Several PCR protocols have been developed in recent years for different targets in the genome of
B. pertussis like an insertion sequence IS
481,
pertussis toxin gene promoter (ptxA-Pr),
pertussis toxin S1 subunit (
ptxS1), porin gene, pertactin filaments hemagglutinin gene and adenylate cyclase (
14,
15,
20,
21). Many laboratories use the insertion sequence IS
481 in PCR assays to determine the presence of
B. pertussis DNA. This sequence is often the target of choice because it is found in multiple copies in the genome of
B. pertussis (50-238 copies per genome), making this test much more sensitive. However, because of its high copy number, false positive results may be generated and positive results using only a target may lead to a false diagnosis of
pertussis (
15,
22,
23). The IS
481 is also present in
B. holmesii (8-10 copies per genome) and in
B. Bronchiseptica, but the presence of IS
481 is host dependent in this specie and is found in several animals, being rare human isolates (
24).
PCR assays using only IS
481 target, may be useful as screening techniques and can improve the sensitivity of the test, but have limited clinical value, especially in outbreak situations and can substantially decrease the specificity. A positive test for IS
481 requires additional testing, using assays that detect toxin gene, pertactin or other targets specific to
B. pertussis, may be useful in interpreting the results for confirmation of the species. An isolated result for IS
481 should be reported as negative or inconclusive for
B. pertussis if there isn´t possibility of a target additional (
13,
15,
25).
In this study we used two target genes; IS481 and ptxS1 to improve the sensitivity and specificity of the test and to increase the accuracy and ensure an interpretation of a result to B. pertussis more reliable.
We identified 694 samples as B. pertussis, since it showed positive results for both researched targets; IS481 and ptxS1 in RT-PCR. Despite these samples have shown negative results for culture, it was considered positive in the final result. All samples that had tested positive for one gene and inconclusive/negative to another gene or inconclusive for both genes investigated were deemed inconclusive, by the algorithm defined. Between 4,697 nasopharyngeal secretion samples analyzed, only 1% had inconclusive results using RT-PCR. The inconclusive result for both genes does not completely rule out the chance to be a B. pertussis, since the IS481 and/or ptxS1 were not negative, only showed a high Ct.
Nine out of the 4,697 samples tested showed positive results for culture and negative/inconclusive to RT-PCR. These samples were re-tested by RT-PCR and the same result was obtained. Then, the RT-PCR was made from the bacterial suspensions from the culture to rule out the possibility of the genetic targets of RT-PCR being altered by some genetic event in these nine samples, which could explain the negative results. The results of RT-PCR from these suspensions were positive. We do not know the reasons justifying these discordant results, however, it may be due to: (i) the amount of material on the swab, poor or absent at the time of extraction of bacterial DNA, since the swab collected is processed first for the culture, (ii) error in DNA extraction, as the swab after being used for DNA extraction is dropped, there wasn´t the possibility of performing a new extraction in these nine samples.
In the literature, few studies have reported cases of culture positive and PCR negative and most of them interpreted these results as: unequal division of sample to both techniques; flaw in the procedure of DNA extraction and PCR inhibitors in the reactions (
26). Similar results were obtained from Tatti et al. (
13) and Gullsby et al. (
27). These authors suggest that the discrepancy can be explained by low amounts of
B. pertussis in these samples or DNA degradation by cycles of freezing and thawing in which the samples were submitted. In our study, it is possible that any of these factors or their combination may explain the cause of these nine samples being positive culture and negative RT-PCR, but the hypothesis of degradation of DNA by cycles of freezing and thawing can be discarded, since our samples have not gone through this process.
In relation to age, it is expected that the higher rates of positivity of pertussis are among samples collected from children under two months of age, still not immunized, then the group of children under six months of age, where most children have incomplete immunization, thus becoming vulnerable to more easily acquire the disease. Our results showed that, in fact, the positivity in children under six months was higher than in the other age groups.
A possible limitation of the study concerns the failure to obtain the information about the time interval between the start of disease and sampling, state of vaccination of the study cases and if the patient suspected had started the antibiotic treatment before sampling or not.
The use of the technique of RT-PCR in IAL Central to diagnosis of pertussis has provided high sensitivity relation to other laboratory methods, like a culture. It was responsible for the diagnosis of 685 positive cases by criteria laboratorial more than culture. With these positive results diagnostic for pertussis, can obtain benefits like detect and avoid possible transmission of the disease for new cases, suitable treatment to patients and prophylaxis of contacts, as well as better control and prevention of outbreaks.
In conclusion, the implementation of the new technique in routine diagnostic resulted in an increase in laboratory confirmation by almost three times, in addition to a fast release of the results of 15 days of culture, for 24 - 48 hours for this technique. Then, the RT-PCR assay does not intend to replace the culture technique, but to promote an improvement in the diagnosis of pertussis.