Toxocara infection among a number of 610 school children in present study was 11.25%. Serology examinations were done in children who had chronic cough. Prevalence of toxocariasis in children at the age of 9-11 was higher than others and in males was more than females.
Human toxocariasis is still a poorly diagnosed disease, especially in places with conditions, which favors its development, and it is largely unknown either to health professionals or the general population. Present study showed that frequency of anti-toxocara antibody is 11.25% that is lower than that described by Sajjadi et al. [
8], with 25.6% in Shiraz (Iran), Aguiar-Santos et al. [10], with 39% in Brazil and Hayashi et al. [
13], with 84.6% in Indonesia. Although it is known that allergic, malignant and infectious diseases can cause an increase of eosinophils in peripheral blood, it is accepted that the most common cause of eosinophilia are parasitic infections. The parasitic diseases causing strong eosinophilia are schistosomiasis, flariasis, trichinosis, toxocariasis, and fasciolosis [
13-
16]. Furthermore, it is known that eosinophilia is very associated with toxocariasis in pediatric patients but there have been few studies about the relationship between toxocariasis and eosinophilia. On the other hand, the children with negative serology also presented a mild eosinophilia, which might be due to another tissue parasitic infection or an early toxocara infection without positive serology, a possible allergy (also frequent in pediatric patients) or other unknown causes. Since the presence of peripheral eosinophilia is one of the laboratory criteria for presumed toxocara infection [
17,
18], it should be stated that the present sample population had a greater chance of having anti toxocara antibodies. In this study there was no significant gender difference in toxocara antibody, that is consistent with Aguiar-Santos et al. and Sajjadi et al. and reports [
8,
10]. Our study presents no significant age difference in toxocara antibody frequency, that was consistent with Sajjadi et al. report, but differed from that of Santos who showed significant age difference. All previous reports described the highest seropositivity of toxocara in hypereosinophilic [
9-
11,
18,
19]. Although in our study the highest seropositivity was also found in hypereosinophilic, but statistically it is not significant, that was consistent with Sajjadi et al. [
8] report. In conclusion, the presence of eosinophilia and the risk factors evaluated in this population were frequently associated to human toxocariasis. Human toxocariasis is a parasitic zoonosis with a wide range of unspecific clinical characteristics that has up to the present received little attention by the health communities [
20]. Further studies will be required to ascertain the contribution of this parasitic disease to the overall morbidity of such populations.
Magnaval et al. reported that poor personal hygiene as well as consumption of raw vegetables grown in contaminated kitchen gardens may result in chronic low-dose infections [
3].
Many studies have shown that the risk factors are very important in the epidemiology of toxocariasis, mainly the presence of dogs and cats living together with the people. However, in this study, we have not found some relationship between playing with dogs or cats, in agreement with other reported studies [
21] but contradicting the findings by Chieffi et al. and Schantz et al., who have reported a higher frequency of infection in individuals who were in contact with dogs [
22,
23].
Hypereosinophilia, hyperleukocytosis, sometimes ESR and gammaglobulin elevation are biological changes commonly found in toxocariasis, most studies conducted on children [
24,
25].
The frequency of human toxocariasis found in the present study could be the result of various factors, but doubtless, the most important are the rural and social characteristics of the district of location with an extended area without paved streets and a deficient daily cleaning, with a medium percentage of population with unsatisfied basic needs and a high proportion of dogs living in the streets.