Treatment of scaphoid nonunion is complex and requires experience (
5,
6). The typical surgical treatment is an open surgery with its own complications, including damage to the scaphoid's small blood vessels (
6,
7). It is assumed that an arthroscopic surgical technique, thanks to less manipulation of the soft tissue of the area, not only reduces these injuries but also provides a direct, accurate, and magnified view of restoring the alignment of the extensive articular surfaces of this bone, contributing more to better reconstruction (
6).
On the other hand, we know that 60% of extension-flexion movements, the most important motion in the wrist, occur on the surface of the radiocardial joint. In open approaches to scaphoid nonunion, the radiocarpal surface of the scaphoid is exposed, and preparing the nonunion site in this surface may induce some damage. However, in the arthroscopic method, we enter via the intercarpal articular surface, which has a more pronounced role in radial and ulnar deviation (
6,
7).
In this study, we treated 15 patients with scaphoid nonunion with arthroscopic methods and evaluated their functional and radiological results were evaluated. After three months, according to simple radiographic evidences, all scaphoids were satisfactory united, and direct complications of surgical procedure, such as surgery site infection or sensory impairment, were not observed in any of the visits.
Slade et al. operated 15 patients with scaphoid nonunion using arthroscopic treatment. Of them, 13 had excellent, and three had good functional results. On average, within 14 weeks, all patients had an adequate union. They did not mention the number of complications (
15).
Slade and Gillon published a review of 108 consecutive cases of scaphoid nonunion treated arthroscopically. They concluded that this treatment method is effective and safe. On average, 96% of the patients had good healing within 22 weeks. The rate of complications was 9%, which was mainly a site infection (
18).
Kim et al. achieved an 86% union rate by examining 36 patients who had undergone arthroscopic surgery. They found that arthroscopic surgery positively affected the function of patients with scaphoid nonunion. Their patients did not experience any complications associated with the surgical procedure (
16).
Kang et al. treated 33 patients who did not have deformity, necrosis, or arthritis after arthroscopic treatment. They showed that in terms of function, the changes were positive compared to before surgery, and the patients were in good condition. They reported that 97% of the union was successful and had no complications related to the surgical procedure (
17).
In our study, one surgeon did all the surgeries to reduce the rate of error. Fortunately, union in the first trimester of surgery demonstrates the success of this method as the most important goal of treatment, and besides its uncomplicated, its value is more prominent. Functional results based on standard questionnaires also show the effectiveness of this treatment method in achieving desirable outcomes. Perhaps if there was a control group treated with open surgery, the difference in the results would be more apparent.
An issue considered in judging the performance results based on standard questionnaires was the subconscious use of the affected hand compared to the other. For example, in the case of multiple essential questions in the questionnaires, the patients had considered their healthy hands in that particular function due to adaptation to the condition, especially if the non-dominant hand was involved. Therefore, they had fewer complaints, which might be the reason for a large percentage of differences between the scores of patient and physician response assessment systems.
5.1. Conclusions
Arthroscopic treatment of scaphoid nonunion seems to be an effective method with low complications and favorable results. The ultimate goal of treating this disease is to prevent degenerative changes in the wrists. We recommend doing a prospective long-term study that can provide a more realistic picture of its long-term outcomes. Small sample size and lack of long-term follow-up were some of the limitations, similar to the previous studies on this subject.