1. Context
2. Objectives
3. Data Sources
4. Study Selection
4.1. Inclusion Criteria
4.2. Definitions
5. Data Extraction
5.1. Statistical Analysis
6. Results
6.1. Literature Retrieval and Literature Quality Evaluation
| Study ID | Country | Ethnicity | SNP | Control | Case | Gender, Male (%, Control/Case) | Age (Control/Case) | Method | NOS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Su, Z. (2014) (9) | Southwestern China | Han | rs4646287 rs7154439 | 352 | 581 | 54.8/70.4 | (50 ± 12)/(47 ± 13)a | TD PCR | 6 |
| Peng, L. (2015) (8) | Southern China | Han | rs2296651 | 90 | 99 | NA | NA | Sanger | 7 |
| Chen, X. (2016) (10) | Central China | Han | rs7154439 | 713 | 1023 | 60.1/64.1 | 37.3[2 - 82]/36.2[3 - 81]b | TaqMan | 7 |
| Su, Z. (2016) (7) | Western China | Tibetans | rs2296651 rs4646287 rs7154439 | 432 | 439 | 53.9/67.4 | 40[33, 55]/39[30, 49]c | TD PCR | 6 |
| Uygurs | 234 | 197 | 59.8/61.9 | 48[39, 58]/29[23, 42]c | |||||
| Wu, W. (2017) (11) | Southern China | Han | rs2296651 rs7154439 | 595 | 586 | 65.0/73.7 | (45.53 ± 11.95)/(45.68 ± 11.53)a | iMLDR | 8 |
| Zhang, Y. (2017) (13) | Southeastern China | Han | rs2296651 rs4646287 rs7154439 | 2116 | 2535 | 74.1/73.1 | (41.3 ± 13.8)/(41.2 ± 12.1)a | Mass Array | 7 |
| Su, M. (2017) (12) | Southern China | Han | rs2296651 rs4646287 | 199 | 305 | 47.2/70.8 | (45.4 ± 11.3)/(42.2 ± 13.9)a | iMLDR | 6 |
| Cheng, X. (2019) (14) | Central China | Han | rs2296651 | 1463 | 1390 | 41.2/39.7 | (40.4 ± 13.9)/(39.5 ± 14.3)a | TaqMan | 7 |
| Chuaypen, N. (2019) (15) | Thailand | Thai | rs2296651 rs4646287 | 206 | 610 | 66.5/69.7 | (51.3 ± 5.9)/(52.6 ± 12.2)a | TaqMan | 7 |
Abbreviations: iMLDR, improved multiplex ligation detection reaction; NA, not available; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa scale; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; TD PCR, touchdown polymerase chain reaction.
aValues are expressed as mean ± SD.
bValues are expressed as mean (range).
cValues are expressed as median (interquartile range).
6.2. Association Between the rs2296651 Polymorphism and Spontaneous Clearance of HBV
| SNP | Number of Studies | Genetic Model | P Value | OR (95%CI) | I2 (%) | Q-test | Egger’s P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs2296651 | 7 | Dominant | GG vs. GA+AA | 0.010a | 0.73 (0.58, 0.93) | 51.1 | 0.046 | 0.277 |
| Codominant | GG vs. GA | 0.008a | 0.74 (0.59, 0.93) | 45.2 | 0.078 | 0.216 | ||
| Allele | G vs. A allele | 0.014a | 0.74 (0.58, 0.94) | 56.0 | 0.026 | 0.332 | ||
| rs4646287 | 5 | Dominant | GG vs. GA+AA | 0.150 | 1.10 (0.97, 1.24) | 0.0 | 0.420 | 0.849 |
| Recessive | GG+GA vs. AA | 0.332 | 1.26 (0.79, 2.02) | 14.1 | 0.324 | 0.862 | ||
| Codominant1 | GG vs. AA | 0.304 | 1.28 (0.80, 2.05) | 14.1 | 0.325 | 0.874 | ||
| Codominant2 | GA vs. AA | 0.530 | 1.17 (0.72, 1.89) | 17.0 | 0.304 | 0.755 | ||
| Codominant3 | GG vs. GA | 0.206 | 1.09 (0.96, 1.24) | 0.0 | 0.810 | 0.239 | ||
| Allele | G vs. A allele | 0.116 | 1.10 (0.98, 1.23) | 0.0 | 0.765 | 0.719 | ||
| rs7154439 | 5 | Dominant | GG vs. GA+AA | 0.323 | 1.04 (0.96, 1.14) | 0.0 | 0.940 | 0.795 |
| Recessive | GG+GA vs. AA | 0.109 | 0.72 (0.48, 1.07) | 60.3 | 0.028 | 0.076 | ||
| Codominant1 | GG vs. AA | 0.136 | 0.75 (0.51, 1.10) | 57.1 | 0.040 | 0.080 | ||
| Codominant2 | GA vs. AA | 0.069 | 0.67 (0.43, 1.03) | 63.9 | 0.016 | 0.066 | ||
| Codominant3 | GG vs. GA | 0.134 | 1.07 (0.98, 1.17) | 0.0 | 0.774 | 0.140 | ||
| Allele | G vs. A allele | 0.739 | 1.01 (0.94, 1.09) | 0.0 | 0.718 | 0.293 |
Abbreviation: SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.
aP < 0.05.
The forest plots for subgroup analysis of the association between rs2296651 polymorphism and spontaneous clearance of HBV. A, B and C, represent the dominant (GG vs. GA+AA), codominant (GG vs. GA) and allele genetic model (G vs. A), respectively. Odds ratios and respective 95% confidence intervals for the different studies included were shown.
6.3. Association Between the rs4646287 Polymorphism and Spontaneous Clearance of HBV
6.4. Association Between the rs7154439 Polymorphism and Spontaneous Clearance of HBV
The forest plots for subgroup analysis of the association between rs7154439 polymorphism and spontaneous clearance of HBV. A, B and C, represent the recessive (GG+GA vs. AA), codominant1 (GG vs. AA) and codominant2 (GA vs. AA), respectively. Odds ratios and respective 95% confidence intervals for the different studies included were shown.



