This cross-sectional study was conducted on 90 intubated patients hospitalized in the PICU department of Amirul Mominin Ali (AS) Hospital from March 2018 to December 2018. The sample size required to determine the difference in the frequency of positive cultures in the two groups (92.3% for cases and 63.2% for controls) was based on Nachian's study (16), considering a type 1 error of 0.05 and a statistical power of 0.80. Using Stata software Version 14, the statistical calculations determined a need for 30 people in each group.
P0: Frequency of positive culture in the control group; P1: Frequency of positive culture in the VAP group.
A demographic information questionnaire and the clinical pulmonary infection scoring tool (CPIS) were used to collect data. The demographic information form included age, gender, weight, and length of hospitalization. The CPIS included six main indicators for diagnosing pneumonia: Body temperature, white blood cell count, chest X-ray, oxygenation, culture of tracheal secretions, and the volume and appearance of tracheal secretions (17). This instrument consists of 6 subscales including: (1) temperature: Score 0 if 36.5 ≤ T ≤ 38.4, score 1 if 38.5 ≤ T ≤ 38.9, score 2 if T < 36.5 or T ≥ 39; (2) white blood cell (WBC) Count: Score 0 if 4000 ≤ WBC ≤ 11000, score 1 if WBC > 11000 or WBC < 4000, score 2 if WBC > 1100 or WBC < 4000; (3) oxygenation: Score 0 if PaO2/FiO2 > 240 or ARDS is present, score 2 if PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 240 and no ARDS; (4) chest radiography: No infiltration: Score 0, diffuse infiltration: Score 1, local infiltration: Score 2; (5) tracheal secretion culture: Pathogenic bacteria did not grow or only a small amount: Score 0, moderate to high growth of pathogenic bacteria: Score 1, growth of pathogenic bacteria of the same type seen in gram staining: Score 2; (6) volume and appearance of tracheal secretions: Absence of pulmonary secretions: Score 0, presence of non-purulent pulmonary secretions: Score 1, presence of purulent pulmonary secretions: Score 2.
Each subscale is scored between 0 and 2, with a total score of 12. In this model, scores ≥ 6 at baseline or after the entry of microbiological results were considered indicative of pneumonia.
This scoring system had 93% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The range of scores was from 0 to 12, and a score higher than 6 was consistent with the diagnosis of pneumonia (
15).
Inclusion criteria included hospitalization in the pediatric intensive care unit, endotracheal intubation, consent of the patient's supervisor to participate in the study, age between 1 month and 14 years, no severe injury in the mouth and jaw area, less than 12 hours since hospitalization in the hospital, no antibiotic use before and during hospitalization, no chronic respiratory disease, no immune system disorder and fever above 38 degrees, no use of anticoagulants, no diabetes or malignancy, and absence of wounds, infections, and oral trauma. Exclusion criteria included the death of patients less than 48 hours after intubation and lack of consent from the patient's supervisor.
In this study, first, a CBC test was taken from patients hospitalized in the pediatric intensive care unit, and then with the help of a Sysmex KX21 device (made by Sysmex, Japan), cell differentiation tests and peripheral blood cell counts were performed (
16). For all patients, one type of device was used and calibrated by the hospital's medical equipment engineer. The chest image was taken with a portable radiology device model 01344-43014T made by PTW company in Germany (
17). The same type of device was used for all patients and calibrated by medical equipment engineers. Arterial oxygen saturation was measured with a Nellcor NPB-295 pulse oximeter with a pediatric probe, which measures the percentage of oxygen saturation (
18). Its performance was checked by an anesthesiologist. To measure tracheal tube cuff pressure, a standard manometer (Ireland Mallinckrodt model, Athlon Medical, with an accuracy of 2 cm of water) was used, which has an international standard. A mercury glass thermometer model (
19) was used to measure body temperature, and its reliability was checked by the researcher by comparing it with two other mercury glass thermometers.
Based on the clinical condition of the patient and CPIS criteria, 90 intubated patients were randomly divided into two groups: Sixty patients with VAP (nasal and ETT group) and 30 patients without VAP (control group participants).
From qualified and intubated patients, a sample of nasal secretions was taken from inside the nose with a sterile swab and placed inside a sterile test tube, while tracheal secretions were collected by catheter suction and sent to the laboratory for culture. The samples collected from the nose and trachea were cultured for the identification of microorganisms in the microbiology laboratory using blood Agar (BA) for the growth of aerobic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms, and eosin methylene blue (EMB) for the isolation of bacteria, according to standard methods. All bacterial cultures were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours, while fungal cultures were kept at ambient temperature for 1 week. The isolated microbial colonies on the culture medium were then examined, and stained slides were prepared from each colony to identify different genera and species of microbial agents.
All culture media were prepared by Merck, Germany, and the same type of culture medium from the same manufacturer was used for all patients. To avoid errors, all experiments were conducted by experienced laboratory science personnel.
3.1. Data Analysis
The data and information were recorded and analyzed using SPSS 20 statistical software. The characteristics of individuals in the two groups were compared using independent t-tests and chi-square tests. A significance level of P < 0.05 was considered significant.
3.2. Ethical Consideration
The present article is derived from the thesis of a doctoral student and received permission from the ethics committee (ethics code
IR.ZBMU.REC.1399.126) at Zabol University of Medical Sciences. The research was conducted with the coordination of hospital officials and in compliance with all ethical considerations.