Chronic Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura is an autoimmune disease characterized by low platelet count, due to destruction and impairment in the production of platelets mediated by auto-antibodies (
1-
3). In addition to the autoimmune phenomena, infectious agents such as
H. pylori are involved in the pathogenesis of CITP, yet the exact role of these agents remains controversial (
2-
5). This study hypothesized that in HP infected chronic ITP patients,
H. pylori eradication therapy may be associated with platelet recovery. The results of this study partly confirmed this theory since from ten HP infected patients (43.5%), HP was eradicated in eight (80%) and two (20%) were non-responder. We also found a significant increase in platelet count of eight patients during six months of follow-up (P < 0.001) compared with the baseline platelet count. This finding was consistent with the findings of other studies (
11,
12). In the study of Ferrara et al. (
11) on 24 patients with CITP, eight individuals (33.3%) were infected with
H. pylori and eradication treatment was successfully achieved in six out of eight patients with significant increases in platelet count in all six cases. Our findings as well as that of Ferrara et al. (
11) highlight the effect of
H. pylori infection on platelet count in CITP as a basic cause or exacerbation factor. Another study by Sato et al. in Japan was performed on 53 patients with CITP (
12). In this study prevalence of
H. pylori infection among CITP patients was 73% (39 patients); eradication of HP in 32 cases led to suitable response in 27 patients (
12). Although the above articles are in line with our study, some reports did not show any platelet recovery in the
H. pylori treatment group compared to the control group (
13,
14). The findings of these studies that were not consistent with our findings, suggest that eradication of co-existing
H. pylori infection is not associated with platelet recovery in childhood chronic ITP (
13,
14). More research with more subjects and long-term follow up in different geographical regions is highly recommended. Although a considerable number of studies were conducted investigating the effect of
H. pylori infection treatment on platelet count in CITP patients yet the effect of ethnicity on treatment should always be considered when comparing the results of different studies. This study was performed on Iranian patients, which obviously have their own genetic properties that can affect treatment results. Prevalence of
H. pylori infection in our study was 43.5%. Previous studies on patients with CITP have demonstrated a different prevalence rate of
H. pylori infection among different countries: 74% in Japan (
12), 12.9% in Iran (
15), 20% in another study from Japan (
16) and no cases in Finland (
17). This variation in prevalence rates among subjects might be due to differences in acquisition of
H. pylori infection in the general population in different countries; as repots are higher in low socioeconomic countries compared to developed countries.
There was no significant change in platelet count in our uninfected patients who had not received HP eradication therapy (P = 0.98). Six out of eight patients (75%) achieved a good response that was demonstrated by the considerable and statistically significant increase in platelet counts after eradication therapy compared with baseline platelet counts (P < 0.001). We also observed 2.8 patients (25%) with partial response after treatment. This finding is similar to the study of Tag et al. Their study performed in Korea during 2009 revealed that from 23 patients with
H. pylori infection, 11 (44%) exhibited a complete response (CR) to
H. pylori eradication therapy, six (24%) partial response (PR), and eight (32%) were nonresponsive (NR) (
7). Russo et al. (
8) in Italy in 2010 also described the efficacy of
H. pylori eradication in increasing platelet count in CITP patients. Their study was done on 244 CITP patients and revealed that from 50 (20%) patients with
H.pylori infection, 37 received eradication therapy and were completely followed-up for six months. In 89% of these cases, eradication therapy was successful and platelet recovery was demonstrated in 39% of patients after eradication (
8). In the present study responders who were defined as patients with successful treatment of
H. pylori showed a significant platelet recovery within six months after the eradication therapy. Although longer follow up duration of platelet count was better for good judgment, yet it seems that six months of monitoring was adequate to find the association. According to the results of this study and other similar studies,
H. pylori infection should be considered as a potential cause or an aggravating factor of thrombocytopenia in chronic ITP; eradication therapy in positive cases of
H. pylori might have a beneficial effect on platelet recovery. However, a larger scale of randomized controlled trials is required for confirming our findings.