Osteoclastoma-like giant cell tumor of the liver is an extremely rare tumor in the liver so that only 5 cases have been reported in the English literature since 1980.
Table 1 shows the characteristics of the above-mentioned 5 cases. The first case was reported by Munoz in 1980 (
1). All of the reported patients including ours were older than 50 years. It does not seem to have any sex preferences, and it is equally distributed in females and males. All of the previously reported cases, except two, have been in the liver with no underlying disease. The first reported case in 1980 by Munoz was observed in a patient with alcoholic cirrhosis who presented symptoms of portal hypertension (
1). The other case autopsied and reported by Zhang was also a cirrhotic patient with no definite cause (
5).
The most common presenting symptom has been abdominal pain; however, as the table shows, one case was incidentally detected (
4).
In all non-cirrhotic cases, liver function tests and tumor markers have been in normal range and therefore, seem to have no diagnostic value (
1-
5).
All of the reported tumors have been hemorrhagic, which has been misdiagnosed as angiosarcoma before pathologic diagnosis (
2).
Microscopic examination has been the same in all the 6 cases including osteoclast-like giant cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and a variable number of nuclei, mixed with malignant pleomorphic mononuclear cells and hemorrhagic background. The most important point in histopathology of this tumor is the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma rich in osteoclast like giant cells, which shows positive epithelial markers instead of mesenchymal (
6). These tumors, which have most commonly been reported in pancreas, sometimes have typical areas of carcinoma (
7).
All of the previously reported cases of osteoclastoma-like giant cell tumor of the liver expired shortly after surgery, indicating that the disease has a very poor prognosis.