Comparison of the Hemodynamic Effects of Pretreatment with Crys-talloids versus Crystalloids plus Ephedrine during Spinal Anesthesia for Caesarean Section.

Authors

M Khooshideh1,*, MH Heidari 2
1Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
2Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine,Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
*Corresponding Author: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Kha Ali Ebne Abitaleb Hospital, Zahedan, Iran, Telephone: +98 (915) 141-9158, [email protected]. Email: [email protected]

Shiraz E-Medical Journal:Vol. 10, issue 2; 59-65
Published online:Apr 01, 2009
Article type:Research Article
Received:Jul 31, 2008
Accepted:Feb 11, 2009
How to Cite:Khooshideh M, Heidari M. Comparison of the Hemodynamic Effects of Pretreatment with Crys-talloids versus Crystalloids plus Ephedrine during Spinal Anesthesia for Caesarean Section.. Shiraz E-Med J. 2009;10(2):. doi:

Abstract

Background:

Prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section avoids maternal and fetal side effects. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of the com-bination of ephedrine crystalloid and prehydration with crystalloid alone on maternal blood pressure and neonatal outcome during cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.

Method:

We enrolled 72 full term women weighing between 50 and 75 Kg, classified as ASA I, scheduled for elective caesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Participants were ran-domly allocated to either the ephedrine or crystalloid group. After arrival in the operating room and intravenous (IV) access, 10 ml/Kg of ringer solution was infused 10-15 minutes before the initiation of the spinal block, but in the ephedrine group, an additional 10mg of ephedrine was added to the solution for infusion. In the crystalloid group, a placebo was added to the solution.

Results:

Hypotension occurred in 55.6% of patients in the crystalloid group and in 25% of patients in the ephedrine group. The difference between the two groups was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.008), however, there was no significant difference in mean systolic blood pressure between the two groups (105.61 7.13 in crystalloid group vs. 107.89 9.84 in ephedrine group). Apgar scores in newborns were above 8 in both groups.

Conclusion:

Prophylactic ephedrine given by infusion in combination with crystalloid was more effective than crystalloid prehydration in the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective caesarean section.

Highlights

Full Text

Full text is available in PDF

Copyright

© 2009, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

8
Aug
2018

The Effects of Pre-Spinal Anesthesia Administration of Crystalloid and Colloid Solutions on Hypotension in Elective Cesarean Section

Mohammad Reza Gousheh,
Reza Akhondzade,
Hamid Asl Aghahoseini,
Alireza Olapour,
Mahbobe Rashidi

Gousheh MR, Akhondzade R, Asl Aghahoseini H, Olapour A, Rashidi M. The Effects of Pre-Spinal Anesthesia Administration of Crystalloid and Colloid Solutions on Hypotension in Elective Cesarean Section. Anesth Pain Med. 2018;8(4):e69446. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.69446

22
Apr
2022

Ephedrine Versus Ondansetron in the Prevention of Hypotension During Cesarean Section: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial: Spinal induced hypotension in parturients

Ahmed Mohamed Khamis,
Abd El-Aziz A. Abd El-Aziz,
Raham Hasan Mostafa,
Mohamed Abdallah Noser

Khamis AM, Abd El-Aziz AEA, Hasan Mostafa R, Noser MA. Ephedrine Versus Ondansetron in the Prevention of Hypotension During Cesarean Section: A Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial: Spinal induced hypotension in parturients. J Cell Mol Anesth. 2022;7(3):e150196. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jcma.v7i3.37841

15
May
2021

A Study of Phenylephrine Administration for the Prevention and Treatment of Hypotension in Cesarean Section during Spinal Anaesthesia

MeenaKumari R,
Sathyanarayana V

R M, V S. A Study of Phenylephrine Administration for the Prevention and Treatment of Hypotension in Cesarean Section during Spinal Anaesthesia. J Cell Mol Anesth. 2021;6(3):e150253. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jcma.v6i3.34213

26
Aug
2018

Comparison of Ephedrine vs. Norepinephrine in Treating Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Hypertensive Patients: Randomized Double-Blinded Study

Valiollah Hassani,
Gholamreza Movaseghi,
Reza Safaeeyan,
Sahar Masghati,
Batool Ghorbani Yekta,
Reza Farahmand Rad

Hassani V, Movaseghi G, Safaeeyan R, Masghati S, Ghorbani Yekta B, et al. Comparison of Ephedrine vs. Norepinephrine in Treating Anesthesia-Induced Hypotension in Hypertensive Patients: Randomized Double-Blinded Study. Anesth Pain Med. 2018;8(4):e79626. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.79626

19
Jul
2020

A Clinical Trial on the Effects of Different Regimens of Phenylephrine on Maternal Hemodynamic After Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section

Mahshid Nikooseresht,
Mohammad Ali Seifrabiei,
Pouran Hajian,
Shadab Khamooshi

Nikooseresht M, Seifrabiei MA, Hajian P, Khamooshi S. A Clinical Trial on the Effects of Different Regimens of Phenylephrine on Maternal Hemodynamic After Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section. Anesth Pain Med. 2020;10(4):e58048. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.58048

More by these authors

M KhooshidehPubMedScholar
MH HeidariPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics