1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Study Design
| Variables | Physicians Scores (N = 8) | Mean Scores | Efficiency Index | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIO2 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9.2 | 4.6 |
| SPO2 | 9 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 9.1 | 4.8 |
| Temperature | 8 | 6 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 7.8 | 2.6 |
| Perfusion index | 7 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 7.5 | 4.7 |
| Heart rate | 4 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 3.8 | 3.6 |
Flow chart of clinical approach to treatment. A, Heart rate drops in deep sleep. So, heart rate 80 bpm was considered as the default; B and C, in cases of body temperature (arms or legs) < 36°C or PI < 2, a mistake might have been happened in pulse oximetry measures (12). So, the accuracy of pulse oximetry signals should be considered in doubt; C, in PI values lower than 2, we could not count on SPO2 signals from pulse oximetry. In practice, this value for infants was 0.7, so PI < 0.4 was not considered. However, system user could define minimum heart rate, minimum temperature and minimum PI depending on patient’s condition; D, preventing neonate from sudden fluctuations in oxygen status, 10 units were considered for checking FIO2 alterations and SPO2 feedbacks. Increase of FIO2 after a block in airway or FIO2 decreasing without any changes in SPO2 value could indicate a trap in the system. In such situations, an alarm should be sent to the user. There were also other options; first, neonatologist could change FIO2 based on patient’s condition. Second, system warned following sudden rise or drop (± 10%) of SPO2 values in less than 40 seconds; E, separating probe from patient’s body, monitor sent values regarding SPO2 and heart rate while system displayed an alarm to warn neonatologist; F, G, considering feedback of FIO2 from pulse oximeter, different opinions from 20 seconds to 5 minutes have been reported (2, 7, 13). So, the minimum time was considered to add one unit per 20 seconds. Moreover, a time near median (between 2 to 5 minutes) was considered to reduce one unit per 3 minutes. Regarding part F, there were 3 reasons to reduce FIO2. First, neonate should be able to breathe normally (21% oxygen). Second, hyperoxia should be prevented because of its side effects. Third, according to oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve, there is a nonlinear association between SPO2 and PaO2 in PaO2 levels more than 98%, the accurate SPO2 values could not be calculated in these ranges; H, five hours after stabilizing patient's condition, final decision was made by neonatologist to change approach to the treatment.
3.2. Development and Implementation of Devices
3.3. Sample Size
3.4. Protocol
3.5. Primary/Secondary Outcomes
3.6. Ethical Considerations
3.7. Data Acquisition and Analysis
4. Results
| Variables | Values |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Male | 10 (55.6) |
| Female | 8 (44.4) |
| Mean birth weight, g | 865±125 |
| Mean gestational age, wk | 27.3±2.4 |
| FIO at study entry | 98 (80 - 100) |
| FIO2 in RMC group | 98.11 ± 2.67 |
| FIO2 in RCLAC group | 79.50 ± 16.03 |
| Ventilation mode | |
| Mechanical ventilation | 12 (66.66) |
| CPAPb | 6 (33.33) |
| Surfactant treatment | |
| No | 7 (38.8) |
| Yes | 11 (61.2) |
| History of multiple gestations | |
| No | 14 (77.77) |
| Yes | 4 (22.22) |
| PIc | 0.78 (0.3 - 1.9) |
| Age, d | 27 (1 - 51) |
aValues are expressed as No. (%) or mean ± SD or median (min-max).
bContinuous positive airway pressure.
cPerfusion index.






