In this study, uveitis was diagnosed in 8% of children with JIA referred to our center, a prevalence comparable to that reported in several recent studies from neighboring countries. Previous studies have reported variable prevalence rates of uveitis in JIA, ranging from 5% to 20% depending on the population studied (
1), whereas a recent meta-analysis reported a pooled uveitis prevalence of 12.7% (95% CI, 10.5% - 15.1%) across different populations (
2). This variation may be attributable to differences in genetic predisposition, environmental exposures, and, in particular, the frequency and rigor of ophthalmologic screening programs.
In our setting, children undergo regular ophthalmologic evaluations in accordance with established screening intervals. Consistent with global data, oligoarticular JIA was the predominant subtype in our uveitis cohort, accounting for 82.1% of cases. Chronic anterior uveitis was the most frequent manifestation and typically involved both eyes. This pattern mirrors observations from North American and European registries, where ANA-positive oligoarticular JIA, most commonly affecting females younger than 6 years, has been closely associated with chronic anterior uveitis (
3,
4).
Interestingly, the ANA positivity rate among our oligoarticular cases was 26.1% (95% CI, 11.0% - 48.7%). This rate falls within the range reported in some published cohorts but is lower than the 40% to 70% range reported in several Western studies. However, formal statistical comparisons were not performed because of differences in study populations, laboratory methods, and sample size. Multicenter prospective studies are needed to determine whether this represents a true regional variation (
5). This difference could reflect regional immunogenetic variation or technical discrepancies in ANA testing protocols and thresholds.
The temporal relationship between arthritis onset and uveitis development is a key prognostic factor. In our cohort, 67.1% of children developed uveitis within 2 years of arthritis diagnosis, and in 32.1% of cases, uveitis presented within 6 months. These findings are consistent with previously reported risk markers for severe JIA-associated uveitis (
6).
Ocular complications were identified in more than half of the patients (53.8%), with posterior synechiae, cataract, and increased intraocular pressure being the most prevalent. These complications are clinically important because they can lead to irreversible visual impairment if not managed promptly. The 2019 ACR/Arthritis Foundation guideline emphasizes that timely screening is critical for preventing vision-threatening complications in high-risk children (
7). Notably, our cohort did not include any cases of glaucoma or blindness, which may reflect timely access to care or, alternatively, limitations in the available follow-up data.
Uveitis recurrence was noted in 39.3% of patients, and 10.7% demonstrated resistance to initial treatment, underscoring the chronic and relapsing nature of JIA-associated uveitis. These figures are comparable to those reported in longitudinal studies examining long-term disease activity and treatment outcomes (
8).
With respect to treatment strategies, nearly all patients received topical and systemic corticosteroids. Methotrexate was the most frequently prescribed disease-modifying antirheumatic drug in our cohort and was used in 92.8% of patients. This reflects current clinical practice patterns rather than evidence of superior effectiveness, as methotrexate is recommended as first-line systemic therapy for JIA-associated uveitis by the 2019 ACR/Arthritis Foundation guideline (
8).
Biologic therapies were reserved for patients with an inadequate response, with adalimumab being the most frequently used agent. This treatment approach aligns with current international recommendations, which advocate early initiation of biologic therapy in refractory or relapsing uveitis (
9). Randomized controlled trials, including the SYCAMORE trial, have demonstrated the efficacy of adalimumab in reducing intraocular inflammation and preventing flare-ups in patients with JIA-associated uveitis (
17). In our cohort, adalimumab was used in 4 patients (14.3%), and infliximab was used in 2 patients (7.1%). However, because of the retrospective design and small sample size, our study cannot assess the comparative effectiveness of different biologic agents or predict which patients are most likely to respond. The decision to initiate biologic therapy was based on clinical judgment and documented criteria (
10,
11).
Although the use of infliximab and cyclosporine was limited in our study, newer therapeutic agents, including tocilizumab and baricitinib, are currently under investigation and may offer additional options in resistant cases (
17). The recent ADJUST trial investigated the outcomes of stopping adalimumab in patients with controlled uveitis, providing important insights into treatment de-escalation strategies (
18). A systematic review specifically focused on biologic therapy in noninfectious pediatric uveitis provides additional context (
19). A 2025 comparative retrospective cohort study reported no cases of uveitis among 285 patients with JIA receiving adalimumab, compared with 30 cases among 365 patients receiving etanercept, suggesting potential differences in uveitis prevention between tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (
20). A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis found that, despite advances in biologic therapy, 16.6% of patients with JIA-associated uveitis developed severe visual impairment in adulthood. Similarly, a 2025 single-center study from Beijing Children's Hospital reported a uveitis frequency of 4.82% among 1038 Chinese patients with JIA, with ocular complications observed in 25.9% of affected individuals (
21).
Overall, our findings from this single-center retrospective study are broadly consistent with global patterns reported in larger cohort studies, although direct comparisons should be made cautiously because of differences in study design, population characteristics, and potential referral bias. Prospective multicenter studies are needed to confirm the generalizability of our observations. However, the notable rates of recurrence and complications in our cohort highlight the ongoing need for systematic screening, timely initiation of systemic immunosuppression, and close collaboration between pediatric rheumatologists and ophthalmologists. As emphasized in the 2019 ACR/Arthritis Foundation guidelines, early ophthalmologic involvement remains a cornerstone of care for preventing irreversible vision loss (
9).
Some distinguishing features of our study deserve further discussion. First, the low ANA positivity rate among patients with oligoarticular JIA (26.1%) was well below the rates reported in Western studies, possibly because of regional differences in immune profiles or variability in laboratory practices. Second, the rapid onset of uveitis in many cases, within 2 years in 67.1% and within 6 months in 32.1%, emphasizes the need for aggressive screening protocols immediately after arthritis diagnosis. Third, although chronic anterior uveitis was the most prevalent form, we also observed less common patterns, such as chronic panuveitis and intermediate uveitis, reflecting a broader clinical spectrum. Finally, the relatively high use of biologics, particularly adalimumab (14.3%), in our modestly sized patient population suggests a proactive shift in clinical practice that aligns with contemporary treatment paradigms.
5.1. Conclusions
Within the limitations of this single-center retrospective study, uveitis was identified in 8.2% of patients with JIA evaluated at our tertiary center, underscoring that uveitis remains a potentially serious complication in children with JIA, particularly those with the oligoarticular subtype. The high prevalence of asymptomatic chronic anterior uveitis and its related complications, such as posterior synechiae, cataracts, and increased intraocular pressure, highlights the critical need for systematic, risk-based ophthalmologic screening.
In this descriptive retrospective study, despite the use of topical corticosteroids and methotrexate, 39.3% of patients experienced at least 1 relapse, and 10.7% met the criteria for refractory disease. These findings underscore the chronic and relapsing nature of JIA-associated uveitis. Biologic therapies, including adalimumab or infliximab, were administered to 21.4% of patients, primarily those with refractory disease or intolerance to methotrexate. Prospective studies with standardized treatment protocols and predefined response criteria are needed to compare the effectiveness of different therapeutic strategies and identify predictors of treatment response. These findings are consistent with current international guidelines advocating early systemic treatment in high-risk patients.
Ultimately, preventing vision-threatening outcomes in JIA-associated uveitis depends heavily on timely diagnosis, regular monitoring, and close collaboration between pediatric rheumatologists and ophthalmologists. Longer-term studies are needed to further refine treatment strategies and reduce the burden of ocular complications in this vulnerable group.
5.2. Limitations
Several limitations of this study should be considered. Because this was a single-center retrospective analysis, the results may not be generalizable to a broader population. The relatively small sample size limited statistical power, especially for subgroup analyses. In addition, the lack of long-term follow-up data and standardized grading for uveitis severity limited the ability to fully assess disease progression and treatment outcomes. Future multicenter prospective studies with larger patient groups will be essential to validate these findings and improve clinical practice.
This study was conducted at a single tertiary pediatric rheumatology referral center. As such, our cohort likely overrepresents patients with more severe, complicated, or refractory JIA who were referred to a specialized center for advanced management. Consequently, the frequency of uveitis (8.2%) and the rates of complications (53.8%), recurrence (39.3%), and refractory disease (10.7%) may be overestimated compared with population-based cohorts. Conversely, patients with mild uveitis or those successfully managed in community settings may have been underreferred to our center. Therefore, our findings may not be generalizable to all patients with JIA and should be interpreted with caution.
As with all retrospective studies, our data were subject to information bias. Although we excluded patients with incomplete medical records, the accuracy and completeness of the recorded data depended on the original documentation by treating physicians. We cannot rule out the possibility that some cases of uveitis, particularly asymptomatic chronic anterior uveitis, were underdiagnosed or underreported in the medical records.
Not all patients had identical follow-up duration or assessment frequency. The interval between ophthalmologic examinations ranged from 3 to 12 months based on individual risk stratification according to the 2019 ACR/Arthritis Foundation guidelines. This variability may have affected the detection of uveitis recurrence and the timing of complication identification. Specifically, patients with longer intervals between examinations may have experienced delayed detection of relapses or complications.