The current quasi-experimental study was conducted in Eghlid, Fars province, Southwest Iran. Based on the protocol of a similar study (
7), the sample size was set to 150 participants; 11 participants were excluded and finally 139 participants were eligible for analysis (69 in the intervention and 70 in the control groups).
The study data were collected using a demographic questionnaire, a rating scale for attitude, and a written test on knowledge about such health-risk behaviors. The attitude scale assessed the teachers’ attitudes towards students’ high-risk behaviors and the effects of education on prevention of such behaviors.
Content validity of the knowledge test was assessed by an expert panel consisting of five university professors. The reliability of the scale was also evaluated using test-retest method with a two-week interval (r = 0.86).
The validity of the attitude rating scale was determined using Content Validity Index (CVI) by Waltz and Bausell (
8). Relevance, simplicity, and clarity of each item were assessed on a four-option Likert scale by five nursing and education specialists. After calculation of CVI, items with CVI < 0.70 were omitted (
8). Face validity was confirmed by five experts and five teachers. Its reliability was evaluated by test-retest method (r = 0.79) and Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.87.
The attitude scale was scored on a four-option Likert scale ranging 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree), and its total score ranged 21 to 48.
The educational contents presented to both groups included some information about high-risk behaviors among adolescents and the methods of preventing, detecting, and dealing with such behaviors. The contents were verified by 10 faculty members of health education and nursing departments of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (SUMS). The content of multimedia CD-ROM was presented in three sections with two or three questions at the end. If the users selected the correct answer, they could see the next section.
After the pre-test, the educational contents were presented as booklets and multimedia CD-ROMs to the control and intervention groups, respectively. Posttest was taken by both groups simultaneously four weeks after execution of the educational program.
The current study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of SUMS (No. CT-9371-7361).