Recently,
P. aeruginosa was identified as the most common pathogen among burn and CF patients who were admitted to hospitals in Tehran, Iran. These opportunistic bacteria can be found in ICU, NICU and other hospital wards. In this study the results of AST showed that the rate of resistance to the tested antibiotics was higher among burn patients than CF patients (
Figure 1).
A. Kanayama et al. conducted a study from Jan 2013 to 2014 in Takatsuki, Japan. They determined that
P. aeruginosa isolates from different clinical specimens were resistant to imipenem, gentamycin, amikacin, ciprofloxacin, and ceftazidime (minimum inhibitory concentration 4 - 32 µg/mL), and they were susceptible to aztreonam. Similarly, in a recent study, AST was done with similar selected antibiotics based on CLSI 2016. The highest resistance rate was related to gentamycin, ceftazidime, and imipenem in burn patients and to amikacin and cefepime in CF patients (
2).
In a 2004 - 2015 study in Latin America, among 3613
P. aeruginosa isolates, the highest susceptibility (72.8%) was seen to amikacin, and 56.8% of the isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime (
24). In the current study, however, high levels of resistance were seen to amikacin in burn and CF patients (83.8% and 53.65%, respectively), and it was not a qualified choice for treatment, at least in Iran.
In a study by Hakemi Vala et al. during 2014 in Tehran, Iran,
P. aeruginosa isolates from burn patients showed the highest rate of resistance to aztreonam, ceftriaxone, and cefotaxim (82.98%) and to gentamycin, ceftazidime, and piperacillin (95.1%). Such difference is related to the increased use and/or prescription of antibiotics. Also, the other ESBL genes such as
blaDIM, SPM, GIM, NDM, VIM, BIC, CTX-M-15 and
blaOXA-48 were determined in this study that the frequency of
blaIMP was 2.1% (
3).
In the 2017 study conducted by Hashem et al. in Ismailia, Egypt, only one (4%) isolate of 147 isolates of
P. aeruginosa from different sources had
blaIMP, but in the current study, the frequency of this gene was higher among burn patients (25%) (
25).
In the study of Kanayama et al. the multiplex PCR results revealed that all isolates had the GES-type β-lactamase gene; in a recent study, however, 13.75% of
P. aeruginosa isolates from burn patients had the
blaGES gene, but it was not detected in any of the
P. aeruginosa isolates from CF patients (
2). These differences can be caused by variations in geographical area or the diversity in both countries’ health systems.
Akhi et al. conducted an experiment from July 2008 - 2009 in Tabriz, Iran. Among 56 isolates investigated in their study, 27.5% had the
blaPER-1 gene. In the current study, 27.5% (burn patients) and 12.19% (CF patients) of
P. aeruginosa isolates contained the
blaPER-1 gene. Despite the difference in time, the frequency of this gene has not changed among
P. aeruginosa isolates from burn patients. However, CF patients are usually young, and the bacterial isolates from such patients had less resistance because of less antibiotic contact during the patient’s life (
26). Thus, a low antibiotic resistance rate among CF patients is predictable.
In their 2012 - 2013 study in Zahedan, Iran, Bokaeian et al. indicated that among 116
P. aeruginosa isolates from different specimens, 13.3% had
blaVEB-1. In the current study, however, 55% and 2.43% of
P. aeruginosa isolates from burn and CF patients, respectively, showed this gene (
27). The reason for the diversity in the results may be explained by not only the difference in the time frame in which these studies were performed, but also by the wide range of patients who referred to Motahari Hospital in Tehran as a reference burn hospital compared to those who referred to the local hospital in Zahedan.
In the study by Moskowitz et al., in 3 alleles, only in a single base (equal to 1-bp) as a transition or transverse mutation was detected. In addition, 6 alleles showed double mutations in 2 missense mutations in the same PmrB molecule. Deletion of a 3-bp fragment including Asp was deleted in locus 45 of
pmrB gene. In accordance with the recent study by Moskowitz et al., different mutations were detected in the
pmrB gene. However, the similarity between the mutated loci was not confirmed. Moreover, no mutation in the
PmrA gene was detected in the recent study among CF patients similar with the Moskowitz et al.’s study (
15).
In a 2016 study by Thi Khanh Nhu et al. published in Nature Journal, the PmrAB two component system is recommended as a first genetic mechanism of colistin resistance, pursuant to the results of the current study and other experiments, different mutations can occur in the
pmrA and
pmrB genes which cause resistance to colistin (
28).
In the 2009 study by Barrow and Kwon, after comparing resistant isolates with the PAO1 standard strain, the results revealed that nucleotide substitutions in the
PmrB gene were related to two amino acid changes (Ala 247 to Thr and Tyr 345 to His) for the sequence in one of their clinical isolates which showed polymyxin B resistance. They demonstrated that polymyxin B resistance is generally caused by mutations in PhoQ or PmrB (
29). In the current study, the
pmrB gene showed different amino acid changes as follows: (Ala 1000 to Gly, Gly 1098 to Ala, Ala 1230 to Gly, and Cys 1341 to Gly) in burn patients and (Arg 366 to Gly, Thr 368 to Gly, and Pro 369 to Arg) in CF patients. Also, in a 2012 case report by Lee et al. in
P. aeruginosa isolates with a urine source, 3 amino acid substitutions were identified in the pmrB gene (Ala 247 to Thr, Met 292 to Thr, and Tyr 345 to His) (
30).
Such variations between the results of the above-mentioned studies and the recent study may be due to differences in the type of antibiotics prescribed, the source of bacterial isolation, or the time difference among their experiment and that of the recent study.
Based on the AST results in the current study, all the P. aeruginosa isolates in burn patients were susceptible to colistin (polymyxin E), but after molecular tests and sequence analysis, the results showed different mutations which represented colistin resistance in these isolates.
The
mcr-1 gene as a plasmid mediated gene has been detected mostly in
Escherichia coli, but has also been found in Salmonella spp. and
Klebsiella pneumonia (
31). According to the 2018 study by MacNair et al. which was published in Nature Journal, the
mcr-1 gene causes resistance to colistin (
32). To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first of its kind to examine
P. aeruginosa isolates for the
mcr-1 gene. However, all of the
P. aeruginosa isolates were negative for the
mcr-1 gene, which indicates that this gene is not common in
P. aeruginosa isolates in this geographic region.
Based on Thi Khanh Nhu’s paper, different mutations in
pmrAB genes are related to colistin resistance in bacterial isolates (
28). Hopefully, by the low frequency of mcr-1 gene and the rate of mutation in
pmrAB genes in this study, the rate of resistance to colistin is low here. In conclusion, it can keep low with caution prescription to polymixins.
These finding help to physicians that mcr-1 and pmrAB mutations are not common in P. aeruginosa which indicates that resistance to colistin has not been established yet. So they can control it by correct drug prescription. It is recommended that in clinical laboratories after phenotypic diagnoses, molecular tests such as PCR be used to confirm the results. Molecular tests help physicians be more confident in administering the most effective antibiotic. Unfortunately, most of the laboratories and physicians are not familiar with ESBLs and the standard protocols of detection. Also, patients should desist from using antibiotics arbitrarily and complete their treatment courses. Therefore, the management and treatment strategies should be revised. Due to the importance of the MLST (multi locus sequence typing) or PFGE (pulsed field gel electrophoresis) techniques for determining of the clonality of strains, typing of recent isolates is our future plan.