The present study was conducted in 40 street children and adolescents who used drugs and had been referred to a psychiatric ward for children and adolescents. Although a small percentage of these children perceived themselves as homeless, we documented other factors, such as the death or lack of a qualified guardian and parental illiteracy or a very low literacy level, which could have contributed to the participants’ situation as substance-using youth. This observation is consistent with international studies that have reported the complex needs of families referred to child welfare services because of parental substance use and child neglect (
15-
17). The high rate of parenting incompetency indicates that any medical and psychiatric interventions initiated among this population must be implemented within the context of a comprehensive program to provide parental substance abuse treatment, psychosocial support, literacy education initiatives, legal assistance, and foster care.
In this study, most (75%) patients were taking heroin Kerack, followed by opium and opium residue; the most common route of administration was smoking, which was inconsistent with international studies that have reported inhalants, tobacco and alcohol (
4), and methamphetamine (
18,
19) as the most commonly used substances by street children in different countries. This variation may be explained by the ease of availability of opioids in the Sistan and Balouchestan province of Iran due to the proximity of Afghanistan, the main producer of illegal opioids in the world. All study participants used drugs through routes other than injection, which was in line with findings from other low-income countries (
8,
20). About one-third of these children had used more than one substance, which reflects a high intensity of drug involvement in this population.
Musculoskeletal pain, diarrhea, and runny nose were the most common signs and symptoms observed during the withdrawal period; there was no significant difference in withdrawal length or symptomatology by age and gender. For the medical management of withdrawal, clonidine, ibuprofen, and hydroxyzine were the most frequently used medications. The symptomatic treatment of opioid withdrawal was well tolerated by the children, and no severe adverse events were seen.
One head-to-head trial that compared clonidine and buprenorphine in a community-based treatment program for opioid dependence among adolescents showed a higher efficacy for buprenorphine in terms of treatment retention and negative urine tests (
21). Little evidence exists regarding the use of maintenance medications to treat opioid dependence. Methadone maintenance treatment for opioid dependence among patients younger than 18 years is highly regulated, and its use is limited to very severe cases (
22). In addition, buprenorphine might have some advantages over methadone in terms of its adverse effects. In a multi-site trial of adolescents and young adults, buprenorphine maintenance increased retention and decreased opioid-positive urine tests compared to patients who received two weeks of buprenorphine detoxification only (
23). Another case series study indicated the feasibility and safety of community-based extended-release naltrexone shots that were given to adolescents and young adults each month for four months in a community-based setting (
24). The use of pharmacotherapies to manage pediatric opioid withdrawal is in its early stages in Iran. More studies are currently needed to determine the status of opioid pharmacotherapies for symptomatic withdrawal in terms of their effectiveness and costs.
The high rate of comorbid physical and psychiatric disorders observed in this study has important clinical implications. First, a clinician working with street children might encounter substance use issues that co-occur with other mental disorders and therefore should be prepared for this possibility. Second, the identification and treatment of physical health issues are crucial while working with this population. A trend toward higher levels of physical and psychiatric comorbidities was seen among boys in this clinical sample, which was not significant due to the small sample size. More studies with larger sample sizes will therefore be needed to determine any differences in the pattern of comorbidities.
Practical implementation issues identified in this study included work load, costs, insurance coverage, administrative issues, and insufficient inter-sectoral collaboration. Cost and insurance coverage issues were also prominent. There were limitations of this study, including its observational design without a control group, the absence of standardized questionnaires to monitor outcomes, and limitations of the outcomes to the inpatient period.
The study suggests that inpatient withdrawal management with clonidine, antihistamines, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs could be feasible for and well tolerated by children and adolescents with opioid dependence during the inpatient period. To develop standards of care for opioid treatment in this population, further studies that test the efficacy of opioids agonist medications on the severity of withdrawal, the length of stay, and the success rate of post-discharge treatment follow-ups are warranted.