Abstract
Background:
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer death in men, worldwide. Geranylgeranylation and farnesylation have a main role in the carcinogenic process, which can be prevented via statins as HMGCOA reductase enzyme inhibitors in cholesterol biosynthesis. These effects might be controlled by several transcription factors such as SOX7 and SOX9, which have been involved in PCa initiation and progression. To the best of our knowledge, no study has demonstrated the association of simvastatin and SOX status in PCa. Therefore, this study is an attempt to evaluate whether simvastatin induces anti-neoplastic effects via the SOX9 and SOX7 transcription factors.Methods:
Prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP and PC3 were used to evaluate the expression of SOX7 and SOX9 using quantitative RT-PCR.Results:
Our data was analyzed by applying one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test and determined that 0.07 µM of simvastatin after 24 h was sufficient to upregulate SOX7 mRNA expression ratio by 3.58 fold in LNCaP. In addition, the level of SOX9 mRNA expression was increased by 12.18 fold at 0.07 µM after 24 h, 8.67 fold at 0.001 µM after 24 h, and 6.33 fold at 0.07 µM after 12 h in LNCaP and in PC3 cell line. The level of SOX9 mRNA expression was increased by 2.64 fold at 0.5 µM after 24 h and 2.78 fold at 0.1 µM after 12 h, however, it decreased by 0.67 fold at 0.1 µM after 24 h.Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that simvastatin can induce the anti-cancer properties via manipulating the expression of SOX7 in LNCaP, as the androgen-dependent cell.Keywords
1. Background
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer death in men and the most common non-skin cancer detected in the United States (1) with 29720 deaths and 238590 new cases in 2013 (2).
Moreover, PCa is the most common cancer after stomach cancer in Iranian males and the second malignancy after bladder cancer, among genitourinary cancers in Iran (3).
Various factors such as genetic/ethnical origin, diet, life style, and environmental factors have been proposed to play a role in development of PCa (4). An alteration in lipid metabolic enzymes and the associated pathways has been detected in several diseases including metabolic, immune, central nervous system dysfunction, as well as cancer.
Lipids play a fundamental role in membrane homeostasis of healthy cells (5). Moreover, accumulation of cholesterol has been associated with various diseases such as atherosclerosis and cancers. Cholesterol, as a vital molecule, plays a crucial role in the organization and structure of the cell membrane. Recently, several studies have demonstrated the association between PCa with cholesterol disequilibrium. Therefore, initiation and development of PCa can be prevented by targeting cholesterol metabolism (6). HMG-CoA reductase transforms Acetyl-CoA to mevalonate and its inhibition leads to reduction in cholesterol synthesis; this step is a rate-limiting step (7). Geranylgeranylation and farnesylation, occurring through cholesterol biosynthesis intermediates, also play an important role in the carcinogenic process, which can be prevented via HMGCOA reductase inhibition (8). Cholesterol also activates the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt pathway by accumulation in the lipid rafts (9).
On the other hand, cholesterol is a precursor for production of androgen hormones byproducts such as testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (9). Recently, the conflicting relationship between testosterone level and PCa has attracted attention among researchers (10). However, more studies show high level of circulating testosterone and consequently, the dihydrotestosterone, as a strong ligand for the androgen receptor, will increase PCa prevalence (9-11).
Moreover, statins as HMGCOA inhibitors not only decrease the level of cholesterol but are also able to inhibit the cancer cell growth (12). There are special reasons for anti-neoplastic properties of statins, however, as noted earlier, it might be related to the cholesterol as precursor of androgen hormone, the true target of statins (9). Most information about statins and decreased risk of PCa comes from clinical trials studies. For example, 28% lower risk of advanced PCa was reported in men taking statin medication for five years or longer. However, much more research is needed to find the putative anti-cancer mechanism of statin, before being recommended as a proper treatment to reduce risk of PCa (13). Recently, some reports showed that statins could increase apoptosis or reduce proliferation of prostatic epithelium and stroma (14). Among different types of statins, simvastatin could regulate prostate cancer cell proliferation, migration, invasion in vitro as well as in vivo. Treatment with simvastatin also inhibited Aktactivity in prostate cancer cells (15). Akt/PKB is a serine/threonine protein kinase that acts as a critical regulator of cell survival and proliferation (16, 17).
Furthermore, experimental evidence supports a role for SOX9 in prostate function. SOX9 regulates the proliferation of epithelial cells in the prostate, contributing to neoplastic transformation (18, 19).
In addition, SOX7, as the other SOX (SRY-related HMG-box) family of transcription factors, is able to regulate multiple biological processes (20). One study showed that ectopic SOX7 expression represses migration, invasion, and proliferation of breast cancer. Moreover, the low level of SOX7 was detected in many human cancers and in several studies SOX7 was introduced as a tumor suppressive molecule in the lung, breast, prostate, and colon cancers (21).
Owing to the anti-cancer effect of statins and the important role of the SOX transcription factor members including SOX7 and SOX9 in PCa initiation and progression, we aimed to evaluate the role of simvastatin on the aforementioned transcription factors.
2. Methods
2.1. Cell Culture
Prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP (androgen-dependent) and PC3 (androgen-independent), purchased from National Cell Bank of Iran Pasture Institute, were cultured in a humid incubator at 37ºC, under 5% CO2 and in 10% fetal calf serum (Cinagen, Iran) containing RPMI 1640 media (Biosera, UK).
2.2. Cell Viability Assay
LNCaP and PC3 cells with 70% confluency were harvested and seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 10000 and 9000 cells/mL, respectively.
Following 24 hours (h) incubation time, monolayer cells were incubated in the presence of different simvastatin (Sigma-Aldrich) concentrations for 12 and 24 h. Then, 100 μL MTT solution in PBS (0.5 mg/mL) was added per well, and incubated for 1 to 4 h at 37ºC. The absorbance was determined at 570 nm using ELISA reader (Mikura Ltd., Horsham, UK).
2.3. RNA Extraction and Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
Total RNA was extracted according to the manufacture’s protocol (RNA Extraction Kit, Yekta Tajhiz, Iran), after proper time of treatment and incubation with simvastatin. Subsequently, RNA quantity were assessed by Nano drop (Termo). The integrity of RNA was verified by the presence of two rRNA bands, using formaldehyde gel electrophoresis (18s, 28s). Reverse transcription was performed with 5 μg of total RNA and random primers using the First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Fermentas, USA). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was performed using a 7500 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, USA) with syber Green® PCR Master Mix (Yekta Tajhiz, Iran), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The PCR reaction mixture contain 5 μL of cDNA (approximately 150 ng), 0.5 μL of 10 pM solutions of each of the forward and reverse primers, and appropriate Master Mix (2X) syber Green in a total volume of 25 μL. Specific primers were designed using the allele ID software. The relative expression level (fold changes) of abovementioned genes in prostate cancer cells were calculated by the 2-ΔΔCT method. The housekeeping gene, GAPDH, was used to normalize the results.
2.4. Statistical Analysis
Data were presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments and were analyzed by applying SPSS 20. One way analysis of variance and Tukey's test were performed to compare the control and treated groups. To indicate a statistically significant difference, P < 0.001 was used.
3. Results
3.1. MTT Assay
MTT assay was performed by incubating monolayers cells in the presence of different concentration of simvastatin for 12 and 24 h. At the end of the treatment period, the number of viable cells was assessed using the colorimetric method. The optimum simvastatin concentration, for the PC3 cell line at 0.1, 0.01, and 0.5 µM and for LNCaP cell line at 0.07 and 0.001 µM, were determined as nontoxic concentrations.
3.2. Expression of SOX7 and SOX9 mRNA in Prostate Cancer Cell Lines
Using quantitative RT-PCR, we determined the effect of simvastatin treatment on the mRNA expression of SOX7, and SOX9 relative to GAPDH in prostate cancer cell lines, PC3 and LNCaP, using different concentrations and different treatment times compared to control. As shown in Figure 1A, the level of SOX9 mRNA expression was increased by 12.18 fold at 0.07 µM after 24 h, 8.67 fold at 0.001 µM after 24 h, and 6.33 fold at 0.07 µM after 12 h in LNCaP cell line. However, in PC3 cell line, the level of SOX9 mRNA expression was increased by 2.64 fold at 0.5 µM after 24 h and 2.78 fold at 0.1 µM after 12 h, however, it decreased by 0.67 fold at 0.1 µM after 24 h (Figure 1B).
Quantification of mRNA expression of SOX9 by quantitative reverse transcriptasepolymerase chain reaction (QRT-PCR) in A, LNCaP and B, PC3 cell lines. Data are the relative expression levels of SOX9 mRNA to GAPDH in treated groups compared to control cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments (P < 0.001).
As shown in Figure 2A, in LNCaP cells, the level of SOX7 mRNA expression was increased by 3.58 fold after 24 h treatment with 0.07µM of simvastatin compared to the control, however, the results were not significant at any other condition. Additionally, the mRNA expression level of SOX7 was not significantly changed in PC3 cell line (Figure 2B).
Quantification of mRNA expression of SOX7 by QRT-PCR in A, LNCaP and B, PC3 cell lines. Data are the relative expression levels of SOX7 mRNA to GAPDH in treated groups compared to control cells. Data are presented as mean ± SD of three independent experiments (P < 0.001).
4. Discussion
The current study was the first attempt to show the effect of simvastatin via transcription factors including SOX9 and SOX7 as the important signaling pathways in prostate cancer.
Wang et al. showed that SOX proteins, such SRY, SOX7, and SOX9, have an important role in prostate (22). Our data show that in LNCaP cells, in presence of 0.07 µM of simvastatin, the level of SOX7 mRNA expression was increased after 24h treatment compared to the control; however, the results were not significant at any other condition. Additionally, the mRNA level of SOX7 was not significantly changed in PC3 cell line.
Our data also showed that the level of SOX9 mRNA has significantly increased at several dosages/times of experiment in LNCaP cells; however, we saw diverse behavior at different concentrations in PC3 cells.
To the best of our knowledge, no study has been found to investigate the potential effects of simvastatin as an anti-cancer agent, on the levels of SOX7 and SOX9 mRNA expression.
However, several studies demonstrated that SOX7 mRNA expression, as a tumor suppressor, is downregulated in lung, colon, and prostate tumor tissues and cell lines (21). Guo et al. showed that SOX7 protein expression is decreased in 47% (15 of 32) of prostate adenocarcinomas. Furthermore, SOX7 mRNA was decreased in 60% of snap-frozen prostate tumors (23). We speculate that simvastatin might be a potential drug with the anti-cancer effect at proper time course and concentration in LNCaP family tumors (0.07 µM after 24 h), affecting the role of SOX7 as tumor suppressor.
Recently, Stovall et al. has found that SOX7 is elevated during silencing of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1), the important enzyme, which maintains DNA methylation patterns in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells (21). Therefore, promoter methylation could be one of the mechanisms regulating the SOX7 expression.
Another study demonstrated that statin can inhibit the signaling pathway Ras/Raf/MAPK/JNK, leading to DNMT1 down-regulation. Moreover, they suggested that statins may downregulate the DNMT1 through its association with HDACs (24). Therefore, simvastatin, at low concentration, might affect LNCaP family tumors via epigenetic pathways such as promoter hypermethylation. However, further studies are needed to prove this hypothesis.
In case of SOX9, several studies showed that SOX9 have involved in PCa, however, its precise role has not been clearly understood. Several studies have shown that it can increase invasion and proliferation of prostate cell lines in a xenograft model via Akt signaling pathway. In contrary, other studies showed that it can suppress the tumor growth (18, 25). Overexpression of SOX9 has been detected in early prostate cancer and LNCaP, CWR22, PC3, and DU145 cell lines. It was found that Wnt/β-catenine pathway regulate the SOX9 expression level in PCa (22, 26). Therefore, SOX9, as a transcription factor, can be an important target for cancer therapy.
To our knowledge, the anti-cancer effect of simvastatin on SOX9 has not yet been evaluated. In one study, Kochuparambil et al. reported that simvastatin could inhibit the Akt activity in prostate cancer cell lines, in a dose and time-dependent manner (15). Our data suggest that simvastatin at 0.1 µM concentration causes the downregulation of SOX9 expression in PC3 cell line after 24 h.
Our results also showed that SOX9 expression is upregulated at all dosages and times of incubation with simvastatin in LNCaP cells and its expression is upregulated in PC3 cells at 0.5 µM and 0.1 µM after 24 h and 12 h, respectively.
Due to limited information regarding the effect of simvastatin on SOX9, it is concluded that if overexpression of SOX9 causes proliferation in tumors, SOX9 cannot be a target for cancer therapy in LNCaP family tumors; however, in PC3 special dose and time might be effective. Nonetheless, if overexpression of SOX9 has a suppressive effect on tumor growth, it seems that simvastatin could have induced the best action on SOX9 in all dosages and times in LNCaP and PC3 except at 0.1 after 24 h treatments in PC3.
Regarding the suppressive effect, researcher have shown that insulin-like growth factor binding protein-related protein (ILGFBPRP), having high expression in senescent prostate epithelial cell line (M12 cells), could increase SOX9 expression (22). On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that at the low concentration, lovastatin induced G1 cell cycle arrest and senescence in human prostate cancer cells (27). Therefore, our data suggest that simvastatin might increase ILGFBPRP and induce SOX9 expression.
4.1. Conclusion
In this study, an attempt has been made to provide new insight into the effect of statins on the prevention of PCa via regulation of expression of transcription factors SOX7 and SOX9. Our findings suggest that simvastatin can induce the anti-cancer properties via manipulating the SOX7 expression levels in prostate cancer cell lines, especially in LNCaP, as androgen-dependent cell line having cross talk with cholesterol metabolism. However, there is ambiguity regarding the effect of simvastatin on prostate cancer via SOX9 expression and future investigations on Akt activity, GSK3B/β-catenin expression, and genes involved in apoptosis and epigenetic can further clarify the mechanism of action of statins.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Brawley OW. Prostate cancer epidemiology in the United States. World J Urol. 2012;30(2):195-200. [PubMed ID: 22476558]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0824-2.
-
2.
Ting H, Deep G, Agarwal C, Agarwal R. The strategies to control prostate cancer by chemoprevention approaches. Mutat Res. 2014;760:1-15. [PubMed ID: 24389535]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3923454]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2013.12.003.
-
3.
Moslemi MK, Lotfi F, Tahvildar SA. Evaluation of prostate cancer prevalence in Iranian male population with increased PSA level, a one center experience. Cancer Manag Res. 2011;3:227-31. [PubMed ID: 21792331]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3139483]. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMR.S18147.
-
4.
Bostwick DG, Burke HB, Djakiew D, Euling S, Ho SM, Landolph J, et al. Human prostate cancer risk factors. Cancer. 2004;101(10 Suppl):2371-490. [PubMed ID: 15495199]. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20408.
-
5.
Beloribi-Djefaflia S, Vasseur S, Guillaumond F. Lipid metabolic reprogramming in cancer cells. Oncogenesis. 2016;5. e189. [PubMed ID: 26807644]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4728678]. https://doi.org/10.1038/oncsis.2015.49.
-
6.
de Boussac H, Pommier AJ, Dufour J, Trousson A, Caira F, Volle DH, et al. LXR, prostate cancer and cholesterol: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Am J Cancer Res. 2013;3(1):58-69. [PubMed ID: 23359865]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3555197].
-
7.
Jakobisiak M, Golab J. Potential antitumor effects of statins (Review). Int J Oncol. 2003;23(4):1055-69. [PubMed ID: 12963986].
-
8.
Wong WW, Dimitroulakos J, Minden MD, Penn LZ. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and the malignant cell: the statin family of drugs as triggers of tumor-specific apoptosis. Leukemia. 2002;16(4):508-19. [PubMed ID: 11960327]. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2402476.
-
9.
Roy M, Kung HJ, Ghosh PM. Statins and prostate cancer: role of cholesterol inhibition vs. prevention of small GTP-binding proteins. Am J Cancer Res. 2011;1(4):542-61. [PubMed ID: 21984972]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3186052].
-
10.
Klap J, Schmid M, Loughlin KR. The relationship between total testosterone levels and prostate cancer: a review of the continuing controversy. J Urol. 2015;193(2):403-13. [PubMed ID: 25260832]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.123.
-
11.
Michaud JE, Billups KL, Partin AW. Testosterone and prostate cancer: an evidence-based review of pathogenesis and oncologic risk. Ther Adv Urol. 2015;7(6):378-87. [PubMed ID: 26622322]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4647137]. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287215597633.
-
12.
Spampanato C, De Maria S, Sarnataro M, Giordano E, Zanfardino M, Baiano S, et al. Simvastatin inhibits cancer cell growth by inducing apoptosis correlated to activation of Bax and down-regulation of BCL-2 gene expression. Int J Oncol. 2012;40(4):935-41. [PubMed ID: 22134829]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3584570]. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2011.1273.
-
13.
Murtola TJ, Visakorpi T, Lahtela J, Syvala H, Tammela T. Statins and prostate cancer prevention: where we are now, and future directions. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008;5(7):376-87. [PubMed ID: 18542103]. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro1146.
-
14.
Lee SH, Park TJ, Bae MH, Choi SH, Cho YS, Joo KJ, et al. Impact of treatment with statins on prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Korean J Urol. 2013;54(11):750-5. [PubMed ID: 24255756]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3830967]. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2013.54.11.750.
-
15.
Kochuparambil ST, Al-Husein B, Goc A, Soliman S, Somanath PR. Anticancer efficacy of simvastatin on prostate cancer cells and tumor xenografts is associated with inhibition of Akt and reduced prostate-specific antigen expression. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2011;336(2):496-505. [PubMed ID: 21059805]. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.110.174870.
-
16.
Song G, Ouyang G, Bao S. The activation of Akt/PKB signaling pathway and cell survival. J Cell Mol Med. 2005;9(1):59-71. [PubMed ID: 15784165].
-
17.
Altomare DA, Testa JR. Perturbations of the AKT signaling pathway in human cancer. Oncogene. 2005;24(50):7455-64. [PubMed ID: 16288292]. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1209085.
-
18.
Thomsen MK, Ambroisine L, Wynn S, Cheah KS, Foster CS, Fisher G, et al. SOX9 elevation in the prostate promotes proliferation and cooperates with PTEN loss to drive tumor formation. Cancer Res. 2010;70(3):979-87. [PubMed ID: 20103652]. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2370.
-
19.
Ma F, Ye H, He HH, Gerrin SJ, Chen S, Tanenbaum BA, et al. SOX9 drives WNT pathway activation in prostate cancer. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(5):1745-58. [PubMed ID: 27043282]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4855922]. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI78815.
-
20.
Stovall DB, Cao P, Sui G. SOX7: from a developmental regulator to an emerging tumor suppressor. Histol Histopathol. 2014;29(4):439-45. [PubMed ID: 24288056]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4107680]. https://doi.org/10.14670/HH-29.10.439.
-
21.
Stovall DB, Wan M, Miller LD, Cao P, Maglic D, Zhang Q, et al. The regulation of SOX7 and its tumor suppressive role in breast cancer. Am J Pathol. 2013;183(5):1645-53. [PubMed ID: 24012678]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3814686]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.07.025.
-
22.
Wang H, McKnight NC, Zhang T, Lu ML, Balk SP, Yuan X. SOX9 is expressed in normal prostate basal cells and regulates androgen receptor expression in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2007;67(2):528-36. [PubMed ID: 17234760]. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1672.
-
23.
Guo L, Zhong D, Lau S, Liu X, Dong XY, Sun X, et al. Sox7 Is an independent checkpoint for beta-catenin function in prostate and colon epithelial cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6(9):1421-30. [PubMed ID: 18819930]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2652859]. https://doi.org/10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-07-2175.
-
24.
Karlic H, Thaler R, Gerner C, Grunt T, Proestling K, Haider F, et al. Inhibition of the mevalonate pathway affects epigenetic regulation in cancer cells. Cancer Genet. 2015;208(5):241-52. [PubMed ID: 25978957]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4503872]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2015.03.008.
-
25.
Drivdahl R, Haugk KH, Sprenger CC, Nelson PS, Tennant MK, Plymate SR. Suppression of growth and tumorigenicity in the prostate tumor cell line M12 by overexpression of the transcription factor SOX9. Oncogene. 2004;23(26):4584-93. [PubMed ID: 15077158]. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207603.
-
26.
Wang H, Leav I, Ibaragi S, Wegner M, Hu GF, Lu ML, et al. SOX9 is expressed in human fetal prostate epithelium and enhances prostate cancer invasion. Cancer Res. 2008;68(6):1625-30. [PubMed ID: 18339840]. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5915.
-
27.
Lee J, Lee I, Park C, Kang WK. Lovastatin-induced RhoA modulation and its effect on senescence in prostate cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2006;339(3):748-54. [PubMed ID: 16316623]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.11.075.