Abstract
Background:
Several factors affect oral and dental hygiene and therefore general health.Objectives:
This study used the health belief model (HBM) to explore factors influencing dental health behaviors of students in Teheran, Iran.Methods:
A cross-sectional study design was used. The participants were 400 male high-school students in district 5 in Tehran selected through multistage stratified random sampling. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data, which included the following measures of the HBM: perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy. A multiple regression analysis and Pearson’s correlation were run to detect potential correlations between the independent variables and dependent variable.Results:
All 400 students completed the study. The results of the linear regression analysis showed that perceived barriers, self-efficacy, and cues to action accounted for the highest percent of total variance observed in dental health behaviors. The total HBM constructs and demographic variables explained 29% of the variance in dental health behaviors.Conclusions:
The current study provides evidence that oral and dental hygiene can be promoted by reducing perceived barriers and enhancing oral and dental hygiene self-efficacy.Keywords
1. Background
Oral health is an essential component of an individual’s general health status. Several studies argued that there was a significant relationship between oral health and quality of life (1, 2). Research also reported an increment in the prevalence of oral diseases in developing countries, in which community-based oral care programs were not established (2). Oral disease has been shown to have a major impact on people’s lives (both physical and psychological) due to the experience of pain, problems eating and chewing, and communication (3-5). Research also pointed to an association between periodontal disease and coronary heart disease (6).
According to estimates, 52% of the Iranian population is younger than 20 years (7). Adolescence is considered a critical period in life, where health behaviors can be acquired and consolidated over the long term (8). A pervious study showed that Iranian adolescents had poor oral health (9). Research also demonstrated that adolescence was marked by involvement in high-risk health-related behaviors, including use of tobacco and alcohol, both of which are known risk factors for oral disease (10). Furthermore, researchers argued that patterns of oral health-related behavior exhibited during adolescence (11, 12).
Several studies showed that perceived oral health beliefs and attitudes influenced oral health-related behavior (13, 14). Therefore, attempts to change oral health behavior should be based on an understanding of an individual’s perceived beliefs. The health belief model (HBM) is a belief- based theory of health-related behaviors that is used to predict and provide suitable dental health interventions (15).
The HBM was developed in the 1950s with the aim of understanding why some people use but others do not use health services. The model consists of the following constructs (16): perceived sensitivity, perceived intensity, perceived barriers, perceived benefits, self-efficacy, cues to action, behavior, and knowledge. The model assumes that various factors, such as the perceived severity of a health problem, perceived benefits, and perceived barriers preventing individuals undertaking preventive actions, affect health-related beliefs and behaviors (17, 18). The HBM has been used to study a variety of long- and short-term health behaviors, including weight-control behavior (19), hearing health behaviors (20), and self-care behaviors (21).
2. Objectives
The aim of the current study was to investigate the relationship between constructs of the HBM and oral health behaviors among a group of male students in Tehran, Iran.
3. Methods
3.1. Design and Participants
This was a cross-sectional study carried out in Tehran, Iran. The participants were male students recruited from three high schools in district 5 in Tehran. There are 19 schools in this district. Using multistage stratified random sampling, three schools were selected. In addition, classes were selected randomly. In total, 400 questionnaires were distributed.
3.2. Ethics
Written informed consent forms were obtained from all the participants involved in this study. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board at Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences.
3.3. Questionnaire
A validated 50-item self-reported measure was used to collect the data (22). Demographic characteristics and knowledge related to oral health behavior were covered by 16 items (6 and 10 items, respectively).
The questionnaire contained four behavior-related items concerning flossing and using fluoride toothpaste. Thirty of the items were designed to measure the HBM constructs, including perceived severity, perceived susceptibility, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues to action, and self-efficacy. Each of these constructs had five items, which the respondents rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 to 5.
The questionnaires were self-administered. Prior to completing the questionnaires, the participants were informed about the research project. All the questionnaires were returned. A panel of experts checked the validity of the questionnaire. Using Cronbach’s alpha, the reliability of the questionnaire was found to be between 0.6 and 0.7. Method was mentioned in the another paper (23).
3.4. Statistical Analysis
The data were analyzed using SPSS, version 18. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to determine whether the data were normally distributed. A multiple regression analysis and Pearson’s correlation were run to detect potential correlations between the independent variables and dependent variable. The significance level was set at 0.05.
3.5. Sample Size
Using the following formula, the required sample size was calculated as 370 subjects, considering α = 5%, a statistical power of 90%, P = 0.5, and d = 0.085:
Considering a 10% drop-up rate, 37 subjects were added to obtain an optimal sample size. The final sample consisted of 407 subjects.
4. Results
All 400 students completed the study. The mean age of the participants was 16.02 years (SD = 0.90). Most of the participants’ parents had attended higher-level education (i.e., an academic degree). Eighty-four (47.5%) of the participants always used a toothbrush. Nineteen (4.9%) of the participants did not brush their teeth before bed. Eighty-five (22%) of the participants had never used dental floss. One hundred forty-six (37.7%) of the participants always used toothpaste containing fluoride. Of the participants, 98 (26.8%) reported that sugary foods, such as chocolates and sweets, were the main perceived barrier to dental health behavior. Other perceived barriers were fear of visiting the dentist and dental injections (n = 40, 10.9%). The most common cues to action as regards dental health behaviors were comments by family members and close friends (46% and 26%, respectively).
The results showed that the participants had only moderate knowledge of the HBM constructs (perceived barriers, self-efficacy, and cues to action), although the scores for perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, and perceived benefits were high (Table 1).
Characteristics of the Study Sample (N = 400)
| Variables | Level | No. (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age | ≤ 15 | 99 (28.9) |
| 16 | 152 (44.3) | |
| 17 ≥ | 92 (26.8) | |
| Grade | Primary | 209 (52.5) |
| Secondary | 143 (35.9) | |
| Higher | 46 (11.6) | |
| Education fields | Mathematics | 132 (40.1) |
| Experimental | 143 (43.5) | |
| Humanities | 46 (14.0) | |
| Other | 8 (2.4) | |
| Father’s education level | Lower diploma | 73 (18.3) |
| Diploma | 126 (31.7) | |
| Academic degree | 199 (50.0) | |
| Mother’s education level | Lower diploma | 83 (20.9) |
| Diploma | 143 (35.9) | |
| Academic degree | 172 (43.2) | |
| Knowledge | Low | 97 (24.5) |
| Moderate | 174 (43.9) | |
| High | 125 (31.6) | |
| Behavior | Low | 100 (25.8) |
| Moderate | 180 (46.5) | |
| High | 107 (27.6) | |
| Perceived | Low | 31 (8.1) |
| susceptibility | Moderate | 114 (29.7) |
| High | 239 (62.2) | |
| Perceived severity | Low | 48 (12.9) |
| Moderate | 148 (39.7) | |
| High | 177 (47.5) | |
| Perceived benefits | Low | 60 (16.1) |
| Moderate | 153 (41.1) | |
| High | 159 (42.7) | |
| Perceived barriers | Low | 147 (40.2) |
| Moderate | 148 (40.4) | |
| High | 71 (19.4) | |
| Self-efficacy | Low | 64 (17.5) |
| Moderate | 192 (52.5) | |
| High | 110 (30.1) | |
| Cues to action | Low | 116 (31.8) |
| Moderate | 173 (47.4) | |
| High | 76 (20.8) |
Table 2 shows the correlations among the constructs of the model for oral health behavior and descriptive statistics for the various variables for the theoretical constructs. Most of the items were correlated with each other. In Table 3, the results of the regression analysis of the association between the oral health behaviors of the students based on the HBM constructs and selected demographic predictors are presented.
Pearson’s Correlation Matrix Between Oral Health Behavior (Dependent Variable) and the Independent Variables Studied (N = 400)
| Variables | Sensitivity | Intensity | Barriers | Benefits | Self-Efficacy | Cues to Action | Behavior | Awareness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perceived susceptibility | 1.00 | |||||||
| Perceived severity | 0.51a | 1.00 | ||||||
| Perceived barriers | -0.04 | -0.10* | 1.00 | |||||
| Perceived benefits | 0.52a | 0.65a | -0.05 | 1.00 | ||||
| Self-efficacy | 0.35a | 0.40a | 0.12* | 0.42a | 1.00 | |||
| Cues to action | 0.26a | 0.35a | -0.07 | 0.38a | 0.43a | 1.00 | ||
| Behavior | 0.29a | 0.21a | 0.32a | 0.18a | 0.41a | 0.21a | 1.00 | |
| Knowledge | 0.40a | 0.24a | 0.11* | 0.23a | 0.21a | 0.10 | 0.29a | 1.00 |
| Mean | 21.07 | 20.11 | 16.72 | 19.5 | 18.78 | 17.47 | 11.93 | 6.45 |
| SD | 3.43 | 3.61 | 4.36 | 3.49 | 3.76 | 3.9 | 2.62 | 1.98 |
Regression Analysis to Predict the Oral Health Behaviors of Male Students Based on Selected Demographic Predictors and the HBM Constructsa,b
| Parameter | B | Std. error | t | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-school grade | ||||
| First | -0.211 | 0.587 | -0.359 | 0.720 |
| Second | -0.054 | 0.495 | -0.110 | 0.912 |
| Third | Reference category | |||
| Education fields | ||||
| Mathematics | 0.009 | 0.959 | 0.010 | 0.992 |
| Experimental | -0.647 | 0.977 | -0.662 | 0.508 |
| Humanities | -0.732 | 1.016 | -0.720 | 0.472 |
| Other | Reference category | |||
| Mother’s education level | ||||
| Lower diploma | -0.260 | 0.393 | -0.662 | 0.509 |
| Diploma | -0.947 | 0.327 | -2.899 | 0.004 |
| Academic degree | Reference category | |||
| Perceived susceptibility | 0.149 | 0.053 | 2.800 | 0.006 |
| Perceived severity | 0.024 | 0.059 | 0.402 | 0.688 |
| Perceived benefits | -0.100 | 0.061 | -1.633 | 0.104 |
| Perceived barriers | 0.166 | 0.033 | 5.021 | < 0.001 |
| Self-efficacy | 0.194 | 0.048 | 4.067 | < 0.001 |
| Cues to action | 0.088 | 0.044 | 1.989 | 0.048 |
| Age | 0.144 | 0.217 | 0.662 | 0.508 |
| Knowledge | 0.159 | 0.085 | 1.878 | 0.062 |
Perceived barriers, self-efficacy, and cues to action showed a positive relationship with dental health behaviors. The constructs of the HBM and demographic variables predicted 29% of dental health behavior.
5. Discussion
This study aimed to identify factors influencing the oral health behaviors of male high-school students based on the HBM. The findings revealed that perceived barriers influenced oral health behaviors. The most commonly cited perceived barrier to health behaviors was sweet food and candy. Previous research showed that 84% of Thai youth consumed sweet foods. Other studies of an Australian population reported that 75% of young people ate sweet foods (24, 25). Therefore, eating sweet foods is common among young populations in almost all societies, something that needs to be addressed. Currently, the rate of dietary counseling in dental clinics is low across the globe, including Iran (26, 27).
In the present study, high costs (10%) and fear of injections (9.3%) were mentioned as barriers to oral health behavior. In a study of a minority group, high costs, fear of dentists, and service and time limitations were cited as the most important barriers to oral health services (28). In the present study, the study population was middle class (socially and economically). Thus, cost was the most important factor.
The next most important factor predicting oral health behavior was self-efficacy with respect to nutrition, brushing, flossing, and visiting dentists. Among the aforementioned factors, flossing self-efficacy was the highest. Previous studies reported that self-efficacy predicted a range of health behaviors, including oral self-care behavior, and that it promoted the predictive efficacy of the HBM (29). Research also showed that self-efficacy was an important predictor of brushing and flossing behaviors (30) and that dental self-efficacy played a key role in oral and dental health hygiene. In addition, tooth-brushing self-efficacy was shown to be more important than dental visiting self-efficacy and cleaning self-efficacy (31). The results of the present study revealed a moderate level of dental health behavior self-efficacy among all the participants. Thus, strategies seem to be needed to promote self-efficacy related to dental health behavior.
The third most important factor predicting oral and dental hygiene was perceived susceptibility. Although this item received high scores, it had less predictive power than that of the other constructs in the model.
In the present study, cues to action were moderate predictors of dental behavior. The families of the participants were most commonly cited as the primary cue to action. Therefore, by educating families and parents, especially women, oral and dental hygiene can be promoted.
The model accounted for 29% of the variance in oral and dental behavior. To maintain the oral and general health of societies, comprehensive dental hygiene plans and appropriate training programs are required. Given the findings of the study, educational programs should be put in place to familiarize students with oral and dental hygiene and teach them that they can implement oral and dental hygiene, even in the presence of barriers.
5.1. Limitations of the Study
The participants in this study were students, which limits the generalizability of the findings of the study. Given the exploratory nature of the study, the relationship among variables could not be investigated. In addition, the study suffers from the limitations that affect all cross-sectional and self-report studies.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Harris N, Garcia-Godoy F. Sawyer-Morse M, Evans A, editors. Primary preventive dentistry, in Understanding human motivation for behavior change. New Jersy: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2003. p. 449-66.
-
2.
Sheiham A. Oral health, general health and quality of life. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83(9):644. [PubMed ID: 16211151].
-
3.
Nithila A, Bourgeois D, Barmes DE, Murtomaa H. WHO Global Oral Data Bank, 1986-96: an overview of oral health surveys at 12 years of age. Bull World Health Organ. 1998;76(3):237-44. [PubMed ID: 9744243].
-
4.
Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2000.
-
5.
Petersen PE, Bourgeois D, Ogawa H, Estupinan-Day S, Ndiaye C. The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83(9):661-9. [PubMed ID: 16211157].
-
6.
Genco R, Offenbacher S, Beck J. Periodontal disease and cardiovascular disease: epidemiology and possible mechanisms. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002;133:14S-22S.
-
7.
Pakshir HR. Dental education and dentistry system in Iran. Med Princ Pract. 2003;12 Suppl 1:56-60. [PubMed ID: 12707502].
-
8.
Bartley M, Blane D, Montgomery S. Health and the life course: why safety nets matter. BMJ. 1997;314(7088):1194-6. [PubMed ID: 9146402].
-
9.
Neamatollahi H, Ebrahimi M. Oral health behavior and its determinants in a group of Iranian students. Indian J Dent Res. 2010;21(1):84-8. [PubMed ID: 20427913]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.62820.
-
10.
Prinstein MJ, Boergers J, Spirito A. Adolescents' and their friends' health-risk behavior: factors that alter or add to peer influence. J Pediatr Psychol. 2001;26(5):287-98. [PubMed ID: 11390571].
-
11.
Yaghoubi M, Javadi M, Bahadori M, Ravangard R. Health promoting hospitals model in Iran. Iran J of Public Health. 2016;45(3):362-9. [PubMed ID: 27141499].
-
12.
Maleki MR, Delgoshaie B, Nasiripour AA, Yaghoubi M. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of health promotion in Iranian hospitals. Health MED. 2012;6(7):2261-67.
-
13.
Kasmaei P, Amin Shokravi F, Hidarnia A, Hajizadeh E, Atrkar-Roushan Z, Karimzadeh Shirazi K, et al. Brushing behavior among young adolescents: does perceived severity matter. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:8. [PubMed ID: 24397588]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-8.
-
14.
Solhi M, Zadeh DS, Seraj B, Zadeh SF. The application of the health belief model in oral health education. Iran J Public Health. 2010;39(4):114-9. [PubMed ID: 23113044].
-
15.
Flaer PJ, Younis MZ, Benjamin PL, Al Hajeri M. A psychosocial approach to dentistry for the underserved: incorporating theory into practice. J Health Care Finance. 2010;37(1):101-8. [PubMed ID: 20973377].
-
16.
Zhao J, Song F, Ren S, Wang Y, Wang L, Liu W, et al. Predictors of condom use behaviors based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) among female sex workers: a cross-sectional study in Hubei Province, China. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):49542. [PubMed ID: 23185355]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049542.
-
17.
Dini Talatappeh H, Tavakoli HR, Rahmati Najarkolaei F, Dabbagh Moghadam A, Khoshdel A. Knowledge, beliefs and behavior of food consumption among students of Military University: the application of health belief model (HBM). Iranian J Mil Med. 2012;14(3):192-9.
-
18.
Sanaeinasab H, Tavakoli R, Karimizarchi A, Amini ZH, Farokhian A, Najarkolaei FR. The effectiveness of education using the health belief model in preventing osteoporosis among female students. East Mediterr Health J. 2014;19 Suppl 3:S38-44. [PubMed ID: 24995758].
-
19.
James DC, Pobee JW, Oxidine D, Brown L, Joshi G. Using the health belief model to develop culturally appropriate weight-management materials for African-American women. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(5):664-70. [PubMed ID: 22709771]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2012.02.003.
-
20.
Saunders GH, Frederick MT, Silverman S, Papesh M. Application of the health belief model: development of the hearing beliefs questionnaire (HBQ) and its associations with hearing health behaviors. Int J Audiol. 2013;52(8):558-67. [PubMed ID: 23682849]. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.791030.
-
21.
Baghianimoghadam MH, Shogafard G, Sanati HR, Baghianimoghadam B, Mazloomy SS, Askarshahi M. Application of the health belief model in promotion of self-care in heart failure patients. Acta Med Iran. 2013;51(1):52-8. [PubMed ID: 23456585].
-
22.
Mazloumi MSS, Rouhani T. Survey of some related factors to oral health in high school female students in Yazd, on the basis of health behavior model (HBM). BUMS. 2008;15(3).
-
23.
Rahmati-Najarkolaei F, Rahnama P, Fesharaki MG, Behnood V. Predictors of oral health behaviors in female students: The application of the health belief model. Ircmj. 2016;Inpress. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.24747.
-
24.
Petersen PE, Hoerup N, Poomviset N, Prommajan J, Watanapa A. Oral health status and oral health behaviour of urban and rural schoolchildren in Southern Thailand. Int Dent J. 2001;51(2):95-102. [PubMed ID: 11569670].
-
25.
Jamieson LM, Bailie RS, Beneforti M, Koster CR, Spencer AJ. Dental self-care and dietary characteristics of remote-living Indigenous children. Rural Remote Health. 2006;6(2):503. [PubMed ID: 16646637].
-
26.
Yokoyama Y, Kakudate N, Sumida F, Matsumoto Y, Gilbert GH, Gordan VV. Dentists' dietary perception and practice patterns in a dental practice-based research network. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):59615. [PubMed ID: 23536883]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059615.
-
27.
Kelly SA, Moynihan PJ. Attitudes and practices of dentists with respect to nutrition and periodontal health. Br Dent J. 2008;205(4):196-7. [PubMed ID: 18650799]. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.655.
-
28.
Kadaluru UG, Kempraj VM, Muddaiah P. Utilization of oral health care services among adults attending community outreach programs. Indian J Dent Res. 2012;23(6):841-2. [PubMed ID: 23649084]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.111290.
-
29.
KD M. Gochman DS, editor. Handbook of health behavior research, Provider determinants, in Adherence to dental regimens. New York: Plenum; 1997. p. 303-19.
-
30.
Buglar ME, White KM, Robinson NG. The role of self-efficacy in dental patients' brushing and flossing: testing an extended Health Belief Model. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78(2):269-72. [PubMed ID: 19640670]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.014.
-
31.
Syrjala AM, Kneckt MC, Knuuttila ML. Dental self-efficacy as a determinant to oral health behaviour, oral hygiene and HbA1c level among diabetic patients. J Clin Periodontol. 1999;26(9):616-21. [PubMed ID: 10487313].