Time-loss injury is generally defined as any physical complaint sustained during training or competition that results in a player being unable to take full part in future football activity (training or match), the severity of such an injury being related to the number of days until return to play (
9). In our study, we defined time-loss injury with regard to the player’s inability to take part in the next official match or matches. Some might argue with our definition since it does not concur with the scientifically accepted consensus statement and impairs any comparison with other epidemiological studies conducted among players from other continents. Nevertheless, we strongly believe that our definition is in line with the thoughts of both players and trainers: in professional football, missing an official match is the only matter of interest for players or trainers, even if training sessions during the preparation of such a match were missed.
As a result of the CBA between the PFA and FFA, ‘Minimum Medical Standards’ was implemented prior to the start of the 2011 - 2012 season in order to reduce the occurrence of time-loss injuries and related missed matches (
8). This measure was observed to be beneficial since the number of missed matches fell (statistically significant) from 2010 - 2011 to 2012 - 2013. By contrast, such a measure did not lead to a statistically significant decrease in number of injuries. A potential explanation could be the definition of injury used in our study. A particular observation in our study is especially the increase in the number of groin injuries through the years despite the introduction of “minimum medical standards”. Although this is difficult to interpret, the increased physical burden related to strength and speed on the players might be a potential reason for the tendency observed as groin injuries occur especially as a consequence of successive accelerations, decelerations and sudden changes of direction. Our findings suggest also that the introduction of, among other things, an appropriate medical testing and the mandatory presence of club physicians and physiotherapists has significantly improved the overall medical counseling in the A-League. Of course, regular assessment of whether the “minimum medical standards” concur with the actual evidence-based medical knowledge is required. Additionally, an important step that should be taken is to monitor the application of the “minimum medical standards” in order to preserve a high consistency in medical counseling from one club to another in the A-League. By contrast, a study in Dutch professional football showed that the medical examinations are diverse in nature and not consistent from one club to another, being difficult to explain why employees from the same occupational category are assessed differently from one club to another (
11).
Both world players’ Union (FIFPro) and the PFA strive to convince all key stakeholders to implement the rights of the world’s professional football players as workers. When it comes to the health and safety of the players, the expectation is that regulations should be in line with the world health organization and international labour organization, which state that “protection, promotion, surveillance and maintenance of the highest degree of physical, mental and social well-being of workers in all occupations long after they enter their retirement years” is a labour right and a fundamental human right that should be facilitated by social partners and stakeholders (
12). Despite this statement, studies have shown that the current medical health care and support in professional football has been exclusively directed towards physical problems (musculoskeletal injuries) occurring during a career (
11,
13,
14). Current and former Dutch professional football players, as well as their club physicians, recently acknowledged the lack of any information and support related to mental and psychosocial health problems, while former English players found the provision of medical care in professional football inadequate (
13,
14). Additionally, information and support related to long-term health problems occurring after retirement from professional football remains unavailable (
13). Consequently, any health and safety regulation for professional footballers, such as the ‘Minimum Medical Standards’ in Australia, should also focus attention on the medical care and support related to mental and social health problems, as well as the long-term consequences such as osteoarthritis (
15-
17).
The introduction of ‘Minimum Medical Standards’ in the A-League had a favorable effect on the number of total, hamstring, knee and ankle injuries and on the number of matches missed due to these injuries, but not on the number of groin injuries. With regard to the findings of this study, further studies should be conducted in order to explore whether the “minimum medical standards” still concur with actual evidence-based medical knowledge, which might lead to potential alterations and improvements. In addition, medical support related to mental illness and adverse long-term health effects should be developed and implemented.