3.1. Study Design and Data Source
This study used a secondary analytical approach based on data from the 2012, 2014, and 2016 waves of the Taiwan Youth Health Survey (TYHS). The TYHS is a nationwide, school-based survey implemented by the Ministry of Health and Welfare in Taiwan to monitor health-risk behaviors and psychosocial conditions among junior high school students. For the present study, the three survey waves were combined and analyzed using a cross-sectional design.
3.2. Sampling and Data Collection
The TYHS applied a stratified, two-stage cluster sampling design to obtain a nationally representative sample of junior high school students. In the first stage, schools were stratified by urban-rural population density and selected with probability proportional to size. In the second stage, classes within selected schools were sampled, and all students in those classes were invited to participate. Data were collected in classrooms using standardized administration procedures by trained personnel. The survey questionnaire was developed for adolescent health surveillance in Taiwan and incorporated items adapted from both domestic and international school-health survey instruments, including the US Youth Risk Behavior Survey and the WHO Global School-based Student Health Survey. The TYHS uses standardized survey items for adolescent health monitoring; however, because the present study was a secondary analysis of existing survey data, formal psychometric evaluation of each item within this analytic sample was not available.
3.3. Participants
A total of 18,330 adolescents were available across the three TYHS waves included in this study. Participants were removed from the analysis if data were missing for the primary outcome or key explanatory variables required for model construction. Therefore, a complete-case strategy was used. After excluding 249 records with incomplete information, the final analytic sample comprised 18,081 adolescents. To enhance transparency regarding potential bias related to case exclusion, the characteristics of included and excluded participants were compared. Because complete-case analysis may introduce selection bias if missingness is not random, this issue was considered in interpreting the findings.
3.4. Conceptual Framework and Study Variables
The analysis was guided by an integrated framework in which adolescent suicide-related cognition was considered in relation to several domains of influence. Explanatory variables were grouped into three categories: Demographic characteristics, lifestyle and dietary behaviors, and family-peer relationship factors. All variables analyzed in this study were derived from self-reported responses in the TYHS questionnaire.
3.5. Outcome Variable
The primary outcome was a composite of suicidal ideation and/or suicide planning during the past 12 months. In the original TYHS survey, these two experiences were assessed using separate questions. For the present analysis, they were combined into a single binary indicator to reflect broader suicide-related cognitive vulnerability and to support stable multivariable estimation at the population level. Adolescents who reported either suicidal ideation or suicide planning within the previous 12 months were classified into the ever group, whereas those who reported neither were classified into the never group. Because suicidal ideation and suicide planning are conceptually related but not identical, the combined outcome should be interpreted as a broad indicator rather than implying equivalence between the two constructs.
3.6. Demographic Characteristics
Demographic variables included survey year (2012, 2014, or 2016), urbanization level (urban area, city, town, or rural area), grade level (7th, 8th, or 9th grade), age (≤ 12, 13, 14, 15, or ≥ 16 years), sex, and body image satisfaction. These variables were selected to describe the study population and to account for baseline differences among adolescents.
3.7. Lifestyle Behaviors
Lifestyle variables comprised physical activity, weekday sedentary time, and non-school screen time on school days. Physical activity was defined as the number of days in the previous 7 days on which the participant engaged in at least 60 minutes of activity and was categorized as 0 days, 1 - 3 days, or 4 - 7 days. Weekday sedentary time was grouped into < 1 hour/day, 1 - 4 hours/day, 5 - 6 hours/day, and ≥ 7 hours/day. Non-school screen time on school days was categorized as none, < 2 hours/day, or ≥ 3 hours/day.
3.8. Dietary Behaviors
Dietary variables included breakfast consumption, vegetable intake, fruit intake, high-fat food intake, fast-food intake, carbonated soft drink intake, and sugary non-carbonated beverage intake. Breakfast frequency during the previous 30 days was categorized as rarely/never, sometimes/often, or always. Fruit and vegetable intake were each classified as < 1 time/day, 1 - 2 times/day, or ≥ 3 times/day. Fast-food intake during the previous 7 days was categorized as 0 days, 1 day, or ≥ 2 days. Other dietary variables were analyzed according to the original TYHS response categories shown in the tables.
3.9. Family-Peer Relationship Factors
Family-peer variables included parental understanding, parental monitoring, parental intrusion of belongings, and peer support at school, all referring to the previous 30 days. Parental understanding captured whether parents understood the adolescent’s worries and problems. Parental monitoring referred to parental knowledge of the adolescent’s leisure-time activities. Parental intrusion of belongings reflected checking belongings without permission. Peer support at school referred to whether classmates were perceived as kind and helpful. Each variable was recorded on a five-level scale: Never, rarely, sometimes, often, and always.
3.10. Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the characteristics of the study sample. Categorical data are presented as numbers and percentages, and continuous variables are presented as means with standard deviations. Differences between included and excluded participants were examined using chi-square tests for categorical variables and independent-samples t tests for continuous variables, as appropriate. For the main analysis, adolescents in the ever and never groups were initially compared using chi-square tests. Each explanatory variable was then examined separately in univariate logistic regression models to estimate crude odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). To evaluate the combined associations of multiple domains with the composite outcome of suicidal ideation and/or suicide planning, hierarchical multivariable logistic regression models were constructed. Demographic variables were entered in Model 1, lifestyle and dietary variables were added in Model 2, and family-peer relationship variables were further included in Model 3. This sequential approach assessed whether associations of interest remained after progressive adjustment for additional domains of potential influence. Variables were selected based on prior literature, conceptual relevance, and availability in the TYHS dataset. Because several behavioral and family-peer variables may be interrelated, model estimates were interpreted with attention to possible overlap among exposures. Additional analyses were performed separately for boys and girls to explore sex-stratified patterns. Because these subgroup models were not accompanied by formal interaction testing, differences between male and female estimates were interpreted cautiously. All analyses were performed using SAS Enterprise Guide (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), and a two-sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3.11. Ethical Considerations
Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Institutional Review Board of Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan (IRB No. CS2 - 22081). The TYHS data used in this study were de-identified before release, and no personally identifiable information was available to the investigators. Accordingly, the requirement for informed consent for this secondary analysis was waived by the Institutional Review Board. All study procedures were conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.