There are common characteristics for asthma and toxocariasis, such as persistent airway hyper-responsiveness and inflammation, eosinophil accumulation in lungs and induction of production of IgE (
13,
14).
Our results failed to demonstrate an association between Toxocara infection and childhood asthma as with another study in Iran conducted by Mosayebi et al. (
15) in the city of Arak, reporting two positive sera in 110 children with asthma (1.8%) and no one in 70 children in the control group. The limitation of their study was that the criteria for diagnosing asthma were unknown and they excluded patients with allergic or genetic asthma from the study whilst it has reported that in schoolchildren approximately 60% - 90% of the asthmatic children are found to be allergic (
16,
17).
A meta-analysis study including seven studies on children and three studies on adults involving a total of 1530 participants (723 cases of asthma and 807 controls) revealed a significant association between Toxocara seropositivity and asthma (OR: 3.36, 95% CI: 1.76 - 6.42) (
3). However, another study that was performed in Brazil with inclusion criteria similar to those used in our study did not find this association (
18).
Nevertheless, another recent meta-analysis published in 2018 with 17 studies (a total of 5469 participants, 872 asthmatics, and 4597 non-asthmatics children) indicated again an increased risk for asthma in children with Toxocara infection seropositivity (OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.47 - 2.47) (
4).
Our different findings could be due to the following reasons. First, the lower prevalence of exposure in our area might attenuate the association. Secondly, the results of meta-analysis studies might have bias because of the heterogeneity among studies due to difference in definition of asthma, methods of case and control selection, geographic and environmental conditions in each region and methods employed for measuring anti-Toxocara antibodies. Furthermore, there is a concern that studies with positive, significant results (positive studies) are more likely to be published and as a result be introduced in meta-analysis studies, than studies with non-significant or negative results (negative studies) (
19).
In Iran, the prevalence of
T. canis varies widely. Sharif et al. (
20) in 2010 suggest that the overall seroprevalence for Toxocara antibodies is 24.5% in schoolchildren in Sari, northern Iran. In 2015, Hosseini-Safa et al. (
9) reported 1.39% positive seroprevalence for toxocariasis in children between 5 to 15 years old in Isfahan. Momeni et al. (
21) had a study on 2-to-20-year-old children in Urmia, northwest of Iran. They found 3% positive samples for this parasite. Their study indicated risk factors such as mother’s educational level, keeping dogs or cats as pets, and history of coughing for Toxocara infection. In Zanjan, seroprevalence of anti-Toxocara antibodies was reported to be 1.6% in children from urban areas and 4.4% in rural areas (
22).
We found the prevalence of anti-Toxocara antibodies in asthmatic children who lived in Karaj to be 1.09%, which is the minimum prevalence reported in Iran. We expected higher prevalence rates as Karaj is a large immigrant city in the neighborhood of Tehran and many of its population consist of workers with a relatively low socioeconomic status. However, surprisingly the prevalence in both case and control groups was very low.
There are some reasons for the low frequency of this infection among children of our study. First, more than 90% of children in both the case and control groups were residents of urban areas, where there are various reports suggesting that living in rural areas is an important risk factor for toxocariasis. In a survey, Dogan et al. (
23) investigated seroepidemiological rate for Toxocara infection in the northwest of Turkey and found that 16.7% children from rural areas had a positive level of anti-Toxocara antibodies, while it was only 0.71% in the urban areas. Living in rural areas and keeping a dog in the house were significant risk factors for this infection in this study. Similarly in Iran, Mahmoudvand et al. (
24) found the seroprevalence of
T. canis infection to be 2.1% in children of 2 to 15 years old referring to health centers of Lorestan province in urban regions and 11.9% in rural regions. Living in rural regions (P = 0.018) and contact with dogs were significant risk factors for
T. canis seropositivity in this province. Children living in rural areas, especially in our country, are more likely to be exposed to other risk factors such as contact with dogs, low parental educational level, poor personal hygiene and use of non-piped water (
25,
26).
Having a pet is uncommon in Karaj because of religious inhibition and small apartments in urban areas. In our study, only six cases among the asthmatic children and two in the control group had history of contact with stray dogs or kept dogs in their houses, with five of them living in rural areas.
The main limitation of our study lies in the relatively small size of groups studied. However, most other published studies investigating this association have also had around 100 cases or less (
3,
4). Also, it seems that more studies with larger samples in high prevalence regions and rural areas are required to investigate the impact of Toxocara infection in development of asthma.
The principal strengths of this study include, first, good case-control matching especially in demographic characteristics. Secondly, asthma was diagnosed based on GINA criteria, which is an international guideline.
5.1. Conclusions
We did not find any association between Toxocara infection and childhood asthma, and Toxocara is not a prevalent risk factor for childhood asthma in urban area of Karaj. Nevertheless, it should be considered among subjects with risk factors such as living in rural areas or owning pets.