Abstract
Objectives:
Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a common cyclic disorder in women, which is characterized by multiple emotional or physical symptoms. The protective effect of vegetable intake against PMS was not completely investigated. Thus, in the current study, we compared vegetable intake in nurses with and without PMS.Methods:
In this case-control study, 307 female nurses with PMS (n = 156) and without PMS (n = 151) were participated from eight hospitals affiliated to the Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Iran. This study was performed from March to October 2014. Anthropometric measurements were performed for all nurses using standard methods. International physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) was used for the physical activity assessment. The premenstrual symptoms screening tool (PSST) was applied to identify women who suffer from PMS. A validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used for dietary intake measurement during the past years.Results:
Across increasing total vegetable quartiles, individuals had a significantly higher energy intake (P < 0.001). A significant difference was found in job duration, working shift, and physical activity, according to quartiles of total vegetable intakes (P < 0.05). A significant difference was observed in the mean intake of cruciferous vegetables between cases and controls (P = 0.001). Healthy women had significantly more cruciferous vegetable intakes compared to PMS women (6.8 ± 3.9 vs 4.0 ± 3.3). After adjusting for the confounders such as total vegetables, cruciferous vegetables, green leafy vegetables, dark yellow vegetables, and other vegetables, subjects in the highest quartile of cruciferous vegetables had lower odds (ratio OR) of PMS compared with those in the lowest-quartile (P = 0.002; OR = 0.33; CI = 0.16 - 0.67).Conclusions:
Our findings showed that higher consumption of cruciferous vegetables might be associated with a lower OR of PMS.Keywords
1. Background
Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a common type of periodic disorder in women during their reproductive years, which is characterized by multiple emotional or physical changes in the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (1). It has been reported that about 70% - 95% of women during the reproductive age suffer from PMS (2, 3). The prevalence of PMS in Iran has been reported at around 52.9%, in which 34.5% suffer from PMS with severe symptoms (4). Irritability and depression, anxiety, fatigue, mood swings, change in libido, headache, abdominal bloating, appetite changes and food cravings, as well as tender breasts are the major signs and symptoms of PMS (5). Although the exact mechanism of PMS is unknown, multiple factors such as genetics or a family history of PMS, history of depression, cyclic changes in hormones, domestic violence, and emotional or physical trauma are contributed to PMS (5). Furthermore, the use of opium, increased aldosterone and renin-angiotensin activities, impaired secretion of internal opioids, higher prolactin secretion, and prostaglandin disorders are the other risk factors for PMS development (6). Several lines of studies demonstrated a relationship between several anthropometric indices such as body mass index (BMI), obesity, and physical activity with PMS (7).
Recent evidences have revealed that lack of dietary intakes of some specific nutrients and micronutrients such as trace elements, vitamins, and antioxidants can be considered a major risk factor for PMS development (8-10). For example, nutritional deficiencies of iron, zinc (3), calcium (11), magnesium (12), potassium (13), thiamin, riboflavin (14), vitamin B (14), and vitamin D (11) have been reported to be correlated with the risk of PMS development. However, the exact mechanism in which these nutrients affect PMS development is not well-understood.
Vegetables are a major source of various micronutrients such as trace elements, antioxidants, vitamins, fibers, oligosaccharides, and carotenoids (15). A great number of studies have considered the beneficial effects of vegetables in treatment and prognosis of different diseases. For example, many studies showed the positive effect of vegetable intake in prevention of diabetes and obesity management (16). Some studies demonstrated that vegetable intake is strongly accompanied by decreased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors such as triacylglycerol and high cholesterol, as well as blood pressure (17). Increased consumption of cruciferous vegetables has been reported to decrease the risk of multiple cancers such as bowel, intestinal, pancreatic, thyroid, and lung cancer (18). Park et al. indicated that consumption of vegetables prevents osteoporosis due to their rich sources of calcium and other vitamins, which are critical for bone health (19). A high intake of vegetables was negatively correlated to the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and respiratory symptoms (20).
Green leafy vegetables were suggested to have a protective effect against lung cancer (21). Based on these evidences, a significant relationship between vegetable intake and different diseases has been well elucidated; however, to the best of our knowledge, the protective effect of vegetable intake against PMS was not investigated.
2. Objectives
Given the critical role of vegetable intake against various diseases, we assume that consumption of vegetables may be effective against PMS. Thus, we designed this study to compare vegetable intake in nurses with and without PMS.
3. Methods
3.1. Subjects
This study is part of a case-control study, which aimed to compare dietary patterns between nurses with PMS and healthy nurses. A total of 156 female nurses with PMS and 151 healthy nurses who work in eight hospitals affiliated to ' Tehran university of medical science, were entered into the study from March to October 2014. These eight hospitals were randomly selected from 17 hospitals. The Premenstrual Symptoms Screening Tool (PSST) was applied to identify women who suffer from PMS (22). This case-control study was approved by the Ethical Committee of ' Islamic Azad University- Science and Research Branch. The objective and protocol of the study were explained to the participants and all individuals signed written informed consents. All participants filled a questionnaire containing demographic data (e.g. age, education, marital status, job experience, shift-working, menstrual cycle, and hemorrhage duration) before the study. The inclusion criteria for subjects were: (i) age range from 20 to 45 years and (ii) personal satisfaction to participate in this research. Individuals who met the following criteria were excluded from the study: (i) BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2; (ii) drug use (e.g. contraceptives, hormones, thyroid regulators, weight reducer, anti-depressants, anti-anxiety, and drugs affecting metabolism and appetite) within the last month; (iii) history of other diseases (e.g. diabetes mellitus, liver and kidney diseases, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and etc.); (iv) women with premature menopause and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS); (v) use of any type of supplements, vitamins, and minerals in the last month; (vi) pregnant or lactating women; and (vii) opiate using.
3.2. Anthropometric Measure
Anthropometric measurements were performed for all nurses using standard methods. Standing height was measured without shoes by the Omron electronic digital scale (Omron, BF508). Body weight was measured with minimal clothing and without shoes by a digital magnetic scale (Omron, BF508). BMI was calculated using the following formula: [BMI = weight (kg)/height (m)2]. Waist circumference (WC) was estimated using a measuring tape with one millimeter precision. The midpoint between the inferior costal margin and the upper iliac crest were measured as WC.
3.3. Physical Activity Assessment
In the current study, the short modified and translated form of international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) was used for all participants' physical activity assessment during the previous week (23). The questionnaire includes seven items assessing vigorous and moderate intensity of activities and walking for at least 10 min/day during the previous week.
We calculated the metabolic equivalent task (MET) min/week for each category of physical activity that existed in the questionnaire. MET-metabolic equivalents were determined based on the IPAQ guidelines, as follows: for walking: MET = 3.3/min, moderate intensity activities: MET = 4/min, and for vigorous: MET = 8/min. To calculate the total physical activity per week, scores of walking (MET × min × day), moderate (MET × min × day), and vigorous (MET × min × day) are summed. We also identified the severity of physical activity based on three categories including mild, moderate, and severe activities. Individuals who had physical activity at least three times per week (1500 MET/min or 3000 MET/week) were considered as highly active. Individuals who had physical activity three days/week (with at least 20 min/day) or five days/week (with at least 30 minutes vigorous, moderate or walking activities) were categorized as moderate active. Individuals without any physical activity are considered as inactive (23). Internal consistency of IPAQ in the study of Moghaddam et al. (23) using Cronbach's Alpha coefficient were calculated and was 0.7, which indicated a good instrument. Furthermore, Spearman Brown correlation coefficient of 0.9 showed respectable test-retest reliability.
3.4. Dietary Assessment
A dietitian evaluated the diet intake of all participants on the first visit at the clinic. A validated semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), that included 147 food items, was used to assess dietary intake during the past years. All subjects were asked to state the consumption frequency for each food item in terms of daily, weekly, monthly, and yearly. Furthermore, the amount of food intake for each participant was recorded. The daily food intake was calculated by converting the information of the FFQ to g/day. The Iranian modified nutritionist IV software (First Databank, San Bruno, CA) was applied for the analysis of food energy and nutrients content. Vegetables were divided into multiple specific groups, including dark yellow vegetables, cruciferous vegetables, green leafy vegetables, and other vegetables (24, 25).
3.5. Statistical Analysis
Demographic and clinical information of all participants were reported as mean ± SD. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was applied to evaluate the normality of the data. An independent student t-test was used to compare the mean of several parameters between the two groups. Chi-square test was used to compare the frequency of each parameter between different categories. The mean values of the quantitative variables across the vegetables quartiles were compared using the ANOVA test. The ANCOVA was used to compare the mean vegetable intake in both groups after adjusting for potential confounders. The correlation between the vegetable intake and chance of PMS was analyzed by simple logistic regression. We applied multivariable models to evaluate the relationship between vegetable intake and PMS (model 2) in addition to the unadjusted analysis (model 1). SPSS software (version 19) were used for data analyzing and a P < 0.05 was considered as significant.
4. Results
Demographic data and characteristics of study participants, according to quartiles of total vegetable intake, are summarized in Table 1. Across increasing total vegetable quartiles, individuals had significantly higher energy intake (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the mean of BMI (P = 0.21), WC (P = 0.052), age (P = 0.33), and menstrual duration (P = 0.73) in the different quartiles of total vegetable intakes (Table 1). However, a significant difference was found in job duration (P = 0.04), working shift (P = 0.02), and physical activity (P = 0.02), according to the quartiles of total vegetables intake.
| Variables | Quartiles of Total Vegetable Intakes | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 (N = 76) | 2 (N = 77) | 3 (N = 77) | 4 (N = 77) | P Valuec | |
| Energy intake, kcal/d | 2303.5 ± 589.6 | 2683.3 ± 669.7 | 2722.9 ± 659.8 | 3099.6 ± 582.9 | < 0.001 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 23.1 ± 3.7 | 22.9 ± 3.5 | 23.3 ± 3.3 | 24.1 ± 4.5 | 0.21 |
| Waist circumference, cm | 77.6 ± 8.1 | 76.0 ± 8.5 | 78.0 ± 7.5 | 79.9 ± 9.9 | 0.052 |
| Job durationy | 4.7 ± 3.9 | 4.8 ± 4.0 | 6.6 ± 5.7 | 6.0 ± 5.1 | 0.04 |
| Menstrual duration, d | 6.3 ± 1.7 | 6.2 ± 1.6 | 6.2 ± 1.7 | 6.5 ± 1.8 | 0.73 |
| Groups | 0.53 | ||||
| PMSd | 35 (22.4) | 44 (28.2) | 40 (25.6) | 37(23.7) | |
| Control | 41 (27.2) | 33 (21.9) | 37 (24.5) | 40 (26.5) | |
| Age, y | 0.33 | ||||
| 20 - 32 | 60 (26.8) | 59 (26.3) | 51 (22.8) | 54 (24.1) | |
| 33 - 45 | 16 (19.3) | 18 (21.7) | 26 (31.3) | 23 (27.7) | |
| Working-shift | 0.02 | ||||
| Morning | 13 (30.2) | 10 (23.3) | 9 (20.9) | 11 (25.6) | |
| Evening | 9 (25.7) | 15 (42.9) | 7 (20.0) | 4 (11.4) | |
| Night | 16 (30.0) | 7 (17.1) | 5 (12.2) | 13 (31.7) | |
| Rotatory | 38 (20.2) | 45 (23.9) | 56 (29.8) | 49 (26.1) | |
| Marital status | 0.74 | ||||
| Single | 35 (23.5) | 38 (25.5) | 35 (23.5) | 41 (27.5) | |
| Married-divorced | 41 (25.9) | 39 (24.7) | 42 (26.6) | 35 (22.8) | |
| Menstrual status | 0.12 | ||||
| Regular | 67 (26.9) | 63 (25.3) | 63 (25.3) | 56 (22.5) | |
| Irregular | 9 (15.5) | 14 (24.1) | 14 (24.1) | 21 (36.2) | |
| Physical activitye, met/min/week | 0.02 | ||||
| Mild | 39 (29.1) | 31 (23.1) | 37 (27.6) | 27 (20.1) | |
| Moderate | 35 (23.0) | 42 (27.6) | 37 (24.3) | 38 (25.0) | |
| Severe | 2 (9.5) | 4 (19.0) | 3 (14.3) | 12 (57.1) | |
| Educational status | 0.24 | ||||
| Bachelor | 70 (24.2) | 74 (25.6) | 75 (26.0) | 70 (24.2) | |
| Master | 6 (33.3) | 3 (16.7) | 2 (11.1) | 7 (38.9) | |
| Job | 0.35 | ||||
| Nurse | 72 (24.4) | 76 (25.8) | 75 (25.4) | 72 (24.4) | |
| Supervisor-head nurse | 4 (33.3) | 1 (8.3) | 2 (16.7) | 5 (41.7) | |
No collinearity and interaction between models independent variables was detected. The comparison of vegetable intake between controls and women with PMS is shown in Table 2. A significant difference was observed in the mean of cruciferous vegetable intake between cases and controls (P = 0.001). Healthy women had a significantly more cruciferous vegetable intake compared to PMS women (6.8 ± 3.9 vs. 4.0 ± 3.3). There was no significant difference in the mean of total vegetable intake (P = 0.9), dark yellow vegetables (P = 0.4), green leafy vegetables (P = 0.5), and other vegetables (P = 0.3) between cases and controls.
| Daily Intake, g | Controls (N = 151) | PMS (N = 156) | P Valuec | P Valued | P Valuee |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total vegetables | 295.5 ± 16.6f | 305.9 ± 17.1 | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
| Dark yellow vegetables | 14.0 ± 5.3f | 12.2 ± 4.5 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Green leafy vegetables | 45.1 ± 5.0f | 45.6 ± 5.8 | 0.2 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| Cruciferous vegetables | 6.8 ± 3.9f | 4.0 ± 3.3 | 0.006 | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Other vegetables | 214.6 ± 13.5fe | 228.6 ± 15.6 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
As shown in Table 3, the odds ratio (OR) of PMS across quartiles of vegetables intake, before and after adjustment for confounding factors, is presented in two different models. Before adjusting the confounders, individuals in the lowest quartile of cruciferous vegetables had a higher OR of PMS compared with those in the highest quartile (P = 0.005). After adjusting for the confounders, subjects in the highest quartile of cruciferous vegetables had a lower OR of PMS compared with those in the lowest quartile (P = 0.002). No significant relationship was found after testing PMS subjects across the quartiles of total vegetables (P = 0.52), dark yellow vegetables (P = 0.33), green leafy vegetables (P = 0.55), and other vegetables (P = 0.73).
| Variables | Q2 (76) | Q3 (77) | Q3 (77) | P Valuetrendc | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | OR | 95% CI | ||
| Total vegetables | |||||||
| Model 1 | 1.56 | (0.82 - 2.96) | 1.23 | (0.65 - 2.32) | 1.11 | (0.59 - 2.10) | |
| P value | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.91 | |||
| Model 2 | 1.30 | (0.62 - 2.54) | 0.87 | (0.41 - 1.78) | 0.72 | (0.35 - 1.72) | |
| P value | 0.4 | 0.7 | 0.4 | 0.52 | |||
| Dark yellow vegetables | |||||||
| Model 1 | 1.04 | (0.55 - 1.97) | 0.87 | (0.46 - 1.66). | 0.73 | (0.39 - 1.38) | |
| P value | 0.90 | 0.70 | 0.3 | 0.34 | |||
| Model 2 | 1.00 | (0.51 - 1.96) | 0.84 | (0.38 - 1.63) | 0.71 | (0.31 - 1.50) | |
| P value | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.33 | |||
| Green leafy vegetables | |||||||
| Model 1 | 0.95 | (0.50 - 1.79) | 1.05 | (0.56 - 1.98) | 1.27 | (0.67 - 2.41) | |
| P value | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 0.42 | |||
| Model 2 | 1.02 | (0.52 - 2.09) | 1.10 | (0.57 - 2.38) | 1.18 | (0.52 - 2.70) | |
| P value | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.55 | |||
| Cruciferous vegetables | |||||||
| Model 1 | 0.77 | (0.41 - 1.45) | 0.79 | (0.39 - 1.61) | 0.40 | (0.22 - 0.76) | |
| P value | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.005 | 0.005 | |||
| Model 2 | 0.74 | (0.38 - 1.45) | 0.67 | (0.31 - 1.45) | 0.33 | (0.16 - 0.67) | |
| P value | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.002 | 0.002 | |||
| Other vegetables | |||||||
| Model 1 | 1.08 | (0.57 - 2.04) | 1.17 | (0.62 - 2.20) | 1.23 | (0.65 - 2.31) | |
| P value | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.51 | |||
| Model 2 | 0.92 | (0.47 - 1.90) | 1.00 | (0.48 - 2.08) | 1.02 | (0.43 - 2.30) | |
| P value | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.73 | |||
5. Discussion
Although a large number of studies considered the relationship between diet intakes and the risk of PMS, little information is available about the relationship between vegetables consumption and PMS. Our data revealed that cruciferous vegetable intake is significantly correlated to PMS, in which higher intake of vegetables was negatively associated with the risk of PMS. We found that cruciferous vegetable consumption might have an ameliorative effect on PMS, while green leafy vegetables, dark yellow vegetables, and other vegetables did not show any significant relationship with PMS.
The underlying mechanism behind the negative relationship between cruciferous vegetables consumption and PMS is not well understood. Cruciferous vegetables such as cauliflower, cabbage, garden cress, broccoli, and brussels sprouts are rich sources of micronutrients, including potassium, calcium, zinc, magnesium, vitamin K, and antioxidants (e.g. vitamin C, E, and carotenoids), (26) which may be a main reason for lower risk of PMS.
Estrogen dominance happens when an unhealthy balance between estrogen metabolites are present. An estrogen metabolite identified as 16-hydroxy is known to be carcinogenic, whereas estrogen metabolite 2-hydroxy has positive effects. Previous studies show that levels of the 16-hydroxy metabolite are high in cases of breast, ovarian, cervix, uterine, and other hormone-sensitive cancers. This dangerous metabolite levels increases in women suffering with PMS and perimenopause. Estrogen concentration and a hormone known as pregnenolone sulfate are elevated in women with PMS. Pregnenolone sulfate plays an important role in memory procedure, however, if levels are too high, it causes anxiety. Furthermore, researchers have isolated a constituent in cruciferous vegetables called Indole-3-Carbinol (I3C), which is especially helpful for improvement of estrogen metabolism. By combining I3C with stomach acid, 3,3-Diindolylmethane, or DIM is formed. The metabolism of DIM intersections with estrogen metabolism, thus, it promotes healthy estrogen metabolism resulting in an appropriate ratio of 2-hydroxy to 16-hydroxy (27, 28). Furthermore, cruciferous vegetables have a high content of glucosinolates (29), which separate them from other vegetables. Glucosinolates known as a class of sulphur-containing glycosides, present at considerable amounts in cruciferous vegetables, and their breakdown products such as the isothiocyanates, are thought to be responsible for their health benefits (30). Due to these properties, it may be correlated to a lower risk of PMS in the current study.
Many studies reported a negative relationship between the intakes of these micronutrients and the risk of PMS (31, 32). Our findings are consistent with the results of previous studies that indicated a significant association between diet intake and the risk of PMS. For instance, Chocano-Bedoya et al. (3) demonstrated that higher intakes of non-heme iron and zinc can be related to a lower risk of PMS, whereas a low potassium intake may be associated with a higher risk of PMS. Several studies reported a significant association between dietary intakes of certain micronutrients such as calcium, thiamin, riboflavin, and vitamin D with the risk of PMS (11, 14). Similarly, Saeedian Kia et al. (32) reported a significant relationship between vitamin D, Ca2+, and Mg2+ nutritional status and the risk of PMS. Some studies demonstrated a positive and significant relationship between PMS with food intake such as fried foods, sweet drink, and fast food (33). For example, Rad et al. (6) showed an inverse relationship between PMS with fried foods, fast foods, sweet drink, and fruit. A previous study demonstrated that women with PMS had a significantly more intake of energy and macronutrients such as cereals, cakes, desserts, and high-sugar foods compared to healthy women (10). In contrast, some studies did not find a relationship between some types of foods and PMS. For example, Houghton et al. (31) considered the relationship between carbohydrate and fiber intake with the risk of PMS in female nurses. They reported that carbohydrate and fiber consumption were not linked to PMS risk. Another study showed that fat intake was not associated with higher PMS risk (34). Purdue-Smithe et al. (35) showed that caffeine intake is not associated with PMS. However, the pervious data indicated that there is a relationship between PMS and some dietary factors; however, the exact mechanism of food action on PMS is unknown.
This study does have some limitations that may affect the interpretation of our findings. First, although sampling was done from different parts of hospitals, no authorization was given for special sections such as operating rooms, emergency rooms, neonatal intensive care units, infection, and cancer wards. The personnel of these wards were too busy to spend time to cooperate with us, and these wards were not safe for non-medical personnel for a long period stay. As previously proven, occupational stress has a positive correlation with the symptoms of PMS. A number of nurses who are more likely to be exposed to stress in these wards were not studied. Second, individuals with PMS were aware about their problems, which might affect their dietary pattern, and were reported differently than controls. Third, in trying to record food intake among nurses over the previous year, both the portion sizes quantification and the consumption frequency may have been subject to remember errors. Therefore, information bias cannot be completely ruled out, and this issue can lead to a dilution of our study results. However, in spite of these errors that can occur with the use of FFQ, they are still considered the best and valid questionnaire for collecting dietary data in the large population. Despite these limitations, this study is among few studies to evaluate the relationship between vegetables intake and PMS occurrence risk.
In addition, one of the strengths of this study is the large sample size. Subsequently, the samples were selected from eight hospitals and selected from different departments, the obtained results have high generalizability in nurses working in hospitals. Although we cannot completely reject the residual confounding effect, it is unlikely that evaluation of confounder’s mistake plays an important role in our study; due to the fact that in this study, the confounding factors were moderated by the ANCOVA test.
In conclusion, we have considered the relationship between vegetable intake and PMS occurrence risk in a nurse population that have high job pressures and responsibilities. Our findings have shown that higher consumption of cruciferous vegetables might be associated with a lower OR of PMS. Further studies are needed for confirming of these findings and clearing of the precise mechanisms.
References
-
1.
Dickerson LM, Mazyck PJ, Hunter MH. Premenstrual syndrome. Am Fam Physician. 2003;67(8):1743-52. [PubMed ID: 12725453].
-
2.
Kwan I, Onwude JL. Premenstrual syndrome. BMJ Clin Evid. 2015;2015. [PubMed ID: 26303988]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4548199].
-
3.
Chocano-Bedoya PO, Manson JE, Hankinson SE, Johnson SR, Chasan-Taber L, Ronnenberg AG, et al. Intake of selected minerals and risk of premenstrual syndrome. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;177(10):1118-27. [PubMed ID: 23444100]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3649635]. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kws363.
-
4.
Samadi Z, Taghian F, Valiani M. The effects of 8 weeks of regular aerobic exercise on the symptoms of premenstrual syndrome in non-athlete girls. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013;18(1):14-9. [PubMed ID: 23983722]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3748549].
-
5.
Yonkers KA, O'Brien PM, Eriksson E. Premenstrual syndrome. Lancet. 2008;371(9619):1200-10. [PubMed ID: 18395582]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3118460]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60527-9.
-
6.
Rad M, Sabzevary MT, Dehnavi ZM. Factors associated with premenstrual syndrome in Female High School Students. J Educ Health Promot. 2018;7:64. [PubMed ID: 29922693]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5963206]. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_126_17.
-
7.
Mohammadi V, Shidfar F, Keshtkar Aghababaee S, Mokhtari P, Mohammadi R, Gohari MR. [The relationship of anthropometric indices with PMS and it's severity in female students of Tehran University of Medical Sciences]. Razi J Med Sci. 2013;20(87-94). Persian.
-
8.
Bryant M, Truesdale KP, Dye L. Modest changes in dietary intake across the menstrual cycle: Implications for food intake research. Br J Nutr. 2006;96(5):888-94. [PubMed ID: 17092378]. https://doi.org/10.1017/bjn20061931.
-
9.
Farasati N, Siassi F, Koohdani F, Qorbani M, Abashzadeh K, Sotoudeh G. Western dietary pattern is related to premenstrual syndrome: A case-control study. Br J Nutr. 2015;114(12):2016-21. [PubMed ID: 26459000]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114515003943.
-
10.
Cross GB, Marley J, Miles H, Willson K. Changes in nutrient intake during the menstrual cycle of overweight women with premenstrual syndrome. Br J Nutr. 2001;85(4):475-82. [PubMed ID: 11348562]. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn2000283.
-
11.
Bertone-Johnson ER, Hankinson SE, Bendich A, Johnson SR, Willett WC, Manson JE. Calcium and vitamin D intake and risk of incident premenstrual syndrome. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(11):1246-52. [PubMed ID: 15956003]. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.165.11.1246.
-
12.
Rosenstein DL, Elin RJ, Hosseini JM, Grover G, Rubinow DR. Magnesium measures across the menstrual cycle in premenstrual syndrome. Biol Psychiatry. 1994;35(8):557-61. [PubMed ID: 8038300]. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3223(94)90103-1.
-
13.
Posaci C, Erten O, Uren A, Acar B. Plasma copper, zinc and magnesium levels in patients with premenstrual tension syndrome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994;73(6):452-5. [PubMed ID: 8042455]. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349409013429.
-
14.
Chocano-Bedoya PO, Manson JE, Hankinson SE, Willett WC, Johnson SR, Chasan-Taber L, et al. Dietary B vitamin intake and incident premenstrual syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr. 2011;93(5):1080-6. [PubMed ID: 21346091]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3076657]. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.110.009530.
-
15.
Slavin JL, Lloyd B. Health benefits of fruits and vegetables. Adv Nutr. 2012;3(4):506-16. [PubMed ID: 22797986]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3649719]. https://doi.org/10.3945/an.112.002154.
-
16.
Pem D, Jeewon R. Fruit and vegetable intake: Benefits and progress of nutrition education interventions- narrative review article. Iran J Public Health. 2015;44(10):1309-21. [PubMed ID: 26576343]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4644575].
-
17.
Adebawo O, Salau B, Ezima E, Oyefuga O, Ajani E, Idowu G, et al. Fruits and vegetables moderate lipid cardiovascular risk factor in hypertensive patients. Lipids Health Dis. 2006;5:14. [PubMed ID: 16753064]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1543619]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-511X-5-14.
-
18.
Williamson G. Protective effects of fruits and vegetables in the diet. J Nutr Food Sci. 1996;96(1):6-10. https://doi.org/10.1108/00346659610105806.
-
19.
Park HM, Heo J, Park Y. Calcium from plant sources is beneficial to lowering the risk of osteoporosis in postmenopausal Korean women. Nutr Res. 2011;31(1):27-32. [PubMed ID: 21310303]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2010.12.005.
-
20.
Celik F, Topcu F. Nutritional risk factors for the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in male smokers. Clin Nutr. 2006;25(6):955-61. [PubMed ID: 16782241]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2006.04.006.
-
21.
Dosil-Diaz O, Ruano-Ravina A, Gestal-Otero JJ, Barros-Dios JM. Consumption of fruit and vegetables and risk of lung cancer: A case-control study in Galicia, Spain. Nutrition. 2008;24(5):407-13. [PubMed ID: 18314310]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2008.01.005.
-
22.
Steiner M, Macdougall M, Brown E. The premenstrual symptoms screening tool (PSST) for clinicians. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2003;6(3):203-9. [PubMed ID: 12920618]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-003-0018-4.
-
23.
Moghaddam MHB, Aghdam FB, Jafarabadi MA. The Iranian version of international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ) in Iran: Content and construct validity, factor structure, internal consistency and stability. World Appl Sci J. 2012;18:1073-80.
-
24.
Liu S, Manson JE, Lee IM, Cole SR, Hennekens CH, Willett WC, et al. Fruit and vegetable intake and risk of cardiovascular disease: The Women's Health Study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72(4):922-8. [PubMed ID: 11010932]. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/72.4.922.
-
25.
Safabakhsh M, Koohdani F, Bagheri F, Siassi F, Khajehnasiri F, Sotoudeh G. Fruit and vegetable intake and pre-diabetes: A case-control study. Eur J Nutr. 2018;57(8):2953-62. [PubMed ID: 29204690]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-017-1569-x.
-
26.
Royston KJ, Tollefsbol TO. The epigenetic impact of cruciferous vegetables on cancer prevention. Curr Pharmacol Rep. 2015;1(1):46-51. [PubMed ID: 25774338]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4354933]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40495-014-0003-9.
-
27.
Siosal M. Mindful eating: Cruciferous vegetables for hormone balance. August 27, 2009. Available from: http://touchstonesofthesacred.com/cruciferous-vegetables-hormone-balance/.
-
28.
Heller DJ. Healthy hormone foods for women: Beyond broccoli. January 9, 2013. Available from: https://www.pmscomfort.com/pms-diet/healthy-hormone-foods-pmdd-pms.aspx.
-
29.
Ciska E, Martyniak-Przybyszewska B, Kozlowska H. Content of glucosinolates in cruciferous vegetables grown at the same site for two years under different climatic conditions. J Agric Food Chem. 2000;48(7):2862-7. [PubMed ID: 10898637]. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf981373a.
-
30.
Abdull Razis AF, Noor NM. Cruciferous vegetables: Dietary phytochemicals for cancer prevention. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(3):1565-70. [PubMed ID: 23679237]. https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.3.1565.
-
31.
Houghton SC, Manson JE, Whitcomb BW, Hankinson SE, Troy LM, Bigelow C, et al. Carbohydrate and fiber intake and the risk of premenstrual syndrome. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018;72(6):861-70. [PubMed ID: 29379144]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5990431]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41430-017-0076-8.
-
32.
Saeedian Kia A, Amani R, Cheraghian B. The association between the risk of premenstrual syndrome and vitamin d, calcium, and magnesium status among university students: A case control study. Health Promot Perspect. 2015;5(3):225-30. [PubMed ID: 26634201]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4667262]. https://doi.org/10.15171/hpp.2015.027.
-
33.
Cheng SH, Shih CC, Yang YK, Chen KT, Chang YH, Yang YC. Factors associated with premenstrual syndrome - a survey of new female university students. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2013;29(2):100-5. [PubMed ID: 23347812]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2012.08.017.
-
34.
Houghton SC, Manson JE, Whitcomb BW, Hankinson SE, Troy LM, Bigelow C, et al. Intake of dietary fat and fat subtypes and risk of premenstrual syndrome in the Nurses' Health Study II. Br J Nutr. 2017;118(10):849-57. [PubMed ID: 29189192]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114517002690.
-
35.
Purdue-Smithe AC, Manson JE, Hankinson SE, Bertone-Johnson ER. A prospective study of caffeine and coffee intake and premenstrual syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;104(2):499-507. [PubMed ID: 27385613]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4962155]. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.115.127027.