The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the biofilm formation by A. baumannii obtained from wound, Lumbar Puncture, bloodstream, and urinary tract infections, and the investigation of the bap, abaI, csuE, ompA, and blaPER-1genes involving in nosocomial infection pathogenesis in A. baumannii isolated from environment and patients in Imam Hossein hospital in Tehran, Iran.
In this study we evaluated the biofilm formation and its severity status with Congo Red Agar (MCRA) and Microtiter plate method. MCRA technique was easy to perform and of course due to less washing steps, its result was more reliable. Several washing steps in Microtiter plate method may result in distrust. This difference may be due to several factors such as multiple washing steps in Microtiter plate method.
Our results with MCR agar and Microtiter plate methods showed that the biofilm formation rate was low (10.8%) and biofilm formation was significantly more frequent in environmental (6 out of 22) samples than clinical (7 out of 98) ones (P = 0.014). Kumari et al. (
10) and Cevahir et al. (
1) studies showed that biofilm formation was abundant in their studied samples.
Formation biofilm ability and adhesiveness in
A. baumannii play a key role in the host pathogen interplay and in infections related with medical devices, involving a range of bacterial conditions, multiple environmental cues, and cell signals. Recently, adequately attention has been directed toward the correlation among the genetic factors involved in cohesion to eukaryotic cells and those signified in the initial step of biofilm production on abiotic surfaces (
5). According to the condition of biofilm formation, many of the gene products have already been demonstrated to play key roles in the adhesiveness and biofilm production of
A. baumannii on both biotic and abiotic surfaces. The biofilm-associated protein (
bap), expressed on the cell surface of bacteria, first reported by Loehfelm and et al. (2008) in
A. baumannii have a role in intercellular adhesion, thus, most probably biofilm maturity on distinct substrata (
4,
5,
13). Other proteins seem to play an important role in biofilm formation on surfaces, of these, the outer membrane protein;
ompA, the 38 kDa porin protein with pore size 1.3 nm, plays a major role in the attachment phase of an
A. baumannii on abiotic surfaces, and also in the pathogen interaction (
3,
5,
21).
Early studies on the
A. baumannii ATCC 19606 T strain reported that pili formation is intermediated by the
csuE, which is required for the first stages of bacterial adhesion on abiotic surfaces, resulting in biofilm formation and development (
5). The
A. baumannii M2 strain was demonstrated to produce an N-acyl-homoserine lactone (
abaI), which as a Quorum Sensing molecule is significant for the production of biofilm on abiotic surfaces (
5). The
blaPER-1is an extended-spectrum-lactamase, which was found in
Acinetobacter spp. and
P. aeruginosa biofilm formation was markedly reduced. In this bacterium, biofilm formation is enhanced by the presence and expression of the
blaPER-1gene. Other studies have been demonstrated that clinical isolates of MDR
A. baumannii had a high ability to produce biofilm and adherence to respiratory epithelial cells (
9,
22-
24).
Our results showed that the
csuE gene was 100% in all clinical and environmental isolates, which has also been shown in the previous studies (
25,
26). The most probable explanation for existence of the
csuE gene in all isolates is that all the isolates had pili. In this study 120 (100%) isolates have the
ompA gene and
abaI gene. We did not find a study based on quantitative assessment of clinical and environmental isolates related to the
ompA gene and
abaI gene. In this study 17 (14.2%) isolates were positive for the
bap gene, of them 10 (8.4%) clinical isolates and 7 (31.8%) belonged to the environmental isolates. Relationship between biofilm formation and the
bap gene was not statically significant. Our findings do not support the study of Goh et al. (
4), in which they showed that the
bap gene were very frequent in the studied isolates. One possible explanation for this discrepancy is that they studied on a smaller number of
A. baumannii, all from clinical sources with resistant to carbapenem. The frequency of the
blaPER-1gene varies based on different studies; i.e. Yong and et al. detected the
blaPER-1genein 54.6% Acinetobacters in Korea, often in the patient sputum of intensive care unit (ICU) (
27). Lee et al. showed the
blaPER-1in all multidrug-resistant (MDR) clinical isolates of
A. baumannii (
28).
We found 13.3% studied isolates were positive for the blaPER-1gene. According to the results of the study, biofilm formation in environmental A. baumannii isolates was more than clinical isolates. One possible explanation for the betterment in the environmental isolates might be attributed to the increased gene exchanges between environmental A. baumannii isolates. Importantly our study revealed that the MCRA technique is significantly better than the Microtiter plate method for evaluation phenotypic biofilm formation.
Overall, the abaI, csuE, and ompA genes were detected in all isolates regardless the biofilm status, while the bap and blaPER-1genes was found in some of the A. baumannii isolates from patients and environmental; therefore, in the studied isolates, no relationship between biofilm formation and the presence of interested genes was found. For better understanding of the relationship among biofilms status and related genes in A. baumannii pathogenesis, further studies considering all other virulence markers genes in both genomic and proteomic level are recommended.
4.1. Conclusions
The Congo red agar method was better than the Microtiter plate technique for phenotypic evaluation of biofilm formation in the A.baumannii. According to the current study, the abaI, csuE, and ompA genes were detected in all isolates while the bap and blaPER-1genes was more frequent in clinical samples. No correlation was found among biofilm production severity and genes status. More studies are recommended for detection of biofilm related genes role on the host - pathogen interaction.