The antimicrobial resistance of
H. pylori strains found in different geographical regions is the direct reflection of their genetic background and the antibiotic therapy commonly used in that region. In this study, the relative abundance of
H. pylori strains resistant to metronidazole and clarithromycin was significantly higher in those who had active ulcers than in those who did not have ulcers. Wolle et al. reported a similar observation concerning metronidazole-resistant strains (
13). In contrast, investigators in China and Taiwan reported almost opposite results (
14,
15). The relative usage of metronidazole for parasitic and anaerobic infections may be the reason for the discrepancies. The higher resistance levels toward clarithromycin in the older population can be indicative of earlier treatment failures in chronic infections with subsequent appearance of highly resistant phenotypes. This theory was experimentally proven by Olokoba et al. (
16). The extent of metronidazole resistance was detected to be 76% in the current study that was associated with more severe clinical complications; however, in other recent investigations in Iran, this rate was reported from 33% to 78.6% (
9). However, in a previous study, no statistically meaningful relationship was found between metronidazole resistance and clinical findings (
17). This rate was claimed to be 80% to 100% in Africa and 50% to 95% in Asia (
18). The prevalence of
H. pylori resistance to metronidazole ranges from 20% to 40% in Europe and the USA, with one exception in Northern Italy (
19). Additionally, previous studies found no meaningful correlation between metronidazole resistance and patient's sex and age, which was similar to our results. Saracino et al. reported almost similar observations in Italy (
20). However, in a single study from India, higher metronidazole resistance rates were reported in women in comparison with male patients (
21). The metronidazole MIC in our study was in the range of 4 µg to 64 µg, which was higher than that detected in a European survey performed by Megraud et al. with MIC of 0.05 µg to 32 µg (
22), but lower than that reported by An et al. in Korea with 0.08 µg to 512 µg (
23). The rate of clarithromycin-resistant strains in this study was found to be 49.1% while other recent investigators in Iran have reported the average range of 22.4% (
9). Studies from the USA, Asia, and Europe reported clarithromycin resistance in 29.3%, 18.9%, and 11.1% of the strains, respectively (
18). In this study, there was a meaningful correlation between clarithromycin resistance rate and the existence of active ulcers. This correlation was not confirmed in a similar study by Khademi et al. (
24). The clarithromycin MICs for the strains isolated in Iran were in the range of 0.016 µg to 256 µg (
25). These values are apparently lower than those reported in other countries. Megraud et al. in Europe reported the MICs in the range of 0.05 µg to 128 µg (
22). However, the rates in Asian countries were reported to be 0.03 µg to 256 µg (
26). In this study, we did not detect any correlation between clarithromycin resistance and patient sex; however, there was a correlation with age. A similar correlation was reported by Ji et al. in China (
27). Lower clarithromycin resistance rates in females and peptic ulcer patients compared to males and those who had non-ulcer disease were also reported by De Francesco et al. in Italy (
18). The higher prevalence of clarithromycin-resistant strains among those with acute ulcer and metaplasia in our study points to the clinical significance of these strains. Such correlation was not detected in a study by Bai et al. in China (
28). Regarding resistance towards ciprofloxacin, the rate observed in this study was 45%; however, other studies from Iran reported it in the range of 2.4% to 65% (
9). The resistance rate in our study was much higher than those reported from Europe (7% - 33.9%) and lower than those from Asia (2.6% - 57%) (
29). Even though the rates of ciprofloxacin resistance among patients with gastritis and duodenal ulcers were 24.1% and 20%, respectively, there was no meaningful correlation between resistance rates and clinical parameters (
17). Additionally, just like the present study, Llanes et al. in Cuba and Shokrzadeh et al. in Iran found no correlation between ciprofloxacin resistance and patients’ gender (
30,
31). Lower rates of ciprofloxacin resistance among 60 - 75-year-old patients might be due to the lower rate of ciprofloxacin consumption among these people compared to younger patients. The correlation between patients’ age and antibiotic resistance rate has previously been shown for metronidazole by Boyanova et al. (
32). They proposed that co-infection with urinary tract infections or respiratory diseases can be considered a risk factor for colonization with ciprofloxacin-resistant strains of
H. pylori.