Int J Cancer Manag

Image Credit:Int J Cancer Manag

Electrochemotherapy of Skin Nodules in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Case Series from Iran

Author(s):
Ashkan ShahverdiAshkan Shahverdi1, 2, Sepide MansuriSepide Mansuri1, 2, Seyed Mojtaba YazdanparastSeyed Mojtaba YazdanparastSeyed Mojtaba Yazdanparast ORCID1, 3, Nahid NafissiNahid NafissiNahid Nafissi ORCID4, Habibollah MahmoodzadehHabibollah Mahmoodzadeh2, 5, Mahdis BayatMahdis Bayat1, 3, Omid NabavianOmid Nabavian2, Sama MansouriSama Mansouri1, Mohammad Esmaeil AkbariMohammad Esmaeil AkbariMohammad Esmaeil Akbari ORCID6, Seyed Rouhollah MiriSeyed Rouhollah Miri1, 2, 5,*, Mohammad AbdolahadMohammad AbdolahadMohammad Abdolahad ORCID1, 2, 3,**
1Cancer Electronics Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Cancer Institute, Imam-Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3Nano Bioelectronics Devices Lab, Cancer Electronics Research Group, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
4Department of Surgery, Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), Rasoul Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5Department of Surgical Oncology, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
6Cancer Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Corresponding Authors:

International Journal of Cancer Management:Vol. 19, issue 1; e170431
Published online:Apr 29, 2026
Article type:Research Article
Received:Feb 18, 2026
Accepted:Apr 13, 2026
How to Cite:Shahverdi A, Mansuri S, Yazdanparast SM, Nafissi N, Mahmoodzadeh H, et al. Electrochemotherapy of Skin Nodules in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Case Series from Iran. Int J Cancer Manag. 2026;19(1):e170431. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijcm-170431

Abstract

Background and Objective:

Breast cancer (BC), the second most prevalent cancer worldwide, poses a significant health challenge. Despite major advances in therapeutic modalities for BC, patients who undergo modified radical mastectomy face considerable risks of locoregional recurrence, ranging from 10% to 40%. Electrochemotherapy (ECT), a novel treatment modality, has demonstrated promising efficacy, particularly for skin and subcutaneous metastases, by enhancing drug penetration and minimizing systemic adverse effects.

Methods:

This case series was the first multicenter study in Iran to evaluate the effect of ECT on skin metastases in patients with recurrent BC following either lumpectomy or mastectomy. The study was conducted in 2 cancer referral centers from April 2023 to November 2024. Patients with BC who experienced treatment failure with skin metastasis or chest wall recurrence were included.

Results:

All included patients had large lesions (> 5 cm) with metastatic spread to the skin. Among the 10 cases, 2 patients achieved complete response, 3 patients developed clear skin margins and became operable for mastectomy, and 5 patients achieved local control of tumor-associated symptoms.

Conclusions:

These findings demonstrated an impressive overall response to ECT in skin metastases of BC and underscore its potential to improve treatment outcomes for patients experiencing recurrent disease while reducing the burden of systemic therapies.

1. Background

According to the Global Cancer Observatory (GCO), breast cancer (BC) ranks as the second most prevalent cancer globally in terms of incidence, accounting for 11.5% of all new cancer cases worldwide (1, 2). Although the incidence of BC has increased, the overall survival rate has also improved to approximately 90% (3, 4). However, despite significant advances in therapeutic approaches for BC, recurrence and metastasis remain pitfalls affecting patient survival. Evidence indicates that 5 - 40% of patients with BC experience chest wall involvement, which represents the most common form of locoregional recurrence and typically occurs within the first 2 years after treatment and over a 10-year period (5). Since BC is one of the most prevalent carcinomas associated with skin metastasis, approximately two-thirds of chest wall recurrences involve the skin and subcutaneous tissue and are not accompanied by systemic metastasis (6, 7). This condition most frequently manifests as multiple nodules, initially in the mastectomy scar area, which can cause ulceration and severe neuropathic pain. Consequently, the treatment of skin nodules in these patients has substantial clinical value because of its significant effect on quality of life (6, 8). Although resection is the treatment of choice for isolated cutaneous lesions, these lesions are often unresectable because of their size. Moreover, other treatment strategies, including chemotherapy and hormonal therapy, are usually ineffective. Postmastectomy radiation has been shown to decrease chest wall recurrence and improve survival outcomes (9). However, the development of postradiation sarcomas, such as angiosarcoma, can significantly undermine the effectiveness of radiotherapy in these patients (10).
Electrochemotherapy (ECT), a nonthermal approach for cancer cell destruction, uses electric field pulses to create temporary pores in the cell membrane, thereby enhancing the uptake of impermeable drugs, such as bleomycin, by up to 1000-fold (9, 11). This method offers a novel strategy to overcome multidrug resistance in solid tumors because it allows localized drug delivery at lower concentrations and reduces systemic adverse effects (12). Currently, this therapeutic strategy is specified in clinical guidelines, such as the European Standard Operating Procedures of Electrochemotherapy (ESOPE) and standard operating procedures (SOPs), for the management of primary or metastatic skin nodules (13, 14). Previous research has demonstrated the efficacy of this technique in treating skin and subcutaneous tumors of various origins, such as BC, and in alleviating symptoms, including bleeding, oozing, pain, and infection associated with skin metastasis (11, 15). Furthermore, patients with low-volume and scattered skin metastases tend to experience fewer new skin lesions after ECT, and partial responses can potentially lead to complete clearance with subsequent treatment sessions (16).

2. Objectives

This study presents the first human-model investigation of ECT for the treatment of skin metastases in patients with BC in Iran. The treatment was used not only to mitigate the adverse effects of cutaneous metastasis but also to treat chemotherapy- or radiotherapy-resistant, nonresectable breast tumors, thereby facilitating the possibility of mastectomy with free skin margins.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Design and Participants

This preliminary report describes a case series study of ECT in patients with BC. The study was conducted in 2 cancer referral centers, Imam Khomeini Cancer Institute and Rasoul Akram Hospital, from April 2023 to November 2024. The University of Tehran Ethics Committee approved the study, and all tests were conducted in accordance with the ethical code IR.TUMS.IKHC.REC.1401.125.
Patients with BC who experienced treatment failure with skin metastasis or chest wall recurrence were included in this study. Patients were categorized into primary and recurrent groups. Patients resistant to standard treatments were considered primary cases. Patients who had been previously treated, experienced a disease-free period, and subsequently developed local chest wall recurrence were considered recurrent cases. The goals of this study were local palliative treatment or conversion of an inoperable tumor into an operable tumor in patients who did not respond to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. A survival of at least 3 months was considered conceivable for these patients, and they were required to have a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) of 0 - 1. After discussion by a multidisciplinary team comprising a surgeon, an oncologist, a pathologist, and a radiologist, patients were selected and informed. They could choose trial treatment or conventional treatment, such as chemotherapy. In cases of acceptance, informed consent was obtained. Patients were required not to have a defibrillator, pacemaker, cardiac arrhythmia, chronic lung disease, pulmonary fibrosis, or pulmonary insufficiency.
Finally, 10 cases that met the inclusion criteria were recruited in this study. All patients had received at least 2 lines of chemotherapy before entering the study. Eight patients with breast carcinoma had previously been treated with radiotherapy. Four patients were inoperable and entered the study to make surgery possible; the others underwent ECT to palliate their symptoms. Five patients underwent a second ECT session around 30 to 40 days after the first session. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.Patients’ Characteristics and Electrochemotherapy and Disease Data
No.AgeTumor LocationPrimary/RecurrenceSite of MetastasisTumor HistotypeTumor GradeERPRHER2Ki67ECT SessionTumor Area (cm²)PainOozingBleedingInfectionMRM
147Bilateral breastsRecurrenceLungIDC3---702569++++-
243Bilateral breastsRecurrenceLungIDC3--+502213++---
341Bilateral breastsPrimaryUpper trunk skin and cervical-contralateral axillary LNsIDC2++-452598++++-
436Right breastRecurrenceWidespread boneIDC3--+202207+----
548Right breast and left axillaRecurrenceContralateral breast skinIDC3---65178++-+-
641Right breastRecurrenceNoneIDC3---302283++++-
755Left breastRecurrenceLiver and cervical LNsIDC2+++451268++-++
838Left breastPrimaryCervical LNsIDC3++-401191+---+
964Right breastPrimaryNoneIDC3---351861++-++
1066Right breastRecurrenceNoneAngiosarcoma3N/AN/AN/A30217+----

Abbreviations: LNs, lymph nodes; IDC, invasive ductal carcinoma; IHC, immunohistochemistry; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; ECT, electrochemotherapy; MRM, modified radical mastectomy; N/A, not applicable.

3.2. Electroporation Operating Procedure and Patient Follow-up

For these patients, needles were placed in the lesions so that the distance between the needles was at most 1 cm. Then, 1000 IU/m² of body surface area of bleomycin was injected intravenously, and after 8 minutes, electrical pulses were delivered.
Patients were followed daily during the first week for clinical complaints, including pain, fever, weakness, bleeding, oozing, and wound infection. They were then followed weekly and monitored clinically and through laboratory tests until the fourth week, and then at the sixth and twelfth weeks thereafter. Laboratory tests included complete blood cell count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP). The tumor-covered area was measured using patient photographs to investigate treatment response. Except for the first 3 days of treatment, pain was controlled by administering analgesics, such as acetaminophen, gabapentin, oxycodone, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and glucocorticoids. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and glucocorticoids were not used during the first 3 days of ECT to avoid inhibiting immune responses. Pain was assessed by comparing both analgesic use and patient-reported scores based on a 1 - 10 pain scale before and after intervention.

3.3. Statistical Analysis

The results were analyzed using SPSS software version 26.

4. Results

4.1. Patient Characteristics

In this study, 9 patients had invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and 1 patient had angiosarcoma in the context of previously treated IDC. There were different IDC subtypes, as follows: 4 patients with triple-negative BC, 2 with HER2-positive BC, and 3 with luminal B disease. Of the 10 patients with advanced (4/10) or metastatic (6/10) BC, 4 were primary cases and 6 were recurrent cases.

4.2. Tumor Response and Palliation

In total, 10 patients with approximately 3285 cm² of involved skin area were treated. The mean decrease in the involved area, based on clinical examination, was approximately 17%, 30%, 34%, 43%, and 46% after 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 weeks, respectively. During this study, 2 patients experienced complete clinical response after 2 sessions (No. 2 and 6), 7 patients experienced partial response (No. 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, and 10), 1 patient had stable disease (No. 1), and none of the patients experienced progression based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria (17). A second ECT session was applied at the sixth week of treatment in 6 patients (No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 10). Three patients had good medical condition and underwent mastectomy after partial response at the sixth week after ECT (No. 7, 8, and 9).
Moreover, the palliative goals, including reductions in bleeding and oozing and eradication of infection, were followed in this study and are shown in Table 2. The mean pain scores reported by patients were 6.7 (3 - 10), 6.4 (3 - 10), 4.8 (1 - 6), 2.1 (0 - 5), 4.6 (0 - 9), and 1.3 (0 - 4) at the first, second, third, fourth, sixth, and twelfth weeks of treatment, respectively. Because 6 patients underwent a second ECT session in the sixth week of treatment, pain was higher in the sixth week than in the fourth week. Analgesic use decreased by approximately 40% after 7 days after ECT.
Table 2.Palliative Goals of Electrochemotherapy
Goals (Number of Patients)First WeekSecond WeekThird WeekFourth WeekSixth WeekTwelfth Week
Bleeding (3)233333
Oozing (7)46775 a7
Infection (6)345566

a Two patients who had responded completely in the fourth week had oozing again at the sixth week; therefore, their treatment was repeated.

The 3 examples of patients who underwent ECT are shown in Figure 1.
Three examples of patients who underwent electrochemotherapy (ECT)
Figure 1.

Three examples of patients who underwent electrochemotherapy (ECT)

4.3. Adverse Effects

Blood tests were performed to evaluate the adverse effects of ECT. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP, and complete blood count were assessed before treatment and weekly thereafter. Mean ESR and CRP values are shown in Table 3. No pancytopenia, including leukopenia, anemia, or thrombocytopenia, was observed during the study.
Table 3.Mean Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate and C-Reactive Protein
Laboratory TestBefore TreatmentFirst WeekSecond WeekThird WeekFourth WeekSixth WeekTwelfth Week
ESR (mm/h)92 (75 - 106)91 (80 - 105)73 (59 - 91)64 (55 - 80)53 (44 - 78)67 (44 - 79)27 (10 - 38)
CRP (mg/dL)36 (19 - 46)30 (18 - 41)25 (14 - 33)21 (15 - 24)18 (14 - 23)24 (12 - 36)12 (9 - 21)

Abbreviations: ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP, C-reactive protein.

4.4. Overall Survival

Patients were followed up for a median of 8 months (5 - 10 months). Three patients underwent mastectomy after a mean of 34 days (21 - 60 days). Three patients with pulmonary metastasis died after a mean of 54 days (48 - 60 days). One patient with liver metastasis died after 76 days. Median progression-free survival after implementation of ECT was 3 months (1 - 7 months).

5. Discussion

Because breast tumor recurrence and metastasis to other organs, such as the skin and chest wall, remain significant therapeutic challenges, BC remains one of the leading causes of mortality among affected patients (18, 19). According to scientific evidence, conventional treatment methods for cutaneous metastasis generally have low effectiveness, and the management of these lesions can often be difficult (20). Moreover, in most patients with metastasis, surgery cannot be performed, and radiotherapy and chemotherapy do not have significant effects; thus, local treatment is necessary to address curative or palliative concerns. The results of this study demonstrated that 10 patients with metastatic or advanced BC underwent ECT, confirming its potency in facilitating surgical intervention and palliating symptoms (21).
Recent guidelines from 2013 recommended ECT as a safe palliative treatment method for skin and subcutaneous tissue metastases of breast tumors, highlighting its therapeutic role in managing these conditions (22, 23). This direct skin treatment modality has a high overall response rate of 75.4% and low toxicity, with fewer than 6% of patients experiencing severe adverse effects, which is consistent with our findings (24, 25). In our intervention, the obtained results demonstrated tumor necrosis in a time-dependent manner. The highest clinical response rate was reached at approximately the sixth week of treatment; thereafter, clinicians can decide whether to perform resection surgery or a second session of ECT. In general, none of the patients had tumor progression. Complete clinical response was obtained in 2 patients, and free margins were reported in the postoperative pathology evaluation of all 3 patients who underwent mastectomy after ECT.
Considering tumor-associated symptoms, such as pain, oozing, infection, and bleeding, strong local control was achieved in all cases after the first treatment session. Consistent with our findings, a recent study reported achievement of palliative goals in 13 patients with chest wall recurrence after ECT (26). Bleeding from skin lesions was controlled in all our patients with large metastatic tumors, leading to improved quality of life, which is consistent with another recent study (11).

5.1. Conclusions

Finally, as shown in many previous studies, ECT was performed safely, with minor adverse effects, such as pain and inflammation, that could be controlled with analgesics and anti-inflammatory agents. In addition, the reproducibility of this procedure makes it possible to repeat it if new lesions appear. In scattered skin metastases of BC with large tumors (> 5 cm), we achieved an overall response in all cases, ranging from complete tumor destruction (2/10) to achieving clear skin margins for mastectomy (3/10) and managing pain and bleeding (5/10). These findings shed new light on the application of ECT as a helpful procedure in the curative and palliative management of patients with BC and skin metastasis.

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Lei S, Zheng R, Zhang S, Wang S, Chen R, Sun K, et al. Global patterns of breast cancer incidence and mortality: A population-based cancer registry data analysis from 2000 to 2020. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2021;41(11):1183-94. [PubMed ID: 34399040]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8626596]. https://doi.org/10.1002/cac2.12207.
  • 2.
    Sözen S, Emir S. Breast Cancer Updates. 2023. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.104150.
  • 3.
    Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M, Garshell J, Miller D, Altekruse S, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2012. National Cancer Institute; 2014.
  • 4.
    Iacoviello L, Bonaccio M, de Gaetano G, Donati MB. Epidemiology of breast cancer, a paradigm of the "common soil" hypothesis. Semin Cancer Biol. 2021;72:4-10. [PubMed ID: 32087245]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2020.02.010.
  • 5.
    Campana LG, Galuppo S, Valpione S, Falci C, Corti L, Brunello A, et al. Electrochemotherapy for Chest Wall Recurrence From Breast Cancer in Older Women: Analysis of 55 Patients. Ann Oncol. 2012;23. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0923-7534(20)32930-6.
  • 6.
    Zhou D, Li M, Xu F, Zheng Q, Lu Q, Hong R, et al. The prognostic significance of skin involvement in breast cancer patients with chest wall recurrence. Ann Med. 2023;55(1):2232299. [PubMed ID: 37431586]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10337506]. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2023.2232299.
  • 7.
    Kong JH, Park YH, Kim JA, Kim JH, Yun J, Sun JM, et al. Patterns of Skin and Soft Tissue Metastases from Breast Cancer according to Subtypes: Relationship between EGFR Overexpression and Skin Manifestations. Oncol. 2011;81(1):55-62. https://doi.org/10.1159/000331417.
  • 8.
    Wang LW, Li L, Zhang HY, Chen YY, Zhong YH. Patterns of Chest Wall Recurrence and Suggestions on the Clinical Target Volume of Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of 121 Postmastectomy Patients. Cancer Manag Res. 2020;12:5909-18. [PubMed ID: 32765092]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7381817]. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S250789.
  • 9.
    Sersa G, Cufer T, Paulin SM, Cemazar M, Snoj M. Electrochemotherapy of chest wall breast cancer recurrence. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012;38(5):379-86. [PubMed ID: 21856080]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.07.006.
  • 10.
    Sheth GR, Cranmer LD, Smith BD, Grasso-Lebeau L, Lang JE. Radiation-induced sarcoma of the breast: a systematic review. Oncologist. 2012;17(3):405-18. [PubMed ID: 22334455]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3316927]. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0282.
  • 11.
    Radica MK, Fabbri N, Santandrea G, Bonazza S, Stefanelli A, Carcoforo P. Use of electrochemotherapy in a voluminous chest wall recurrence of triple-negative breast cancer: case report. AME Case Rep. 2020;4:30. [PubMed ID: 33179002]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7608727]. https://doi.org/10.21037/acr-20-54.
  • 12.
    Condello M, D'Avack G, Spugnini EP, Meschini S. Electrochemotherapy: An Alternative Strategy for Improving Therapy in Drug-Resistant SOLID Tumors. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(17). [PubMed ID: 36077875]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9454613]. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14174341.
  • 13.
    Marty M, Sersa G, Garbay JR, Gehl J, Collins CG, Snoj M, et al. Electrochemotherapy – An easy, highly effective and safe treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases: Results of ESOPE (European Standard Operating Procedures of Electrochemotherapy) study. Eur J Cancer Suppl. 2006;4(11):3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcsup.2006.08.002.
  • 14.
    Mir LM, Gehl J, Sersa G, Collins CG, Garbay J, Billard V, et al. Standard operating procedures of the electrochemotherapy: Instructions for the use of bleomycin or cisplatin administered either systemically or locally and electric pulses delivered by the CliniporatorTM by means of invasive or non-invasive electrodes. Eur J Cancer Suppl. 2006;4(11):14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcsup.2006.08.003.
  • 15.
    Campana LG, Clover AJ, Valpione S, Quaglino P, Gehl J, Kunte C, et al. Recommendations for improving the quality of reporting clinical electrochemotherapy studies based on qualitative systematic review. Radiol Oncol. 2016;50(1):1-13. [PubMed ID: 27069444]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4825335]. https://doi.org/10.1515/raon-2016-0006.
  • 16.
    Campana LG, Valpione S, Falci C, Mocellin S, Basso M, Corti L, et al. The activity and safety of electrochemotherapy in persistent chest wall recurrence from breast cancer after mastectomy: a phase-II study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134(3):1169-78. [PubMed ID: 22821399]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2095-4.
  • 17.
    Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(3):205-16. [PubMed ID: 10655437]. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/92.3.205.
  • 18.
    Manore SG, Doheny DL, Wong GL, Lo HW. IL-6/JAK/STAT3 Signaling in Breast Cancer Metastasis: Biology and Treatment. Front Oncol. 2022;12:866014. [PubMed ID: 35371975]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8964978]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.866014.
  • 19.
    Caswell-Jin JL, Sun LP, Munoz D, Lu Y, Li Y, Huang H, et al. Analysis of Breast Cancer Mortality in the US-1975 to 2019. JAMA. 2024;331(3):233-41. [PubMed ID: 38227031]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10792466]. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2023.25881.
  • 20.
    Benevento R, Santoriello A, Perna G, Canonico S. Electrochemotherapy of cutaneous metastastes from breast cancer in elderly patients: a preliminary report. BMC Surg. 2012;12 Suppl 1(Suppl 1). S6. [PubMed ID: 23173816]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3499246]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-12-S1-S6.
  • 21.
    Morley J, Grocott P, Purssell E, Murrells T. Electrochemotherapy for the palliative management of cutaneous metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(12):2257-67. [PubMed ID: 31285093]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2019.07.003.
  • 22.
    Committee AB. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with primary and metastatic breast Cancer. 2015.
  • 23.
    Health NIf EC. Electrochemotherapy for metastases in the skin from tumours of non-skin origin and melanoma. Interventional procedures guidance [IPG446]. NICE; 2013.
  • 24.
    Jothi V, Raman V, Sharma R, Camarillo I, Sundararajan R. Electroporation-based enhanced anticancer effect of veliparib on triple negative breast cancer cells. Proc Electrostatics Joint Conference. 2016.
  • 25.
    Esposito E, Siani C, Pace U, Costanzo R, di Giacomo R. Debulking mastectomy with electrochemotherapy: a case report of no surgery approach to recurrent breast cancer. Transl Cancer Res. 2021;10(2):1144-9. [PubMed ID: 35116441]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8798959]. https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-2803.
  • 26.
    Larkin JO, Collins CG, Aarons S, Tangney M, Whelan M, O'Reily S, et al. Electrochemotherapy: aspects of preclinical development and early clinical experience. Ann Surg. 2007;245(3):469-79. [PubMed ID: 17435555]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1877027]. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000250419.36053.33.

Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Ordering Reprints

Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC 

Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles