Although brucellosis is controlled in many developed countries, it remains a major problem for the health system in developing countries including the Mediterranean and the Middle East countries (
4). In our study, 39% of the patients were female and 61% were male and the mean age was 41.6 ± 16.9; this study was similar to other studies in terms of age and gender of brucellosis patients (
4-
6).
Non-localized brucellosis was detected in 79.4% of patients in our study, while others were complicated with spondylitis, epididymo-orchitis, sacroiliitis, meningoencephalitis, osteomyelitis, arthritis, hepatitis, thrombophlebitis of the lower extremities, and endocarditis. In Roshan et al.’s study in 2004 in Babol, 31% of cases had a localized brucellosis (
7). In a study by Najafi et al. in 2003 (
8), about 8.7% of patients were complicated with epididymo orchitis while in this study, 3.2% of cases had this problem.
In our survey, 70% of patients were anemic. In addition, leukopenia and leukocytosis, each in 13%, thrombocytopenia in 4.1%, abnormal ESR in 56%, abnormal AST in 22%, abnormal ALT in 16%, and abnormal ALP in 88% of cases were observed. Various studies have presented different values. In a study by Karaman et al. in Turkey, anemia, leukopenia, and were reported in 28.6%, 13.9%, and 16% patients, respectively (
9). Davoudi et al. reported a case of DVT in a 15-year-old boy with acute pain and swelling in his left thigh in June 2011, as a rare complication of Brucellosis (
10). In a study by Fanni et al. in Tehran, anemia as 53%, leucopenia as 33%, and thrombocytopenia as 12% were reported (
11). In an analysis conducted by Roushan et al. in Northern Iran, anemia in 15.1%, leucopenia in 3%, and abnormal ESR in 77.8% of patients were reported (
7). In a study by Guler et al. in Turkey, leukopenia as 21.4%, anemia as 70%, thrombocytopenia as 23%, and pancytopenia were reported (
12).
In our study, 23% of cases had jobs involving direct contact with animals and 87.2% had used local dairy products. Therefore, most of our patients had occupational exposure. In a study by Haddadi et al. in Tehran, 17.1% of patients had occupational exposure to livestock (
13). In other studies, occupational exposure has been reported in 58.7%, 71%, 27%, and 32% of cases (
7,
14). Therefore, although occupation is considered a risk factor, the disease is not necessarily transmitted occupationally in developing countries. However, the high percentage of using local dairy products both in our study and in other studies (
15) suggests that the main route of transmission still remains the consumption of contaminated dairy products.
Most inflicted cases were observed in the spring and summer. Considering the spring and summer are the calving seasons with highest milk production in the cattle, the dairy production and contact with animals increase in this period. Thus, most of the cases were observed in the spring and summer. This is consistent with the findings of many previous studies (
16,
17).
Most clinical signs and symptoms included chills, fever, loss of appetite, and sweating. In addition, the most common chief complaints included fever, chills, backache, and myalgia. In a 10-year clinical study on brucellosis patients in Macedonia, the most frequently observed symptoms were arthralgia, fever, and sweating and the most common signs were fever and hepatomegaly (
18). In the Roushan’s study, the most common complaints were fever and arthralgia (
7).
For serological diagnosis of human brucellosis, Rose Bengal, Wright’s Sero-agglutination, 2-ME, and antiglobulin Coombs tests are done as standard methods. Most patients with acute infection respond to all tests (
19). In a study by Najafi et al. titled “Comparing the Serological Diagnostic value of ELISA and Wright tests in human brucellosis with positive PCR,” a clinical and laboratory study was conducted on 59 patients suspected of brucellosis, the Wright test compared to ELISA had higher sensitivity, lower specificity, approximately equal positive predictive value, higher negative predictive value, and generally higher accuracy (
20).
4.1. Conclusions and Recommendations
Clinical symptoms and laboratory parameters in our study included fever, chills, back pain, myalgia, anemia, and abnormal ESR. Our study showed that although occupation is considered a risk factor for brucellosis, the disease is not necessarily transmitted occupationally. The consumption of contaminated dairy products is still the main route of transmission of brucellosis. It is recommended to detect brucellosis by using standard laboratory techniques and regarding clinical and epidemiologic information.