The present study was a reverse A1B1A2B2C1 design with a multiple baseline and a six-month follow-up (clinical trial registration code: TCTR20180417001) that was carried out between January 2014 and May 2015. The patient is a 67-year-old married man having a child who has had heavy episodic alcohol consumption for about 20 years and was selected through a respondent-driven sampling method (
9). Consumption of at least 24 standard drinks per week was considered as the criterion for heavy alcohol consumption. The patient about a year ago after the diagnosis of cell carcinoma by punch biopsy underwent radical resection of a squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx (in accordance with the Union for International Cancer Control’s [UICC] criteria: stage pT2, pN1), then, received adjuvant radiotherapy and cisplatin. Five months ago, computed tomography (CT) scan confirmed bone and lung metastases.
The patient was entered treatment process with an alcohol abuse complaint in the form of heavy episodic alcohol consumption and dysthymia. Based on the international classification of diseases, ninth revision (ICD-9) and the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM), the patient was diagnosed as alcohol use disorder (ICD-code: 303). Also, after a structured clinical interview for DSM-5 disorders (SCID), diagnosis of dysthymia was confirmed.
During January 2014 and May 2015, we used a reverse A1B1A2B2C1 design with a multiple baseline and a six-month follow-up, that A was the baseline stage and B was the intervention phase, and C was considered as follow-up stage. Preliminary evaluation of the 28 days prior to the registration of the baseline included an electrocardiogram examination, blood, and urine tests by a team consisting of a psychiatrist, two clinical psychologists, and a nurse.
In A1 and A2 baselines (4 weeks, 8 evaluations), only evaluation was done and no intervention was made. In phase B1 (6 weeks, 12 evaluations) and B2 (6 weeks, 12 evaluations), an intranasal oxytocin was presented to the patient. In order to reduce the level of oxytocin plasma for evaluation as the second baseline, the interval between two phases of B1 and A2 was considered as 2 months. The entire study period was 14 months and 44 evaluations were carried out. Also, the sustainability of changes was evaluated in the form of a six-month follow-up (C1, 4 weeks, 4 evaluations).
Oxytocin intranasal spray (Syntocinon®; Novartis, Basel, Switzerland) included oxytocin plus glycerol, sorbitol, benzyl alcohol, and distilled water, that contained an amber 7 mL glass nasal spray with a metered pump. Placebo sprays had the same combination, but did not contain oxytocin. Each pump spray delivered 50 μL of Oxytocin (9 IU) or placebo. All sprays were safely kept at a cool temperature (4°C). The patient was provided with necessary instruction for proper use of nasal spray as well as recording the doses in a notebook and a timer was used as reminder. The bottles were collected at the end to assess the total amount and estimate the used dose. The medication was received by the patient on all the days (except for the first day that applied by the therapist) at two meals before breakfast (about 10 A.M.) and before afternoon snack (about 3 P.M.) each time with 18 IU doses (9 IUs puffs per each hole).
In this study, SCID-5, Beck depression inventory (BDI) and alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) were used. All interviews were digitally recorded and copied from the words and coded. All the data of this study were collected after agreement with the patient, and informed consent was received before the intervention and publication, and all stages of the study were based on the latest version of the Declaration of Helsinki (DoH). The data were analyzed, using the generalized estimation equation (GEE) (
10), a generalized linear mixed models (GLMM, random effects models) with repeated measures, and repeated measures correlation (rmcorr) (
11).
The scores of the subject in the variable of total score of AUDIT during 14 months and in the form of 44 evaluations are presented in
Figure 1.
Score of AUDIT in during 44 evaluations
As it could be seen, the results of the GEE test show that there were significant decreases in the two stages of intervention (B1 and B2) (P < 0.02). This improvement was not maintained in the follow-up stage (P < 0.05).
GLMM showed that the decrease in alcohol consumption and its related problems in interaction with the depression index was significant (P < 0.03).
Correlation test with repeated measures showed that there is a significant relationship between two indices of consumption rate and depression (P < 0.008).