Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen and one of the most important causes of infection in burn patients that followed by
Staphylococcus aureus and
Acinetobacter baumannii (
13).
Pseudomonas aeruginosa acquired antibiotic resistance; so, we need new methods of treatment to decrease the probability of drug resistance. MBL producer
P aeruginosa in burn patients is the main reasons for increasing mortality and morbidity rates. In the two last decades,
P aeruginosa was the most dominant bacteria in burn patients in Tehran, Iran (
14). All of the
P. aeruginosa strains in our study have resistance against almost all antibacterial agents. The MBL-producing
P aeruginosa strains were resistant to amikacin, ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, tobramycin, imipenem, meropenem, ceftriaxone, carbenicillin, piperacillin/tazobactam and cefepime. Also, 49% of the isolates were resistant to gentamycin.
P aeruginosa have some mechanisms that can cause drug resistance such as enzyme mechanism and Efflux pump iron which have the ability to develop resistance to antibacterial agents (
15). We have a high rate of MBLs in our study in comparison to some studies in other parts of the world, the study in Spain showed that just 6.9% of isolates were MBL producer (
16), in India MBL producer were 33% (
17), but the rate of MBL producer was lower in our study, maybe because of treatment policy such as antibiotics that prescribed and hospitalization condition. The most reported, as well as in Iran indicated that the prevalence of VIM beta-lactamase is more than IMP (
18,
19) but in our study IMP was the most dominant MBL that is in concordance with other studies. In our study, 6 isolates were positive for bla (IMP) gene. Some other genes probably can cause resistance such as GIM, KHM, SIM, AIM, SPM, NDM and FIM (
20-
22). The mortality rate of infection due to MBL-producer
P aeruginosa in Spain was 27% (
23), in Brazil was 82.6% (
24) and in our study was 8.3%. Also, VIM-2 can cause drug resistance; the existence of this gene in
P. aeruginosa was reported in France for the first time (
25). In our study, the antibacterial effect of,
Z. multiflora plants and
M. communis,
Chamomile,
Ziziphus leaves were tested against MBL-producer
P. aeruginosa. We conclude that
Myrtus communis extracts had a beneficial antibacterial effect against regular and IMP-producing
P. aeruginosa strains. Kang et al. used ethanolic extracts of
M. communis and inhibitory growth of
P. aeruginosa was observed (
26). Akin et al. concluded that
M. communis essential oil was not a good inhibitor for
P. aeruginosa; however, we found
M. communis as a good inhibitor in our study (
27). Owlia et al. has shown that
M. communis had an antibacterial effect on this isolates, but Chamomilla essential oils were effortless on
Pseudomonas aeruginosa that is in contrast to our study (
28). Hashemi et al. reported that the inhibitory effect of
Z. multiflora on
P. aeruginosa isolated from burn patients are more than
Peganum harmala and
M. communis (
29). In the same study to our research Al-Saimary et al. in 2001 in Iraq found that the aqueous extracts of
M. communis and Eucalyptus leaves had a good effect on
P aeruginosa that isolated from burned patients (
30). Bokaeian et al. in 2014 suggested that
M. communis leaves are powerful bactericidal and effective against
P. aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumonia (
31). Carvalho et al. reported that ethanolic extract of Chamomile had a beneficial antibacterial effect against
P. aeruginosa and no effect against
S. aureus,
E. coli,
Salmonella enterica subsp.
enterica sorovar Typhimurium (
32).