AST, ALT, and bilirubin levels 24 to 48 hours post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with P-values less than 0.05, indicating notable hepatic enzyme alterations. In contrast, our study found no statistically significant changes in AST and ALT levels post-surgery, although ALP levels decreased significantly. These discrepancies may arise from differences in sample size or methodologies used to assess liver function. The recent study highlights the possibility that laparoscopic cholecystectomy can cause clinically significant transient elevations in liver enzymes, challenging our conclusion that periodic evaluations of LFTs post-cholecystectomy are unnecessary and emphasizing the need for further investigation into these differences (
15).
In a study by Akhtar-Danesh et al., involving 3519 pediatric patients who underwent cholecystectomy, the morbidity rate was 3.9%, with a lower morbidity rate observed in patients operated on due to gallstones. In contrast, our study reported no morbidity following cholecystectomy, differing slightly from the findings of Akhtar-Danesh et al. (
22). This disparity may stem from differences in the ethnicity and population of the study participants, as our study was conducted in Iran, while theirs was conducted in Canada. Notably, our study spanned a duration of 10 years, during which only 66 patients underwent gallstone surgery in a referral tertiary hospital. By comparison, Akhtar-Danesh et al.'s study spanned 8 years and included 3519 pediatric cholecystectomy cases for various indications (
22). This difference in the study population may also reflect the higher prevalence of gallstones in Western populations compared to Eastern populations, as noted in the literature (
12).
In our study, nearly half of the patients were female. Although the gender difference was not statistically significant, a gender disparity in gallstone prevalence was observed, with a higher prevalence in females compared to males. This finding aligns with previous studies that have also reported a greater incidence of gallstones in females (
23-
25).
5.1. Limitations and Suggestions
Limited access to patient tests was a significant factor contributing to the small sample size in this study. Furthermore, the retrospective and cross-sectional nature of the study introduced limitations, including potential biases and reduced control over confounding variables. While the use of the Wilcoxon test for comparisons was appropriate, the small sample size may have limited the statistical power of our findings. This limitation highlights the need for caution in interpreting the results, as they may not fully represent broader patient populations.
Given these constraints, it is recommended that a prospective study be conducted with a larger patient population. Such a study should aim to compare differences in paraclinical tests between open and laparoscopic surgery, not only in the context of cholecystectomy but also across other surgical procedures where both methods are applicable.
5.2. Conclusions
Our study demonstrated that cholecystectomy does not significantly impact ALT and AST levels. However, a significant decrease was observed in ALP levels post-cholecystectomy. Based on our findings, routine monitoring of liver enzymes after cholecystectomy may not be necessary, as the lack of significant changes in ALT and AST suggests these enzymes do not require close observation post-operatively. The observed decrease in ALP levels could potentially be attributed to the resolution of the liver’s cholestatic condition following the procedure. We recommend that clinicians consider these findings when determining post-operative monitoring protocols, as unnecessary testing could increase healthcare costs without providing additional clinical benefits.