The findings of this qualitative study indicate that logotherapy can positively influence hope and psychological well-being in women with breast cancer by acting through key dimensions such as psychological/internal factors, psycho physiological responses, and social support. These impacts manifested as enhanced emotional resilience, more adaptive coping strategies, improved subjective perceptions of physical health, and strengthened social connections. However, the results also suggest that hope and well-being are embedded in a broader network of interrelated factors, including medical treatment, lifestyle habits, and healthcare system support. Accordingly, achieving sustained improvements in psychological health and quality of life likely requires multifaceted and ongoing interventions beyond logotherapy alone.
5.1. Psychological/Internal Factors
The findings of this study suggest that fostering a sense of meaning and purpose in life plays a central role in enhancing hope and psychological resilience among women with breast cancer. Meaning-centered interventions such as logotherapy have been shown in previous quantitative research to improve psychological indicators, including hope and adaptive coping capacities, often measured through validated tools like Snyder’s Hope Scale and various resilience scales.
For instance, earlier quasi-experimental studies have reported statistically significant increases in hope scores following group logotherapy (e.g., F = 11.24, P ≤ 0.001) (
17), as well as large effect sizes indicating reduced death anxiety and increased goal-directed thinking (e.g., F = 30.78, P ≤ 0.001) (
16). It is important to note that these statistical results are drawn from prior studies and are presented here for contextualization; the current research employed a qualitative approach and, therefore, does not produce numerical outcomes. Nevertheless, the experiential themes identified in this study, such as enhanced emotional stability, a renewed sense of purpose, and the reframing of illness as an opportunity for growth, are conceptually aligned with those quantitative findings.
The findings of this study underscore the pivotal role of fostering a sense of meaning and purpose in life in enhancing hope and psychological resilience among women with breast cancer. Consistent with Frankl’s logotherapy framework, which posits that the search for meaning is a fundamental human drive, meaning-centered interventions have been empirically linked to improvements in key psychological indicators such as hope and adaptive coping.
Theoretically, logotherapy’s focus on meaning-making in the midst of suffering aligns with broader existential and psychological frameworks linking existential meaning to decreased distress and more effective coping strategies (
22,
23). In our interviews, many participants described how reconceptualizing their cancer experience — not simply as an affliction but as an opportunity for personal growth and meaning — enabled them to maintain hope in the face of uncertainty and fear. This psychological adaptation reflects the core of Frankl’s theory, demonstrating that individuals’ capacity to find meaning in adversity fosters resilience and sustains their motivation to persevere.
5.2. Psycho-physiological Effects
Although this qualitative study did not directly assess biomarkers or physiological outcomes, participants’ narratives — together with insights from existing research — suggest credible psycho-physiological pathways through which logotherapy may promote psychological well-being and indirectly influence physical health.
At the heart of these pathways lies the role of meaning-making in regulating psychological stress. According to Frankl’s logotherapy, the human capacity to find meaning in suffering is not only central to psychological endurance but also transformative in how individuals relate to adversity. Participants in this study described how reframing their cancer experience through a meaning-oriented perspective enabled them to maintain emotional resilience, reduce existential anxiety, and reclaim a sense of purpose — all psychological resources that are known to mitigate the harmful physiological effects of chronic stress (
24).
From a psychophysiological standpoint, sustained psychological distress is associated with dysregulation of the immune and endocrine systems. Although direct studies on the biological effects of logotherapy remain limited, prior research on psychosocial interventions — including those with a meaning-centered focus — have reported reduced cortisol levels, improved immune functioning, and better treatment adherence in patients with cancer (
25). For example, combining logotherapy with nutritional counseling has been shown to improve depressive symptoms, dietary behaviors, and overall quality of life (
25,
26). These findings, though derived from quantitative methods, lend support to the idea that addressing existential dimensions of illness can contribute to overall health.
In line with this, many participants in the current study reported subjective improvements in physical vitality, such as feeling stronger, lighter, or more energized, after engaging in logotherapy. One participant stated, “After I understood why I’m going through this, even my body felt less heavy.” These experiential accounts do not serve as clinical proof but offer valuable qualitative evidence that psychological processes such as meaning-making may influence individuals’ perception of their physical condition.
Such perceptions align with Frankl’s proposition that even in the face of unavoidable suffering, individuals retain the freedom to choose their attitude and meaning. By consciously redefining their relationship with illness — not as a purely destructive force but as a context for growth — participants in this study demonstrated an inner transformation. This shift supported not only emotional adaptation but also fostered a more compassionate and empowered relationship with the body, potentially leading to improved psychophysiological balance.
While definitive causal links between logotherapy and physiological outcomes cannot be drawn from qualitative data, these findings underscore the importance of holistic, integrative care models that attend to both the existential and psychological dimensions of healing. Meaning-based interventions such as logotherapy may serve as vital components in enhancing psychological health and perceived well-being, which in turn may create internal conditions more conducive to recovery and long-term resilience in women with breast cancer.
5.3. Social Factors
Our findings also highlight the importance of social connection, belonging, and support in influencing hope and well-being among patients undergoing logotherapy. While many quantitative logotherapy studies focus primarily on individual psychological change, the group-based format often employed in those interventions inherently provides social interaction, shared narrative, and peer support (
16). These features may amplify resilience by normalizing struggle, validating personal meaning-making, and reducing isolation (
16,
17,
27).
Although prior studies seldom isolate “social factors” as independent predictors of survival, the qualitative data here suggest that meaning-making in a communal setting strengthens motivation, reinforces coping strategies, and bolsters perceived social support. Participants credited family, peer groups, and healthcare staff as instrumental in sustaining hope. In effect, social factors may serve as contextual enhancers of psychological mechanisms rather than primary causal agents.
These findings resonate with Frankl’s assertion that meaning is often discovered in relationship with others, especially in the face of shared suffering. Logotherapy does not view individuals as isolated units but as beings-in-the-world, whose sense of meaning is often reinforced through connection, responsibility toward others, and shared purpose. In this context, social interaction serves not merely as external support but as a relational space where personal narratives are shaped, reflected, and validated.
For many participants in this study, meaning-making emerged not only through introspection but through dialogue with significant others, including family members, fellow patients, or caregivers, who witnessed and responded to their suffering. This aligns with Frankl’s view that discovering meaning often occurs in response to love, service, or communal responsibility. For instance, several women expressed that their desire to be strong for their children, or to share their experience to help others, became sources of existential purpose that enhanced their emotional resilience.
By framing their suffering as part of a larger human struggle, rather than an isolated personal tragedy, participants were able to transform helplessness into agency. This process reflects the logotherapeutic principle that even when external circumstances (such as illness) cannot be changed, individuals retain the freedom to change their inner stance. In a communal setting, this inner transformation is often catalyzed and sustained by empathic witnessing and mutual encouragement, which fosters both hope and psychological adaptation.
5.4. Diagnosis, Treatment, and Healthcare Experiences
Another important insight from our study is that participants’ experiences of diagnosis and medical treatment shaped their hope and coping trajectories. While qualitative data do not allow estimation of survival effects, health services research supports that timely diagnosis, access to care, treatment adherence, and management of side effects are strong determinants of clinical outcomes (
28-
30). For example, delays in diagnosis beyond 3 months have been associated with worse prognostic features and survival in breast cancer (
28). Additionally, treatment side effects and interruptions can undermine patients’ mental health and adherence, thereby compromising outcomes (
28,
29).
In our interviews, participants expressed that when logotherapy helped them accept their diagnosis and reframe medical challenges meaningfully, they were better able to adhere to treatment plans, manage side effects proactively, and maintain a hopeful outlook even in difficult therapy phases. Therefore, meaning-centered psychological support may facilitate better engagement with medical care and thus indirectly support favorable outcomes.
These observations are closely aligned with Frankl’s core premise that suffering, when confronted with a purposeful attitude, can be transformed into a source of growth rather than despair. Participants who reported being able to frame their diagnosis not as a sentence but as a challenge with potential meaning often displayed greater adherence to treatment and more proactive health behaviors. This shift reflects a key logotherapeutic concept that when a person finds meaning in unavoidable suffering, they regain a sense of agency, even in the face of limited control over external events such as illness or medical procedures.
Moreover, several participants described how acceptance of diagnosis — not as passive resignation, but as an active choice to confront reality meaningfully — allowed them to manage fear, navigate uncertainty, and maintain psychological stability during harsh treatment phases. Such psychological adaptation illustrates Frankl’s idea of the “tragic triad” (pain, guilt, and death) being bearable through attitudinal change, enabling the individual to preserve dignity and hope even amid medical adversity.
In this light, logotherapy does not merely offer emotional relief; it provides a framework for existential orientation that helps patients reinterpret medical suffering as part of a larger life narrative, one in which they still have the power to choose their stance, act with purpose, and find meaning despite the limitations imposed by illness.
5.5. Patient Support and Overall Well-Being
Another key finding of the current study is that perceived support and overall well-being play a vital role in shaping hope among women with breast cancer. Participants frequently emphasized that emotional support from family, friends, and healthcare providers enhanced their sense of meaning and helped them maintain hope throughout diagnosis and treatment.
While this study does not examine survival outcomes directly, prior research has shown that higher levels of social well-being in the first year after breast cancer diagnosis are associated with better clinical outcomes, including lower recurrence rates and reduced mortality risk. For example, one study found that women with the highest levels of social well-being had a 38% lower risk of mortality and a 48% lower risk of breast cancer recurrence compared to those with the lowest scores (
31). These findings support the notion that psychosocial factors, particularly early social support, may influence both psychological adjustment and long-term health trajectories (
32).
In this qualitative study, participants described how a sense of being supported — emotionally and practically — served as a foundation for building and sustaining hope. This aligns with previous studies that emphasize the role of psychosocial well-being in fostering resilience and treatment engagement (
33,
34). Therefore, while no causal conclusions can be drawn, the data suggest that psychosocial support enhances emotional well-being, which may, in turn, contribute to more positive health experiences and behaviors during cancer recovery.
These findings can be further understood through the lens of logotherapy, which emphasizes that human beings are motivated not only by the pursuit of pleasure or power, but by the will to meaning. Within this framework, social support plays a critical role, not simply as emotional comfort but as a relational context in which individuals are able to construct and validate meaning. In the current study, participants frequently described how the presence of caring others, whether family, peers, or medical staff, helped them to feel seen, valued, and connected, which in turn enabled them to find purpose in their struggle and sustain a hopeful attitude.
Frankl posits that meaning is often found in relationships, acts of love, and the responsibility we feel toward others. Many women in this study articulated how their motivation to recover was strengthened by their roles as mothers, spouses, or supportive peers. These relational dimensions of meaning helped transform their illness experience from a source of passive suffering into a motivational force for resilience, rooted in connection and responsibility.
Thus, perceived support did more than enhance comfort; it provided the psychological scaffolding for the active construction of hope. By enabling patients to anchor their suffering within a larger narrative of meaning and connection, such support aligned directly with the logotherapeutic model, offering not only relief from distress but a framework for existential survival.
5.6. Lifestyle and Recovery Processes
Another important finding of this study is that lifestyle and recovery processes contribute significantly to the hope and well-being experienced by women with breast cancer. Participants highlighted that adopting healthier behaviors and actively engaging in recovery helped them maintain motivation and optimism throughout their cancer journey.
While this qualitative study does not provide direct evidence on survival outcomes, previous quantitative research suggests that certain lifestyle factors are associated with breast cancer prognosis. For instance, women with unfavorable lifestyle factors, such as overweight status, physical inactivity, and alcohol consumption, have been reported to have a higher risk of postmenopausal breast cancer and poorer survival outcomes (
35). One cohort study found that patients with breast cancer with multiple unfavorable lifestyle factors had nearly double the overall mortality risk compared to those with favorable lifestyles (
35).
Regular physical activity, both before and after diagnosis, is linked to improved survival chances by reducing inflammation, regulating hormones, and helping maintain a healthy body weight (
35,
36). Maintaining a healthy weight, avoiding alcohol, and engaging in exercise are widely recommended as strategies to improve recovery and potentially delay disease progression (
35,
37). Additionally, breastfeeding has been associated with a slightly lower breast cancer risk and may contribute positively to long-term outcomes (
37,
38).
In this study, participants described how meaning and hope served as motivators to adopt and sustain healthier lifestyle choices, supporting their recovery process. This aligns with existing evidence indicating that psychological factors can influence behavioral consistency and treatment adherence.
From a logotherapeutic perspective, lifestyle modifications and active engagement in recovery are not merely health behaviors but manifestations of an individual’s search for meaning and purpose amid adversity. Frankl’s theory suggests that when patients find meaning in their suffering and view their illness journey as a purposeful challenge, they are more likely to exercise agency and adopt behaviors that align with their newly embraced values and goals.
Participants’ descriptions of how hope and meaning motivated them to pursue healthier lifestyles illustrate this principle. The act of caring for one’s body becomes a form of self-respect and affirmation of life’s value, transforming recovery from a passive process into an active existential commitment. This engagement with recovery, fueled by meaning, enhances psychological resilience and creates a positive feedback loop where improved well-being reinforces adherence to beneficial lifestyle choices.
Moreover, this connection between meaning and health behaviors underlines the integrative nature of logotherapy, which addresses not only emotional or cognitive dimensions but also promotes holistic well-being that encompasses physical health. Thus, psychological meaning-making can serve as a critical catalyst that empowers women with breast cancer to confront medical challenges proactively, fostering a sense of control and optimism essential for sustained recovery.
5.7. Ongoing Care and Monitoring
Another key aspect influencing hope was the experience of ongoing care and regular monitoring after treatment. Participants expressed that continued follow-up visits, surveillance imaging, and regular medical contact provided reassurance and a sense of control over their health.
While this qualitative study did not assess survival directly, previous studies indicate that ongoing surveillance, especially through mammography in long-term breast cancer survivors, can aid early detection of recurrences or second primary cancers, potentially improving survival outcomes. For example, among survivors aged 65 and older who remained disease-free for at least 5 years, surveillance mammography between years 6 to 14 post-diagnosis was associated with modest reductions in breast cancer-specific mortality (
39).
However, the benefits of such surveillance for older patients with limited perceived life expectancy remain unclear, and some patients with longer expected survival do not receive recommended follow-up care (
40,
41). These findings underscore the need for personalized follow-up strategies based on individual prognosis.
Comprehensive follow-up care also includes management of treatment side effects, emotional support, and lifestyle counseling, all of which contribute to maintaining quality of life and psychological well-being (
42-
49).
From the perspective of Frankl’s logotherapy, ongoing care and monitoring are not only clinical necessities but also integral to the patient’s existential journey. The continued medical contact and surveillance provide patients with a tangible sense of control and security, which are crucial for sustaining hope and fostering resilience. By integrating these medical routines into their meaning-making process, patients transform what could be perceived as intrusive or anxiety-inducing procedures into affirmations of life and active engagement in their recovery. This reframing aligns with Frankl’s concept that individuals find freedom and dignity in how they respond to suffering, suggesting that ongoing care serves as a platform for psychological adaptation and empowerment.
In summary, although survival outcomes in breast cancer are primarily influenced by clinical factors such as stage at diagnosis and tumor biology, this study’s findings alongside existing literature emphasize the important roles of psychosocial well-being, lifestyle behaviors, and ongoing medical care in shaping patients’ hope, motivation, and recovery experiences.
Meaning in life appears to have a particularly strong influence on psychosocial domains such as patient support and overall well-being, where it fosters hope, resilience, and mental health. It also encourages healthier lifestyle choices and engagement in recovery, although this effect may be somewhat less pronounced. Regarding diagnosis and treatment experiences, meaning may help patients accept their illness and cooperate with medical care, but its impact seems moderate. Finally, ongoing care and long-term monitoring are largely shaped by medical protocols and healthcare systems, with meaning exerting a relatively smaller influence.
Overall, meaning-centered interventions like logotherapy may contribute indirectly to improved health outcomes by enhancing psychological well-being and promoting positive health behaviors, but claims about direct effects on survival should be made cautiously and supported by further research.
5.8. Conclusions
This qualitative study explored the impact of a logotherapy intervention on hope and psychological well-being in women with breast cancer, assessed 3 months post-intervention. The findings revealed four 4 domains influencing these outcomes: Diagnosis and treatment experiences, patient support and overall well-being, lifestyle and recovery processes, and ongoing care and monitoring, supported by 15 related sub-concepts.
While logotherapy demonstrated positive effects, particularly in enhancing psychological resilience, facilitating meaning-making, and improving emotional health, these effects appeared limited in scope and duration within the studied timeframe. The results emphasize the psychological benefits of logotherapy, rather than clinical outcomes.
Importantly, the study’s findings support Viktor Frankl’s theoretical proposition that individuals can preserve hope and psychological integrity by discovering meaning in the face of suffering. Participants who engaged in meaning-oriented reflection showed greater emotional adaptability and a stronger sense of agency during their cancer journey.
Logotherapy enhances psychological resilience and hope, enabling patients to reinterpret their cancer experience with greater meaning and inner strength.
To promote long-term improvements in hope, psychological well-being, and quality of life for women with breast cancer, logotherapy should be integrated alongside medical treatment and broader psychosocial and lifestyle interventions. This integration may help patients not only endure the burden of illness but also find existential significance within it, thereby deepening psychological resilience. Ongoing support and periodic reinforcement of meaning-centered approaches may be essential to maintain and enhance initial benefits, thereby fostering more durable outcomes for individuals navigating the challenges of cancer.
5.9. Limitations and Measures Taken to Address Them
This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, the sample size was relatively small and selected through purposive sampling, which may limit the generalizability of the findings to the broader population of women with breast cancer. To mitigate this, participants were deliberately chosen to represent diverse stages of disease, socioeconomic backgrounds, and family contexts, and data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved, ensuring comprehensive coverage of the phenomena studied. Second, as a qualitative study, it provides rich, in-depth insights but does not allow for causal inference or quantitative measurement of the intervention’s effects. To strengthen the credibility of the findings, data triangulation was employed by incorporating perspectives from patients, healthcare professionals, and family members. Third, the reliance on self-reported data introduces potential biases such as recall bias and social desirability bias. To minimize these, interviewers were trained to build rapport and encourage honest, reflective responses through open-ended questioning techniques. Fourth, the follow-up period of 3 months may be insufficient to capture the long-term effects of logotherapy on hope and well-being. Therefore, it is recommended that future studies include longer follow-up durations to assess sustained impacts. Fifth, the study was conducted within a specific cultural and geographic context, which may limit the transferability of the findings to other settings. While purposive sampling aimed at enhancing demographic diversity, caution is advised when applying results across different cultural environments. Finally, the study could not fully control for medical and treatment-related variables, such as cancer stage and treatment modality, which may influence psychological outcomes. To address this, the sample included participants with varied clinical characteristics, and the inclusion of healthcare providers’ perspectives helped provide a more holistic understanding of influencing factors.