Abstract
Context:
Anemia is a common, global health problem that has short-term and long-term effects during pregnancy. Several studies have been conducted on the prevalence of anemia among pregnant Iranian women in the last 10 years (2005-2015). The current study evaluated the prevalence of anemia among pregnant Iranian women in this time period.Evidence Acquisition:
The current study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Searches for relevant literature were conducted on scientific databases such as the Iranian journal database (Magiran), Iranian biomedical journal database (IranMedex), the scientific information database (SID), global medical article Limberly (Medlib), IranDoc, Scopus, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Springer, Web of Science, Wiley online library, and Google Scholar. All population-based studies and national surveys that reported on the prevalence of anemia among pregnant Iranian women published between January 1st, 2005 and December 31st, 2015 were included. All related articles were considered based on inclusion criteria. Using a random effects model, data were analyzed through STATA software (ver.11.1).Results:
Eighteen articles with a combined sample size of 51,521 were investigated. The prevalence of anemia in pregnant Iranian women was estimated at 17.9% (CI: 95%; 14.7 - 21.1). The highest and lowest percentages were reported in Iran’s central (24.9%) and western (6.3%) parts, respectively. The prevalence of anemia among rural (17.6%) and urban (22.1%) pregnant Iranian women was also determined.Conclusions:
The prevalence of anemia among pregnant Iranian women has increased in the last 10 years. Therefore, appropriate intervention plans, including training in proper nutrition during pregnancy and training in the correct use of iron, vitamins, and folic acid supplements, should be arranged and performed in prenatal clinics or before marriage.Keywords
Prevalence Anemia Pregnant Women Pregnancy Iran Meta-Analysis
1. Context
From the beginning of history, pregnancy has been considered as an undeniable, natural, and most necessary need that happens millions of times annually (1). Research has been conducted on the different issues and dangers that affect pregnancy; one such issue is anemia (2).
Anemia is a common, global health problem that has short-term and long-term effects during pregnancy (3). Generally, anemia is observed in poor countries. It has a significant impact on issues such as placental abruption, preeclampsia, premature rupture of membranes (PROM), low birth weight, and fetal or maternal fatality (4, 5).
Anemia often becomes more severe in the presence of other chronic diseases such as Helicobacter pylori, malaria, tuberculosis, HIV, and diabetes. Without treatment, anemia can cause an increase in fetal and maternal mortality rates (6-8). Recent studies have shown that anemia is responsible for 15% - 20% of maternal deaths (5).
In a systematic review with a sample size of 11,037, Esmat et al. (2010) reported the highest and the lowest prevalence of anemia among pregnant Iranian women to be 21.5% and 4.3%, respectively and the average prevalence as 12.4% (based on the definition provided by the WHO [hemoglobin < 11 gr/dL]) (9). Several studies have investigated the prevalence of anemia among pregnant Iranian women in the last 10 years (2005 - 2015) (10-27). However, no systematic review or meta-analysis has been conducted in the mentioned period. Accordingly, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the prevalence of anemia among pregnant Iranian women in the last 10 years (2005 - 2015) and compare this prevalence with that of the years before 2005.
2. Evidence Acquisition
The current study was performed in several stages: determination of the subject, data collection, data analysis, and interpretation of the results. The Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist was used during the study (28). To avoid biases, all processes of collection and selection of studies, quality assessment, and data extraction were performed by two independent researchers.
2.1. Data Sources
The present systematic review was performed to estimate the prevalence of anemia among pregnant Iranian women during the period of 2005-2015. Searches for relevant studies conducted between January 1st, 2005 and December 31st, 2015 were done through databases such as the Iranian journal database (Magiran), Iranian biomedical journals (IranMedex), the Scientific Information Database (SID), global medical article Limberly (Medlib), IranDoc, Scopus, PubMed, ScienceDirect, Springer, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library, and Google scholar.
The searches were conducted using both Persian and English keywords including: "Prevalence", "Anemia", "Hemoglobin", "Ferritin", "Pregnancy", "Pregnant Woman", "Prenatal care" and "Complications of pregnancy". A combination of AND/OR operators were used in the searches. In order to locate more studies, the references of all relevant articles were reviewed.
2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
The main inclusion criterion for this study was a reference to the prevalence of anemia in pregnant Iranian women and the exclusion criteria included: 1, Studies in which a non-random sampling method was used; 2, studies without specific sample origins; and 3, studies of a repetitive nature.
In this study, anemia is defined based on the definition provided by the WHO (hemoglobin < 11 mg/dL) (29). When the full text was not available, an email request for the whole article was sent to the author.
2.3. Quality Assessment
After finding all relevant articles, the selected ones were evaluated by researchers based on the STROBE checklist (30). The 22-item STROBE checklist assesses a wide range of methodological issues including sampling methods, measurement of parameters, statistical analysis, adjustment for confounding factors, reliability and validity of research instruments, and research objectives. Each question of the checklist has a score between 0 and 2 points and the maximum attainable number of points was 44. The articles considered in this study were categorized into three classes of low (0 - 15 points), medium (16 - 30 points), and high (31 - 44 points) quality. Finally, all relevant articles that attained a minimum score of 16 were included in the meta-analysis.
2.4. Study Selection
In the first stage, 210 articles related to the prevalence of anemia in pregnant Iranian women were found. Of the initial 210 articles, 100 replication articles were excluded from the study (replication studies are those extracted by both researchers; they have similar titles, authors, and content and are published in the same journal). The abstracts of all 110 remaining articles were evaluated; however, 25 articles were excluded from the study due to irrelevancy.
In the second stage, the full texts of the remaining 85 articles were examined. Of those 85, 62 articles were excluded due to: 1, irrelevant topics; 2, using a random sampling method; 3, lack of a standard framework for the evaluation of anemia incidence; and 4, not conducted in the period of 2005 - 2015. The remaining 23 articles were entered into the quality assessment stage, during which 5 more articles were excluded due to low quality. The final 18 articles were examined through the process of meta-analysis (Figure 1).
The Steps of Study Selection for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Forest Plots of the Prevalence of Anemia for Random Effects Meta- Analysis
2.5. Data Extraction
Using a pre-prepared checklist, all 18 articles were arranged for the data extraction stage. The checklist included author’s name, year of study, place of study, type of study, sample size, average age, gestational age, cut-off point for hemoglobin, prevalence of anemia, and rural/urban samples.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
The random effects model was used for meta-analysis of the combined results of the studies. The variance for each study was calculated using the instead of binominal formula. The presence of heterogeneity was determined by the DerSimonian and Laird (DL) approach (28). The significance level was < 0.1, and the I2 index was used for estimates of inconsistency within the meta-analyses. The I2 index estimates the percent of observed between-study variability that is due to heterogeneity rather than to chance and ranges from 0 to 100 percent (values of 25%, 50%, and 75% were considered as representing low, medium, and high heterogeneity, respectively) (31, 32).
A value of 0% indicates no observed heterogeneity while a value of 100% indicates significant heterogeneity. For this review, we determined that I2 values above 75% were indicative of significant heterogeneity, warranting analysis with a random effect model as opposed to the fixed effect model to adjust for the observed variability. Meta-regression was introduced to explore and explain heterogeneity between studies in a meta-analysis. The analysis among the sub-groups was carried out regarding the specific region (North, South, West, East, and Central) and whether the area was rural or urban.
Data manipulation and statistical analyses were done using STATA software, version 11.2. A P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Due to the type of study and the checklist parameters considered in the quality assessment stage, determination of publication bias and presentation of funnel plots were not necessary (33, 34)
3. Results
During the initial search, a total of 210 relevant articles were found. After exclusion of articles according to the previously described criteria, 18 papers published between the years 2005 and 2015 were selected for analysis (Figure 1).
The combined sample size of pregnant Iranian women was 51,521 with an average age of 26.17 years (CI: 95%; 22.6 - 29.68). General specifications for each sample are presented in Table 1.
Detailed Characteristics of 18 Articles Included in the Systematic Review on the Prevalence of Anemia Among Pregnant Iranian Women
| Author Name | Place of Study | The Population Under Review | Year of Study | Sample Size | Trimester of Pregnancy | The Mean Age, y | Prevalence of Anemia, % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirzaie et al. (10) | Kerman | not defined | 2005 | 2213 | 1,2 and 3 | 26.82 | 4.7 |
| Veghari et al.(11) | Gorgan | Rural | 2007 | 48 | 25.8 | ||
| Faraji et al.(12) | Rasht | Urban | 2008 | 555 | 1 | 23.3 | 21.3 |
| Ranaei et al.(13) | Sanandaj | Urban | 2009 | 1137 | 1 | 8 | |
| Soofizadeh et al.(14) | Sanandaj | Rural | 2009 | 1500 | 1 | 28.4 | 7.1 |
| Akbarzadeh et al.(15) | Shiraz | Rural | 2009 | 89 | 1,2 and 3 | 25.74 | 29.2 |
| Sadeghian et al.(16) | Tabriz | Rural | 2010 | 34 | 1 | 32.65 | 5.9 |
| Mostajeran et al.(17) | Isfahan | Urban and rural | 2010 | 7233 | 9.4 | ||
| Rahbar et al.(18) | Semnan | not defined | 2010 | 546 | 1 | 25.6 | 32.1 |
| Pasdar et al.(19) | Kermanshah | not defined | 2010 | 32450 | 1,2 and 3 | 3.6 | |
| Sharifi et al.(20) | Shiraz | Urban and rural | 2011 | 400 | 3 | 12.3 | |
| Alizadeh et al.(21) | Ardebil | not defined | 2011 | 312 | 3 | 16:37 | 23.2 |
| Riahinejad et al.(22) | Esfahan | Urban | 2012 | 280 | 1,2 and 3 | 26.2 | 46 |
| Jafari et al.(23) | Bushehr | Urban | 2015 | 250 | 1,2 and 3 | 27.2 | 21.8 |
| Saberi et al.(24) | Mashhad | not defined | 2015 | 504 | 1,2 and 3 | 27.8 | 23 |
| Eslami et al.(25) | Six provinces | Urban and rural | 2015 | 2993 | 3 | 26.82 | 21.6 |
| Parashi et al.(26) | Tehran | Urban | 2010 | 168 | 1 | 27.5 | 31 |
| Yazdani et al.(27) | Babol | not defined | 2010 | 809 | 1,2 and 3 | 26.9 | 14.4 |
Between 2005 and 2015, the prevalence of anemia in pregnant Iranian women has been 17.9% (CI: 95%; 14.7 - 21.1). The lowest prevalence (3.6%) was reported in a study conducted in Kermanshah in 2010 and the highest prevalence (46%) was reported in another study performed in Esfahan in 2012 (Figure 3).
Forest Plots of the Prevalence of Anemia for Random Effects Meta-Analysis in the Studied Articles Separated by Region
Geographically, the prevalence of anemia among pregnant Iranian women is presented in Figure 3. The highest and the lowest prevalence of anemia were in Iran’s western (6.3%) and central (24.9%) regions.
The prevalence of anemia among rural and urban pregnant Iranian women were 17.6% (CI: 95%; 3.31 - 7.31) and 22.1% (CI: 95%; 14 - 30.1), respectively (Figure 4).
Forest Plots of the Prevalence of Anemia for Random Effects Meta-Analysis in the Studied Articles Separated by urban, rural or (1 = urban, 2 = rural, 3 = both, 4 = Unknown)
To determine the relationship between the prevalence of anemia in pregnant Iranian women and the period in which the examined studies were conducted, a meta-regression analysis was conducted; however, the calculated P-value (0.136) was not statistically significant (Figure 5).
Meta-Regression Plot of the Prevalence of Anemia Based on Year of Study (P = 0.812)
4. Discussion
This study is the only systematic review and meta-analysis study on the prevalence of anemia among pregnant Iranian women in the period 2005 to 2015. Studies have reported variable prevalence of anemia in pregnant Iranian women living in different geographical regions which might be due to the differences in geographical issues, lifestyles, and daily diet (12, 13, 17). In this study, the prevalence of anemia was evaluated based on the three factors of geography, rural/urban living, and year of study. The overall prevalence of anemia in pregnant Iranian women was 17.9%.
The most common cause of anemia in pregnant women is iron deficiency 95% of cases are caused by lack of iron in the diet and the unethical use of iron compounds (35, 36). Therefore, the prevalence of anemia can be reduced through interventions such as training in proper nutrition and the use of iron and folic acid supplements (37).
This study has estimated the prevalence of anemia in pregnant Iranian women from 2005 to 2015 to be 17.9%. According to the WHO (30) 5% - 19.9% is the range in which the prevalence of anemia can be considered a mild health problem in a country, placing Iran in this group. The WHO reports the prevalence of anemia in pregnant Iranian women to be estimated at 40% (29), which is inconsistent with the results of this study. The reduction of the prevalence of anemia in pregnant Iranian women could be due to the use of iron and folic acid supplements at health centers and also a national program to enrich flour with iron and folic acid (37).
The results of this study show an increase in the prevalence of anemia compared to a previous systematic review study conducted in Iran between 1993 and 2005 which reported the prevalence as 12.4% (9). The cause of this increase in recent years could be inappropriate nutrition or unethical use of iron and folic acid supplements by pregnant mothers.
Clinical trials have indicated the effectiveness of iron supplements in improving hemoglobin concentration during pregnancy (38, 39). In their review study, Haider et al. (2012) also showed that the use of iron supplements during pregnancy increases children’s birth weight (40). Therefore, it seems that the most effective intervention to reduce the prevalence of anemia in pregnant women is educating them in the proper use of iron and folic acid supplements.
The reported prevalence of anemia in other parts of the world such as Egypt (26%), Africa (31% - 52%), and Central and Eastern Europe (14.40%) is also varied (41, 42). These different rates in different parts of the world can reflect social and economic issues along with the frequency of iron use and the incidence of parasitic and infectious diseases (43).
Geographically, the highest and lowest prevalence of anemia were observed in the central zone of Iran (24.9%) and the western zone (6.3%), respectively. This could be explained by the existing differences in the residents’ lifestyles and daily diet. In the aforementioned systematic review of studies conducted between 1993 and 2005, no geographical analysis was performed; thus, in this study, the rates of prevalence of anemia in pregnant Iranian women before and after 2005 could not be compared based on geographical regions.
In regards to sample size and geographical region covered, the most comprehensive study on the prevalence of anemia among pregnant Iranian women was performed by Eslami et al. in 2015 (25). They conducted their study on 2,993 pregnant Iranian women living in six provinces of Iran and reported an overall prevalence of 21.6%, which is in line with the present study’s results.
In this meta-analysis, the prevalence of anemia among rural pregnant women (17.6%) was lower than that of urban pregnant women (22.1%); this could be due to differences in lifestyle and daily diet.
The limitations of the present study include: 1, the researcher could not search the combination of keywords in Iranian databases; and 2, some related articles and medical theses were excluded from the analysis due to either low quality or lack of a standard framework for the evaluation of anemia incidence.
4.1. Conclusion
The current study shows that the prevalence of anemia in pregnant Iranian women in the last 10 years was lower than the WHO’s statistics for developing countries. However, the prevalence has increased rather than decreased in the past decade. Therefore, appropriate intervention plans, including training in proper nutrition during pregnancy and training in the correct use of iron, vitamins, and folic acid supplements, should be arranged and performed in prenatal clinics or before marriage.
In order to address this issue, a systematic and meta-analysis review study cannot replace a national study. It is advised that for an accurate estimation of the current prevalence of anemia and its related factors in any region of Iran a national study should be designed and performed.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Ellertson C, Elul B, Ambardekar S, Wood L, Carroll J, Coyaji K. Accuracy of assessment of pregnancy duration by women seeking early abortions. Lancet. 2000;355(9207):877-81. [PubMed ID: 10752703]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)10170-3.
-
2.
Scholl TO. Iron status during pregnancy: setting the stage for mother and infant. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81(5):1218S-22S. [PubMed ID: 15883455].
-
3.
Cunningham FG. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Williams obstetrics. 2001.
-
4.
Balarajan Y, Ramakrishnan U, Ozaltin E, Shankar AH, Subramanian SV. Anaemia in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2011;378(9809):2123-35. [PubMed ID: 21813172]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62304-5.
-
5.
Idowu OA, Mafiana CF, Dapo S. Anaemia in pregnancy: a survey of pregnant women in Abeokuta, Nigeria. Afr Health Sci. 2005;5(4):295-9. [PubMed ID: 16615838]. https://doi.org/10.5555/afhs.2005.5.4.295.
-
6.
Gangopadhyay R, Karoshi M, Keith L. Anemia and pregnancy: a link to maternal chronic diseases. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;115 Suppl 1:S11-5. [PubMed ID: 22099433]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(11)60005-2.
-
7.
Azami M, Darvishi Z, Borji M, Sayehmiri K. The prevalence of helicobacter pylori infection among iranian pregnant women- a meta-analysis study. Knowledge Health. 2016;11(2):17-23.
-
8.
Azami M, Darvishi Z, Borji M, Sayehmiri K. Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with anemia in pregnant women-a meta-analysis study. Iran J Med Microbiol. 2016;10(1):1-7.
-
9.
Esmat B, Mohammad R, Behnam S, Shahrzad M, Soodabeh T, Minoo A, et al. Prevalence of Iron Deficiency Anemia among Iranian Pregnant Women; a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Reprod Infertil. 2010;11(1):17-24. [PubMed ID: 23926476].
-
10.
Mirzaie F, Eftekhari N, Goldozeian S, Mahdavinia J. Prevalence of anemia risk factors in pregnant women in Kerman, Iran. IJRM. 2010;8(2):66-9.
-
11.
Veghari GH. Anemia in north of Iran (south-east of Caspian Sea). Pak J Biol Sci. 2007;10(10):1703-7. [PubMed ID: 19086521].
-
12.
Faraji R, Mirbolouk F, Sharemi SH, Asgharnia M, Jouafshani MA, Gholamzadeh M. Relationship between maternal hemoglobin concentration and BMI during the first trimester in primiparous women and her neonatal's birth weight. 2010.
-
13.
Ranaei F, Shahoei R, Zaheri F. Prevalence of low hemoglobin and its correlation with maternal factors and pregnancy outcomes in pregnant women in health centers of sanandaj in 2009. Life Sci J. 2013;10(2s).
-
14.
Soofizadeh N, Farhadifar F, Kalantar E, Shahsavari S. Evaluating the prevalence of asymptomatic urinary tract infection and anemia in pregnant women in first trimester. IJOGI. 2012;15:11-6.
-
15.
Akbarzadeh M, Alizadeh L, Tabatabaei H, Ramzi M. Correlation of maternal factors and hemoglobin in concentration during pregnancy; shiraz. 2009;12(2):133-41.
-
16.
Sadeghian M, Fatourechi A, Lesanpezeshki M, Ahmadnezhad E. Prevalence of anemia and correlated factors in the reproductive age women in rural areas of tabas. J Family Reprod Health. 2013;7(3):139-44. [PubMed ID: 24971116].
-
17.
Mostajeran M, Hassanzadeh A, Toloei A, Majlessi F, Shariat M, Aghdak P. Prevalence of iron deficiency anemia in unwanted and high risk pregnancies in isfahan province, iran. 2013.
-
18.
Rahbar N, Ghorbani R, Rezaei Ahvanoyy F. Prevalence of iron deficiency anemia and its complications in pregnant women referred to medical-health centers in Semnan. IJOGI. 2014;17(128):12-7.
-
19.
Pasdar Y, Heidari N, Safari Y, Safari Faramani R, Izadi N, Jamshidpour M, et al. Prevalence of some risk factors in pregnant women. IJOGI. 2012;15(21).
-
20.
Sharifi N, Majlesi F. A survey on iron-deficiency anemia in pregnant women with presentation of an educational program. ZJRMS. 2012;13(1):42.
-
21.
Alizadeh L, Salehi L, Ramzi M. Maternal hemoglobin level and birth outcomes in pregnant adolescents. Sci J Iran Blood Transfus Organ. 2013;9(4).
-
22.
Riahinejad S, Ghasemi Tehrani H, Alipour Hafshejani E, Ghasemi M, NourizadehDehkordi F. Valuation of vitamin d level at the end of first trimester and its relation with anemia, bacterial vaginosis, and toothache in pregnant mothers. IUMS. 2015;32(311):3.
-
23.
Jafari S, Mohammadi M, Baghaei H, Movahed A, Akbarzadeh S, Kowsarifard M, et al. Serum level of zinc and copper among pregnant women of jam area referred to towhid hospital, southern part of bushehr. ISMJ. 2015;18(2):344-52.
-
24.
Saberi M, Rahmani SH. The relationship between anemia during pregnancy and birth weight. IJOGI. 2015;18(142):6-10.
-
25.
Eslami M, Yazdanpanah M, Taheripanah R, Andalib P, Rahimi A, Nouzar N. Importance of Pre-pregnancy Counseling in Iran: Results from the High Risk Pregnancy Survey 2012. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2013;1(3):213-8. [PubMed ID: 24596867]. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2013.39.
-
26.
Parashi S, Bahasadri S, Alirezaiei M. Assessing the association between iron deficiency anemia and h. Pylori infection among pregnant women referring to a busy antenatal clinic in Tehran-Iran. Shiraz E-Med J. 2013;14(3):153-61.
-
27.
Yazdani S, Bouzari Z, Akhondi S, Naeimi rad M, Khodadad R. The comparison of the risk factors in the term and preterm delivery. JBUMS. 2015;17(3):7-12.
-
28.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):1006-12. [PubMed ID: 19631508]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005.
-
29.
De Benoist B, McLean E, Egli I, Cogswell M. WHO global database on anaemia. 2008. 12 p.
-
30.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453-7. [PubMed ID: 18064739]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X.
-
31.
DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7(3):177-88. [PubMed ID: 3802833].
-
32.
Ades AE, Lu G, Higgins JP. The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models. Med Decis Making. 2005;25(6):646-54. [PubMed ID: 16282215]. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X05282643.
-
33.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539-58. [PubMed ID: 12111919]. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186.
-
34.
Brockwell SE, Gordon IR. A comparison of statistical methods for meta‐analysis. Statistics Med. 2001;20(6):825-40.
-
35.
Kabiri AA, Sheioleslam H. Prevalence of iron deficiency anemia in women who referred to Qazvin public heaith center (Persian). J Qazvin Univ Med Sci. 1999:62-6.
-
36.
Steketee RW, Nahlen BL, Parise ME, Menendez C. The burden of malaria in pregnancy in malaria-endemic areas. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;64(1-2 Suppl):28-35. [PubMed ID: 11425175].
-
37.
Sayehmiri K, Darvishi Z, Azami M, Samiramis Q. The prevalence of anemia in the first, second and third trimester of pregnancy in iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. IJOGI. 2015;18(168):7-15.
-
38.
Pena-Rosas JP, Viteri FE. Effects and safety of preventive oral iron or iron+folic acid supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(4):CD004736. [PubMed ID: 19821332]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004736.pub3.
-
39.
Rush D. Nutrition and maternal mortality in the developing world. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72(1 Suppl):212S-40S. [PubMed ID: 10871588].
-
40.
Haider BA, Olofin I, Wang M, Spiegelman D, Ezzati M, Fawzi WW, et al. Anaemia, prenatal iron use, and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:f3443. [PubMed ID: 23794316]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3443.
-
41.
Stevens GA, Finucane MM, De-Regil LM, Paciorek CJ, Flaxman SR, Branca F, et al. Global, regional, and national trends in haemoglobin concentration and prevalence of total and severe anaemia in children and pregnant and non-pregnant women for 1995-2011: a systematic analysis of population-representative data. Lancet Glob Health. 2013;1(1):e16-25. [PubMed ID: 25103581]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70001-9.
-
42.
Bagchi K. Iron deficiency anaemia--an old enemy. East Mediterr Health J. 2004;10(6):754-60. [PubMed ID: 16335761].
-
43.
Levy A, Fraser D, Katz M, Mazor M, Sheiner E. Maternal anemia during pregnancy is an independent risk factor for low birthweight and preterm delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;122(2):182-6. [PubMed ID: 16219519]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.02.015.